Suitability of Rural Living & Work Facilities, Spatial Behavior of Farmers and Family Income

Mao, Yanling; Li, Na

doi:10.35784/pe.2022.1.07

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Suitability of Rural Living & Work Facilities, Spatial Behavior of Farmers and Family Income

Autorzy

Mao Yanling , Li Na

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/pe.2022.1.07

Warianty tytułu

Zrównoważoność ułatwiania życia i pracy na wsi, przestrzenne wzorce zachowań rolników i dochody ich rodzin

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

In recent years, China has put forward policies to improve rural infrastructure and promote the development of rural industries causing to dramatic transition in the living and employment conditions. Moreover, under the pressure of the high expenditure of living and the difficulty of finding jobs, new changes have taken place in the spatial behavior pattern of farmers’ residence and employment. Based on a field survey of 839 observations in 123 villages in Poyang Lake basin, China, we developed indicators to evaluate the suitability of rural living facilities (SLF) and work facilities (SWF). Multinomial logit regression model was used to measure the relationship between SWF, SLF and the spatial behavior patterns of farmers. The results show that: (1) SWF development in rural areas lags behind SLF; (2) Higher SLF is most distributed in suburban areas ; (3) Higher SWF is mostly distributed in suburban towns and characteristic towns; (4) The effects of SLF and SWF on the spatial behavior patterns of farmers are significantly positive; (5) Farmers in the urban-rural amphibious pattern usually obtain a higher income level, and also bring vitality to the countryside.

W ostatnich latach Chiny przedstawiły politykę poprawy infrastruktury wiejskiej i promowania rozwoju przemysłu wiejskiego, powodując istotne zmiany w warunkach życia i zatrudnienia. Ponadto, pod presją wysokich wydatków na życie i występujących trudności ze znalezieniem pracy, nastąpiły nowe zmiany w przestrzennym wzorcu zachowań rolników w miejscu zamieszkania i pracy. Na podstawie ankiety terenowej obejmującej 839 obserwacji w 123 wioskach w dorzeczu jeziora Poyang w Chinach, opracowaliśmy wskaźniki do oceny przydatności ułatwiania życia na wsi (SLF) i ułatwiania pracy (SWF). Do pomiaru związku między SWF, SLF a przestrzennymi wzorcami zachowań rolników zastosowano wielomianowy model regresji logitowej. Wyniki pokazują, że: (1) rozwój SWF na obszarach wiejskich pozostaje w tyle za SLF; (2) SLF jest najbardziej rozpowszechniony na obszarach podmiejskich, podczas gdy; (3) Wyższe SWF są rozprowadzane głównie w miejscowościach podmiejskich i miejscowościach charakterystycznych; (4) Wpływ SLF i SWF na przestrzenne wzorce zachowań rolników jest znacząco pozytywny; (5) Rolnicy funkcjonujący w układzie miejsko-wiejskim zwykle uzyskują wyższy poziom dochodów, a także wnoszą witalność wsi.

Słowa kluczowe

suitability of living facilities suitability of work facilities spatial behavior pattern multinomial logit model rural development family income

zrównoważoność ułatwiania życia zrównoważoność ułatwiania pracy przestrzenny wzorzec zachowań wielomianowy model logitowy rozwój obszarów miejskich dochody rodzin

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2022

Tom

Vol. 17, nr 1

Strony

71--83

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 43 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Mao Yanling

