Environmental and social aspects of corporate sustainability as perceived by consumers – a case study of clothing brands

• Autorzy: Radzymińska Monika , Garbowska Bożena

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.168.27

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: Competing for a limited number of socially conscious consumers and the appearance of new generations on the market forces a continuous addition of knowledge concerning pro-environmental and pro-social consumer attitudes and behaviour. Therefore, the present study attempts to: - identify the type of actions taken within the framework of sustainable development by selected clothing brands, - assess the pro-environmental and pro-social attitudes of young consumers purchasing clothing, - determine whether environmental and social aspects are a criterion for clothing choice among young consumers. Design/methodology/approach: Two approaches were used in the research. In the first stage of the research, messages posted on the websites of selected clothing brands were analysed. In the second, a quantitative study was conducted among young consumers (n = 218) by indirect online survey measurement, using a survey questionnaire embedded in a Google form. Findings: Young consumers present positive pro-environmental and pro-social attitudes. According to the respondents, the social commitment of companies influences the positive image and popularity of their products. However, almost half of all consumers presented an ambivalent or negative attitude towards paying more for the purchase of goods whose producers are involved in philanthropic and pro-environmental activities. This suggests that, in the view of this segment of respondents, it is the traders who should take financial responsibility for their actions by not raising the prices of the products they sell. Concern for others by purchasing socially committed brands and the environmental friendliness of the product were shown to rank lower in the hierarchy of clothing choice factors. Research limitations: The research was conducted on a narrow subject basis, so the results obtained cannot be generalised to the young consumer segment. The scope of the presented research is also limited. The results of the research should be regarded as a pilot study. Practical implications: The findings are of relevance to managers in charge of sustainability campaigns for clothing brands. They point to the need for further education aimed at shaping altruistic and pro-environmental attitudes. Originality/value: This study highlights that sustainability encompasses a range of activities with different ways of communicating values to consumers.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainability; consumer; pro-environmental attitudes; pro-social attitude; behavior

PL

zrównoważony rozwój; konsument; postawy proekologiczne; postawa prospołeczna; zachowanie

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: z. 168
• Strony: 393--407
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 37 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Radzymińska Monika

• University of Warmia and Mazury, Faculty Economics, Institute of Management and Quality Sciences, Olsztyn

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0531-268X

autor

Garbowska Bożena

• University of Warmia and Mazury, Faculty Economics, Institute of Management and Quality Sciences, Olsztyn

