Sustainable multi-criteria decision port development framework

• Autorzy: Županović Dino , Gundić Ana , Zekić Astrid , Mavra Tomislav

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.18.04.10

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The specific features of various ports create difficulties for county port authorities in Zadar County and other coastal regions of Croatia in effectively performing daily tasks like managing, maintaining, constructing, and operating ports. The reason for this is the increased presence of various elements that directly affect decision-making regarding the port's progress. Therefore, it has been acknowledged that it is necessary to establish a methodology that allows decision-makers (county port authorities) to make objective decisions regarding the future direction of port development. This article presents a methodology proposal based on the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method of multi-criteria decision-making. When determining the methodology, special attention was paid to the decision-makers, who were found to possess specific professional knowledge in their activity but rarely possess prior expertise in multi-criteria decision-making. Hence, it was crucial to establish a methodology that would be both straightforward and suitable for adoption by decision-makers themselves. The AHP method, aided by a wide range of easily accessible and even cost-free tools, facilitates this through its visual representation of goals, criteria, sub-criteria, interconnections, and subsequent outcomes. This approach ensures the feasibility of ongoing monitoring throughout the decision-making process. Ultimately, the proposed methodology was verified on the examples of five port areas based on conducted empirical research, which, with their properties, satisfy different directions of development. At the same time, the obtained results confirm its applicability.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

port development; port operations; energy efficiency; Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis; MCDA; Analytical Hierarchy Process; AHP; sustainability; infrastructure development; transport systems

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 18 No. 4
• Strony: 831--845
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Županović Dino

• University of Zadar, Zadar, Croatia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0346-0101

autor

Gundić Ana

• University of Zadar, Zadar, Croatia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-7862

