PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Quantitative assessment of urban transport development – a spatial approach

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Urban transport is considered the basis of properly functioning cities and their development. The main aim of the paper is to attempt the assessment of urban transport development in selected voivodeships (provinces) as a crucial factor of macro logistics. The research also aimed to identify the underdeveloped areas of urban transport in Poland as the basis for the implementation of support policy. The source of information in the investigation process was data drawn from the Central Statistical Office in Poland for 2013–2016. In the scope of dealing with the research problem, chosen classical and order multivariate statistical measures were implemented into the research process. Next, the taxonomic measures for the years of interest served as the basis for the construction of the total (general) synthetic measure applicable to the entire period. The main results and findings of the research indicate that the level of urban transport development is correlated with the whole transportation system which affects the socio-economic development of some regions of Poland. The research can lead to a better understanding of Polish urban transportation development in selected regions. Hence, the results can be helpful in the investment process and for shaping the right transportation policy to improve the use of financial resources.
Rocznik
Strony
32--44
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 61 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • Bialystok University of Technology, Faculty of Engineering Management, Poland
  • Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics, Faculty of Management, Russia
autor
  • Bialystok University of Technology, Faculty of Engineering Management, Poland
  • Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics, Faculty of Humanities, Russia
Bibliografia
  • Ahmad, S., & Puppim de Oliveira, J.A. (2016). Determinants of urban mobility in India: Lessons for promoting sustainable and inclusive urban transportation in developing countries. Transport Policy, 50, 106-114.
  • Бездудная, А.Г., & Фраймович, Д.Ю. (2016). Диагностика эффективности инвестиций в воспроизводственных процессах региональных инновационных систем [Diagnostics of investment efficiency in the reproductive processes of regional innovation systems]. Конкурентоспособность в  Глобальном Мире: Экономика, Наука, Технологии, 7(1), 35-39.
  • Caris, A., Limbourg, S., Macharis, C., van Lier, T., & Cools, M. (2014). Integration of inland waterway transport in the intermodal supply chains: a taxonomy of research challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 126-136.
  • Cheba, K. (2011). Taksonomiczna analiza rozwoju transportu drogowego w Polsce [Taxonomic analysis of road transport development in Poland]. Logistyka, 2, 97-106.
  • Cheba, K., & Saniuk, S. (2015). Kreowanie mobilności mieszkańców miast jako nowy obszar wartości miasta [Creating mobility of urban residents as a new area of the city’s value]. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 249, 134-144.
  • Cheba, K., & Saniuk, S. (2016). Sustainable urban transport – the concept of measurement in the field of city logistics. Transportation Research Procedia, 16, 35-45.
  • Cools, M., Moons, E., & Wets, G. (2010). Calibrating activity-based models with external origin-destination: overview of possibilities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2175, 98-110.
  • Czech, A. (2014). Application of chosen normalization methods in the process of construction of synthetic measure in indirect consumption research. Folia Oeconomica, 3(302), 231-240.
  • Czech, A., & Lewczuk, J. (2016). Taxonomic and econometric analysis of road transport development in Poland – the voivodship approach. Economics and Management, 4(4), 88-100.
  • Czech, A., Lewczuk, J., & Bortłomiuk, A. (2016). Multidimensional assessment of the European Union transport development in the light of implemented normalization methods. Economics and Management, 8(4), 75-85.
  • Czech, A., & Lewczuk, J. (2017). Statistical assessment of the development of the transportation system in chosen countries – an international approach. Procedia Engineering, 182, 112-119.
  • Czech, A., & Słaby, T. (2017). Ocena poziomu życia gospodarstw domowych według województw – meandry analizy taksonomicznej [The assessment of Polish households living standards in voivodeships – the meanders of taxonomic analysis]. Wiadomości Statystyczne, 10(677), 19-37.
  • Dębkowska, K., & Jarocka, M. (2013). The impact of the method of the data normalization on the results. Folia Oeconomica, 286, 181-188.
  • Domański, C., Pruska, K., & Wagner, W. (1998). Wnioskowanie statystyczne przy nieklasycznych założeniach [Statistical estimation with non-classical assumptions]. Łódz, Poland: University of Łodz.
  • Ducret, R., Lemarié, B., & Roset, A. (2016). Cluster analysis and spatial modeling for urban fright. Identifying homogeneous urban zones based on urban form and logistics characteristics. Transportation Research Procedia, 12, 301-313.
  • Ejdys, J., Nazarko, J., Nazarko, Ł., & Halicka, K. (2015). Foresight application for transport sector. In M. Fiorini, J. Jia-Chin Lin (Eds.), Clean mobility and Intelligent Transport Systems (pp. 379-402). London, England: The Institution of Engineering and Technology.
