Multi-criteria decision-making system for sustainable building assessment/certification

• Autorzy: Medineckiene M. , Zavadskas E. K. , Björk F. , Turskis Z.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1016/j.acme.2014.09.001

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper presents a new multi-criteria decision-making technique to select criteria for building sustainability assessment. The methodology of building certification system is integrated with the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. The criteria set for assessment is determined based on Swedish certification system Miljöbyggnad. Criteria weights are determined by applying Analytic Hierarchic Process (AHP) method. Weights of criteria are calculated based on Saaty's judgement scale and new original scale, presented by the authors. ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) method (MCDM method) is applied to solve problem under investigation. The developed assessment method involves LEED system's criteria.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

certification systems; MCDM; AHP; ARAS; criteria

PL

stabilność budynku; metoda MCDM; macierz decyzyjna; systemy certyfikacji

• Wydawca: Springer ; Wrocław University of Science and Technology
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 15, no. 1
• Strony: 11--18
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 41 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Medineckiene M.

• Division of Building Technology, The Royal Institute of Technology, Brinellvägen str. 23, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden

autor

Zavadskas E. K.

• Division of Building Technology, The Royal Institute of Technology, Brinellvägen str. 23, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden

autor

Björk F.

• Division of Building Technology, The Royal Institute of Technology, Brinellvägen str. 23, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden

autor

Turskis Z.

• Department of Construction Technology and Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio ave. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

