Humanity’s uranium-238 inventory : a significant and enduring gamma-radiation liability

• Autorzy: Pescatore Claudio

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/nuka-2025-0004

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Uranium-238 (U-238), accounting for 99.3% of naturally occurring uranium, primarily utilized for nuclear energy production, is also used in civilian and military applications, leading to vast, geographically dispersed stocks across different byproduct streams. While traditional risk assessments focus on chemical toxicity and alpha radiation, the gamma risks from the U-238 decay chain remain overlooked. Using dose-progression modeling and secular equilibrium analysis, this work quantifies the timeline and magnitude of U-238-induced gamma hazards from depleted uranium (DU), spent fuel (SF), and mill tailings. Findings show that gamma emissions from U-238 inventories exceed radiological safety thresholds well before secular equilibrium, necessitating revised risk assessments and improved, durable containment strategies. By highlighting this underexplored health and environmental issue in nuclear science, the study emphasizes the persistent challenge of managing Humanity’s U-238 inventory, which represents a significant and enduring gamma liability across all timescales. Notably, only about 8% of this inventory is managed under robust long-term plans, while the remaining 92%, comprising DU and U-238 in mill tailings, remains inadequately prepared for the future. Addressing the gamma hazards of U-238’s decay chain requires a paradigm shift in how this radionuclide is managed. Key priorities for action are identified.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Bi-214; depleted uranium; DU; gamma hazard; mill tailings; Pa-234m; polluter pays

• Wydawca: Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology
• Czasopismo: Nukleonika
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: Vol. 70, No. 2
• Strony: 31--42
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 46 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Pescatore Claudio

• Research Affiliate at the UNESCO Chair on Heritage Futures, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden

