Urban Ecology Aspects: Theory and Development

• Autorzy: Suvorova Anna A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12912/27197050/141528

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Issues of spatial development, including Urban Development, based on the principles of "balanced spatial development", are reflected in the main paradigm of the XXI century – sustainable economic, social and environmental development. The study of the problems of sustainable development of settlements, especially cities, is now one of the core areas of scientific justification of the planetary concept of sustainable development. On the one hand, the sustainability of Human Settlements Development is often one of the leading topics when discussing in scientific circles the possibilities of a global transition of modern civilization to a model of sustainable development. Today, it is not possible to conduct a professional discussion on sustainable development without the participation of specialists. The concept of sustainable development of Human Settlements has developed into an independent branch, both theoretical and applied, which is now perceived by the scientific community as a natural and integral part of the paradigm of sustainable economic, social and environmental development of our planet. In fairness, we also note that the concept of Sustainable Human Settlements Development has not always occupied its rightful place among the various aspects of sustainable development that it has today. From the Stockholm Summit in 1972 until habitat II in 1996, issues of Sustainable Human Settlements Development were at the periphery of the attention of the international scientific community. Although a separate section is devoted to promoting the sustainable development of human settlements in the "agenda for the XXI Century", however, this document does not contain a definition of this concept and is mainly devoted to the issues of effective management and planning of Human Settlements Development. Moreover, the Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development, as well as the plan of implementation adopted at the Johannesburg Summit in 2002, also do not include it among its provisions related to the sustainable development of human settlements. Thus, from the moment of approval of the planetary concept of sustainable economic, social and environmental development, it should have been quite a long time before the balance of Human Settlements Development acquired its inherent level of problematic relevance today, and most importantly – understanding of its content part. This is due to a number of reasons, both objective and subjective. They are associated with both patterns of development of scientific knowledge and organizational reasons.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

smart city; urban development; ecological aspect; concept

• Wydawca: Lubelski Oddział Polskiego Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology ; WNGB Wydawnictwo Naukowe
• Czasopismo: Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 22, iss. 6
• Strony: 105--113
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 17 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Suvorova Anna A.

• Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, Russia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7089-2524

Bibliografia

• 1. Allam Z. & Newman P. 2018. Redefining the smart city: culture, metabolism and governance. Smart Cities 1, 4–25. DOI:10.3390/smartcities1010002
• 2. Batty M., Axhausen K.W., Giannotti F., Pozdnoukhov A., Bazzani A., Wachowicz M., et al. 2012. Smart cities of the future. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top., 214, 481–518. DOI:10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
• 3. Bhagya N., Silva M., Khan M., Kijun H. 2018. Towards Sustainable Smart Cities: A Review of Trends, Architectures, Components, and Open Challenges in Smart Cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 697–713. DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053
• 4. Bibri S.E. & Krogstie J. 2017. Smart sustainable cities of the future: an extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustain. Cities Soc., 31, 183–212. DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016
• 5. Britton J. 2019. Smart Meter Data and Equitable Energy Transitions – Can Cities Play a Role? Local Environment. DOI:10.1080/13549839.2017.1383372
• 6. Coutard O. & J. Rutherford, eds. 2016. Beyond the Networked City: Infrastructure Reconfigurations and Urban Change in the North and South. London, Routledge.
• 7. de Hoop E., Smith A., Boon W., Macrorie R., Marvin S., Raven R. 2018. Smart Urbanism in Barcelona: A Knowledge Politics Perspective. In The Politics of Urban Sustainability Transitions: Knowledge, Power and Governance, edited by J. Jensen, P. Spath, and M. Cashmore, Routledge, 33–52.
• 8. Haarstad H. 2017. Constructing the Sustainable City: Examining the Role of Sustainability in the 'Smart City' Discourse. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(4), 423–437. DOI:10.1080/1523908X.2016.1245610
• 9. Kong L. & Woods O. 2018. The Ideological Alignment of Smart Urbanism in Singapore: Critical Reflections on a Political Paradox. Urban Studies, 55(4), 679–701. DOI:10.1177/0042098017746528
• 10. Marvin S., Bulkeley H., Mai L., McCormick K., Voytenko Palgan Y. 2019. Urban Living Labs: Experimenting with City Futures. London, Routledge.
• 11. McFarlane C., Söderström O. 2017. On alternative smart cities: from a technology-intensive to a knowledge-intensive smart urbanism. City 21, 312–328. DOI:10.1080/13604813.2017.1327166
• 12. Raven R.P.J.M., Sengers F.W., Spaeth P., Xie L., Cheshmehzangi A., de Jong M. 2017. Urban Experimentation and Institutional Arrangements. European Planning Studies. DOI:10.1080/09654313.2017.1393047
• 13. Siemens. 2017. Cities of the Future Creating Smart Cities in Canada. Available online at: https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:e6ef58a3-4561-418a-bcdc-3b766ea3def3/brochure-cities-future-canada-e.pdf
• 14. Trencher G. Forthcoming. Towards a Smart City 2.0: Smartness as a Tool for Tackling Social Problems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
• 15. Viitanen J., Kingston R. 2014. Smart cities and green growth: outsourcing democratic and environmental resilience to the global technology sector. Environ. Plan. A 46, 803–819. DOI:10.1068/a46242
• 16. Wiig A., Wyly E. 2016. Introduction: Thinking Through the Politics of the Smart City. Urban Geography 37, 485–493. DOI:10.1080/02723638.2016.1178479
• 17. Zvolska L., Lehner M., Voytenko Palgan Y., Mont O., Plepys A. 2019. Urban Sharing in Smart Cities: The Cases of Berlin and London. Local Environment. DOI:10.1080/13549839.2018.1463978.