Examining moderating effect of environmental dynamism and hostility on entrepreneurial orientation/performance relationship

• Autorzy: Suder Marcin , Okręglicka Małgorzata

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2023.28.2.18

Warianty tytułu

PL

Badanie moderującego wpływu dynamiki i wrogości otoczenia na relację orientacja przedsiębiorcza/ wyniki organizacji

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Although the positive impact of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) on business performance is often indicated, environmental conditions may moderate this relationship. The novelty of this study is visible in the consideration of external environmental factors (in particular, environmental dynamism [ED] and hostility [EH]) as determinants of enterprise performance in the rapidly changing economic situation. The main aims of the research are to identify and analyze the moderating effect of ED and EH on the EO/performance relationship. To achieve this aim, the survey was realized in 2023 on a research sample of 145 enterprises. The research focused on small companies from the printing industry that operated in Poland. The research confirmed the impacts of two of the three dimensions of EO (proactiveness and innovation) on organizational performance and the partial moderating effects of ED (positive) and EH (negative) on the EO/performance relationship.

PL

Mimo iż wskazuje się często na pozytywny wpływ orientacji przedsiębiorczej (EO) na wyniki biznesowe, warunki otoczenia mogą moderować tę zależność. Nowatorskość badania jest widoczna w uwzględnieniu zewnętrznych czynników otoczenia (w szczególności dynamiki otoczenia [ED] i wrogości otoczenia [EH]) jako determinant funkcjonowania przedsiębiorstw w szybko zmieniającej się sytuacji gospodarczej. Głównym celem badań jest identyfikacja i analiza moderującego wpływu ED i EH na relację EO/ wyniki organizacji. Aby osiągnąć ten cel, zostało zrealizowane w 2023 roku badanie na próbie badawczej 145 przedsiębiorstw. Badaniami objęto małe firmy z branży poligraficznej, działające w Polsce. Badania potwierdziły wpływ dwóch z trzech wymiarów EO (proaktywności i innowacyjności) na wyniki organizacji oraz częściowy moderujący wpływ ED (pozytywny) i EH (negatywny) na relację EO/ wyniki organizacji.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

entrepreneurial orientation; environmental dynamism; environmental hostility; structural equation modeling

PL

orientacja przedsiębiorcza; dynamika otoczenia; wrogość otoczenia; modelowanie równań strukturalnych

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 28, No. 2
• Strony: 305--322
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 50 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Suder Marcin

• AGH University of Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6279-7359

