The Use of Activated Alumina and Magnetic Field for the Removal Heavy Metals from Water

• Autorzy: Szatyłowicz E. , Skoczko I.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/85373

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The objective of this work was to verify the granular activated alumina (AA) sorption properties, during the process of removing copper, lead and cadmium from water, and to monitor the impact of magnetic field (MF) on the effectiveness of removing copper, lead and cadmium from water. Activated alumina adsorption is known to be an effective and inexpensive technology for the removal of selenium and arsenic from water, and was suggested by EPA as a BAT for point-of-use applications. The removal of copper, lead and cadmium from water using AA and impact of magnetic field was reported to a lesser extent. Pilot tests showed that the use of AA sorption materials with MF impact could possibly decrease the copper, lead and cadmium content in the model water. The MF also had a positive effect on the efficiency of removal copper, lead and cadmium on AA. Increasing the efficiency of heavy metals removal in the samples exposed to magnetic field varied from 1.9% to 8.2% compared to the control samples.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

activated alumina; magnetic field; water treatment; heavy metals

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 19, nr 3
• Strony: 61--67
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 18 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Szatyłowicz E.

• Department of Technology and Systems of Environmental Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, 45A Wiejska St., 15-351 Białystok, Poland

autor

Skoczko I.

• Department of Technology and Systems of Environmental Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, 45A Wiejska St., 15-351 Białystok, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Dhanasekaran P., Satya Sai P.M., Anand Babu C., Krishna Prabhu R., Rajan K.K. 2016. Arsenic removal from groundwater by Anjili tree sawdust impregnated with ferric hydroxide and activated alumina. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 16(1), 115–127.
• 2. Ferreira De Brito, J., De Oliveira Ferreira, L., Ragozoni Pereira, M.C., Paulo Da Silva, J., Ramalho, T.C. 2012. Adsorption of aromatic compounds under magnetic field influence, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 223(6), 3545–3551.
• 3. Genç-Fuhrman H., Mikkelsen P.S., Ledin A. 2007. Simultaneous removal of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni and Zn from stormwater: Experimental comparison of 11 different sorbents, Water Research 41(3), 591–602.
• 4. Hao X., Liu H., Zhang G., Zou H., Zhang Y., Zhou M., Gu Y. 2012. Magnetic field assisted adsorption of methyl blue onto organo-bentonite, Applied Clay Science, 55, 2012, 177–180.
• 5. Naiya, T. K., Bhattacharya, A. K., Das, S. K. 2009. Adsorption of Cd(II) and Pb(II) from aqueous solutions on activated alumina. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 333(1), 14–26.
• 6. Kırbıyık, Ç., Pütün, A.E., Pütün, E. 2016. Comparative studies on adsorptive removal of heavy metal ions by bio sorbent, biochar and activated carbon obtained from low cost agro-residue. Water Science and Technology, 73(2), 423–436.
• 7. Li G., Zhu W., Zhang C., Zhang S., Liu L., Zhu L., Zhao W. 2016. Effect of a magnetic field on the adsorptive removal of methylene blue onto wheat straw biochar, Bioresource Technology, 206, 16–22.
• 8. Liang L., Sun W., Guan X., Huang Y., Choi W., Bao H., Li L., Jiang Z. 2014. Weak magnetic field significantly enhances selenite removal kinetics by zero valent iron, Water Research, 49, 371–380.
• 9. Singh, T.S., Pant, K.K. 2004. Equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamic studies for adsorption of As(III) on activated alumina. Separation and Purification Technology, 36(2), 139–147.
• 10. Sun Y. Guan X., Wang J., Meng X., Xu C., Zhou G. 2014. Effect of Weak Magnetic Field on Arsenate and Arsenit from Water by Zerovalent Iron: An XAFS Investigation, Environmental Science & Technology, 48, 6850−6858.
• 11. Hering J. G., Chen P., Wilkie J. A., Elimelech M., Liang S. 2004. Arsenic removal from drinking water during coagulation, American Water Works Association. 96, 106–114.
• 12. Mc Neill L.S., Edwards M. 1995. Predicting arsenic removal during metal hydroxide precipitation, American Water Works Association, 87(4), 105–113.
• 13. Kim D.H., Kim J., Choi W. 2011. Effect of magnetic field on the zero valent iron induced oxidation reaction, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 192(2), 928–931.
• 14. Davis S.A., Misra, M. 1997. Transport model for the adsorption of oxyanions of selenium (IV) and arsenic (V) from water onto lanthanum-and aluminum-based oxides, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 188(2), 340–350.
• 15. EPA 2007. Removing Multiple Contaminants from Drinking Water: Issues to Consider, EPA, 816-H- 07–004.
• 16. Kartin Ch., Martin J. 1995. An overview of arsenic removal processes, Desalination, 103(1–2), 79–88.
• 17. Toledo E.J.L., Ramalho T.C., Magriotis Z.M. 2008. Influence of magnetic field on physical–chemical properties of the liquid water: Insights from experimental and theoretical models, Journal of Molecular Structure, 888, 409–415.
• 18. Yan L., Wang W., Li X., Duan J., Jing Ch. 2016. Evaluating adsorption media for simultaneous removal of arsenate and cadmium from metallurgical wastewater, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4(3), 2795–2801.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).