Differences in evaluation methods of trunk sway using different MoCap systems

• Autorzy: Kutilek P. , Socha V. , Cakrt O. , Svoboda Z.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5277/abb140210

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The position of the trunk can be negatively influenced by many diseases. Several methods can be used for identifying defects in balance and coordination as a result of pathology of the musculoskeletal or nervous system. The aim of this article is to examine the relationship between the three methods used for analysis of trunk sway and compare two fundamentally different MoCap systems. We used a camera system and a 3DOF orientation tracker placed on subject’s trunk, and measured inclination (roll) and flexion (pitch) during quiet stance. Ten healthy participants in the study were measured with eyes open and closed. The pitch versus roll plots of trunk were formed, and the area of the convex hull, area of confidence ellipse and total length of the trajectory of the pitch versus roll plot were calculated. The statistical analysis was performed and strong correlation between the area of the convex hull and area of the confidence ellipse was found. Also, the results show moderate correlation between the area of the confidence ellipse and total length of the trace, and moderate correlation between the area of the convex hull and total length of the trace. In general, the different MoCap systems show different areas and lengths but lead to the same conclusions. Statistical analysis of the participants with eyes open and eye closed did not show significant difference in the areas and total lengths of the pitch versus roll plots.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

trunk; postural stability; camera system; orientation tracker; convex hull; confidence ellipse; pitch versus roll

PL

tułów; stabilność; powłoka wypukła

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 16, no. 2
• Strony: 85--94
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 38 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Kutilek P.

• Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, the Czech Republic

autor

Socha V.

• Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, the Czech Republic

autor

Cakrt O.

• Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, the Czech Republic
• University Hospital Motol – 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, the Czech Republic

autor

Svoboda Z.

