Comparison of the effects of anthropogenic seismic events and natural earthquakes on buried infrastructure network components

• Autorzy: Rusek Janusz , Słowik Leszek , Tajduś Krzysztof

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/bpasts.2023.147347

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Mining tremors may have an impact on the safety risk of steel pipelines through their effects. It is therefore important to quantify the impact of a high-energy mining tremor in terms of strength. In addition, a comparison of the results obtained with the effect of a seismic tremor can illustrate the scale of such a hazard. Recently, this has been a very frequently raised issue in the area of surface protection against negative mining impacts and the protection of post-mining areas. Ensuring safe use is particularly important for gas transmission elements. This paper presents the results of a comparative analysis of the impact of mining tremors and seismic impacts on a specimen steel pipeline segment. The analyzed pipeline is located in the eastern part of Poland in the area of paraseismic impacts of the LGCD (Legnica-Glogow Copper District) mine. For this purpose, an analytical approach was used to assess the impact of seismic wave propagation on underground linear infrastructure facilities. Accelerogram records for the 02-06-2023 seismic tremor from Turkey and the mining tremor for 11-25-2020 were used. In the case of the design of underground pipelines, the cross-section of the element for which measures describing wall stress and the ovalization of the cross-section are determined is usually considered. In the situation of the influence of seismic wave propagation or so-called permanent ground deformation, the response of the pipeline in the longitudinal direction is analyzed. As a final result, longitudinal strains transferred to the pipeline as a consequence of the propagating seismic wave and mining tremor were determined. The absolute difference between the deformations in the ground and along the length of the pipeline was determined. This type of analysis has not been carried out before and provides new insights into the topic of paraseismic impacts on the scale of their interaction with natural earthquakes. Mining tremor data was obtained from the mine’s seismological department. The seismic tremor data, on the other hand, was downloaded via the publicly available ESM (Engineering Strong- Motion Database).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

pipeline; dynamic; seismic; mining

PL

rurociąg; górnictwo; dynamiczność; sejsmiczność

• Wydawca: Polska Akademia Nauk, Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych
• Czasopismo: Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Technical Sciences
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 71, nr 6
• Strony: art. no. e147347
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Rusek Janusz

• AGH University of Krakow al. Adama Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0368-2580

autor

Słowik Leszek

• ITB Building Research Institute ul. Filtrowa 1, 00-611 Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8770-1595

autor

Tajduś Krzysztof

• AGH University of Krakow al. Adama Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2014-0900

