PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Corporate social responsibility of the Port of Gdansk

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Nowadays, seaports are not only important links between land and sea transport chains, but also serve as logistics centres. Due to their nature, they have an impact on environments both near and far, which requires the implementation of the corporate social responsibility (CSR) concept. In practice, this primarily means taking into account stakeholder expectations in planning and implementing marketing strategies. CSR is becoming the subject of interest not only for major seaports but also smaller ports with regional significance. The Port of Gdansk is the largest in Poland and one of the largest in the Baltic Sea Region, and it therefore plays a significant role in the region’s development. The aim of this article is to define the CSR areas of the Port of Gdansk Authority S.A., and the socially responsible tasks undertaken by port operators and the whole port service centre under the name of the Port of Gdansk.
Rocznik
Strony
72--82
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 35 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Economics, Institute of Maritime Transport and Seaborne Trade
  • University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Economics, Institute of Maritime Transport and Seaborne Trade
  • University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Economics, Institute of Maritime Transport and Seaborne Trade
Bibliografia
  • 1. Acciaro, M. (2015) Corporate responsibility and value creation in the port sector. International Journal of Logistics 18, 3, pp. 1–21.
  • 2. Adamus-Matuszyńska, A. (2013) Corporate Social Responsibility and its influence on company competitiveness. Scientific Journal of University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce 98, pp. 191–201.
  • 3. Bateman, S. (1996) Environmental Issues with Australian Ports. Ocean & Coastal Management 33, 1–3, pp. 229–247.
  • 4. Berechman, J. & Tseng, P. (2012) Estimating the Environmental Costs of Port Related Emissions: The Case of Kaohsiung. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 17, 1, pp. 35–38.
  • 5. Bergqvist, R. & Egels-Zandén, N. (2012) Green Port Dues – The Case of Hinterland Transport. Transportation Business & Management 5, pp. 85–91.
  • 6. Bowen, H. (1953) Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper.
  • 7. Carroll, A.B. (2008) A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices. In: Crane, A. et al. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
  • 8. Davis, K. (1960) Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities? California Management Review 2, 3, pp. 70–76.
  • 9. Denktas-Sakar, G. & Karatas-Cetin, C. (2012) Port Sustainability and Stakeholder Management in Supply Chains: A Framework on Resource Dependence Theory. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 28, 3, pp. 301–319.
  • 10. Dinwoodie, J., Tuck, S. & Knowles, H. (2012) Assessing the Environmental Impact of Maritime Operations in Ports: A Systems Approach. In: Song, D., Panayides, P. (Eds). Maritime Logistics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 263–284.
  • 11. ESPO (2012) Green Guide: Towards Excellence in Port Environmental Management and Sustainability. Brussels: European Seaport Organisation (ESPO).
  • 12. Freeman, R.E. & Dmytriyev, S. (2017) Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory: Learning From Each Other. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management 1, pp. 8–15.
  • 13. Goulielmos, A., Lun, V. & Lai, K. (2012) Maritime Logistics in EU Green Ports and Short Sea Shipping. In Song, D., Panayides, P. (Eds). Maritime Logistics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 245–262.
  • 14. Gromadowski, K. (2013) Problems of integrating CSR activities with the overall strategy of the Port of Gdynia based on benchmarking Port of Rotterdam. Warsaw: PRET SA.
  • 15. Haralambides, H. & Gujar, G. (2012) On balancing supply chain efficiency and environmental impacts: An eco-DEA model applied to the dry port sector of India. Maritime Economics and Logistics 14, 1, pp. 122–137.
  • 16. Interview (2019) Interview with employees responsible for preparing reports on the implementation of CSR policy at the Port of Gdansk Authority S.A.
  • 17. Journal of Laws (1997) Act of 20 December 1996 on Seaports and Harbour. Journal of Laws, No. 9, as amended (Ustawa z dnia 20 grudnia 1996 roku o portach i przystaniach morskich. Dz.U. 1997, nr 9, z późn. zm.).
  • 18. Kashyap, R., Mir, R. & Mir A. (2011) Corporate Social Responsibility: A Call For Multidisciplinary Inquiry. Journal of Business & Economics Research 2, 7, pp. 1405–1417.
  • 19. Klimek, H. & Dąbrowski, J. (2018) Corporate social responsibility of the Port of Gdynia. SHS Web of Conferences 57, 01017.
  • 20. Kuźma, L. (1978) Seaports and the natural environment. Warsaw: Transport Committee PAN.
  • 21. Lam, J.S.L. & Gu, Y. (2013) Port hinterland intermodal container flow optimisation with green concerns: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 5, 3. pp. 257–281.
  • 22. Liao, Ch., Tseng, K., Cullinae, K. & Lu Ch. (2010) The Impact of an Emerging Port on the Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Inland Container Transport: An Empirical Study of Taipei Port. Energy Policy 38, 9, pp. 5251–5257.
  • 23. Liao, Ch., Tseng, P.H. & Lu C.S. (2009) Comparing Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Trucking and Intermodal Container Transport in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 14, 7, pp. 493–496.
  • 24. McGuire, J.W. (1963) Business and Society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • 25. Misztal, K. (2008) Corporate social responsibility of seaports. In: Bak, M., Kulawczuk, P. (Eds). Corporate social responsibility in small and medium-sized enterprises. Warsaw: IBnDiPP, EQUAL.
  • 26. Płoska, R. & Próchniak, J. (2017) The problem of defining areas of social responsibility on the example of the selected EU Baltic Sea ports. Zarządzanie i Finanse Journal of Management and Finance 15, 2/2, pp. 323–337.
  • 27. Port Gdańsk (2019) [Online] Available from: www.portgdansk.pl [Accessed: June 19, 2019].
  • 28. Port of Gdansk Authority SA (2016) The Policy of Good Business Practices of CSR in effect at the Port of Gdansk Authority SA. [Online] Available from: www.portgdansk.pl [Accessed: June 19, 2019].
  • 29. Port of Gdansk Authority SA (2017) Summarising the PGA SA’s Activities in the Area of Corporate Social Responsibility in 2016. [Online] Available from: www.portgdansk.pl [Accessed: June 17, 2019].
  • 30. Port of Gdansk Authority SA (2019). Available from: www. portgdansk.pl [Accessed: September 13, 2019].
  • 31. Roso, V. (2007) Evaluation of the Dry Port Concept from an Environmental Perspective: A Note. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 12, 7, pp. 523– 527.
  • 32. Santos, S., Rodrigues, L.L. & Branco, M.C. (2016) Online sustainbility communication practises of European seaports. Journal of Cleaner Production 112, pp. 2935– 2942.
  • 33. Terebińska, M. (2017) Corporate Social Responsibility at the Port of Gdansk Authority SA. Marketing and Market 11 (CD), pp. 620–630.
  • 34. Verhoeven, P. (2011) European port governance, report of an inquiry into the current governance of European seaports. The ESPO Fact Finding Report, Brussels.
  • 35. Żurek, J. (2016) Corporate social responsibility – reality or just an idea. In: Klimek, H. (Ed.). Seaports in a spatial, economic, transport, logistics and social perspective. Gdansk: UG Publishing House.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-973e73f7-448f-408d-8a59-3371f126f3b4
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.