Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The imperative to harmonize economic growth with environmental preservation has catalyzed transformations in strategic management in current global landscape. The "Port-Park-City" (PPC) model, epitomized by the success of China Merchants Group Port (CMPort), offers a compelling case of how strategic sustainability revolutionizes international business. This research probes the innovative PPC model, initially thriving within China, to assess its adaptability to international investments. Through a meticulous analysis of two pivotal investment cases—the China Belarus Industrial Park (GSIP) and the Djibouti Port Industrial Park—we investigate the replicability of the PPC model and its capacity to confer a sustainable competitive edge. Adopting a "coupling effect" perspective, we scrutinize commonalities in PPC model implementation in these cases. This research address the pressing demand for global enterprises to adapt to evolving paradigms of strategic management. Our findings underscore the PPC model's potential not only in bolstering business success but also in advancing global sustainability, fostering competitive advantage, and catalyzing business model innovation. This encapsulates the essence of sustainable strategic management.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
671--680
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 34 poz., rys.
Twórcy
autor
- Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
autor
- Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
autor
- Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Bibliografia
- [1] Afonasieva, AV. Economic presence of China in countries along the route of the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2018. (7), pp.142-148.
- [2] Braeutigam, D and Tang, XY. "Going Global in Groups": Structural Transformation and China's Special Economic Zones Overseas. World Development, 2014(63), pp.78–91.
- [3] Brass, JN. Djibouti's unusual resource curse. Journal of Modern African Studies. 2018(46) 4. pp. 523-545.
- [4] Chen, YH; van Marrewijk, C; Xu, CS and Zuo, CM. Does the Belt and Road Initiative affect the business environment of participating countries? Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy. 2022. 27 (3), pp.425-444.
- [5] Cheng, LK. Three questions on China's "Belt and Road Initiative". China Economic Review. 2016. (40), pp.309-313.
- [6] Du, JL and Zhang, YF. Does One Belt One Road initiative promote Chinese overseas direct investment? China Economic Review. 2018(47), pp.189-205.
- [7] Dunford, M and Liu, WD. Chinese perspectives on the Belt and road initiative. Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society. 2019(12), pp.145–165.
- [8] Dunford,M; Gao,BY and Liu, WD. Geography and the theory of uneven and combined development: Theorizing uniqueness and the return of China. Environment and Planning A. 2021(53), vol. 53, pp. 890-916.
- [9] Feng, L; Liu, LF and Zhang, H. Game Theory-Based Pathway Selection for Fair and Reciprocal Cooperation among Ports along the Maritime Silk Road. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2019.
- [10] Great Stone. 2021. https://www.zbgyy.cn/cn/info_17.aspx?itemid=2340&lcid=10
- [11] Huo, WW., Chen, PSL., Zhang, W and Li, KX. International port investment of Chinese port- related companies. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics. 2019(11). pp. 430¬454.
- [12] Hutchinson, FE; Yean, TS. The Bri in Malaysia's Port Sector: Drivers Of Success And Failure. Asian Affairs. 2021(52), pp.688-721
- [13] Ji, C and Li, ZL. Development Model and Practice Logic of Djibouti International Free Trade Zone. 2019(7), pp.37-43.
- [14] Jin, G; Shen, KR and Jiang, Y. Does the Belt and Road Initiative cause more troubled Chinese overseas investments? International Review of Economics & Finance. 2021(72), pp.217-232.
- [15] Liu, W. 2016. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1705252683443779852&wfr=spider&for=pc
- [16] Liu, ZG; Dunford, M and Liu, WD. Coupling national geo-political economic strategies and the Belt and Road Initiative: The China-Belarus Great Stone Industrial Park. Political Geography. 2021(84) 84: 102296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102296
- [17] Liu, ZG; Schindler, S and Liu, WD. Demystifying Chinese overseas investment in infrastructure: Port development, the Belt and Road Initiative and regional development. Journal of Transport Geography. 2020(87).
- [18] Liu ZG and Wang T. The multi-scale coupling construction mechanism of China's overseas intergovernmental cooperation parks: A case study of China-Belarus Industrial Park. Acta Geographica Sinica. 2020(75), 1185-1198.
- [19] Lissovolik, Y. and Vinokurov, E. Extending BRICS to BRICS+: Potential for development finance, connectivity, and financial stability. Area Development and Policy, 2018, 4(2), 117–133.
- [20] Lobyrev, V; Tikhomirov, A; Tsukarev, T and Evgeny, V. Belt and Road transport corridors: Barriers and investments. Social Science Electronic Publishing 2018 (50). Retrieved from Saint Petersburg.
- [21] Logan Pauley and Hamza Shad, “Gwadar: Emerging Port City or Chinese Colony?,” The Diplomat, 5 October 2018, https://thediplomat.com/
- [22] Ren, WW. 2016. https://www.imsilkroad.com/news/p/329627.html
- [23] Shibasaki, R; Tanabe, S; Kato, H and Lee, PTW. Could Gwadar Port in Pakistan Be a New Gateway? A Network Simulation Approach in the Context of the Belt and Road Initiative. Sustainability. 2019(11), 5757; doi:10.3390/su11205757
- [24] Shi, YF; Wang XP. Shi Yifeng; Wang Xingping. Research on the Interactive Development and Influencing Factors of Overseas Parks and Local Cities: The Case of China-Belarus Industrial Park. Urban Studies. 2019(26) 3, pp. 49-58.
- [25] Tao, CL; Liu, ST; Tian, Y; Gu, XS and Cheng, BD. Effects of China's OFDI on Exports: A Context Analysis with the "21st-Century Maritime Silk Road'' Regions. Journal of Coastal Research. 2019(94), pp. 903-907.
- [26] Terry Mobley. The Belt and Road Initiative. Strategic Studies Quarterly. 2019(13): pp. 52-72.
- [27] Yang, GJ; Huang, XH; Huang, JH and Chen, HY. Assessment of the effects of infrastructure investment under the belt and road initiative. China Economic Review. 2020 (6).
- [28] Yarashevich, V. Political economy of modern Belarus: Going against mainstream? Europe-Asia Studies, 2014, 66(10), pp.1703–1734.
- [29] Yu, HC; Fang, ZX ; Peng, GJ ; Feng, MX. Revealing the Linkage Network Dynamic Structures of Chinese Maritime Ports through Automatic Information System Data. Sustainability. 2017(9), 10.
- [30] Vangeli,and Anastas. "China's Engagement with the Sixteen Countries of Central, East and Southeast Europe under the Belt and Road Initiative." China and the world economy(English version). (2017):24.
- [31] Wang, H. China's Approach to the Belt and Road Initiative: Scope, Character and Sustainability. 2019(22), pp. 29-55.
- [32] Wang ML and Wu YX. Research on the Development of China ASEAN Port Construction under the the Belt and Road Initiative. Social Sciences in Guangxi.2018(6), pp.82-86.
- [33] Wu, YD. 2021. https://www.sohu.com/a/493388840_120578424
- [34] Zhao H. Development and prospect of China-Belarus economic and trade relations. Russian Central Asian & East European Market. 2016(3).
Uwagi
1. Pełne imiona podano na stronie internetowej czasopisma w "Author Index."
2. Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-96ab664b-4822-41c8-9974-9f5e6089f6b8
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.