autor

Zekić Astrid

• University of Zadar, Zadar, Croatia

autor

Mavra Tomislav

• University of Zadar, Zadar, Croatia

Bibliografia

• [1] Agencija za obalni linijski pomorski promet. Available online: https://agencija-zolpp.hr/ (accessed on 1 May 2024)
• [2] Al-Harbi, K. M. A.-S. Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management. 2001, 19(1), pp. 19-27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0263786399000381
• [3] Bertolini, M.; Braglia, M.; Carmignani, G. Application of the AHP methodology in making a proposal for a public work contract. International Journal of Project Management. 2006, 24(5), 422-430. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.01.005, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0263786306000123
• [4] Chang, C.-W.; Wu, C.-R.; Lin, C.-T.; Chen, H.-C. An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machine. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2007, 52(2), pp. 296-307. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223228484_An_application_of_AHP_and_sensitivity_analysis_for_selecting_the_best_slicing_machine
• [5] Guze, S.; Neumann, T.; Wilczyński, P. Multi-Criteria Optimisation of Liquid Cargo Transport According to Linguistic Approach to the Route Selection Task. 2017, 24, pp. 89-96. https://sciendo.com/pl/article/10.1515/pomr-2017-0026
• [6] Lai, V. S.; Wong, B. K.; Cheung, W. Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection. European Journal of Operational Research. 2002, 137(1), pp. 134-144. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377221701000844
• [7] Liu, Y.; Eckert, C. M.; Earl, C. A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Sys-tems with Applications. 2020, 161, article no. 113738. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0957417420305625
• [8] Marinković V. Croatian Islands - insight into the traffic-geographical features of accessibility. Geoadria. 2018, 23(2), pp. 177-205. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/321076
• [9] Nacionalni plan razvoja luka otvorenih za javni promet od županijskog i lokalnog značaja – nacrt konačnog izvješća. Lis-topad 2016. Available online: https://mmpi.gov.hr/more-86/projekti-113/nacionalni-plan-razvoja-luka-otvorenih-za-javni-promet-od-zupanijskog-i-lokalnog-znacaja/18202 (accessed on 1 May 2024)
• [10] Naredba o razvrstaju luka otvorenih za javni promet na području Zadarske županije.Official Gazette No. 7/2021-149. Available online: https://narodnenovine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2021_01_7_149.html (accessed on 1 May 2024)
• [11] Nosal, K.; Solecka, K. Application of AHP Method for Multi-criteria Evaluation of Variants of the Integration of Urban Public Transport. Transportation Research Procedia. 2014, 3, pp. 269-278. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2]2146514001690
• [12] Novak, G. Hvar kroz stoljeća; Izdavački Zavod JAZU: Zagreb, Croatia, 1972.
• [13] Odluka o osnivanju Lučke uprave. Službeni glasnik Zadarske županije 6/98, 15/03, 14/04, 11/05, 12/05, 9/07, 6/11, 16/15. Available online: https://vlada.gov.hr/UserDocsImages//2016/Sjednice/2015/246%20sjednica%20Vlade//246%20-%2020d.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2024)
• [14] Opačić V.T. Geografski aspekt proučavanja trajektnog prometa: primjer hrvatskog otočja. Geoadria. 2022, 7(2), pp. 95-109. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/14771
• [15] Özcan, T.; Çelebi, N.; Esnaf, Ş. Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem. Expert Systems with Applications. 2011, 38(8), pp. 9773-9779. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0957417411002284
• [16] Peng, Y.; Kou, G.; Wang, G.; Wu, W.; Shi, Y. Ensemble of Software Defect Predictors: An AHP-based Evaluation Method. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. 2011, 10(01), pp. 187-206. https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/epdf/10.1142/S0219622011004282
• [17] Plan razvoja Zadarske županije 2021. – 2027. Zadar. 2021. Available online: https://www.zadarska-zupanija.hr/images/dokumenti/314/Plan_razvoja_Zadarske_%C5%BEupanije_za_razdoblje_od_2021._do_2027._godine.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2024)
• [18] Popis lučkih uprava na području Republike Hrvatske. Available online: https://mmpi.gov.hr/more/lucke-uprave/8456 (ac-cessed on 1 May 2024)
• [19] Saaty, R. W. The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling. 1987, 9(3-5), pp. 161-176. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/0270025587904738
• [20] Saaty, T. L. (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences. 2008, 1(1), pp. 83-98. https://www.rafikulislam.com/uploads/resourses/197245512559a37aadea6d.pdf
• [21] Saaty, T. L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research. 1990, 48(1), pp. 9-26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/037722179090057I
• [22] Saaty, T. L. Decision making for leaders: The analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world; 3rd Revised edition; Pitts-burgh: RWS Publications, 2012.
• [23] Saaty, T. L.; Vargas, L. G. Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applica-tions with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. New York: Springer, 2006. http://www.untag-smd.ac.id/files/Perpustakaan_ Digital_1/DECISION%20MAKING%20Decision%20Making%20with%20the%20Analytic%20Network%20Process.pdf
• [24] Strategija prometnog razvoja Republike Hrvatske za razdoblje od 2014. do 2030. godine. Official Gazette No. 131/2014-2465, Available online: https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2014_11_131_2465.html (accessed on 1 May 2024)
• [25] Triantaphyllou E. Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Applied Optimization. 2000, 44, Springer, Boston, MA, 5-6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/209805531_Multi-Criteria_Decision_Making_Methods_A_Comparative_Study
• [26] Uredba o razvrstaju luka otvorenih za javni promet i luka posebne namjene. Official Gazette No. 110/04, 82/07. Available online: https://www.zakon.hr/cms.htm?id=29397 (accessed on 1 May 2024)
• [27] Vaidya, O. S.; Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research. 2006, 169(1), pp. 1-29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377221704003054
• [28] Veisi, H.; Liaghati, H.; Alipour, A. Developing an ethics-based approach to indicators of sustainable agriculture using ana-lytic hierarchy process (AHP). Ecological Indicators. 2016, 60, pp. 644-654. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1470160X15004331
• [29] Zakon o pomorskom dobru i morskim lukama. Official Gazette No. 158/03, 100/04, 141/06, 38/09, 123/11. Official Gazette No. 83/23. Available online: https://www.zakon.hr/z/505/Zakon-o-pomorskom-dobru-i-morskim-lukama (accessed on 1 May 2024)
• [30] Xanthopulos, Z.; Melachrinoudis, E.; Solomon, M. M. Interactive Multiobjective Group Decision Making with Interval Pa-rameters. Management Science. 2000, 46(12), pp. 1585-1601. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227447278_Interactive_Multiobjective_Group_Decision_

Uwagi

1. Pełne imiona podano na stronie internetowej czasopisma w "Authors in other databases."

2. Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).