Design and Ergonomics : Methods for Integrating Ergonomics at Hand Tool Design Stage

• Autorzy: Marsot J. , Claudon L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

As a marked increase in the number of musculoskeletal disorders was noted in many industrialized countries and more specifically in companies that require the use of hand tools, the French National Research and Safety Institute (INRS) launched in 1999 a research project on the topic of integrating ergonomics into hand tool design, and more particularly to a design of a boning knife. After a brief recall of the difficulties of integrating ergonomics at the design stage, the present paper shows how 3 design methodological tools. Functional Analysis, Quality Function Deployment and TRIZ.have been applied to the design of a boning knife. Implementation of these tools enabled us to demonstrate the extent to which they are capable of responding to the difficulties of integrating ergonomics into product design.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ergonomic; design; method; TRIZ; QFD

PL

ergonomia; projektowanie sprzętu; narzędzia ręczne

• Wydawca: Taylor & Francis
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
• Rocznik: 2004
• Tom: Vol. 10, No. 1
• Strony: 13--23
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Marsot J.

• Working Equipment Engineering Department, French National Research and Safety Institute (INRS), Vandoeuvre, France

autor

Claudon L.

• Working Life Department, French National Research and Safety Institute (INRS), Vandoeuvre, France

Bibliografia

• 1. Armstrong TJ, Foulke JA, Joseph BS, Goldstein SA. Investigation of cumulative trauma disorders in a poultry processing plant. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1982;43:103-16.
• 2. Vanbergeijk E. Selection of power tools and mechanical assists, ergonomic considerations of hand-held power tools for control of occupational hand and wrist injuries In: Hand tools: ergonomics issues in evaluation and selection, July 22-23, 1996. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan; 1996. p. 1-5.
• 3. Tichauer ER, Gage H. Ergonomic principles basic to hand tool design. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1977;38:622-34.
• 4. Aptel M. Etude dans une entreprise de montage d’appareils électroménagers des facteurs de risque professionnels du syndrome du canal carpien. Documents pour le Médecin du Travail 1993;54(2):149-64.
• 5. Aptel M, Claudon L, Marsot J. Integration of ergonomics into hand tool design: principle and presentation of an example. JOSE 2002;8(1):107-15.
• 6. Theureau J, Pinsky L. Paradoxe de l’ergonomie de conception et logiciel informatique. Revue des Conditions de Travail 1984;9:25-31.
• 7. Vadcard P. Aide à la programmation de l’utilisation des outils en conception de produit [doctoral dissertation]. Paris, France: Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers; 1996.
• 8. Sagot JC, Gouin V, Gomes S. Ergonomics in product design: safety factor. Safety Science 2003;41:137-54.
• 9. Laprie JC. Guide de la sûreté de fonctionnement. Toulouse, France: CEPADUES Editions; 1996.
• 10. Aoussat A. La pertinence en innovation: nécessité d’une approche plurielle [doctoral dissertation]. Paris, France: Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers; 1990.
• 11. Jouffroy D, Ciccotelli J, Martin P. Contribution of a distributed design method to the safety of numerically controlled woodworking machine. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Intelligent Manufacturing Systems - IMS Europe 1998, Lausanne, Switzerland, April 15-17, 1998. Lausanne, Switzerland: Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; 1998. p. 449-58.
• 12. Roussel B. Ergonomie en conception de produits: Proposition d’une méthode centrée sur la formulation de principes de solutions ergonomiques dans le processus interdisciplinaire de conception de produits [doctoral dissertation]. Paris, France: Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers; 1996.
• 13. Association Française Pour l’Analyse de la Valeur (AFAV). Exprimer le besoin-application de la démarche fonctionnelle. Paris, France: Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR); 1989.
• 14. Claudon L. Ergonomic hand tool design: interview of users. In: Podgórski D, Karwowski W, editors. ERGON-AXIA 2000, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Ergonomics and Safety for Global Business Quality and Productivity. Warszawa, Poland: Central Institute for Labour Protection; 2000. p. 123-26.
• 15. Akao Y. QFD - Prendre en compte les besoins du client dans la conception du produit. Paris, France: Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR); 1993.
• 16. Daetz D, Barnard B, Norman R. Customer integration - the Quality Function Deployment (QFD). Leader’s guide for decision making. New York, NY, USA: Wiley; 1995.
• 17. Tsuda Y. QFD models for concurrent engineering development processes of automobiles. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 1995;3(3):213-20.
• 18. Sivaloganathan S, Evbuomwan NFO, Jebb A. The development of a design system for concurrent engineering. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 1995;3(4):257-69.
• 19. Haapalainen M, Kivisto-Rahnasto J, Mattila M. Ergonomic design of non-powered hand tools: an application of quality function deployment (QFD). Occupational Ergonomics 1999/2000;2(3):179-89.
• 20. Madu CN. House of quality in a minute. Fairfield, CT, USA: CHI; 2000.
• 21. Radwin RG. Pistol grip power tool handles and trigger size effect on grip exertions and operator preferences. Human Factors 1993;35(3):551-69.
• 22. Lewis WG, Narayan CV. Design and sizing of ergonomic handles for hand tools. Appl Ergon 1977;24(5):351-6.
• 23. Claudon L. Ergonomic hand tool design project [final report]. Nancy, France: French National Research and Safety Institute (INRS); 2002. In French.
• 24. Altshuller G. And suddenly the inventor appeared. Worcester, MA, USA: Technical Innovation Center; 1996.
• 25. Cogu G. Méthodologie d’innovation: la résolution de problèmes créatifs. In: Actes du Colloque “Modélisation des processus de conception”. Nancy, France: PRIMECA; 1999. p. 1-20.
• 26. Zusman A, Zlotin B. Overview of creative methods. The TRIZ Journal 1999;July. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from: http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/1999/07/e/index.htm
• 27. Cavalucci D. Etat de l’art, limites et perspectives d’évolution de TRIZ. In: Actes du colloque “Journées analyse de la valeur, Méthode TRIZ et Capitalisation d’Expérence”. Paris, France: Association Française Pour l’Analyse de la Valeur (AFAV); 1999. p. 1-20.
• 28. Kowalick J. Problem solving systems: what’s next after TRIZ? The TRIZ Journal 1999;March. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from: http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/1999/03/b/index.htm
• 29. Lee L. The complete guide to sharpening. Newtown, CT, USA: Taunton Press; 1994.
• 30. Richardot F. Industrial statements on the application of voice of customer. In: Proceedings of the conference “Product and Service Design for Customers - VOC and QFD”. Epinal, France; 1999. pp. 17-40. In French.
• 31. Terninko J. The QFD, TRIZ and Taguchi connection: customer-driven robust innovation. The TRIZ Journal 1998;January. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from: http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/1998/01/b/index.htm
• 32. Wu A. Integration of QFD, TRIZ, and robust design: overview et luggage case study. Livonia, MI, USA: American Supplier Institute; 1997.
• 33. León-Rovira, N, Aguayo H. a new model of the conceptual design process using QFD/FA/TRIZ. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from: http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/1998/07/d/index.htm
• 34. Martin C, Bocquet JC. Conception intégrée. Interopérativité des méthodes: AF, QFD, AMDEC dans le cadre du projet PIRAMID. In: 6ème Colloque national sur la conception mécanique intégrée. La Plagne, France: PRIMECA; 1999. p. 247-54.
• 35. Hasan R, Bernard A, Ciccotelli J, Martin P. Integrating safety into the design process: elements and concepts relative to the working situation. Safety Science 2003;41:155-79.