PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

An empirical study on discussion and evaluation of green university

Autorzy
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Sustainable development has become an important criterion for human beings to pursue happiness in their daily lives. In order to ensure the sustainable development of the earth, the first step is to let this concept take root. Hence, the key to making a campus into a green university and promoting national consensus lies in the implementation quality. Moreover, the influence of the factors can be effectively examined and improved by providing correction plans on a rolling basis according to the green university certification criteria and from the perspective of business performance. The aim is to provide detailed coping strategies and facilitate schools moving towards the goal of a green university. By the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), this study explored the criteria for green university evaluation, investigated the causal relationship and mutual influence among criteria. It also offered suggestions on green performance management for the case university. The findings of this study can help schools to develop environmental policies, identify the priorities for implementing green university policies, and achieve the goal of a green university efficiently.
Rocznik
Strony
75--85
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 23 poz., tab., rys.
Twórcy
autor
  • Institute of Service Industries and Management, Minghsin University of Science and Technology, Hsinchu 30401, Taiwan
Bibliografia
  • [1] Mamoudou C. Determinants of production-based and consumption-based CO2 emissions: a comparative analysis. Int J Environ Pollut. 2020;67(1):22-47. DOI: 10.1504/IJEP.2020.108362.
  • [2] Marszałek M, Kowalski Z, Makara A. The possibility of contamination of water-soil environment as a result of the use of pig slurry. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2019;26(2):313-30. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2019-0022.
  • [3] Suwartha N, Sari RF. Evaluating UI Green Metric as a tool to support green universities development: assessment of the year 2011 ranking. J Clean Prod. 2013;61:46-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.034.
  • [4] Bekessy S, Samson K, Clarkson R. The failure of non-binding declarations to achieve university sustainability - a need for accountability. Int J Sust High Educ. 2007;8:301-16. DOI: 10.1108/14676370710817165.
  • [5] Biasutti M, Frate S. A validity and reliability study of the attitudes toward sustainable development scale. Environ Educ Res. 2017;23(2):214-30. DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2016.1146660.
  • [6] Bartlett PF, Chase GW. Sustainability on Campus: Stories and Strategies for Change. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2004. ISBN: 9780262524223.
  • [7] Creighton SH. Greening the Ivory Tower: Improving the Environmental Track Record of Universities, Colleges, and Other Institutions. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1998. ISBN: 9780262531511.
  • [8] Cioca LI, Ivascu L, Rada EC, Torretta V, Ionescu G. Sustainable development and technological impact on CO2 reducing conditions in Romania. Sustainability. 2015;7(2):1637-50. DOI: 10.3390/su7021637.
  • [9] Holdsworth S, Thomas IA. Sustainability education academic development framework (SEAD). Environ Educ Res. 2016;22(8):1073-97. DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2015.1029876.
  • [10] Jajo NK, Harrison J. World university ranking systems: an alternative approach using partial least squares path modelling. J Higher Educ Policy Manage. 2014;36(5):471-82. DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2014.936090.
  • [11] Lauder A, Sari RF, Suwartha N, Tjahjono G. Critical review of a global campus sustainability ranking: GreenMetric. J Clean Prod. 2015;108:852-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.080.
  • [12] Lukman R, Kranjc D, Glavic P. University ranking using research, educational and environmental indicators. J Clean Prod. 2010;18:619-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.015.
  • [13] Moed HF. Critical comparative analysis of five world university rankings. Scientometrics. 2016;1-24. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2212-y.
  • [14] Scott R. Education for sustainability through a photography competition. Sustainability. 2015;6(2):474-86. DOI: 10.3390/su6020474.
  • [15] Handfield R, Walton SV, Sroufe R, Melnyk SA. Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of Analytical Hierarchy Process. European J Operational Res. 2002;141:70-87. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00261-2.
  • [16] Izunildo C, Antonio G, Virgilio CM. A decision-making model for lean, agile, resilient and green supply chain management. Int J Product Res. 2012;50(17):4830-45. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.657970.
  • [17] Tsai SB, Huang CY, Wang CK, Chen Q. Using a mixed model to evaluate job satisfaction in high-tech industries. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0154071. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154071.
  • [18] Wu WW, Lee YT. Developing global managers’ competencies using Fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems Applications. 2007;32(2):499-507. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005.
  • [19] Lin CJ, Wu WW. A causal analytical method for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Expert System Applications. 2008;34(1):205-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.012.
  • [20] Lee YC, Hsieh YF. Integration of revised simultaneous importance performance analysis and decision making trial and evaluation laboratory - A study of mobile telecommunication industry in Taiwan. African J Business Manage. 2011;5(6):2312-21. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299308104.
  • [21] Wu WW. Segmenting critical factors for successful knowledge management implementation using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Appl Soft Computing. 2012;12(1):527-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2011.08.008.
  • [22] Guo JJ, Tsai SB. Discussing and evaluating green supply chain suppliers: A case study of the printed circuit board industry in China. South African J Industrial Eng. 2015;26(2):56-67. DOI: 10.7166/26-2-956.
  • [23] Tsai SB, Wang K. Using a novel method to evaluate the performance of human resources in green logistics enterprises. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2019;26(4):629-40. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2019-0045.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-97fdbe79-0237-4dbb-9122-badc15d2c1d0
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.