Carbon Footprint of Semi-Mechanical Sago Starch Production

• Autorzy: Yusuf Mega Ayu , Romli Muhammad , Suprihatin , Wiloso Edi Iswanto

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/110813

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Indonesia is the country with the greatest potential for sago in the world. This research is intended to determine the carbon footprint of sago starch produced from a semi-mechanical process. The calculation was carried out using the LCA approach with the system boundary of cradle to gate. The process steps were carried out in a combination of manual work and diesel-driven engines. The inventory data on material, energy input flows and emissions were obtained from 3 samples of typical medium-scale semi-mechanical sago mills. It was found that the carbon footprint of the sago produced from semi-mechanical processes was 37.9±0.6 kgCO₂eq per 1 ton of dried sago starch. Further analysis shows that 62% of the carbon footprint comes from the extraction stage and 38% from the transportation. It can be estimated that the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from the semi-mechanical sago starch production in Indonesia for 2018 reached around 2,617,639 kg CO₂eq.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

greenhouse gases; carbon footprint; life cycle assessment; sago starch

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 20, nr 11
• Strony: 159--166
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Yusuf Mega Ayu

• Department of Agroindustrial Technology, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Bogor 16680, Indonesia
• Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of Musamus, Merauke 99616, Indonesia

autor

Romli Muhammad

• Department of Agroindustrial Technology, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Bogor 16680, Indonesia

autor

Suprihatin

• Department of Agroindustrial Technology, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Bogor 16680, Indonesia

autor

Wiloso Edi Iswanto

• Research Center for Chemistry, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Tangerang Selatan 15314, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• 1. Bantacut T. 2011. Sago: Resource for Main Food Diversification. PANGAN, Vol. 20, No. 1, March, 27–40
• 2. Syakir M and Elna . 2013. Potential of Sago Plants (Metroxylon sp.) As Bioenergy Raw Materials. Perspektif 12(2), 57–64.
• 3. Ni’mah S, Achmad R, Heru S. 2013. Design of Sago Flour Processing Plant, Pomits Engineering Journal 2(1), 1–3
• 4. Nugraha AZ, Yani M, Wiloso EI. 2017. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Cement Products at PT. Indocement Tunggal Prakarsa. Thesis : Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
• 5. Directorate General of Plantation. 2017. Statistics of plantations in Indonesia for sago commodities 2015–2017. Secretariat of the directorate general of Indonesian plantations
• 6. International Standards Organization (ISO), 2006. Environmental management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and framework, ISO14040, BSI, CEN
• 7. UNEP 2007. Life cycle management-A business guide to sustainability, United National Environmental Programme, Geneva
• 8. Cuce L, Klemes JJ, Kravanja Z, 2012. A review of footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. J of Cleaner Production, 34, 9–12.
• 9. International Standards Organization (ISO), 2008. Environmental management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and framework, ISO14040, BSI, CEN.
• 10. International Standards Organization (ISO), 2008. Environmental management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and framework, ISO14040, BSI, CEN.
• 11. UNEP 2007. Life cycle management-A business guide to sustainability, United National Environmental Programme, Geneva
• 12. Pei-Lang, A.T., A.M.D. Mohamed and A.A. Karim. 2005. Sago Starch and Composition of Associated Components in Palms of Different Growth Stages. Carbohydrate Polymers 63 (2006) 283–286
• 13. Saifuddin D. 2000. Design of Advanced Sago Starch Processing Plant Using SLP. [Thesis].Bogor(ID). InstitutPertanianBogor
• 14. Anbukumar S, Prasad NM, Kumar MA. 2014. Effluent Treatment for Sago Industry Using Zeolite and Active Carbon. Open J Water Pollut Treat. 1(2):18–26,doi 10.15764.
• 15. Richana N, Lestari P, Chilmijati N, dan Widowati. 2000. Characteristics of starch (Garut and Sago tapioca) and Utilization into Liquid Glucose. Inside: Indonesian Food Technology Association (PATPI), editor. Empowering the Food Industry in the Context of Increasing Competitiveness in Facing the Era of Free Trade. Food Industry Seminar. Surabaya: PATPI, 396–406.
• 16. Ahmad F B and Williams P A, 1998. Rheological Properties of Sago Starch. J. Agric Food Chem. 46(1): 4060–4065
• 17. Chavalparit O, Ongwandee M., 2009. Clean technology for the tapioca starch industry in Thailand. J. Of Cleaner Production, 17, 105–110
• 18. Sritoth K, Pitachomkwan K, Wanlapatit S, Oates CG., 2000b. Cassava starch technology: the Thai Experience. Stach/Starke, 52, 439–449
• 19. Usubharatana P and Phungrassami H. 2015. Carbon Footprint of Cassava Starch Production in NorthEastern Thailand. Procedia CIRP 29, 462–467
• 20. Nemecek T, Kagi T, Blaser S. 2007. Life Cycle Inventories of Agricultural Production Systems. Vol. 15.
• 21. Wurdinger E., Roth U., Wegener A. & Peche R. (2003) Kunststoffe aus Nachwachsenden Rohstoffen: Vergleichende okobilanz fur Loose-fillPackmittel aus Starke bzw. aus Polystyrol”. Final report. BIfA, IFEU, Flo-Pak (eds.), Projektforderung: Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt; Augsburg, Marz 2003, pp. 514.