Sustainable organizations the state of research based on bibliometric analysis

• Autorzy: Próchniak Joanna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2025.216.28

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The aim of the article is to identify the current academic research on the perception of sustainable organizations management and development. Methodology approach: The study uses a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology using the SCOPUS database to identify the framework of sustainable organizations in research. The VOSviewer tool was used to exercise the co-occurrence of keywords to select specific research topics to be included in the analysis. Findings: Organizations have a key role to play in mitigating climate change, so new business models are needed to manage social, regulatory and economic interrelationships. New sustainable models are shaped by shareholders’ business objectives, stakeholder expectations and regulatory frameworks. The aspects that emerged from the bibliometric data analysis of co-occurrences and word clusters were the following: socio-economic framework (with stakeholders analyzed independently), managing for sustainability, innovation, circular business models and supply chain management. In spite of many sustainability studies, there is still a gap in knowledge on how to proceed and build sustainable business models of organizations. Research limitations and implications: Analyzing the spectrum of research on sustainable organizations to date can support future research on sustainable value creation generators and models for sustainable organizations. An important limitation factor for analyses based on the literature is the risk of omitting important aspects of sustainable organizations, as research based on co-occurrence of words has such limitations. Practical implications: The research impacts interrelated and complex relationships among helices in the Triple helix model: academia, business, and regulations. It aims to trigger innovations in the business sphere. It is useful to bring academic research into practice as part of a Triple Helix approach and its more developed forms, clearly addressing regulatory challenges and practical application in business. Originality/value: Identifying the state of research on sustainable organizations aims to recognize the current trends in sustainable organization better and understand the picture of academia approach.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainable organization; sustainable development of organization; sustainable business model

PL

zrównoważona organizacja; zrównoważony rozwój organizacji; zrównoważony model biznesowy

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: z. 216
• Strony: 455--473
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 91 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Próchniak Joanna