maoyanling@ncu.edu.cn

School of Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, China

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3151-9935

autor

Li Na

lina@email.ncu.edu.cn

School of Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, China

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9582-3381

Bibliografia

1. CAO G., LI M., MA Y., TAO R., 2014, Selfemployment and intention of permanent urban settlement: Evidence from a survey of migrants in China’s four major urbanising areas, Urban Studies, 52(4): 639-664.
2. CHEN S., LIU Z., 2016, What determines the settlement intention of rural migrants in China? Economic incentives versus sociocultural conditions, Habitat International, 58: 42-50.
3. CHENG M., YANSUI L., ZHOU Y., 2019, Measuring the symbiotic development of rural housing and industry: A case study of Fuping County in the Taihang Mountains in China, Land Use Policy, 82: 307-316.
4. DIAKOULAKI D., MAVROTAS G., PAPAYANNAKIS L., 1995, Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method, Computers & Operations Research, 22(7): 763-770.
5. GEEDIPALLY S. R., TURNER P. A., PATIL S., 2011, Analysis of Motorcycle Crashes in Texas with Multinomial Logit Model, Transportation Research Record, 2265(1): 62-69.
6. HARE D., 1999, ‘Push’ versus ‘pull’ factors in migration outflows and returns: Determinants of migration status and spell duration among China's rural population, The Journal of Development Studies, 35(3): 45-72.
7. HOLMES J., 2006, Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda, Journal of Rural Studies, 22(2): 142-160.
8. HUANG Z., DU X., 2015, Assessment and determinants of residential satisfaction with public housing in Hangzhou, China, Habitat International, 47: 218-230.
9. KIMARO P. J., TOWO N. N., MOSHI B. H., 2015, Determinants of Rural Youth's Participation in Agricultural Activities: The Case of Kahe Eaet Ward in Moshi Rural District,Tanzania, International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(2):1-47.
10. LI J., ROSE N., 2017, Urban social exclusion and mental health of China's rural-urban migrants – A review and call for research, Health & Place, 48: 20-30.
11. LI S., DONG Y., ZHANG L., LIU C., 2021, Offfarm employment and poverty alleviation in rural China, Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(4):943- 952.
12. LI S., LIU Y., 2016, The jobs-housing relationship and commuting in Guangzhou, China: Hukou and dual structure, Journal of Transport Geography, 54:286-294.
13. LI W., LI J., CUI J., 2020, Exploring rural decline with the perspective of demographics: Case study of Hubei, China, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 120:102917.
14. LI Y., QIAO L., WANG Q., DáVID K., 2020, Towards the evaluation of rural livability in China:Theoretical framework and empirical case study, Habitat International, 105: 102241.
15. LIANG Z., CHEN Y. P., GU Y., 2002, Rural Industrialisation and Internal Migration in China, Urban Studies, 39(12): 2175-2187.
16. LIU J., BI H., WANG M., 2020, Using multi-source data to assess livability in Hong Kong at the community-based level: A combined subjectiveobjective approach, Geography and Sustainability, 1(4): 284-294.
17. LIU Y., 2018, Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China, Acta Geographica Sinica, 73: 637-650.
18. LIU Y., LI Y., 2017, Revitalize the world’s countryside, Nature, 548(7667): 275-277.
19. LIU Y., LONG H., CHEN Y., et al., 2016, Progress of research on urban-rural transformation and rural development in China in the past decade and future prospects, Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(8):1117-1132.
20. LONG H., WOODS M., 2011, Rural Restructuring under Globalization in Eastern Coastal China: What can we learn from Wales?, Journal of Rural and Community Development, 6: 70-94.
21. MATTSSON K. T., CASSEL S. H., 2020, Immigrant Entrepreneurs and Potentials for Path Creating Tourism Development in Rural Sweden, Tourism Planning & Development, 17(4): 384-403.
22. MUSHTAHA E., ALSYOUF I., AL LABADI L., HAMAD R., KHATIB N., AL MUTAWA M., 2020, Application of AHP and a mathematical index to estimate livability in tourist districts: The case of Al Qasba in Sharjah, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9(4): 872-889.