• Palacky University of Olomouc, Faculty of Physical Culture, the Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• [1] HIROSE D., ISHIDA K., NAGANO Y., TAKAHASHI T., YAMAMOTO H., Posture of the trunk in the sagittal plane is associated with gait in community-dwelling elderly population.
• [2] KOLLER W.C, GLATT S., VETERE-OVERFIELD B., HASSANEIN R., Falls and Parkinson’s disease, Clin. Neuropharmacol., 1989, 12, 98–105.
• [3] MORRIS M.E., Movement disorders in people with Parkinson disease: a model for physical therapy, Phys. Ther., 2000, 80,578-597.
• [4] ASHBURN A., STACK E., PICKERING R., WARD C., A community-dwelling sample of people with Parkinson’s disease: characteristics of fallers and non-fallers, Age Ageing, 2001, 30, 47–52.
• [5] ALLUM J.H.J., ADKIN A.L., CARPENTER M.G., HELDZIOLKOWSKA M., HONEGGER F., PIERCHALA K., Trunk sway measures of postural stability during clinical balance tests: effects of a unilateral vestibular deficit, Gait Posture, 2001, 14, 227–237.
• [6] GILL J., ALLUM J.H., CARPENTER M.G., HELD-ZIOLKOWSKA M., ADKIN A.L., HONEGGER F., PIERCHALA K., Trunk sway measures of postural stability during clinical balance tests: effects of age, J. Gerontol., 2001, 56, 438–447.
• [7] STASZKIEWICZ R., CHWALA W., FORCZEK W., LASKA J., Three-dimensional analysis of the pelvic and hip mobility during gait on a treadmill and on the ground, Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 2012, 14(3), 83–89.
• [8] ADKIN A.L., BLOEM B.R., ALLUM J.H.J., Trunk sway measurements during stance and gait tasks in Parkinson’s disease, Gait Posture, 2001, 22, 240–249.
• [9] PIETRASZEWSKI B., WINIARSKI S., JAROSZCZUK S., Threedimensional human gait pattern – reference data for normal men, Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 2012, 14(3), 9–16.
• [10] ALLUM J.H.J., ADKIN A.L., Improvements in trunk sway observed for stance and gait tasks during recovery from an acute unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit, Audiol. Neurol. Otol., 2003, 8, 286–302
• [11] LOU E., BAZZARELLI M., HILL D., DURDLE N., A low power accelerometer used to improve posture, Proc. of the IEEE Canada, Toronto 2001, 1385–1389.
• [12] BRANDT T., DAROFF R.B., The multisensory physiological and pathological vertigo syndromes, Ann. Neurol., 1980, 7, 195–203.
• [13] VAN DE WARRENBURG B.P., BAKKER M., KREMER B.P., BLOEM B.R., ALLUM J.H., Trunk sway in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia, Mov. Disord., 2005, 20, 1006–1013.
• [14] DE HOON E.W., ALLUM J.H., CARPENTER M.G., SALIS C., BLOEM B.R., CONZELMANN M., BISCHOFF H.A., Quantitative Assessment of the Stops Walking While Talking Test in the Elderly, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 2003, 84, 838–842.
• [15] HORLINGS C.G.C., KUNG U.M., BLOEM B.R., HONEGGER F., VAN ALFEN N., VAN ENGELEN B.G.M., ALLUM J.H.J., Identifying deficits in balance control following vestibular or proprioceptive loss using posturographic analysis of stance tasks, Clin. Neurophysiol., 2008, 119, 2338–2346.
• [16] ODENRICK P., SANDSTEDT P., Postural sway in the normal child, Human Neurobiol., 1984, 3, 241–244.
• [17] PRIETO T.E., MYKLEBUST J.B., MYKLEBUST B.M., Characterization of postural steadiness and ankle joint compliance in the elderly, IEEE EMBS Magazine, 1992, 11, 25–27.
• [18] OLIVEIRA L.F., SIMPSON D.M., NADAL J., Calculation of area of stabilometric signals using principal component analysis, Physiol. Meas., 1996, 17, 305–312.
• [19] RAYMAKERS J.A., SAMSON M.M., VERHAAR H.J.J., The assessment of body sway and the choice of the stability parameter( s), Gait Posture, 2005, 21, 48–58.
• [20] CORINNE G.C. et al., Influence of virtual reality on postural stability during movements of quiet stance, Neurosci. Lett., 2009, Vol. 451, No. 3, 227–231
• [21] FERRUFINO L., BRIL B., DIETRICH G., NONAKA T., COUBARD O.A., Practice of Contemporary Dance Promotes Stochastic Postural Control in Aging, Front Hum. Neurosci., 2011, 5, 169.
• [22] ROCCHI M.B.L., SISTI D., DITROILO M., CALAVALLE A., PANEBIANCO R., The misuse of the confidence ellipse in evaluating statokinesigram, Ital. J. Sport Sci., 2005, 12, 169–172.
• [23] SWANENBURG J., DE BRUIN E.D., FAVERO K., UEBELHART D., MULDER T., The reliability of postural balance measures in single and dual tasking in elderly fallers and non-fallers, BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 2008, 9, 162.
• [24] MOGHADAM M., ASHAYERI H., SALAVATI M., SARAFZADEH J., TAGHIPOOR K.D., SAEEDI A., SALEHI R., Reliability of center of pressure measures of postural stability in healthy older adults: effects of postural task difficulty and cognitive load, Gait Posture, 2011, 33, 651–655.
• [25] CAKRT O., VYHNALEK M., SLABY K., FUNDA T., VUILLERME N., KOLAR P., JERABEK J., Balance rehabilitation therapy by tongue electrotactile biofeedback in patients with degenerative cerebellar disease, Neurorehabilitation, 2012, 31, 429–434.
• [26] STEVE T. JAMISONA, XUELIANG PAND, AJIT M.W. CHAUDHARIA, Knee moments during run-to-cut maneuvers are associated with lateral trunk positioning,
• [27] KUTILEK P., HOZMAN J., HEJDA J., CERNY R., Methods of measurement and evaluation of eye, head and shoulders position in neurological practice, [in:] Ken-Shiung Chen (ed.) Advanced topics in neurological disorders, Rijeka: InTech., 2012, 25–44.
• [28] Prediction of lower extremities movement using characteristics of angle-angle diagrams and artificial intelligence, Kutilek P., Hozman J., 2011 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference, EHB 2011, Art. No. 6150372.
• [29] MICERA S., SABATINI A.M., GENOVESE V., CARPANETO J., BACCI L., MANNINI A., MONACO V., ODETTI L., POPPENDIECK W., HOFFMANN K., Assessment technologies for the analysis of the efficacy of a vestibular neural prosthesis, Biomed. Tech., 2010, 10, 55–94.
• [30] OCHI F., ABE K., ISHIGAMI S., ORSU K., TOMITA H., Trunk motion analysis in walking using gyro sensors, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference – IEEE/EMBS, 1997, Vol 4, 1824–1825.
• [31] PREPARATA F.P., HONG S.J., Convex Hulls of Finite Sets of Points in Two and Three Dimensions, Commun. ACM, 1977, 20, 87–93.
• [32] ZHOU Yu., Distributed Control of Multi-Robot Deployment Motion, [in:] Casolo F. (ed.) Motion control, Rijeka: InTech., 2010, 277–297.
• [33] JORGENSEN M.B., SKOTTE J.H., HOLTERMANN A., SJOGAARD G., PETERSEN N.C., SOGAARD K., Neck pain and postural balance among workers with high postural demands – a crosssectional study, BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 2011, 12, 176.
• [34] PRIETO T.E., MYKLEBUST J.B., HOFFMANN R.G., LOVETT E.G., MYKLEBUST B.M., Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1996, 43, 956–966.
• [35] USTINOVA K.I., LANGENDERFER J.E., Postural stabilization by gripping a stick with different force levels, Gait & Posture, Vol. 38, Issue 1, May 2013, 97–103,
• [36] KUCZYNSKI M., PALUCH P., Postural stability in patients with back pain, Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 1999, 1(2), 19–23.
• [37] ZIELINSKA T., TROJNACKI M., Postural stability in symmetrical gaits, Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 2009, 11(2), 1–8.
• [38] SYCZEWSKA M., ZIELIŃSKA T., Power spectral density in balance assessment. Description of methodology, Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 2010, 12(4), 89–92.