The IT project lifecycle in R&D: an adaptive approach to project management

• Autorzy: Eckes-Kondak Maria , Dajda Jacek

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2025.216.5

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: This article examines a structured framework for the IT research and development (R&D) project lifecycle, focusing on critical phases of effective project management and success. Design/methodology/approach: This study examines project cycle management (PCM), project management institute (PMI), and PRINCE2 methodologies through a detailed literature review and comparative analysis of these frameworks about a project in the IT R&D sector. The focus is on adapting the life cycle to the specifics of an IT R&D project, taking into account classic and agile methods, and analyzing the variability of resource utilization at different stages of these projects. Findings: The results indicate that dividing IT R&D projects into clearly defined phases promotes effective control and adaptive management. Each phase is also characterized by different relevance and resource utilization, which influences the need to adjust management actions depending on the stage of the IT R&D project. In addition, some phases are iterative, which harmonizes with the tenets of agile management of this type of project. Research limitations/implications: To achieve optimal project results, it is recommended to adapt the life cycle to the specifics of the IT R&D project, emphasizing the importance of its different phases in the context of adaptive management. The article proposes a project management approach that combines the structured phases of PCM with the adaptability of PMI and PRINCE2 methodologies and agile methods to better suit R&D objectives. Practical implications: The research highlights the need to adapt traditional project management models to the specific nature of IT R&D projects by incorporating iterative processes and greater flexibility. The proposed hybrid project lifecycle model enhances management efficiency, optimizes resource allocation, and enables quicker responses to changing conditions and stakeholder needs. Applying this approach can contribute to shorter development cycles, reduced risks, and faster market introduction of innovations. The findings have significant practical implications, supporting organizations in achieving better project outcomes and gaining a competitive advantage. Originality/value: By focusing on the unique needs of IT R&D projects, this paper contributes valuable insights to the field of project management, highlighting the role of structured life cycles in maximizing the effectiveness of IT R&D projects.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

adaptive project management; project life cycle; IT R&D projects

PL

adaptacyjne zarządzanie projektami; cykl życia projektu; projekty badawczo-rozwojowe w dziedzinie IT

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: z. 216
• Strony: 71--91
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 36 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Eckes-Kondak Maria