23. ONNOM W., TRIPATHI N., NITIVATTANANON V., NINSAWAT S., 2018, Development of a Liveable City Index (LCI) Using Multi Criteria Geospatial Modelling for Medium Class Cities in Developing Countries, Sustainability, 10(2): 1-19.
24. OWUSU T. Y., 1998, To Buy or Not To Buy: Determinants of Home Ownership among Ghanaian Immigtants in Toronto, Canadian Geographer, 42(1):40-52.
25. QU Y., JIANG G., ZHAO Q., MA W., ZHANG R., YANG Y., 2017, Geographic identification, spatial differentiation, and formation mechanism of multifunction of rural settlements: A case study of 804 typical villages in Shandong Province, China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 166: 1202-1215.
26. STEINNES D. N., 1978, A simulataneous econometirc model of the intraurban location of employment and residence, Regional Science Perspectives, 8(2):101-105.
27. TAN S., LI Y., SONG Y., et al., 2017, Influence factors on settlement intention for floating population in urban area: a China study, Quality & Quantity, 51(1): 147-176.
28. TAO L., HUI E. C. M., WONG F. K. W., CHEN T., 2015, Housing choices of migrant workers in China:Beyond the Hukou perspective, Habitat International, 49: 474-483.
29. WANG Y., JIN C., LU M., LU Y., 2017, Assessing the suitability of regional human settlements environment from a different preferences perspective: A case study of Zhejiang Province, China, Habitat International, 70: 1-12.
30. WANG Y., ZHU Y., YU M., 2019, Evaluation and determinants of satisfaction with rural livability in China’s less-developed eastern areas: A case study of Xianju County in Zhejiang Province, Ecological Indicators, 104: 711-722.
31. WENG Y., ZENG Y., LIN W., 2021, Do rural highways narrow Chinese farmers’ income gap among provinces?, Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(4):905-914.
32. WU J., YU Z., WEI Y. D., YANG L., 2019, Changing distribution of migrant population and its influencing factors in urban China: Economic transition, public policy, and amenities, Habitat International, 94: 102063.
33. YANG R., LIU Y., LONG H., QIAO L., 2015, Spatio-temporal characteristics of rural settlements and land use in the Bohai Rim of China, Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25(5): 559-572.
34. YANG Y., BAO W., LIU Y., 2020, Coupling coordination analysis of rural production-living-ecological space in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, Ecological Indicators, 117: 106512.
35. YI X., JUE W., HUAN H., 2021, Does economic development bring more livability? Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 293: 126187.
36. YUAN X., DU W., WEI X., YING Y., SHAO Y., HOU R., 2018, Quantitative analysis of research on China’s land transfer system, Land Use Policy, 74:301-308.
37. YUAN Y., WANG M., ZHU Y., HUANG X., XIONG X., 2020, Urbanization’s effects on the urban-rural income gap in China: A meta-regression analysis, Land Use Policy, 99: 104995.
38. ZHAN D., KWAN M., ZHANG W., FAN J., YU J., DANG Y., 2018, Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China, Cities, 79:92-101.
39. ZHENG S., FU Y., LIU H., 2006, Housing-choice hindrances and urban spatial structure: Evidence from matched location and location-preference data in Chinese cities, Journal of Urban Economics, 60(3): 535-557.
40. ZHOU D., XU J., LIN Z., 2017, Conflict or coordination? Assessing land use multi-functionalization using production-living-ecology analysis, Science of The Total Environment, 577: 136-147.
41. ZHOU X., 2014, Increasing Returns to Education, Changing Labor Force Structure, and the Rise of Earnings Inequality in Urban China, 1996–2010, Social Forces, 93(2): 429-455.
42. ZHOU Y., GUO Y., LIU Y., WU W., LI Y., 2018, Targeted poverty alleviation and land policy innovation: Some practice and policy implications from China, Land Use Policy, 74: 53-65.
43. ZOU L., LIU Y., WANG J., YANG Y., 2021, An analysis of land use conflict potentials based on ecological-production-living function in the southeast coastal area of China, Ecological Indicators, 122:107297.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-9912680b-74e5-4751-bb81-0b2ddab34716