Bibliografia

• 1. US Atomic Energy Commission. (1974). Environmental survey of the reprocessing and waste management portions of the LWR fuel cycle. (WASH-1248). Directorate of Licensing. (NUREG-0116). Available at https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1409/ML14091A203.pdf.
• 2. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB. (1999). SR-97 post-closure safety: Deep repository for spent nuclear fuel. Stockholm, Sweden: SKB. (Technical Report TR-99-06). Available at https://www.skb.com/publication/2488114/TR-99-06_vol1.pdf.
• 3. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. (2008). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. (Vol. 1). United Nations. Available at https://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2008_1.html.
• 4. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. (2016). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to the General Assembly –Annex D. United Nations. Available at https://www.unscear.org/unscear/uploads/documents/publications/UNSCEAR_2016_Annex-D-CORR.pdf.
• 5. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2023). The environmental behaviour of uranium. Vienna: IAEA. (Technical Report no. 488). Available at https://www.iaea.org/publications/14688/the-environmentalbehaviour-of-uranium.
• 6. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. (2000). Report to the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. (Suppl. no. 46). United Nations.
• 7. Burns, P. C., Ewing, R. C., & Navrotsky, A. (2012). Nuclear fuel in a reactor accident. Science, 335(6073), 1184–1188. DOI: 10.1126/science.1211285.
• 8. Office of Radiation Programs. (1980). Draft environmental impact statement for remedial action standards for inactive uranium processing sites. Washington, D.C.: US Environmental Protection Agency. Available at https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/20015ZDF.PDF?Dockey=20015ZDF.PDF.
• 9. International Commission on Radiological Protection. (2007). The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication no. 103. Ann. ICRP, 37(2/4), 1–332. Available at https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20103.
• 10. Pescatore, C. (2024). Beyond one million years: The intrinsic radiation hazard of high-level nuclear wastes. Nukleonika, 69(4), 215–224. DOI: 10.2478/nuka-2024-0029.
• 11. International Atomic Energy Agency. (n.d.). Depleted uranium. Vienna: IAEA. Available at https://www.iaea.org/topics/spent-fuel-management/depleted-uranium.
• 12. International Atomic Energy Agency. (1997). Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management. Vienna: IAEA. Available at https://www.iaea.org/topics/nuclear-safety-conventions/joint-convention-safetyspent-fuel-management-and-safety-radioactive-waste.
• 13. Nuclear Energy Agency. (2001). Management of depleted uranium. NEA. Available at https://www.oecdnea.org/upload/docs/application/pdf/2019-12/3035-management-depleted-uranium.pdf.
• 14. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2023). Background information on depleted uranium. USNRC. Available at https://www.nrc.gov/waste/llw-disposal/decision-support/uw-streams/bg-infodu.html#current.
• 15. Sutherland, J. K. (2008). The nuclear reactor closed cycle. EFN – Environmentalists for NuclearTM. Available at https://www.ecolo.org/documents/documents_in_english/uran-closed-cycle-sutherl.pdf.
• 16. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. (2024). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2024 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. United Nations.
• 17. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2004). The long-term stabilization of uranium mill tailings. Vienna: IAEA. (TECDOC-1403). Available at https://www.iaea.org/publications/6670/the-long-termstabilization-of-uranium-mill-tailings.
• 18. Nuclear Energy Agency. (2014). Managing environmental and health impacts of uranium mining. Paris: OECD. (NEA no. 7062). Available at https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_14766/managing-environmentaland-health-impacts-of-uranium-mining?details=true.
• 19. United Nations Environment Programme. (2001).Depleted uranium in Kosovo: Post-confl ict environmental assessment. UNEP. Available at https://www.unep.org/resources/report/depleted-uranium-kosovopost-confl ict-environmental-assessment.
• 20. United Nations Environment Programme. (2002). Depleted uranium in Serbia and Montenegro: Post-confl ict environmental assessment. UNEP. Available at: https://www.unep.org/topics/disasters-and-confl icts/response-and-recovery/post-crisis-environmentalassessment/depleted.
• 21. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2003). Radiological conditions in areas of Kuwait with residues of depleted uranium. Vienna: IAEA. Available at https://www.iaea.org/publications/6880/radiological-conditions-in-areas-of-kuwait-with-residues-ofdepleted-uranium.
• 22. International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons. (2007). Precaution in practice. ICBUW. Available at https://paxforpeace.nl/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/11/986_icbuw-precaution-in-practice-1.pdf.
• 23. Duraković, A. (2003). Undiagnosed illnesses and radioactive warfare. Croatian Medical Journal, 44(5), 520–532. Available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14515407/.
• 24. Chu, M. S. Y., & Bernard, E. A. (1991). Waste inventory and preliminary source term model for the greater confi nement disposal site at the Nevada test site. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories. (SAND-91-0170). Available at https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/613994-jGolcx/webviewable/.
• 25. US Department of Energy Nevada National Security Site. (September 2022). Environmental reportsummary 2021. Nevada National NNSS. (DOE/NV/03624—1517). Available at https://nnss.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2023/04/Nevada-National-SecuritySite-Environmental-Report-2021-Summary-Final.pdf.
