A comprehensive emergency management strategy for transportation systems in USA

• Autorzy: Korkmaz K. A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.20858/tp.2017.12.4.15

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Transportation systems in USA are an integral part of the current infrastructure systems and involves a huge investment as part of the government and taxpayers. Therefore, transportation systems have economic, social and vital importance for the U.S. Security and safety of transportation systems and infrastructures in case of any possible future disasters and hazards are crucial for state transportation agencies. The objective of this paper is to develop and implement a comprehensive emergency management strategy for transportation systems in the U.S. in case of any disaster and hazards. In this paper, recommendations are provided to define best deployment of updated emergency response into practice. Practical issues are detailed affecting potential implementation of the strategy. Possible actions to address management issues and tools are investigated; and methods of identifying and measuring the impacts associated with implementation of the strategy are explained.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

emergency management; transportation systems; USA; highway; disaster; hazard

PL

zarządzanie kryzysowe; system transportowy; autostrada; USA; katastrofa; hazard

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Transport Problems
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: T. 12, z. 4
• Strony: 153--162
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 37 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Korkmaz K. A.

• Eastern Michigan University, School of Visual and Built Environments Ypsilanti, MI, USA

Bibliografia

• 1. Schneiderbauer, S. Risk and vulnerability to natural disasters – from broad view to focused perspective. PhD thesis. University Berlin. 2007.
• 2. Taubenböck, H. & Roth, A. & Dech, S. Vulnerability assessment using remote sensing: The earthquake prone mega-city Istanbul, Turkey. In: International Symposium on Remote Sensing on Environment (ISRSE, 2007). San Jose, Costa Rica. 25/6/2007 - 29/6/2007. P.5.
• 3. Schneider, P. & Schauer, B. An earthquake risk assessment tool for Turkey. HAZTURK Strategies for earthquake loss estimation program for Turkey. Istanbul, Turkey. 2005.
• 4. Zlatanova, S. & Fabbri, A.G. Geo-ICT for Risk and Disaster Management. Importance of Geo-ICT in risk and disaster management. Geo Journal Library. Geospatial Technology and the Role of Location in Science. 2009.
• 5. Queensland Government, 2009. State Disaster Management Group. Available at: www. disaster.qld.gov.au
• 6. Ohio Department of Transportation Asset Management, 2011. Available at: https://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/Planning/TechServ/Documents/TAM%203.2.11.pdf
• 7. NCHRP 525, 2010, A guide to emergency response planning at state transportation agencies.
• 8. FHWA/TX-00/1834-4 Emergency management planning for Texas transit agencies: A Guidebook. 1999.
• 9. The World Bank emergency development plan. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2014/09/10/lessons-in-effective-disaster-recoveryfrom-vulnerable-countries
• 10. Korkmaz, K.A. Earthquake disaster risk assessment and evaluation for Turkey. Environ Geol. 2009. Vol. 57. P. 307–320.
• 11. Korkmaz, K.A. Integrated seismic hazard evaluation and disaster management approach for Turkey. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2010.
• 12. ASTM D 6433-11. 2011. Standard practice for roads and parking lots pavement condition index surveys. West Conshohocken, PA. USA.
• 13. GoB (2012). ‘Disaster Management Act 2012’. Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief.
• 14. Krawczyk, B. & Szydło, A. Identification of homogeneous pavement sections. Roads and Bridges - Drogi i Mosty. 2013. No. 2(3). P. 269-281.
• 15. Kapucu, N & Arslan, T & Demiroz, F. Collaborative emergency management and national emergency management network. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal. 2010. Vol. 19. No. 4. P. 452-468.
• 16. Loprencipe, G. & Cantisani, G. & Di Mascio, P. Global assessment method of road distresses. In: Fourth International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering IALCCE. 2014.
• 17. Wang, B. Study on decision model of emergency resources allocation based on equilibrium selection. CNKI journal. Theory Research. 2010-17.
• 18. Arjen, B. & Hart, P. & Stern, E. & Sundelius, B. The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2005.
• 19. McConnell, A. & Drennan, L. Mission impossible? Planning and preparing for crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 2006. Vol. 14. No. 2. P. 59–70.
• 20. Baer, M. & Heron, K. & Morton, O. & Ratliff, E. Safe: The Race to Protect Ourselves in a Newly Dangerous World. New York: HarperCollins Publishers. 2005.
• 21. GDACS. Global Disaster Alert and Coordination System. 2014.
• 22. Ichoua, S. Humanitarian logistics network design for an effective disaster response. In: Proceedings of the 7th International ISCRAM Conference. 2010.
• 23. Birkland, T.A. After Disaster: Agenda Setting. Public Policy, and Focusing Events. Washington. DC: Georgetown University Press. 1997.
• 24. Boin, R.A. From crisis to disaster: toward an integrative perspective. In: Perry, R. & Quarantelli, E.L. (eds.) What is a Disaster? New Answers to Old Questions. Philadelphia: Xlibris Press. 2005. P. 153–172.
• 25. Guha-Sapir, D. & Hoyois, P. & Below, R. Annual disaster statistical review 2013: The numbers and trends. Brussels: CRED. 2014.
• 26. Afshar, A. & Haghani, A. Modeling integrated supply chain logistics in realtime large-scale disaster relief operations. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2012. Vol. 46(4). P. 327-338.
• 27. Homeland Security. 2016. National Response Framework. Available at: https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1466014682982-9bcf8245ba4c60c120aa915abe74e15d/National_Response_Framework3rd.pdf

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018)