Tytuł artykułu
Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
In past few decades, there was a tremendous enhancement in natural disaster and their effects on economy and population. An adverse events like foods, wildfires, cyclones, earthquakes, tsunamis, etc., are regarded as a natural disaster once it strikes the vulnerable population areas. An early tracking of susceptibility areas and immediate tracking of affected areas might help in facilitating rescue and early warnings to the public. To achieve autonomous natural disaster prediction, this paper makes use of current developments in remote sensing, which speed up the availability of aerial/satellite data and are reinforced by progress in the computing sector. The aerial/satellite imageries are employed for acquiring the data from areas of Queensland-Australia that are more prone to natural disaster in an eagle-eye perspective. Since there were several techniques employed so far for the automatic prediction of natural disaster susceptibilities, there were some limitations like reduced rate of accuracy and so on. So as to overcome these limitations, deep learning based automated process is employed for predicting the natural disaster areas and probability of event occurrences. The main intention of the work is to detect the natural disaster occurrence from the sensed data which aids in providing warning to public and to safeguard them by taking necessary actions. Initially, remote sensing data is pre-processed and the features are extracted using Adaptive linear Internal embedding algorithm-based feature extraction (ALIE-FE). The extracted features are selected using Recursive Wrapper-based feature subset selection. To estimate best fitness function and to enhance the prediction accuracy, the optimization process is carried using Bio-Inspired Squirrel Search Optimization algorithm (BI-SSOA). Finally, the classification is carried by means of Deep learning based Multi-layer Alex Net classifier (DBMLA) approach. The simulation is carried and the outcomes attained are estimated for predicting food susceptibility and wildfire susceptibility. The proposed BISSOA-DBMLA offers sensitivity of 98%, specificity of 99%, and TSS of 97%. The proposed system offers 98.99% classification accuracy. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, TSS, and area under the curve (AUC) are used to evaluate the efficacy of the suggested system in light of the achieved results from other approaches. To demonstrate the efficacy of the suggested mechanism, the achieved results are compared with those of current approaches.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
3005--3021
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 23 poz.
Twórcy
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science, Chennai, India
autor
- Liberal Arts and Convergence Studies, Honam University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
autor
- Department of IT, MVSR Engineering College, Hyderabad, Indi
Bibliografia
- 1. Anand Deva Durai c, (2021) Global Ocean monitoring through remote sensing methods and big data analysis. Int J Innov Sci Eng Res 8 1 10–19
- 2. Anbarasan M et al (2020) Detection of flood disaster system based on IoT, big data and convolutional deep neural network. Comput Commun 150:150–157
- 3. Asencio-Cortés G, Morales-Esteban A, Shang X, Martínez-Álvarez FJC (2018) Earthquake prediction in California using regression algorithms and cloud-based big data infrastructure. Comput Geosci 115:198–210
- 4. Choi C, Kim J, Kim J, Kim D, Bae Y, and. Kim HSJAIM, (2018) Development of heavy rain damage prediction model using machine learning based on big data. Adv Meteorol. 2018 1 11
- 5. Choubin B, Mosavi A, Alamdarloo EH, Hosseini FS, Shamshirband S, Dashtekian K, Ghamisi P (2019) Earth fissure hazard prediction using machine learning models. Environ Res 179:108770
- 6. Fathi M, Haghi Kashani M, Jameii SM, and. Mahdipour EEJAOCMI, (2021) Big data analytics in weather forecasting: a systematic review. Arch Comput Methods Eng 29 1
- 7. Kalantar B et al (2021) Deep Neural network utilizing remote sensing datasets for flood hazard susceptibility mapping in Brisbane, Australia. Remote Sens 13(13):2638
- 8. Li W (2020) GeoAI: Where machine learning and big data converge in GIScience. J Spatial Inf Sci 20:71–77
- 9. Luechtefeld T, Rowlands C, r Hartung TJT (2018) Big-data and machine learning to revamp computational toxicology and its use in risk assessment. Toxicol Res 7(5):732–744
- 10. Nugent T, Petroni F, Raman N, Carstens L, Leidner JL, A comparison of classification models for natural disaster and critical event detection from news. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) pp. 3750–3759: IEEE. (2017).
- 11. Obaid AJ (2021) Multiple objective effect analysis to monitor the sustainability for the refurbishment of ecosystem. Int J Innov Sci Eng Res 8(3):81–88
- 12. Quinn JA et al (2018) Humanitarian applications of machine learning with remote-sensing data: review and case study in refugee settlement mapping. Phil Trans R Soc A 376(2128):20170363
- 13. Ragini JR, Anand PR, and. Bhaskar VJIJOIM, (2018) Big data analytics for disaster response and recovery through sentiment analysis. Int J Inf Manag 42, 13–24
- 14. Rahmati O et al (2019) Multi-hazard exposure mapping using machine learning techniques: a case study from Iran. Remote Sens 11(16):1943
- 15. Raza M et al (2020) Establishing effective communications in disaster affected areas and artificial intelligence based detection using social media platform. Arch Comput Method Eng 112:1057–1069
- 16. Razali N, Ismail S, Mustapha A (2020) Machine learning approach for flood risks prediction. Int J Artif Intell 9(1):73
- 17. Resch B, Usländer F, Havas CJC, Science GI (2018) Combining machine-learning topic models and spatiotemporal analysis of social media data for disaster footprint and damage assessment. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 45(4):362–376
- 18. Sayad YO, Mousannif H, sj Al Moatassime HJF (2019) Predictive modeling of wildfires: a new dataset and machine learning approach. Fire Saf J 104:130–146
- 19. Sulova a, and. Jokar Arsanjani JJRS, (2021) Exploratory analysis of driving force of wildfires in Australia: an application of machine learning within Google Earth engine. Remote Sens 13 1 10
- 20. Sun AY, Scanlon BRJERL (2019) How can big data and machine learning benefit environment and water management: a survey of methods, applications, and future directions. Environ Res Lett 14(7):073001
- 21. Yu M, Yang C, Li YJG (2018) Big data in natural disaster management: a review. Geosciences 8(5):165
- 22. Yuan F,and Liu R, (2019) Identifying damage-related social media data during Hurricane Matthew: a machine learning approach. In Computing in Civil Engineering 2019: visualization information modeling, and simulation: American Society of Civil Engineers Reston VA 207 214
- 23. Zhang X, Zhao K, Wang L, Wang Y, Niu Y (2020) An improved squirrel search algorithm with reproductive behavior. IEEE Access 8:101118–101132
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-940ad263-3d83-415e-a981-0c07dc03bddb