• University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Management

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1096-3196

Bibliografia

• 1. Abdelkafi, N., Xu, J., Pero, M., Ciccullo, F., Masi, A. (2023). Does the combination of sustainable business model patterns lead to truly sustainable business models? Critical analysis of existing frameworks and extensions. Journal of Business Economics, 93(4), pp. 597-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-023-01140-0.
• 2. Abhayawansa, S., Adams, C.A., Neesham, C. (2021). Accountability and governance in pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals: conceptualising how governments create value. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(4), pp. 923-945. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2020-4667.
• 3. Acciarini, C., Borelli, F., Capo, F., Cappa, F., Sarrocco, C. (2022). Can digitalization favour the emergence of innovative and sustainable business models? A qualitative exploration in the automotive sector. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(3), pp. 335-352. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-02-2021-0033.
• 4. Adams, C.A. (2017). Conceptualising the contemporary corporate value creation process. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(4), pp. 906-931. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2016-2529.
• 5. Agrawal, R., Wankhede, V.A., Kumar, A., Upadhyay, A., Garza-Reyes, J.A. (2022). Nexus of circular economy and sustainable business performance in the era of digitalization. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(3), pp. 748-774. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2020-0676.
• 6. Alexander, A., Kumar, M., Walker, H. (2018). A decision theory perspective on complexity in performance measurement and management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(11), pp. 2214-2244. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2016- 0632.
• 7. Allen, S.D., Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. (2021). Expanding conceptual boundaries of the sustainable supply chain management and circular economy nexus. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2021.100011.
• 8. Alzoubi, H.M., Ahmed, G., Al-Gasaymeh, A., Al Kurdi, B. (2020). Empirical study on sustainable supply chain strategies and its impact on competitive priorities: The mediating role of supply chain collaboration. Management Science Letters, 10(3), pp. 703-708. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.9.008.
• 9. Annunziata, E., Pucci, T., Frey, M., Zanni, L. (2018). The role of organizational capabilities in attaining corporate sustainability practices and economic performance: Evidence from Italian wine industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, pp. 1300-1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.035.
• 10. Armani, A.B., Petrini, M., Santos, A.C. (2020). What are the attributes of sustainable leadership? Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 22(4), pp. 820-835. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v22i4.4086.
• 11. Bai, C., Dallasega, P., Orzes, G., Sarkis, J. (2020). Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776.
• 12. Benstead, A.V., Hendry, L.C., Stevenson, M. (2018). Horizontal collaboration in response to modern slavery legislation: An action research project. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(12), pp. 2286-2312. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2017-0611.
• 13. Blas, J., Roca, M.R., Bulmer, E. (2022). The importance of sustainable leadership among company directors in the audio-visual sector in Spain: a cultural, ethical, and legal perspective. Communication and Society, 35(4), pp. 89-100. https://doi.org/10.15581/ 003.35.4.89-100.
• 14. Bocken, N.M.P., Short, S.W. (2021). Unsustainable business models - Recognising and resolving institutionalised social and environmental harm. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127828.
• 15. Bölen, M.C., Calisir, H., Özen, Ü. (2021). Flow theory in the information systems life cycle: The state of the art and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), pp. 546-580. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12641.
• 16. Boons, F., Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-ofthe-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, pp. 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007.
• 17. By, R.T. (2021). Leadership: In Pursuit of Purpose. Journal of Change Management, 21(1), pp. 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1861698.
• 18. Cai, Y. (2022). Neo-Triple Helix Model of Innovation Ecosystems: Integrating Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Models. Triple Helix, 9(1), pp. 76-106. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10029.
• 19. Cai, Y., Etzkowitz, H. (2020). Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future. In Triple Helix (Vol. 7, Iss. 2-3, pp. 189-226). Brill Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10003.
• 20. Carayannis, E.G., Grigoroudis, E., Del Giudice, M., Della Peruta, M.R., Sindakis, S. (2017). An exploration of contemporary organizational artifacts and routines in a sustainable excellence context. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(1), pp. 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0366.
• 21. Chari, A., Niedenzu, D., Despeisse, M., Machado, C.G., Azevedo, J.D., Boavida-Dias, R., Johansson, B. (2022). Dynamic capabilities for circular manufacturing supply chains-Exploring the role of Industry 4.0 and resilience. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), pp. 2500-2517. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3040.
