PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Buckling behaviour of cold-formed steel channel section, sigma section, and built-up sigma section: Experimental and numerical study

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In construction industry cold formed steel section (CFS) is highly preferred in purlins, girts, studs in walls and shear wall chords. Based on its strength requirements, CFS can be produced in the desired cross-sectional dimensions and shapes. The majority of wall studs are made of cold-formed steel, which is typically channel section. Hence, this study aims to compare the buckling behaviour of cold formed steel channel section, sigma section, and built-up sigma section. An experimental and numerical analysis conducted to know the buckling capacity of cold-formed steel section subjected to axial compression. The load- deflection and failure modes are discussed in this study. Additionally, the strength-to-weight ratio of channel sections, sigma sections, and built-up sigma sections was compared. The built-up sigma section has superior performance relative to the single section. Furthermore, finding indicates that the sigma section surpasses the C-section.
Twórcy
  • Vellore Institute of Technology, School of Civil Engineering, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632014, India
  • Vellore Institute of Technology, School of Civil Engineering, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632014, India
Bibliografia
  • 1. Łukowicz A., Urbańska-Galewska E., Deniziak P., Gordziej-Zagórowska M. Classification of restraints in the optimization problem of a cold-formed profile. Advances in Science and Technology – Research Journal. 2015; 9(28):61–67.
  • 2. Anbarasu M., Murugapandian G. Experimental study on cold-formed steel web stiffened lipped channel columns undergoing distortional–global interaction. Materials and Structures. 2015; 49(4):1433–1442.
  • 3. Zhang J.H., Young B. Numerical investigation and design of cold-formed steel built-up open section columns with longitudinal stiffeners. Thin-Walled Structures. 2015; 89:178–191.
  • 4. Urbańska-Galewska E., Deniziak P., Gordziej-Zagórowska M., Łukowicz A. Thin-walled cross section shape influence on steel member resistance. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal. 2016; 10(29):41–5.
  • 5. Anbarasu M., Venkatesan M. Behaviour of cold-formed steel built-up I-section columns composed of four U-profiles. Advances in Structural Engineering. 2018; 22(3):613–25.
  • 6. Fratamico D.C., Torabian S., Zhao X., Rasmussen K.J.R., Schafer B.W. Experiments on the global buckling and collapse of built-up cold-formed steel columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2018; 144:65–80.
  • 7. Zhang J.H., Young B. Finite element analysis and design of cold-formed steel built-up closed section columns with web stiffeners. Thin-Walled Structures. 2018; 131:223–37.
  • 8. Anbarasu M. Behaviour of cold-formed steel built-up battened columns composed of four lipped angles: Tests and numerical validation. Advances in Structural Engineering. 2019; 23(1):51–64.
  • 9. Roy K., Lim J.B.P. Numerical investigation into the buckling behaviour of face-to-face built-up cold-formed stainless steel channel sections under axial compression. Structures. 2019; 20:42–73.
  • 10. Anbarasu M. Numerical investigation on behaviour and design of cold-formed steel built-up column composed of lipped sigma channels. Advances in Structural Engineering. 2019; 22(8):1817–29.
  • 11. Anbarasu M., Adil Dar M. Axial capacity of CFS built-up columns comprising of lipped channels with spacers: Nonlinear response and design. Engineering Structures. 2020; 213:110559-9.
  • 12. Anbarasu M., Dar M.A. Improved design procedure for battened cold-formed steel built-up columns composed of lipped angles. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2020; 164:105781.
  • 13. Li Q.Y., Young B. Tests of cold-formed steel built-up open section members under eccentric compressive load. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2021; 184:106775.
  • 14. Mahar A.M., Jayachandran S.A., Mahendran M. Global buckling strength of discretely fastened back-to-back built-up cold-formed steel columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2021; 187:106998.
  • 15. El Aghoury M.A., Hanna M.T., Amoush E.A. Experimental and theoretical investigation of cold-formed single lipped sigma columns. Thin-Walled Structures. 2016; 111:80–92.
  • 16. Kalam Aswathy K.C., Kumar M.V.A. Interaction behavior of fixed ended cold-formed steel unequal lipped angle columns. Thin-Walled Structures. 2024; 202:112056-6.
  • 17. Rahnavard R., Razavi M., Fanaie N., Craveiro H.D. Evaluation of the composite action of cold-formed steel built-up battened columns composed of two sigma-shaped sections. Thin-Walled Structures. 2023; 183:110390-0.
  • 18. Mei Y., Cui Y., Ma C., Sun Y., Su A. Tests, numerical simulations and design of G550 high strength cold-formed steel lipped channel section columns failing by interactive buckling. Thin-Walled Structures. 2023; 192:111172-2.
  • 19. He Z., Zhang Y., Zhou X., Zou B., Zhang Z. Post-buckling behavior and DSM design of cold-formed steel lipped channel columns experiencing local-distortional-global interaction. Structures. 2024; 67:106945.
  • 20. Yılmaz Y., Öztürk F. Buckling behavior of cold-formed steel sigma and lipped channel section beam-columns: Experimental and numerical investigation. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2024; 214:108456-6.
  • 21. Vijayamurugan N., Prabaharan V., Akhas P. Kumar. Effect of lip depth on the flexural capacity of cold-formed steel section. International Journal of Steel Structures. 2024; 24(4):849–61.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-93e98496-f8c6-4840-90fd-6f5aacf715f6
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.