Reflections on integral and integrated heritage care at the threshold of the third millennium

• Autorzy: Laenen Marc

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/odk.2881

Warianty tytułu

PL

Refleksje na temat integralnej i zintegrowanej opieki nad dziedzictwem u progu trzeciego tysiąclecia

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Our living environments are being affected by climate change, increased migrations, aggression due to political conflicts and by new real estate developments which cause new challenges to their cultural heritage resources. The “reflection” attempts to promote an integral and integrated approach for cultural heritage enhancement, integral because all heritage sectors should join forces and integrated in planning following an agreed vision on man and society, guided by the principles of sustainability and standards of quality. Especially the problem of integration of different cultures in an agreed “consociation” is being analysed. Three paths of strategic action are suggested to create the right environment for such approach: a strong advocacy and educational strategy with convincing arguments as an answer to the “why” question, a methodology to implement UNESCO’s HUL Recommendation as an answer to the “how” question and a system of interpretation and presentation of cultural heritage as a basis for mutual understanding, respect leading to comparative heritage understanding. The “reflection” is intended to initiate discussions.

PL

Na nasze środowiska życia wpływają zmiany klimatyczne, wzmożone migracje, agresja spowodowana konfliktami politycznymi oraz nowe inwestycje w nieruchomości, które stawiają nowe wyzwania przed zasobami dziedzictwa kulturowego. "Refleksja" stara się promować integralne i zintegrowane podejście do poprawy dziedzictwa kulturowego, integralne, ponieważ wszystkie sektory dziedzictwa powinny połączyć siły i zintegrować się w planowaniu zgodnie z ustaloną wizją człowieka i społeczeństwa, kierując się zasadami zrównoważonego rozwoju i standardami jakości. W szczególności analizowany jest problem integracji różnych kultur w ramach uzgodnionego "stowarzyszenia". Proponowane są trzy ścieżki strategicznego działania, aby stworzyć odpowiednie środowisko dla takiego podejścia: silna strategia rzecznicza i edukacyjna z przekonującymi argumentami jako odpowiedź na pytanie "dlaczego", metodologia wdrażania Rekomendacji HUL UNESCO jako odpowiedź na pytanie "jak" oraz system interpretacji i prezentacji dziedzictwa kulturowego jako podstawa wzajemnego zrozumienia, szacunku prowadzącego do porównawczego zrozumienia dziedzictwa. "Refleksja" ma na celu zainicjowanie dyskusji.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

advocacy; consociation; cultural diversity; cultural heritage leverage; cultural tourism; integral approach; integrated approach; interpretation; presentation

PL

rzecznictwo; stowarzyszenie; różnorodność kulturowa; wpływ dziedzictwa kulturowego; turystyka kulturowa; podejście integralne; podejście zintegrowane; interpretacja; prezentacja

• Wydawca: Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków ICOMOS ; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej
• Czasopismo: Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Nr 12
• Strony: 123--138
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 46 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Laenen Marc