• 22. Ciliberto, C., Szopik-Depczyńska, K., Tarczyńska-Łuniewska, M., Ruggieri, A., Ioppolo, G. (2021). Enabling the Circular Economy transition: a sustainable lean manufacturing recipe for Industry 4.0. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), pp. 3255-3272. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2801.
• 23. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards.
• 24. Daddi, T., Todaro, N.M., De Giacomo, M.R., Frey, M. (2018). A Systematic Review of the Use of Organization and Management Theories in Climate Change Studies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(4), pp. 456-474. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2015.
• 25. Delbridge, R., Helfen, M., Pekarek, A., Schuessler, E., Zietsma, C. (2024). Organizing Sustainably: Introduction to the Special Issue. Organization Studies, 45(1), pp. 7-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231217143.
• 26. Dellve, L., Eriksson, A. (2017). Health-promoting managerial work: A theoretical framework for a leadership program that supports knowledge and capability to craft sustainable work practices in daily practice and during organizational change. Societies, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7020012.
• 27. Dembek, K., Lüdeke-Freund, F., Rosati, F., Froese, T. (2023). Untangling business model outcomes, impacts and value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2296-2311. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3249
• 28. Dentchev, N., Baumgartner, R., Dieleman, H., Jóhannsdóttir, L., Jonker, J., Nyberg, T., Rauter, R., Rosano, M., Snihur, Y., Tang, X., van Hoof, B. (2016). Embracing the variety of sustainable business models: social entrepreneurship, corporate intrapreneurship, creativity, innovation, and other approaches to sustainability challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, pp. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.130.
• 29. Deveci, M., Brito-Parada, P.R., Pamucar, D., Varouchakis, E.A. (2022). Rough sets based Ordinal Priority Approach to evaluate sustainable development goals (SDGs) for sustainable mining. Resources Policy, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103049.
• 30. Di Maddaloni, F., Derakhshan, R. (2019). A leap from negative to positive bond. A step towards project sustainability. Administrative Sciences, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9020041.
• 31. Dijkstra, H., van Beukering, P., Brouwer, R. (2020). Business models and sustainable plastic management: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120967.
• 32. Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups Text with EEA relevance.
• 33. Durán-Romero, G., López, A.M., Beliaeva, T., Ferasso, M., Garonne, C., Jones, P. (2020a). Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120246.
• 34. Dwivedi, A., Agrawal, D., Jha, A., Gastaldi, M., Paul, S.K., D'Adamo, I. (2021). Addressing the Challenges to Sustainable Initiatives in Value Chain Flexibility: Implications for Sustainable Development Goals. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22, pp. 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00288-4.
• 35. Etienne, M., Du Toit, D.R., Pollard, S. (2011). ARDI: A Co-construction Method for Participatory Modeling in Natural Resources Management. Ecology and Society, 16(1).
• 36. Feng, X., Adams, D. (2023). Can leaders enhance followers' psychological capital? A framework to support leader-member exchange for sustainable organizations. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(6/7), pp. 1323-1334. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2022-0458.
• 37. Fundin, A., Lilja, J., Lagrosen, Y., Bergquist, B. (2020). Quality 2030: quality management for the future. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2020.1863778.
• 38. García-Morales, V.J., Lloréns-Montes, F.J., Verdú-Jover, A.J. (2008). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. British Journal of Management, 19(4), pp. 299-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00547.x.
• 39. García-Muiña, F., Medina-Salgado, M.S., González-Sánchez, R., Huertas-Valdivia, I., Ferrari, A.M., Settembre-Blundo, D. (2021). Industry 4.0-based dynamic Social Organizational Life Cycle Assessment to target the social circular economy in manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 327. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jclepro.2021.129439.
• 40. Genovese, A., Acquaye, A.A., Figueroa, A., Koh, S.C.L. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega (United Kingdom), 66, pp. 344-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.omega.2015.05.015.
• 41. Glover, J.L., Champion, D., Daniels, K.J., Dainty, A.J.D. (2014). An Institutional Theory perspective on sustainable practices across the dairy supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, pp. 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.027.
• 42. Hahn, R., Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: a review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, pp. 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.07.005.
• 43. Hahn, R., Reimsbach, D., Wickert, C. (2023). Nonfinancial Reporting and Real Sustainable Change: Relationship Status-It's Complicated. Organization and Environment, 36(1), pp. 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266231151653.
• 44. Henry, L.A., Buyl, T., Jansen, R.J.G. (2019). Leading corporate sustainability: The role of top management team composition for triple bottom line performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), pp. 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2247.