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0566-3543

Bibliografia

• 1. Adomaviciute, K., Bzikadze, G., Cherian, J., Urbonavicius, S. (2016). Cause-Related marketing as a commercially and socially oriented activity: what factors influence and moderate the purchasing? Engineering Economics, 27, pp. 578-585, doi: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.27.5.15166.
• 2. Azizi, M., Mohebbi, N., De Felice, F. (2016). Evaluation of sustainable development of wooden furniture industry using multi criteria decision making method. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, No. 8, pp. 387-394, doi: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.033.
• 3. Bernardi, A., Cantù, C.L., Cedrola, E. (2022). Key success factors to be sustainable and innovative in the textile and fashion industry: Evidence from two Italian luxury brands. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 116-133, doi: 10.1080/20932685.2021.2011766.
• 4. Bocken, N.M.P., Short, S.W., Rana, P., Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, No. 65, pp. 42-56, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039.
• 5. Da Giau, A., Macchion, L., Caniato, F., Caridi, M., Danese, P., Rinaldi, R., Vinelli, A. (2016). Sustainability practices and web-based communication: An analysis of the Italian fashion industry. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 72- 88, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2015-0061.
• 6. Dhanda, U., Shroitryia, V.K. (2021). Corporate sustainability: the new organizational reality. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management. Vol. 16, No. 3/4, pp. 464- 487, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-01-2020-1886.
• 7. Dou, Y., Li, Y., Dong, K., Ren, X. (2021). Dynamic linkages between economic policy uncertainty and the carbon futures market: does COVID-19 pandemic matter? Resources Policy, Vol. 75, No. 102455, pp. 1-14, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102455.
• 8. Dyllick, T., Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 11, pp. 130-141, doi: 10.1002/bse.323.
• 9. Elsayed, K. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: Does inventory management matter? International Journal of Supply Chain and Operations Resilience, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 139- 156, doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSCOR.2015.069925.
• 10. Farah, T., Li, J., Li, Z., Shamsuddin A. (2021). The non-linear effect of CSR on firms’ systematic risk: international evidence. Journal International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Vol. 71, No. 101288, pp. 1-15, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101288.
• 11. Gamal, L., Wahba, H., Correia, M.R. (2002). Corporate sustainability performance throughout the firm life cycle: case of Egipt. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 79-97, doi: https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i1p6.
• 12. Genedy, A., Sakr, A. (2017). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in developing countries. Case of Egypt. International Journal of Business and Economic Development (IJBED), No. 5(2). Retrieved from: https://www.ijbed.org/details&cid=144.
• 13. Green, T., Peloza, J. (2011). How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28, p. 55, doi: 10.1108/07363761111101949.
• 14. Gupta, S., Pirsch, J.A. (2006). Taxonomy of Cause-Related Marketing Research: Current Findings and Future Research Directions. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Mark, 15, pp. 25-43, doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v15n01_02.
• 15. Hasan, I., Kobeissi, N., Liu, L., Wang, H. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: The mediating role of productivity. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 149, No. 3, pp. 671-688, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3066-1.
• 16. Jin, B.E., Cedrola, E., Kim, N.L. (2019). Process innovation: Hidden secret to success and efficiency. In B. Jin, E. Cedrola (Eds.), Process innovation in the global fashion industry (pp. 1-23), doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52352-5_1.
• 17. Jung, S., Jin, B. (2014). A theoretical investigation of slow fashion: Sustainable future of the apparel industry. International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 510- 519, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12127.
• 18. KPMG (2017). The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017. https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2017/10/the-kpmg-survey-of-corporate responsibility-reporting-2017.html, 11.10.2021.
• 19. Kurucz, E.C., Colbert, B.A., Lüdeke-Freund, F., Upward, A., Willard, B. (2017). Relational leadership for strategic sustainability: Practices and capabilities to advance the design and assessment of sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, No. 140, pp. 189-204, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.087.
• 20. Macchion, L., Moretto, A., Caniato, F., Caridi, M., Danese, P., Spina, G., Vinelli, A. (2017). Improving innovation performance through environmental practices in the fashion industry: The moderating effect of internationalisation and the influence of collaboration. Production Planning and Control, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 190-201, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2016.1233361.
• 21. Nathaniel, S.P., Murshed, M., Bassim, M. (2021). The nexus between economic growth, energy use, international trade and ecological footprints: the role of environmental regulations in N11 countries. Energy, Ecology and Environment, No. 6, pp. 496-512, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-020-00205-y.
• 22. Nielsen Global Research (2014). Doing Well by Doing Good. https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/report/2014/doing-well-by-doing-good/, 11.05.2021.
• 23. Oskam, I., Bossink, B., de Man, A.P. (2018). The interaction between network ties and business modeling: Case studies of sustainability-oriented innovations. Journal of Cleaner Production, No. 177, pp. 555-566, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.202.
• 24. Patel, J.D., Gadhavi, D.D., Shukla, S.Y. (2017). Consumers’ Responses to Cause Related Marketing: Moderating Influence of Cause Involvement and Skepticism on Attitude and Purchase Intention. International Review in Public Nonprofit Marketing, 14, pp. 1-18, doi: 10.1007/s12208-016-0151-1.
• 25. Pavione, E., Pezzetti, R., Matteo, D.A. (2016). Emerging competitive strategies in the global luxury industry in the perspective of sustainable development: The case of Kering group. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 241-261. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjanMWJyPn0AhVQzKQKHeNnCIIQFnoECAwQAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.managementdynamics.ro%2Findex.php%2Fjournal%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F162%2F125&usg=AOvVaw2vA2WudfK5kB41kAawiuee.
• 26. Qamar, N. (2013). Impact of cause related marketing on consumer purchase intention: mediating role of corporate image, consumers’ attitude and brand attractiveness’. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 16, pp. 633-643 doi: 10.5829/ idosi.mejsr.2013.16.05.11846.
• 27. Ren, X., Cheng, C., Wang, Z., Yan, C. (2021). Spillover and dynamic effects of energy transition and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions for the European Union: a dynamic spatial panel model. Sustainable Development, Vol. 1, No. 29, pp. 228-242, doi: 10.1002/sd2144.
• 28. Ren, X., Li, Y., Shahbaz, M., Dond, K., Lu, Z. (2022). Climate risk and corporate Environmental Performance: Empirical evidence from China. Sustainable Production and Consumption, No. 30, pp. 467-477, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.023.
• 29. Robinson, S.R., Irmak, C., Jayachandran, S. (2012). Choice of cause in cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing, 4, pp. 126-139.
• 30. Ruan, X., Ding, N., Yang, J. (2022). Dual-level eco-efficiency analysis in sustainable management: An empirical study on textile manufacturers and supply chains in China. Journal of Environmental Management, No. 304, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1016/ j.jenvman.2021.114227.
• 31. Schaltegger, S., Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 20, pp. 222-237, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682.
• 32. Scuotto, V., Garcia-Perez, A., Cillo, V., Giacosa, E. (2020). Do stakeholder capabilities promotesustainable business innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises? Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Research, No. 119, pp. 131-141, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.025.
• 33. Tartaglione, C., Gallante, F., Guazzo, G. (Eds.) (2012). Sostenibilitŕ: Moda. Cosa significa, Comesi applica, Dove sta andando l’idea di sostenibilitŕ nel sistema moda. ARES 2.0.
• 34. Vlachos, P.A. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer-Firm Emotional Attachment: Moderating Effects of Consumer Traits. European Journal of Marketing, 46, pp. 1559-1581, doi: 10.1108/03090561211259989.
• 35. Wahba, H., Elsayed, K. (2015). The mediating effect of financial performance on the relationship between social responsibility and ownership structure. Future Business Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1-2, pp. 1-12, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2015.02.001.
• 36. Witek, L. (2015). Implemantacja Cause Related Marketing – korzyści i warunki tworzenia skutecznych programów. Logistyka, 2, pp. 1633-1639.
• 37. World Commission on Environmental Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 38. Youn, S., Kim, H. (2008). Antecedents of Consumer Attitudes toward Cause-Related Marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 48, pp. 123-137, doi: 10.2501/S0021849908080136.