• ICCROM, Belgia

Bibliografia

• 1. (The) Athens Charter on the Restoration of Historic Monuments, 1931.
• 2. Choay F., Sept propositions sur le concept d’ “authenticité” et son usage dans les pratiques du patrimoine historique, The Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, Nara, Japan, 1-6 November 1994, Proceedings, UNESCO, Agency of Cultural Affairs ( Government of Japan) ICCROM, ICOMOS, Trondheim, 1995.
• 3. Council of Europe, European Charter of Architectural Heritage, Strasbourg,1975.
• 4. Council of Europe,. Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society (Faro Convention), Strasbourg, 2005.
• 5. Davos Declaration: Eight Criteria for high quality Baukultur, Swiss Federal Office for Culture, Davos,2020.
• 6. De Dijn H., Levende geschiedenis: geënsceneerde authenticiteit?, [in:] Streven, 77, 10, 2010.
• 7. De Dijn H., Drie vormen van weten over Ethiek, Wetenschap en Moraalfilosofie, Kalmthout, 2017.
• 8. European Union: Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Council of regions, Brussels, 2017.
• 9. Falser M. S., From Venice 1964 to Nara1994-Changing concepts of authenticity? [in:] Conservation and Preservation, Interactions between Theory and Practice. In memoriam Alois Riegl ( 1858 – 1905), Proceedings, of the International ICOMOS scientific Committee for the Theory and the Philosophy of Conservation and Restoration, Vienna 23 – 27 April 2008, Florence, 2010.
• 10. Heidegger M., Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes, Frankfurt am Main, 1950.
• 11. Houbart C., Raymond Lemaire(1921-1997) et la conservation de la ville ancienne. Approche historique et critique de ses projets belges dans une perspective internationale, Diss. Leuven, 2015.
• 12. ICOM. Déclaration ICOM-FMAM sur le tourisme culturel durable dans le monde entier, (Décembre,2007).
• 13. ICOMOS, The Charter on Historic towns and Urban Areas, (The Washington Charter),1987.
• 14. ICOMOS, The Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Significance (The Burra Charter)1979, reviewed and adopted version 2013.
• 15. ICOMOS, The International Charter on Cultural Tourism, 1999.
• 16. ICOMOS, The Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites, (Ename Charter), 2008.
• 17. (The) International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter), 1964.
• 18. Jokilehto J., Authenticity a general Framework for the concept, [in:] The Nara Conference on Authenticity, Nara, Japan, 1-6 November 1994, Proceedings, UNESCO, Agency of Cultural Affairs (Government of Japan) ICCROM, ICOMOS, Trondheim, 1995.
• 19. Jokilehto J., Questions of Authenticity, www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/publications/2020-05/convern8_02/jjokiletho_ing_pdf.
• 20. Laenen M., Reflections on Heritage Values, [in:] Values and Criteria in Heritage Conservation, Proceedings of the International Conference of ICOMOS, ICCROM, Fondazione Romualdo Del Bianco, Florence 2th – 4th March 2007 Florence, 2008.
• 21. Laenen M., From heritage conservation towards its “social fruition” for society and humanity: the multifaceted interpretation and presentation of the “cultural biography” of living environments for cultural dialogue, [in:] Heritage and Landscape as Human Values – proceedings, Proceedings of the Symposium held at ICOMOS' 18th General Assembly, Florence, Italy, 9-14 November 2014, Napels, 2015.
• 22. Laenen M., Building Peace trough Heritage, some observations on the interpretation and presentation of heritage sites as a contribution to peace, [in:] Proceedings of the Scientific Symposium on Building Peace trough Heritage, World Forum to Change trough Dialogue, Florence, 13th-15th March, Firenze, 2020.
• 23. Larsen E. K. (ed), The Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, Nara, Japan, 1-6 November 1994, Proceedings, UNESCO, Agency of Cultural Affairs ( Government of Japan) ICCROM, ICOMOS, Trondheim, 1995.
• 24. Lipp W., Stulc J., Szmygin B., Giometti S. (ed), Conservation Turn-Return to Conservation, Tolerance of Change,Limits of Change, ICOMOS, International Scientific Committee for the Theory and Philosophy of Conservation and Restoration,May 5th-9th,Prague/Cescy Krumlov, Czech Republic, March 3th-6th, Florence,2011, Firenze,2012.
• 25. Lowenthal D., Changing Criteria of Authenticity, [in:] The Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, Nara, Japan, 1-6 November 1994, Proceedings, UNESCO, Agency of Cultural Affairs (Government of Japan) ICCROM, ICOMOS, Trondheim, 1995.
• 26. Ito N., ”Authenticity” inherent in Cultural Heritage in Asia and Japan, [in:] Larsen, E.K. (ed), The Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, Nara, Japan, 1-6 November 1994, Proceedings, UNESCO,Agency of Cultural Affairs (Government of Japan) ICCROM, ICOMOS, Trondheim, 1995.
• 27. (The) Norwich Accord, 2009, Finding the Spirit of the Place. Conservation, Communication and Cultural Tourism. Declaration of the United Kingdom ICOMOS Committee on Cultural Tourism, Norwich, 2009.
• 28. O’leary B., Consociation, https://pesd.princeton.edu/mode/246.
• 29. Perez de Cuellar J., (ed), Our Creative Diversity, Report of the World Commission on Culture and Development, UNESCO, Paris, 1995.
• 30. Report of the Meeting on Authenticity and Integrity in the African Context, Zimbabwe 2000.
• 31. Riegl A., Der Moderne Denkmalkultus, Sein Wesen, seine Entstehung, Wien- Leizig, 1903.
• 32. (The) Riga Charter on Authenticity and Historical reconstruction in relationship to Cultural Heritage, Riga, Latvia, 23th-24th October 2000.
• 33. (The) San Antonio Declaration on Authenticity for the Americas, 1999.
• 34. Selfslagh B., Europese erfgoedconventies, hulpmiddelen en nieuwe uitdagingen, [in:] Een verleden landschap? Erfgoedzorg vandaag en morgen, nieuwe uitdagingen, Provincie Limburg, Tielt, 2006.
• 35. Spelsberg I., Cultural Landscape – an expanding notion and its challenges for conservation, [in:] Conservation and Preservation, Interactions between Theory and Practice, In memoriam Alois Riegl (1858 – 1905), Proceedings, of the International ICOMOS Scientific Committee for the Theory and the Philosophy of Conservation and Restoration, Vienna 23 – 27 April 2008, Florence, 2010.
• 36. Stovel H., Origins and Influence of the Nara Document on Authenticity, [in:] APT bul, 39, (2-3), 2008.
• 37. Tomaszewski A. (ed), Values and Criteria in Heritage Conservation, Proceedings of the International Conference of ICOMOS, ICCROM, Fondzione Romualdo Del Bianco, Florence,March 2th-4th, 2007, Firenze, 2008.
• 38. Tomaszewski A., Giometti S. (ed), The Image of Heritage, Changing Perceptions, Permanent Responsibilities, Proceeedings of the International Conference of the ICOMOS International Committee for the Theory and the Philosophu of Conservation and Restoration, March 6th-8th, Florence, 2009, Firenze, 2011.
• 39. Tomaszewski A., From Athens 1931 to Venice 1964, History and actuality, [in:] Conservation and Preservation, Interactions between Theory and Practice. In memoriam Alois Riegl (1858 – 1905), Proceedings, of the International ICOMOS scientific Committee for the Theory and the Philosophy of Conservation and Restoration, Vienna 23 – 27 April 2008, Florence, 2010.
• 40. UNESCO Convention concerning the Protection of the world Cultural and Natural Heritage, 1972.
• 41. UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, 2003.
• 42. UNESCO Convention on the Protection and the Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, 2005.
• 43. UNESCO Historic Urban Landscape Recommendation, 2011.
• 44. Van Balen K., The Nara Grid an Evaluation Scheme Based on the Nara Document on Authenticity, www.jstor.org/stable/25433951.
• 45. Verpoest L., Authenticité patrimoine historique et projet de conservation et restauration, [in:] Laurent Debailleux (ed), Patrimoine et Authenticité, Conférence-débat. Actes de la Conférence, Université de Mons, 05 May 2020, Université de Mons/Polytechniqe, Mons, GAV, 2021.
• 46. YAMAMOTO Declaration on Integrated Approaches for Safeguarding Tangible and Intangible Cultural Heritage, http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/files/23863/10988742599yamoto_declaration, (5.11.2009).