Preliminary field tests and long-term monitoring as a method of design risk mitigation: a case study of Gdańsk Deepwater Container Terminal

• Autorzy: Miśkiewicz M. , Mitrosz O. , Brzozowski T.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Appropriate risk assessment plays a fundamental role in the design. . The authors propose a possible method of design risk mitigation, which follows recommendations included in Eurocode 7. The so-called “Observational Method” (OM) can produce savings in costs and programmes on engineering projects without compromising safety. The case study presented is a complex design solution that deals with the heavy foundations of a gantry crane beam as one of the elements of a Deepwater Container Terminal extension. The paper presents a detailed process of the design of the rear crane beam being a part of the brand new berth, together with its static analysis, as well as the long-term results of observations, which have revealed the real performance of the marine structure. The case presented is based on excessive preliminary field tests and technical monitoring of the structure, and is an example of a successful OM implementation and design risk mitigation.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

monitoring; field test; Observational Method; CFA piles; micropiles; geotechnics

• Wydawca: Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Ocean Engineering & Ship Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Maritime Research
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: nr 3
• Strony: 106--114
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Miśkiewicz M.

• Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk Poland

autor

Mitrosz O.

• Keller Polska Sp. z o.o. ul. Rdestowa 51A, 81-577 Gdynia Poland

autor

Brzozowski T.

• Keller Polska Sp. z o.o. ul. Rdestowa 51A, 81-577 Gdynia Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Buca R., Mitrosz O.: Complex Geotechnical Engineering for Port of Gdansk Development – Gateway to CentralEastern Europe. Proceedings of 13th Baltic Sea Geotechnical Conference, Vilnius 2016, pp. 290-296.
• 2. Buca R., Mitrosz O.: Inżynieria geotechniczna a rozbudowa Portu Gdańsk (in Polish). Journal GDMT, October – December /4/2016/57, pp. 60-63.
• 3. Chróścielewski J., Sabik A., Sobczyk B., Witkowski W.: Nonlinear FEM 2D failure onset prediction of composite shells based on 6-paramter shell theory. Journal Thin-Walled Structures 105, 2016, pp. 207-219.
• 4. Code DIN 4125:1990. Ground anchorages. Design, construction and testing.
• 5. Code PN-EN 1537:1999. Execution of special geotechnical work – Ground anchors.
• 6. Code PN-EN 1997-1:2008. Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design – Part 1: General rules.
• 7. DCT Gdańsk S.A.: Employer’s requirements. Gdańsk July 2014.
• 8. Krasiński A.: Analiza jednostkowego oporu gruntu niespoistego wzdłuż pobocznicy i pod podstawą pala w zależności od średnicy pala oraz uziarnienia i stanu naprężenia w gruncie (in Polish). Doctoral Thesis, Gdańsk University of Technology, 1998.
• 9. Miśkiewicz M., Meronk B., Brzozowski T., Wilde K.: Monitoring system of the road embankment. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering (in press).
• 10. Miśkiewicz M., Pyrzowski Ł., Wilde K., Mitrosz O.: Technical monitoring system for a new part of Gdańsk Deepwater Container Terminal. Polish Maritime Research 2017, 24(S1), pp. 149-155. DOI: 10.1515/pomr-2017-0033.
• 11. Miśkiewicz M., Okraszewska R., Pyrzowski Ł.: Composite footbridge – synergy effect in cooperation between universities and industry. ICERI2014: 7th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, ICERI Proceedings, 2014, pp. 2897-2903.
• 12. Nicholson D., Tse C., Penny C.: The Observational Method in ground engineering – principles and applications. Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA) Report 185, London 1999.
• 13. Ordinance of the Polish Ministry of Transport, Construction and Maritime Economy. Document no 2012.0.463 (in Polish), dated 25th of April 2012.
• 14. Ordinance of the Polish Ministry of Transport and Maritime Economy. Document no 1998.101.645 (in Polish), dated 1st of June 1998.
• 15. Patel D., Nicholson D., Huybrechts N., Maertens J.: The observational method in geotechnics. Proceedings of XIV European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Madrid 2007, pp. 24-27.
• 16. Peck R.B.: Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil mechanics. Journal Geotechnique 1969, 19(2), pp. 171-181.
• 17. Pyrzowski, Ł., Miśkiewicz, M., Chróścielewski, J.: The effect of fishing basin construction on the behaviour of a footbridge over the port channel. Polish Maritime Research 2017, 24(S1), pp. 182-187. DOI: 10.1515/pomr-2017-0037
• 18. Topolnicki M., Buca R.: Możliwości zastosowania modelowania BIM w geotechnice (in Polish). Proceedings of seminar IBDiM i PZWFS „Głębokie Wykopy”, Warsaw 2016.
• 19. Topolnicki M.: Ryzyko związane ze wzmacnianiem gruntu za pomocą kolumn o różnej sztywności (in Polish). Proceedings of XXVIII Ogólnopolskie Warsztaty Pracy Projektanta Konstrukcji, Wisła 2013.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017)