  • European Commission. (2011). White Paper on Transport. Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2001). Travel and the built environment: A synthesis. Transportation Research Record, 1780, 87-113.
  • Fanni, Z., Khakpour, B. A., & Heydari, A. (2014). Evaluating the regional development of border cities by TOPSIS model (case study: Sistan and Baluchistan Province, Iran). Sustainable Cities and Society, 10, 80-86.
  • Figura, J. (2013). Taksonomia w polityce logistycznej państwa [Taxonomy in logistic policy of state]. Katowice, Poland: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny.
  • Gratiela, B. (2013). Analysis of transport’s external costs in the European Union. Constanta Maritime University Annals, 14(20), 213-216.
  • Hajduk, S. (2016). Assessment of urban transport – a comparative analysis of selected cities by taxonomic methods. Economics and Management, 8(4), 67-74.
  • Hajduk, S. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of publications on city logistics in international scientific literature. Procedia Engineering, 182, 282-290.
  • Hayashi, Y., & Morisugi, H. (2000). International comparison of background concept and methodology of transportation project appraisal. Transport Policy, 7, 73-88.
  • Hellwig, Z. (1968). Zastosowanie metody taksonomicznej do typologicznego podziału krajów ze względu na poziom ich rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę wykwalifikowanych kadr [Application of the taxonomy method to typology classification of the countries because of the development level or resources and the structure of human resources]. Przegląd Statystyczny, 4, 307-327.
  • Ignacy, J. (2016). Wrocław Agglomeration attractiveness as a source of competitive advantage for enterprises. Journal of Management and Financial Sciences, 9(24), 147-160.
  • Jahanshahi, K., Jin, Y., & Williams, I. (2015). Direct and indirect influences on employed adults’ travel in the UK: New insights from the National Travel Survey data 2002-2010. Transportation Research Part A, 80, 288-306.
  • Jajuga, K., & Walesiak, M. (2000). Standardization of data set under different measurement scales. In R. Decker, W. Gaul (Eds.), Classification and information processing at the turn of the millennium (pp. 105-112). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Jarocka, M., & Glińska, E. (2017). The state and prospects for development of railway transport infrastructure in Eastern Poland – secondary data analysis. Procedia Engineering, 182, 299-305.
  • Kauf, S., & Tłuczak, A. (2014). Spatiotemporal estimation of the logistic structure differentiation in the European Union country. Proceedings of MAC-EMMT, 1, 14-19.
  • Kherbash, O., & Liviu Mocan, M. (2015). A review of logistic and transport sector as a factor of globalization. Procedia Economics and Finance, 27, 42-47.
  • Korczak, J., & Kijewska, K. (2016). The concept of sustainable development of public passenger transport in Koszalin. Transportaion Research Procedia, 16, 217-226.
  • Kozera, A., Stanisławska, J., & Wysocki, F. (2014). Sytuacja finansowa gospodarstw domowych zamieszkujących obszary wiejskie w Polsce po wstąpieniu Polski do Unii Europejskiej [The Financial Situation of Households in Rural Areas in Poland in the Context of European Integration]. Roczniki Naukowe Ekonomii Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich, 101(2), 91-101.
  • Kumar, S., & Hoffmann, J. (2002), Globalization: the Maritime nexus. In C. Grammenos (Ed.), Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business (pp. 35-62). London, England: Loyds List Press.
  • Lewczuk, J., & Ustinovichius, L. (2015). The concept of multi-functional development of cross-border regions: Poland case. Procedia Engineering, 122, 65-70.
  • Liberadzki, B. (2013). Fiskalizm a strategiczne cele transportu [Fiscalism and strategical aims of transport]. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów SGH, 123, 11-16.
  • Lira, J., Wagner, W., & Wysocki, F. (2002). Mediana w  zagadnieniach porządkowania obiektów wielocechowych [Median in the ordering issues of multivariable objects]. In W.J. Paradysz (Ed.), Statystyka regionalna w służbie samorządu lokalnego i biznesu [Regional statistics in duty of local government], (pp. 87-99). Poznań, Poland: Internetowa Oficyna Wydawnicza Centrum Statystyki Regionalnej, & Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Poznaniu.
  • Madras, T., & Mitura, M. (2014). Dochody własne miast wojewódzkich w analizie ich kondycji finansowej [Own-sources revenues of voivodeship capital cities in the analysis of their financial condition]. Ekonomia i Zarządzanie, 6(4), 123-134.