• 45. Heyes, G., Sharmina, M., Mendoza, J.M.F., Gallego-Schmid, A., Azapagic, A. (2018). Developing and implementing circular economy business models in service-oriented technology companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, pp. 621-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.168.
• 46. Hoepner, A.G.F., Majoch, A.A.A., Zhou, X.Y. (2021). Does an Asset Owner's Institutional Setting Influence Its Decision to Sign the Principles for Responsible Investment? Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), pp. 389-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04191-y.
• 47. Hudec, O. (2017). Cities of resilience: Integrated adaptive planning. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 21(1), 106-118. https://doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V21I1.776.
• 48. Ikerd, J. (2024). Business Management for Sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093714.
• 49. Isaksson, R., Ramanathan, S., Rosvall, M. (2023). The sustainability opportunity study (SOS) - diagnosing by operationalising and sensemaking of sustainability using Total Quality Management. TQM Journal, 35(5), pp. 1329-1347. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM01-2022-0038.
• 50. Ismail, A., Jaafar, S.M.R.S. (2022). A fuzzy multi-criteria framework for the development of sustainable community-based tourism in Malaysia. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 17(9), pp. 114-125. https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2022.09.008.
• 51. Jabbour, C.J.C., De Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L. (2016). Green Human Resource Management and Green Supply Chain Management: linking two emerging agendas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp. 1824-1833. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2015.01.052.
• 52. Jennings, P.D., Hoffman, A.J. (2021). Three Paradoxes of Climate Truth for the Anthropocene Social Scientist. Organization and Environment, 34(4), pp. 517-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619858857.
• 53. Jit, R., Sharma, C.S., Kawatra, M. (2017). Healing a Broken Spirit: Role of Servant Leadership. Vikalpa, 42(2), pp. 80-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090917703754.
• 54. Kaufmann, L.J., Danner-Schröder, A. (2022). Addressing grand challenges through different forms of organizing: a literature review. In Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 79, pp. 163-186. Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000079014.
• 55. Kawiana, I.G.P., Rexhepi, B.R., Arsha, I.M.R.M., Swara, N.N.A.A.V., Yudhistira, P.G.A. (2023). Accelerating Values In Shaping Ethical Leadership And It's Effect On Organisational Performance. Quality - Access to Success, 24(196), pp. 295-302. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/24.196.36.
• 56. Kopczynska, E., Ferreira, J.J. (2021). The Role of Government Measures in UniversityIndustry Collaboration for Economic Growth: A Comparative Study across Levels of Economic Development. Triple Helix, 64(1), pp. 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927- bja10023.
• 57. Lozano, R. (2018). Proposing a definition and a framework of organisational sustainability: A review of efforts and a survey of approaches to change. Sustainability, Switzerland, Vol. 10, Iss. 4. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041157.
• 58. Lozano, R. (2023). Analysing organisations' engagement with and impacts to sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), pp. 5721-5733. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3445.
• 59. Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and business models: Integrative framework and propositions for future research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), pp. 665-681. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2396.
• 60. Maak, T. (2007). Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), pp. 329-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9510-5.
• 61. Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J.J., Dahlgaard-Park, S.M., Gomišček, B. (2014). Sustainability exploration and sustainability exploitation: from a literature review towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, pp. 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.045.
• 62. Manninen, K., Huiskonen, J. (2022). Factors influencing the implementation of an integrated corporate sustainability and business strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131036.
• 63. Marjamaa, M., Salminen, H., Kujala, J., Tapaninaho, R., Heikkinen, A. (2021). A Sustainable Circular Economy: Exploring Stakeholder Interests in Finland. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 10(1), pp. 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277977921991914.
• 64. Mashele, F., Chuchu, T. (2018). An empirical investigation into the relationship between sustainability and supply chain compliance within the South African Public and the private sector. A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management, Vol. 12. ABRM. www.jbrmr.com.
• 65. McLoughlin, K., Meehan, J. (2021). The institutional logic of the sustainable organisation: the case of a chocolate supply network. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(3), pp. 251-274. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-11-2020-0773.
• 66. Mendoza, M.J.F., Sharmina, M., Gallego-Schmid, A., Heyes, G., Azapagic, A. (2017). Integrating Backcasting and Eco-design for the Circular Economy: The BECE Framework.
• 67. Mishenin, Y., Koblianska, I., Medvid, V., Maistrenko, Y. (2018). Sustainable regional development policy formation: Role of industrial ecology and logistics. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(1), pp. 329-341. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(20).