Bibliografia

• [1] K.S. Hudson, M.B. Hudson, J. Hu, A. Harounian, and M. Lew, “Quantifying Earthquake Hazards to Lifeline Systems at a Regional Scale with a Study of the Los Angeles Water System Pipeline Network,” in Lifelines 2022, 2022, pp. 428–439.
• [2] N.S. Kwong, K.S. Jaiswal, J.W. Baker, N. Luco, K.A. Ludwig, and V.J. Stephens, “Earthquake Risk of Gas Pipelines in the Conterminous United States and Its Sources of Uncertainty,” ASCE-ASME J. Risk. Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part A.-Civ. Eng., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 4021081, 2022, doi: 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001202.
• [3] Z. Jing, J. Wang, Y. Zhu, and Y. Feng, “Effects of land subsidence resulted from coal mining on soil nutrient distributions in a loess area of China,” J. Clean Prod., vol. 177, pp. 350–361, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.191.
• [4] K. Tajdu´s, R. Misa, and A. Sroka, “Analysis of the surface horizontal displacement changes due to longwall panel advance,” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., vol. 104, pp. 119–125, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.02.005.
• [5] K. Tajdu´s et al., “Analysis of Mining-Induced Delayed Surface Subsidence,” Minerals, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 1187, 2021, doi: 10.3390/min11111187.
• [6] L. Szojda and Ł. Kapusta, “Numerical Analysis of Buildings Located on the Edge of the Post-Mining Basin,” Arch. Min. Sci., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 125–140, 2023, doi: 10.24425/ams.2023.144321.
• [7] P. Boroń, J.M. Dulińska, and D. Jasińska, “Impact of High Energy Mining-Induced Seismic Shocks from Different Mining Activity Regions on a Multiple-Support Road Viaduct,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 16, p. 4045, 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13164045.
• [8] E. Pilecka, K. Stec, J. Chodacki, Z. Pilecki, R. Szermer-Zaucha, and K. Krawiec, “The Impact of High-Energy Mining-Induced Tremor in a Fault Zone on Damage to Buildings,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 14, p. 4112, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14144112.
• [9] P. Sopata, T. Stoch, A. Wójcik, and D. Mrocheń, “Land Surface Subsidence Due to Mining-Induced Tremors in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (Poland)—Case Study,” Remote Sens., vol. 12, no. 23,p. 3923, 2020, doi: 10.3390/rs12233923.
• [10] K. Zhou, P. Małkowski, L. Dou, K. Yang, and Y. Chai, “Using Elastic Wave Velocity Anomaly to Predict Rockburst Hazard in Coal Mines,” Arch. Min. Sci., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 141–164, 2023, doi: 10.24425/ams.2023.144322.
• [11] D. Tomaszewski, J. Rapiński, L. Stolecki, and M. Śmieja, “Switching Edge Detector as a Tool for Seismic Events Detection Based on GNSS Timeseries,” Arch. Min. Sci., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 317–332, 2022, doi: 10.24425/ams.2022.141461.
• [12] F. Pachla and T. Tatara, “Dynamic Resistance of Residential Masonry Building with Structural Irregularities,” in Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures III, Springer, 2020, pp. 335–347.
• [13] J. Rusek, L. Słowik, and D. Rataj, “Paraseismic Resistance Evaluation for Existing Steel Conveyor Bridge Subjected to Mining Tremors,” Arch. Min. Sci., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 603–630, 2022, doi: 10.24425/ams.2022.143677.
• [14] A.K. Chopra, “Dynamics of structures. theory and applications to earthquake engineering,” in Earthquake Engineering, Pearson, 2017.
• [15] P. Kalisz and K. Stec, “Oddziaływanie wstrząsów górniczych na gazociągi,” Przegląd Górniczy, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 1–8, 2016. (in Polish)
• [16] Seismic Guidelines for Water Pipelines. American Lifelines Alliance, 2005.
• [17] S.R. Dash and S.K. Jain, “IITK-GSDMA Guidelines for seismic design of buried pipelines: provisions with commentary and explanatory examples,” Kanpur, India, National Information Center of Earthquake Engineering, 2007.
• [18] IITK-GSDMA. Guidelines for the seismic design of buried pipelines. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, 2007.
• [19] D. Bekmirzaev, I. Mirzaev, R. Kishanov, N. Mansurova, and S. Sabirova, “Study of the Mass Effect of a Complex Node of UnderGround Pipelines of Orthogonal Configuration Based on Real Earthquake Records,” in Proceedings of MPCPE 2021, 2022, pp. 371–383.
• [20] H. Lu, X. Jiang, Z.-D. Xu, H. Ni, and L. Fu, “Mechanical behavior of high-pressure pipeline installed through horizontal directional drilling under seismic loads,” Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., vol. 136, p. 105073, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2023.105073.
• [21] M.S. Israilov, “Action of an Oblique Seismic Wave on an Underground Pipeline,” Mech. Solids, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1006–1015, 2022, doi: 10.3103/S0025654422050089.
• [22] V. Calugaru, A. Nisar, C. Hitchcock, M.W. Greenfield, and R.M. Nelson, “Seismic Reliability Assessment of Buried Pipelines Subjected to Significant Permanent Ground Deformations in an M9 Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake,” in Lifelines 2022, 2022, pp. 716–726.
• [23] S. Toprak, E. Nacaroglu, M. Ceylan, and T.D. O’Rourke, “Effects of Ground Strain and Pipeline Orientation on Pipeline Damage during Earthquakes,” in Lifelines 2022, 2022, pp. 489–499.
• [24] D. Choudhury and C.H. Chaudhuri, “Buried Pipeline Subjected to Ground Deformation and Seismic Landslide: A State-of-the-Art Review,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (Beijing 2022), 2022, pp. 363–375.
• [25] Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe. American Lifelines Alliance, 2001.
• [26] M.J. O’Rourke and X. Liu, “Seismic design of buried and offshore pipelines,” MCEER Monograph MCEER-12-MN04, p. 380, 2012.
• [27] Y. Huo, S.M.M.H. Gomaa, T. Zayed, and M. Meguid, “Review of analytical methods for stress and deformation analysis of buried water pipes considering pipe-soil interaction,” Undergr. Space, vol. 13, pp. 205–227, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.undsp.2023.02.017.
• [28] Z. Guo, J. Han, M. Hesham El Naggar, B. Hou, Z. Zhong, and X. Du, “Numerical analysis of buried pipelines response to bidirectional non-uniform seismic excitation,” Comput. Geotech., vol. 159, p. 105485, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105485.
• [29] K. Zhao, N. Jiang, C. Zhou, H. Li, Z. Cai, and B. Zhu, “Dynamic behavior and failure of buried gas pipeline considering the pipe connection form subjected to blasting seismic waves,” Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 170, p. 108495, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108495.
• [30] G. Baltzopoulos, R. Baraschino, E. Chioccarelli, P. Cito, A. Vitale, and I. Iervolino, “Near-source ground motion in the M7. 8 Gaziantep (Turkey) earthquake,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 3903–3912, 2023, doi: 10.1002/eqe.3939.
• [31] G. Papazafeiropoulos and V. Plevris, “Kahramanmaras-Gaziantep, Turkiye Mw 7.8 Earthquake on February 6, 2023: Preliminary Report on Strong Ground Motion and Building Response Estimations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13088, 2023.
• [32] Episodes Platform, TCS AH Consortium https://episodesplatform.eu/?lang=pl#episodes:
• [33] N.M. Newmark and W.J. Hall, “Pipeline design to resist large fault displacement,” in Proceedings of US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1975, vol. 1975, pp. 416–425.
• [34] R. Czarny, Z. Pilecki, and D. Drzewi´nska, “The application of seismic interferometry for estimating a 1D S-wave velocity model with the use of mining induced seismicity,” J. Sustainable Mining, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 209–214, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jsm.2018.09.001.
• [35] J. Wang and T. Tanimoto, “Estimation of Vs30 at the EarthScope Transportable Array Stations by Inversion of Low-Frequency Seismic Noise,” J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth, vol. 127, no. 4, p. e2021JB023469, 2022.
• [36] “IV – EQUATIONS,” in Assessment of Safety and Risk with a Microscopic Model of Detonation, C.-O. Leiber and B. Dobratz, Eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2003, pp. 41–78.
• [37] A. Lesmana, A. Priyono, and T. Yudistira, “A Resolution Enhancement of Rayleigh Wave Dispersive Imaging using Modified Phase-Shift Method,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, vol. 318, no. 1, p. 12019.
• [38] M.J. O’Rourke, G. Castro, and I. Hossain, “Horizontal soil strain due to seismic waves,” J. Geotech. Eng., vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1173–1187, 1984.
• [39] M. Shinozuka and T. Koike, Estimation of structural strains in underground lifeline pipes. Columbia University, Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, 1979.
• [40] INGV, ESM Engineering Strong-Motion Database, 2023. https://esm-db.eu/#/event/INT-20230206_0000008.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).