  • Максимцев, И.А., Межевич, И.А., & Разумовский В.М. (2017). Мировая экономика перед вызовами Annus Horribilis: на пороге новой регионализации [The world economy facing the challenges Annus Horribilis: on the threshold of a new regionalization]. Известия Санкт-Петербургского Государственного Экономического Университета, 1(103), 107-114.
  • Malasek, J. (2016). A set of tools for making urban transport more sustainable. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 876-885.
  • Malina, A., & Zeliaś, A. (1997). On building taxsonometric measure of living conditions. Statistics in Transitions, 3(3), 523-544.
  • Matteis, T., Liedtke, G., & Wisetjindawat, W. (2016). A framework for incorporating market interactions in an agent based model for freight transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 12, 925-937.
  • Młodak A. (2005). Ocena zmienności cech statystycznych w modelu taksonomicznym [The evaluation of the variability of statistical features in the taxonomic model]. Wiadomości Statystyczne, 9, 5-18.
  • Młodak, A. (2006). Analiza taksonomiczna w statystyce regionalnej [Taxonomic analysis in regional policy]. Warszawa, Poland: Difin.
  • Młodak, A. (2009). Historia problemu Webera [The history of Weber issue]. Matematyka Stosowana, 10(51), 3-21.
  • Mun, S., & Nakagawa, S. (2010). Pricing and investment of cross-border transport infrastructure. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40, 228-240.
  • Olszewska, A.M., & Gudanowska, A.E. (2014). Wykorzystanie wybranych metod porządkowania obiektów do klasyfikacji województw pod kątem ich potencjału innowacyjnego. Metody Ilościowe w Badaniach Ekonomicznych, 15(4), 91-100.
  • Paprocki, W. (2013). Reakcje uczestników rynku transportowego na wzrost obciążeń fiskalnych – analiza na przykładzie wprowadzenia viaTOLL [Reactions of transportation market to the increase of fiscal burden – viaTOLL introduction analysis]. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów SGH, 123, 17-33.
  • Panek, T., & Zwierzchowski, J. (2013). Statystyczne metody wielowymiarowej analizy porównawczej. Teoria i zastosowania [Statistical methods of multivariate comparative analysis. Theory and practice]. Warszawa, Poland: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
  • Persia, L., Cipriani, E., Sgarra, V., & Meta, E. (2016). Strategies and measures for sustainable transport systems. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 955-964.
  • Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., Jing, Y., & Collins, P. (2015). Public administration for development: trends and the way forward. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 65-72.
  • Radziszewski, P., Nazarko, J., Vilutiene, T., Dębkowska, K., Ejdys, J., Gudanowska, A., Halicka, K., Kilon, J., Kononiuk, A., Kowalski, K. J., Król, J. B., Nazarko, Ł., & Sarnowski, M. (2016). Future trends in road pavement technologies development in the context of environmental protection. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 11(2), 160-168.
  • Roorda, M.J., Cavalcante, R., McCabe, S., & Kwan, H. (2010). A conceptual framework for agent-based modeling of logistic services. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(1), 18-31.
  • Sánchez-Diaz, I., Holguin-Veras, J., & Wang, X. (2014). An  exploratory analysis of spatial effects on fright trip attraction. Transportation, 43, 177-196.
  • Solecka, K. (2011). Integration of public transport in Polish and EU documents and examples of solutions for integration of public transport in Poland and in the world. Transport problems, 6(4), 23-34.
  • Steal, D., & Marshall, S. (2001). The relationship between urban form and travel patterns. An international review and evaluation. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 1(2), 113-141.
  • Strojny, J. (2013). Zastosowanie taksonomii struktur do analizy ewolucji system transport towarowego w krajach Unii Europejskiej [Using taxonomy of structures to analyze the evolution of the freight transport system in the European Union]. Wiadomości Statystyczne, 10, 53-66.
  • Tarka, D. (2012). Infrastruktura transportowa w wybranych krajach Unii Europejskiej – analiza taksonomiczna [Transportation infrastructure in EU countries – taxonomic analysis]. Ekonomia i Zarządzanie, 4(4), 88-100.
  • Ustinovichius, L., Lewczuk, J., & Czech, A. (2017). Methodological approach justifying the concept of crossborder and trans boundary cooperation with other countries and regions. Procedia Engineering, 208, 183-189.
  • Vörös, T., Juhász, M., & Koppány, K. (2015). The measurement of indirect effects in project appraisal. Transportation Research Procedia, 13, 114-123.
  • Ward, E.J., Dimitriou, H.T., & Dean, M. (2016). The application of policy-led multi-criteria analysis to mega transport infrastructure project appraisal. Research in Transportation Economics, 58, 21-45.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-9917a4f5-ea87-4d5e-837c-5bf29a10830e
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.