• 26. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2009). Radiological conditions at the Semipalatinsk testsite, Kazakhstan: Preliminary assessment and recommendations for further study. Vienna: IAEA. Available at https://www.iaea.org/publications/4741/radiological-conditions-at-the-semipalatinsk-test-sitekazakhstan.
• 27. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2004). Environmental contamination from uranium production facilities and their remediation. Vienna: IAEA. Available at https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1228_web.pdf.
• 28. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2012). Spent fuel performance assessment and research – Final report of a Coordinated Research Project (SPARII). Vienna: IAEA. (TECDOC-1680). Available at https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/TE_1680_web.pdf.
• 29. Khattak, M. A., Mahadi, M. Z. B., & Bahri, N. B. S. (2017). A review of nuclear spent fuel storage facilities. Journal of Advanced Research in Science, 29(1), 1–19. Available at https://www.akademiabaru.com/doc/ARSRV29_N1_P1_19.pdf.
• 30. Bevard, B., Mertyurek, U., Belles, R., & Scaglione, J. M. (2015). BWR Spent Nuclear Fuel Integrity Research and Development Survey for UKABWR Spent Fuel Interim Storage. OSTI. Available at https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1234354.
• 31. Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management. (March 1979). Report to the President by the Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management. (DOE Report TID-29442/UC-70). Available at https://curie.pnnl.gov/system/files/Interagency_Review_Group_Report_MOL.19980625.0169.pdf.
• 32. Linnaeus University. (2019). Workshop on Information and Memory for Future Decision Making: Radioactive Waste and Beyond, Stockholm, May 2019. Available at https://lnu.se/en/research/research-groups/unescochair-on-heritage-futures/information-memory/.
• 33. Pescatore, C., & Palm, J. (2020). Preserving memory and information on heritage and on unwanted legacies – new tools for identifying sustainable strategies to prepare and support decision making by future generations. SCEaR Newsletter, 1, 4–14. Available at https://literaryartisticarchives-ica.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/scearnewsletter2020-1june30.pdf.
• 34. International Atomic Energy Agency, & Nuclear Energy Agency. (2022). Uranium 2022: Resources, production and demand (Red Book). Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_79960/uranium-2022-resources-productionand-demand?details=true.
• 35. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2022). Status and trends in spent fuel and radioactive waste management. Rev. 1. (Nuclear Energy Series no. NW-T1.14). Vienna: IAEA. Available at https://www.iaea.org/publications/14739/status-and-trends-in-spentfuel-and-radioactive-waste-management.
• 36. Hedin, A. (1997). How dangerous is spent fuel? Swedish Spent Fuel Management Company. (SKBTR-97-13). Available at https://www.skb.com/publication/13607.
• 37. Orano Mining. (n.d.). Après-mines France. https://www.orano.group/fr/l-expertise-nucleaire/de-lexploration-au-recyclage/producteur-d-uranium-dereference/apres-mines-france-orano-mining#.
• 38. Ballini, M., Chautard, C., Nos, J., & Phrommavanh, V. (2020). A multi-scalar study of the long-term reactivity of uranium mill tailings from Bellezane site (France). J. Environ. Manage., 271, 111050. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X19307647.
• 39. Djenbaev, B., Zholbolduev, B., Zhulmaliev, T., & Voisekhovich, O. (2015). Radioecological assessment of the uranium tailings in Tuyuk-Suu (Kyrgyzstan). Journal of Geological Sciences, 3(2), 89–97. Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2dc1/555576dcded0097b521ee07ecb4f8c35c1bb.pdf.
• 40. Carvalho, F. P., Madruga, M. J., Reis, M. C., & Alves, J. G. (2007). Radioactivity in the environment around past radium and uranium mining sites of Portugal. J. Environ. Radioact., 96(1/3), 39–46. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X07000665.
• 41. Lavrova, T., & Voitsekhovych, O. (2013). Radioecological assessment and remediation planning at the former uranium milling facilities at the Pridnieprovsky Chemical Plant in Ukraine. J. Environ. Radioact., 113, 35–43. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230741377_Radioecological_assessment_and_remediation_planning_at_the_former_uranium_milling_facilities_at_the_Pridnieprovsky_Chemical_Plant_in_Ukraine.
• 42. Wang, J., Liu, J., Chen, Y., Song, G., Chen, D., & Xiao, T. (2016). Technologically elevated natural radioactivity and assessment of dose to workers around a granitic uranium deposit area, China. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 309(3), 1331–1339. Available at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10967-016-4809-2.
• 43. Carvalho, F. P. (2018). Uranium mining legacy and radiation protection. Radiation & Applications, 3(2), 130–134. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324157440_Uranium_Mining_Legacy_and_Radiation_Protection.
• 44. Haywood, F. F., Christian, D. J., Ellis, B. S., Hubbard, H. M. Jr., Lorenzo, D., & Shinpaugh, W. H. (June 1980). Radiological survey of the inactive uraniummill tailings at Ambrosia Lake, New Mexico. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. (ORNL5458). Available at https://doi.org/10.2172/5293415.
• 45. Swift, J., Hardin, J. M., & Calley, H. W. (January 1976). Potential radiological impact of airborne releases and direct gamma radiation to individuals living near inactive mill tailings piles. U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation Programs. (EPA-520/1-76-001). Available at https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/910121O5.PDF?Dockey=910121O5.PDF.
• 46. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2018). Meet Oklo, the Earth’s two-billion-year-old only known natural nuclear reactor. Available at https://www. iaea.org/newscenter/news/meet-oklo-the-earths-twobillion-year-old-only-known-natural-nuclear-reactor

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).