autor

Okręglicka Małgorzata

• Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5806-2322

Bibliografia

• 1.Al-Momani, L., Haddad, S., Sharabati, A.A. and Hashesh, M.A., (2023). The moderation role of entrepreneurial orientation on the influence of innovation on pharmaceutical SMEs' performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 100074.
• 2.Aloulou, W.J., (2023). Be Innovative and Resilient: Empirical Evidence from Saudi Firms on How to Translate Entrepreneurial Orientation into Firm Performance. Administrative Sciences, 13, 168.
• 3.Arshad, A.S., Rasli, A., Arshad, A.A. and Zain, Z.M., (2014). The impact of entrepreneurial orientation on business performance: a study of technology-based SMEs in Malaysia. Procedia Social & Behavioral Sciences, 130, 46-53.
• 4.Bernerth, J.B, Aguinis, H., (2016). A critical review and best practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229-283.
• 5.Chan, H.K., Yee, R.W.Y., Dai, J. and Lim, M.K., (2016). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181(B), 384-391.
• 6.Choi, S.B., Lee, W.R. and Kang S-W., (2020). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Resource Orchestration Capability, Environmental Dynamics and Firm Performance: A Test of Three-Way Interaction. Sustainability, 12(13), 5415.
• 7.Covin, J.G. and Slevin, D.P., (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75-87.
• 8.Dess, G.G. and Beard, D.W., (1984). Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 52-73.
• 9.Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S.J., Bryde, D.J., Giannakis, M., Foropon, C., Roubaud, D. and Hazen, B.T., (2020). Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: A study of manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Production Economics, 226, 107599.
• 10.Elidjen, Hidayat, D. and Abdurachman, E. (2022). The roles of gamification, knowledge creation, and entrepreneurial orientation towards firm performance. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 6(4), 229-237.
• 11.Ferreira, F.A.F., Marques, C.S.E., Bento, P., Ferreira, J.J.M. and Jalali, M.S., (2015). Operationalizing and measuring individual entrepreneurial orientation using cognitive mapping and MCDA techniques. Journal of Business Research, 68, 2691-2702.
• 12.Ferreras-Méndez, J.L., Olmos-Peñuela, J., Salas-Vallina, A. and Alegre, J., (2021). Entrepreneurial orientation and new product development performance in SMEs: The mediating role of business model innovation. Technovation, 108, 102325.
• 13.García-Sánchez, I-M., Martín-Moreno, J., Khan, S.A. and Hussain, N., (2021). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to environmental hostility: Are family firms more stakeholder oriented? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 1003-1018.
• 14.Hair, J., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2022), A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3nd ed.), SAGE Publications.
• 15.Huang Y.-F., Lin, H.-C. and Lee, H.-M., (2023). Innovation in manufacturing SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic: How does environmental dynamism reinforce employee proactive behavior? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122247.
• 16.Huang, S., Ding, D. and Chen, Z., (2014). Entrepreneurial Leadership and Performance in Chinese New Ventures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23, 453-471.
• 17.Huang, S., Huang, Q. and Soetanto, D., (2023). Entrepreneurial orientation dimensions and the performance of high-tech and low-tech firms: A configurational approach. European Management Journal, 41(3), 375-384.
• 18.Hughes, M., Hughes, P. and Morgan, R.E. (2007). Exploitative Learning and Entrepreneurial Orientation Alignment in Emerging Young Firms: Implications for Market and Response Performance. British Journal of Management, 18, 359-375.
• 19.Jansen, J.J.P., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J., and Volberda, H.W., (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sciences, 52(11), 1661-1674.
• 20.Kajalo, S. and Lindblom, A., (2015). Market orientation, entrepreneurial orientation and business performance among small retailers. International Journal of Retail &
• 21.Kraus, S., Vonmetz, K., Orlandi, L.B., Zardini, A., and Rossignoli, C. (2023). Digital entrepreneurship: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and digitalization for disruptive innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 193, 122638.
• 22.Kraus, S., Rigtering, J. C., Hughes, M. and Hosman, V. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation and the business performance of SMEs: a quantitative study from the Netherlands. Review of Managerial Science, 6, 161-182.
• 23.Kusa, R., Duda, J. and Suder, M. (2021). Explaining SME performance with fsQCA: The role of entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneur motivation, and opportunity perception. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), 234-245.
• 24.Kwiotkowska, A. (2018). Dynamism, hostility and complexity of the organisation's environment. Empirical verification of the construct. Organizacja i Zarządzanie: kwartalnik naukowy, 3, 69-80.
• 25.Kyrdoda, Y., Balzano, M. and Marzi, G., (2023). Learn to survive crises: The role of firm resilience, innovation capabilities and environmental dynamism. Technology in Society, 74, 102285.
• 26.Liao, Z. and Long, S., (2019). Can interfirm trust improve firms' cooperation on environmental innovation? The moderating role of environmental hostility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28,198-205.
• 27.Lin, T.T., (2021). The role of ethical leadership in fostering team initiative: analyzing the effects of team identification and environmental dynamism. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5(4), 478-488.
• 28.Löfsten, H. and Lindelöf, P. (2005). Environmental hostility, strategic orientation and the importance of management accounting - an empirical analysis of new technology-based firms. Technovation, 25(7), 725-738.
• 29.Lomberg, C., Urbig, D., Stӧckmann, C., Marino, L.D. and Dickson, P.H., (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation: The dimensions’ shared effects in explaining firm performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(6), 973-998.
• 30.Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, G.G., (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
• 31.Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, G.G., (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429-451.
• 32.Lumpkin, G.T., Wales, W.J. and Ensley, M.D., (2006). Entrepreneurial orientation effects on new venture performance: The moderating role of venture age. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, N1-N6).
• 33.Masa’deh, R., Al-Henzab, J., Tarhini, A. and Obeidat, B.Y., (2018). The associations among market orientation, technology orientation, entrepreneurial orientation, and organizational performance. Benchmarking, 25, 3117-3142.
• 34.Miller, D. and Friesen, P. H., (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1-25.
• 35.Naman, J.L. and Slevin, D.P., (1993). Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic management journal, 14(2), 137-153.
• 36.Oh, S.-Y. and Kim, S., (2022). Effects of inter- and intra-organizational learning activities on SME innovation: the moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(5), 1187-1206.
• 37.Putniņš, T.J. and Sauka, A., (2020). Why does entrepreneurial orientation affect company performance? Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(4), 711-735.
• 38.Ramayah, T.J.F.H., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H. and Memon, M.A., (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using smartPLS 3.0. An updated guide and practical guide to statistical analysis.
• 39.Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G.T. and Frese, M., (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 33(3), 761-787.
• 40.Real, J.C., Roldán, J.L. and Leal, A., (2014). From entrepreneurial orientation and learning orientation to business performance: analysing the mediating role of organizational learning and the moderating effects of organizational size. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 186-208.
• 41.Rincon, M.L.C., Diaz, M.L.A. and Puente, R.C., (2022). Is entrepreneurship enough to achieve superior performance in SMEs in emerging countries? Multiple mediation of market orientation and marketing capabilities. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. ahead-of-print.
• 42.Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. and Becker, J.-M., (2022). SmartPLS 4. Oststeinbek: SmartPLS. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com
• 43.Schilke, O., (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: the nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 179-203.
• 44.Simerly, R.L. and Li, M., (2000). Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: a theoretical integration and an empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 31-49.
• 45.Tajeddini, K., Martin, E. and Ali, A., (2020). Enhancing hospitality business performance: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and networking ties in a dynamic environment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90, 102605.
• 46.Tang, Z. and Hull, C., (2012). An Investigation of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Perceived Environmental Hostility, and Strategy Application among Chinese SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 50, 132-158.
• 47.Wales, W.J., Patel, P.C., Parida, V. and Kreiser, P.M., (2013). Nonlinear effects of entrepreneurial orientation on small firm performance: The moderating role of resource orchestration capabilities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(2), 93-121.
• 48.Wójcik-Karpacz, A., Karpacz, J. and Pavlov, D., (2019). Wpływ orientacji przedsiębiorczej na wynik przedsiębiorstwa-moderująca rola dynamizmu rynku. Przegląd Organizacji, 1, 11-19.
• 49.Zahra, S.A. and Garvis, D.M., (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 469-492.
• 50.Zhang, H., Hu, L. and Kim, Y. (2023). How Does Iteration of Entrepreneurial Opportunities in User Enterprises Affect Entrepreneurial Performance? A Dual Case Study Based on Dual Strategic Orientations. Systems, 11, 459.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).