• 68. Mohaghegh, M., Åhlström, P., Blasi, S. (2023). Agile manufacturing and transformational capabilities for sustainable business performance: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Production Planning & Control, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2023. 2229264.
• 69. Muff, K., Liechti, A., Dyllick, T. (2020). How to apply responsible leadership theory in practice: A competency tool to collaborate on the sustainable development goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), pp. 2254-2274. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1962.
• 70. Murray, A., Skene, K., Haynes, K. (2017). The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), pp. 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2.
• 71. Ogutu, H., El Archi, Y., Dénes Dávid, L. (2023). Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), pp. 11-45. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.001
• 72. Perez-Uribe, R., Ocampo-Guzman, D., Salcedo-Perez, C., Carvajal-Contreras, A. (Eds.) (2024). Organizational Management Sustainability in VUCA Contexts. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0720-5
• 73. Piwowar-Sulej, K. (2021). Core functions of Sustainable Human Resource Management. A hybrid literature review with the use of H-Classics methodology. Sustainable development, 29(4), 671-693.
• 74. Piwowar-Sulej, K. (2024). Sustainable human resource management: a mixed-method analysis of the research field focusing on the Visegrad countries. Central European Management Journal.
• 75. Raelin, J.A. (2016). Imagine there are no leaders: Reframing leadership as collaborative agency. Leadership, 12(2), pp. 131-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715014558076.
• 76. Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., Seth, N. (2006). Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS quarterly, 225-246.
• 77. Rane, S.B., Thakker, S.V., Kant, R. (2021). Stakeholders' involvement in green supply chain: a perspective of blockchain IoT-integrated architecture. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 32(6), pp. 1166-1191. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-11-2019-0248.
• 78. Rosati, F., Faria, L.G.D. (2019). Business contribution to the Sustainable Development Agenda: Organizational factors related to early adoption of SDG reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), pp. 588-597. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1705.
• 79. Ryan, S., Cross, C. (2024). Micromanagement and its impact on millennial followership styles. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 45(1), pp. 140-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2022-0329.
• 80. Santa-Maria, T., Vermeulen, W.J.V., Baumgartner, R.J. (2022). How do incumbent firms innovate their business models for the circular economy? Identifying micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), pp. 1308-1333. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2956
• 81. Shayganmehr, M., Kumar, A., Garza-Reyes, J.A., Moktadir, M.A. (2021). Industry 4.0 enablers for a cleaner production and circular economy within the context of business ethics: A study in a developing country. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125280
• 82. Sołtysik, M., Tyrańska, M., Piwowar-Sulej, K., Agustina, T.S. (Eds.) (2024). Sustainable Human Resource Management: Strategy, Organizational Innovation and Leadership in Industry 5.0. Taylor & Francis.
• 83. Stål, H.I., Corvellec, H. (2018). A decoupling perspective on circular business model implementation: Illustrations from Swedish apparel. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, pp. 630-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.249.
• 84. Streimikiene, D., Mikalauskiene, A., Digriene, L., Kyriakopoulos, G. (2021). Assessment of the role of a leader in shaping sustainable organizational culture. Amfiteatru Economic, 23(57), pp. 483-503. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2021/57/483.
• 85. Trocka, M. (2023). Raportowanie informacji związanych z klimatem na przykładzie banków. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 85(2), pp. 201-219. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.2.15.
• 86. Tura, N., Hanski, J., Ahola, T., Ståhle, M., Piiparinen, S., Valkokari, P. (2019). Unlocking circular business: A framework of barriers and drivers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, pp. 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.202.
• 87. Tura, N., Keränen, J., Patala, S. (2019). The darker side of sustainability: Tensions from sustainable business practices in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 77, pp. 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.09.002.
• 88. Val, P.A., Regaliza, J.C.P., Maraña, P.A. (2020). Quality in organizations: Its capacity for transformation to create sustainable value. Economics and Business Letters, 9(4), pp. 306- 316. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.9.4.2020.306-316.
• 89. Vegter, D., van Hillegersberg, J., Olthaar, M. (2020). Supply chains in circular business models: processes and performance objectives. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105046.
• 90. Witjes, S., Lozano, R. (2016). Towards a more Circular Economy: Proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 112, pp. 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec. 2016.04.015.
• 91. Zhao, W., Huang, L. (2022). The impact of green transformational leadership, green HRM, green innovation and organizational support on the sustainable business performance: evidence from China. Economic Research [Ekonomska Istrazivanja], 35(1), pp. 6121-6141. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2047086.