Bibliografia

• [1] R. Hassan, Evaluating the potential impact of global warming on the UAE residential buildings – a contribution to reduce the CO2 emissions, Building and Environment 44 (12) (2009) 2451–2462.
• [2] H. Rohracher, Managing the technological transition to sustainable construction of buildings: a socio-technical perspective, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 13 (1) (2001) 137–150.
• [3] J. Ball, Can ISO 14000 and eco-labelling turn the construction industry green? Building and Environment 37 (4) (2002) 421–428.
• [4] A. Haapio, P. Viitaniemi, A critical review of building environmental assessment tools, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28 (7) (2008) 469–482.
• [5] ISO, ISO, ISO/TS 21929-1:2006(E), Sustainability in building construction–sustainability indicators–Part 1: framework for development of indicators for buildings, ISO, Geneva, 2006.
• [6] ISO, ISO, ISO/TS 21931-1:2006(E), Sustainability in building construction – framework for methods of assessment forenvironmental performance of construction works – Part 1: Buildings, ISO, Geneva, 2006.
• [7] J. Burnett, City buildings – eco-labels and shades of green! Landscape and Urban Planning 83 (1) (2007) 29–38.
• [8] H.H. Ali, S.F. Al Nsairat, Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – case of Jordan, Building and Environment 44 (5) (2009) 1053–1064.
• [9] WorldGBC (2010), Available at: http://www.worldgbc.org/ about-worldgbc/who-we-are (accessed December 2011).
• [10] Green Star, Australia, (2010), Available at: http://www.gbca.org. au/green-star/green-star-overview (accessed December 2011).
• [11] LEED Canada (2010), Available at: http://www.cagbc.org/leed/ what/index.php (accessed December 2011).
• [12] DGNB Germany (2010), Available at: http://www.dgnb.de/en/ certification/the-german-sustainable-building-certification/ index.php (accessed December 2011).
• [13] LEED India (2010), Available at: http://www.igbc.in/site/igbc/ index.jsp (accessed December 2011).
• [14] CASBEE (2010), Available at: http://www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/ english/overviewE.htm (accessed December 2011).
• [15] Green Star NZ (2010), Available at: http://nzgbc.org.nz/main/ greenstar/elaboration/about (accessed December 2011).
• [16] Green Star SA (2010), Available at: http://www.gbcsa.org.za/ greenstar/ratingtools.php (accessed December 2011).
• [17] BREEAM (2010), Available at: http://www.breeam.org/page. jsp?id=66 (accessed December 2011).
• [18] LEEED (2010), Available at: http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage. aspx?CMSPageID=1988 (accessed December 2011)
• [19] Miljöbyggnad (Swedish Green Building Council – SGBC). Available at: http://www.sgbc.se/ (accessed December 2011).
• [20] P. Vasant, A. Bhattacharya, B. Sarkar, S.K. Mukherjee, Detection of level of satisfaction and fuzziness patterns for MCDM model with modified flexible S-curve MF, Applied Soft Computing 7 (3) (2007) 1044–1054.
• [21] E.K. Zavadskas, T. Vilutienė, Z. Turskis, J. Šaparauskas, Multi- criteria analysis of Projects' performance in construction, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 14 (1) (2014) 114–121.
• [22] E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17 (2) (2011) 397–427.
• [23] Y.-C. Shiue, C.-Y. Lin, Applying analytic network process to evaluate the optimal recycling strategy in upstream of solar energy industry, Energy and Buildings 54 (2012) 266–277.
• [24] B. Vučićević, M. Stojiljković, N. Afgan, V. Turanjanin, M. Jovanović, V. Bakić, Sustainability Assessment of residential buildings by non-linear normalization procedure, Energy and Buildings 58 (2013) 348–354.
• [25] M. Ebrahimi, A. Keshavarz, Prime mover selection for a residential micro-CCHP by using two multi-criteria decision- making methods, Energy and Buildings 54 (2012) 283–289.
• [26] M. Staniūnas, M. Medineckienė, E.K. Zavadskas, D. Kalibatas, To modernize or not: ecological–economical assessment ofmulti-dwelling houses modernization, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 13 (1) (2013) 88–98.
• [27] J. Zagorskas, E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, Z.M. Burinskienė, A. Blumberga, D. Blumberga, Thermal insulation alternatives of historic brick buildings in Baltic Sea Region, Energy and buildings 78 (2014) 35–42.
• [28] Y-H. Hung, S.-C.T. Chou, G.-H. Tzeng, Knowledge management adoption and assessment for SMEs by a novel MCDM approach, Decision Support Systems 51 (2) (2011) 270–291.
• [29] T.L. Saaty, E. Erdener, A new approach to performance measurement the analytic hierarchy process, Design Methods and Theories 13 (2) (1979) 62–68.
• [30] T.L. Saaty, How to make a decision: the Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operation Research 48 (1990) 9–26.
• [31] J. Liu, R. Yao, R. McCloy, A method to weight three categories of adaptive thermal comfort, Energy and Buildings 47 (2012) 312–320.
• [32] D.-S. Chang, C.-C. Liao, Identifying the key factors for chiller system collaborative service design, Energy and Buildings 49 (2012) 286–293.
• [33] C. Chengmin, Z. Yufeng, M. Lijun, Assessment for central heating systems with different heat sources: a case study, Energy and Buildings 48 (2012) 168–174.
• [34] E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16 (2) (2010) 159–172.
• [35] Z. Turskis, E.K. Zavadskas, V. Kutut, A model based on ARAS-G and AHP methods for multiple criteria prioritizing of heritage value, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 12 (1) (2013) 45–73.
• [36] A. Kaklauskas, J. Rutė, E.K. Zavadskas, A. Daniūnas, V. Pruskus, J. Bivainis, R. Gudauskas, V. Plakys, Passive house model for quantitative and qualitative analyses and its intelligent system, Energy and buildings 50 (2012) 7–18.
• [37] A. Ruzgys, R. Volvačiovas, Č. Ignatavičius, Z. Turskis, Integrated evaluation of external wall insulation in residential buildings using SWARA-TODIM MCDM method, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 20 (1) (2014) 103–110.
• [38] J. Tamošaitienė, E. Gaudutis, Complex assessment of structural systems used for high-rise buildings, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 19 (2) (2013) 305–317.
• [39] A. Yazdani-Chamzini, M.M. Fouladgar, E.K. Zavadskas, S.H.H. Moini, Selecting the optimal renewable energy using multi criteria decision making, Journal of Business Economics and Management 14 (5) (2013) 957–978.
• [40] E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, S. Kildienė, State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 20 (1) (2014) 165–179.
• [41] W.K.M. Brauers, M. Kracka, E.K. Zavadskas, Lithuanian case study of masonry buildings from the Soviet period, Journal of civil engineering and management 18 (3) (2012) 444–456.