CBRN consequence managemen t: New approach and possibilities of participation of chemical units

• Autorzy: Zahradníček R. , Otřísal P. , Skaličan Z.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/23008741.1215432

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Managing the consequences after using weapons of mass destruction is considered a classic task of the Chemical Corps units and formations. Restoring essential combat capability of troops and recovering from chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear event is a primary goal of operations, which are termed “CBRN consequence management”. The paper discusses the current approach to the topic in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and provides notes from operational experience that can lead to the development of relevant military capabilities. Based on an analysis of theoretical and practical approaches, the authors propose capability areas of modern Chemical Corps units that support CBRN consequence management operations.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

consequence management; chemical corps; CBRN defence; weapons of mass; destruction

• Wydawca: Akademia Sztuki Wojennej
• Czasopismo: Security and Defence Quarterly
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 10, No. 1
• Strony: 147--163
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 15 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Zahradníček R.

• NBC Defence Institute of the University of Defence, Czech Republic

autor

Otřísal P.

• NBC Defence Institute of the University of Defence, Czech Republic

autor

Skaličan Z.

• NBC Defence Institute of the University of Defence, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• 1. AAP-06, Edition 2015. NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions. Cover by STANAG 3680. NATO Standardization Office, 2014.
• 2. AJP-3.8(A). Allied Joint Doctrine for CBRN Defence. Covered by STANAG 2451. NATO Standardization Agency, 2012.
• 3. ACKLEY, Alissa. Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Consequence Management: Ways to Improve Fixed-Site Decontamination Capability. Newport : Naval War College, 2007.
• 4. Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Consequence Management. Publication JP 3-41. Washington : Joint Chiefs of Staff, 2012.
• 5. DAVIDSON, Clyde a kol. Operation Tomodachi: Consequence Management Support Force. Initial Impressions Report No. 12-08. Fort Leavenworth : Center for Army Lessons Learned, 2012.
• 6. Disaster Response Staff Officer´s Handbook. Guide no. 06-08. Fort Leavenworth : Center for Army Lessons Learned, 2010.
• 7. DVOŘÁK, Tomáš. Consequence Management after enemy WMD attack (in Czech). Text No. 1146. Vyškov : Millitary College of Ground Forces, 1991.
• 8. Guidelines for First Response to a CBRN Incident. Brusel : NATO Civil Emergency Planning, Operations Division, 2008. 16 p. Available at: < cep/cep-cbrn-response-e.pdf>.
• 9. JENNINGS, Nathan. Responding to MASCAL Terrorism at the Company Level: Lessons in Consequence Management from OIF. Infantry, 2014, Vol. 103, Number 2, p. 8-12. ISSN 0019-9532.
• 10. LAKE, William, DIVARCO, Stephen. Guidelines for Mass Casualty Decontamination During a HAZMAT/Weapon of Mass Destruction Incident: Volumes I and II. Aberdeen Proving Ground : Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, 2013.
• 11. Maneuver Enhancement Brigade Operations. Field manual FM 3-90.31. Washington: Headquarters, Department of the Army, 2009. 163.
• 12. MAREK, Vladimír. Trails by Shatt al-Arab: Stories of the Czech chemical unit and medical and Military Police personnel serving in Kuwait and Southern Iraq. Prague : Ministry of Defence – Military Information and Service Agency, 2007. ISBN 978-80-7278-427-1.
• 13. Multiservice Tactics, Techniques and Porcedures for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Consequence Management Operations. Field manual ATP 3-11.41. Washington : Headquarters, Department of the Army, 2015.
• 14. NATO Comprehensive Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear (CBRN) Defence Concept. MC 0603/1. Brussels : NATO Headquarters, 2014.
• 15. PANGI, Robyn. Consequence Management in the 1995 Sarin Attacks on the Japanese Subway System. BCSIA Discussion Paper 2002-4. Cambridge : Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government, 2002.