• AGH University of Krakow, Faculty of Computer Science

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9049-4440

autor

Dajda Jacek

• AGH University of Krakow, Faculty of Computer Science

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8617-4981

Bibliografia

• 1. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (2013). PMBOK® Guide (5th ed.). Project Management Institute.
• 2. Basu, R. (2015). Managing projects in research and development. London: Routledge.
• 3. Beck, K., Beedle, M., Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Flower, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J., Marick, B., Martin, R.C., Mellor, S., Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J., Thomas, D. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development. Retrieved from: http://www.agilemanifesto.org/, 10.01.2025.
• 4. Chin, C.M.M., Spowage, A.C. (2010). Defining a project management framework for the adoption of Lean thinking in Agile software development methodology. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 3, Iss. 3, pp. 589-603, doi: 10.1108/17538371011056077.
• 5. Cleland, D.I. (2007). Project management: Strategic design and implementation (5th ed.). London: McGraw-Hill.
• 6. Concannon, T.W., Meissner, P., Grunbaum, J.A., McElwee, N., Guise, J.M., Santa, J., Conway, P.H., Daudelin, D., Leslie, L.K. (2014). Defining the benefits and challenges of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, Vol. 3, Iss. 2, pp. 137-147, doi: 10.2217/cer.14.13.
• 7. Crawford, L.H., Pollack, J. (2004). Hard and soft projects: A framework for analysis. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 22, Iss. 8, pp. 645-653, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.04.004.
• 8. De Wit, A. (1988). Measurement of project success. Project Management, Vol. 6, Iss. 3, pp. 164-170, doi: 10.1016/0263-7863(88)90043-9.
• 9. European Commission (2004). Aid delivery methods: Project cycle management guidelines. EuropeAid. Retrieved from: https://capacity4dev.europa.eu/library/aid-delivery-methodsproject-cycle-management-guidelines-europeaid-2004_en, 10.01.2025.
• 10. Filiz Turkmen, G., Topcu, I. (2021). Research and development project selection: A comprehensive analysis of the trends and methods. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 32, Iss. 4, pp. 28-43, doi: 10.7166/32-4-2452.
• 11. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, Iss. 1, pp. 75-105, doi: 10.2307/25148625.
• 12. Hooge, S., Dalmasso, C. (2015). Breakthrough R&D stakeholders: The challenges of legitimacy in highly uncertain projects. Project Management Journal, Vol. 46, Iss. 6, pp. 54-73, doi: 10.1002/pmj.21550.
• 13. Jetter, A., Albar, F. (2016). The practice of project management in product development. Project Management Institute. Retrieved from: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/project-management-product-development-11194, 10.01.2025.
• 14. Kerzner, H. (1981). The R&D project manager. Project Management Quarterly, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, pp. 20-24.
• 15. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. New York: Wiley.
• 16. Kerzner, H. (2019). Innovation project management: Methods, case studies, and tools for managing innovation projects. New York: Wiley.
• 17. Kloppenborg, T.J., Petrick, J.. (1999). Leadership in the project life cycle and team character development. Project Management Journal, Vol. 30, Iss. 2, doi: 10.1177/8756972899030002.
• 18. Kostalova, J., Tetrevova, L. (2016). Application of project management methods and tools concerning the project life cycle and the project type. 9th International Scientific Conference Business and Management 2016, doi: 10.3846/bm.2016.03.
• 19. Li, J., Zhang, D., Liu, L. (2020). Checkpoints in new product development. Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 32, Iss. 4, pp. 283-297, doi: 10.1080/10429247.2020.1758538.
• 20. López, L., Burgueño, L., Molina, C. (2021). QFL: Data-driven feedback loop to manage quality in agile development. Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 179, Iss. 110977, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2102.05920.
• 21. Meredith, J.R., Mantel, S.J. Jr. (2011). Project management: A managerial approach. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
• 22. Miller, R., Hobday, M. (2020). Managing collaborative R&D projects. In: G. Fernandes, L. Dooley, D. O'Sullivan, A. Rolstadås, (Eds.), Managing Collaborative R&D Projects: Innovation Through Collaboration (pp. 1-25). London: Springer.
• 23. Mohindra, T., Srivastava, M. (2019). Comparative analysis of project management frameworks and proposition for project-driven organizations. PM World Journal, Vol. 8, Iss. 5. Retrieved from: https://pmworldlibrary.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/pmwj85-Sep2019-Mohindra-Srivastava-comparative-analysis-of-project-managementframeworks.pdf, 10.01.2025.
• 24. Pinto, J.K., Slevin, D.P. (1989). Critical success factors in R&D projects. Research Technology Management, Vol. 32, Iss. 1, pp. 31-35, doi: 10.1080/08956308.1989. 11670572.
• 25. Smith, J. (2010). Managing technological innovation projects. Project Management Journal, Vol. 41, Iss. 3, pp. 30-45. Retrieved from: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/managing-technological-innovation-projects-1129, 10.01.2025.
• 26. Smith, J., Brown, A. (2020). Application of PRINCE2 methodology in IT project management. Journal of Information Technology and Project Management, Vol. 12, Iss. 3, pp. 45-60, doi: 10.1016/j.jitpm.2020.03.005.
• 27. Smith, R., Johnson, L. (2022). Development levels of stakeholder relationships in collaborative projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 15, Iss. 4, pp. 789-807, doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-03-2022-0066.
• 28. Toppila, A., Liesiö, J., Salo, A. (2011). A resource allocation model for R&D investments: A case study in telecommunication standardization. In: W. A. Salo, J. Keisler, A. Morton (Eds.), Portfolio decision analysis: Improved methods for resource allocation (pp. 241-258). London: Springer.
• 29. Turner, J.R., Müller, R. (2003). The project life cycle: A foundation for effective project management. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 21, Iss. 5, pp. 379-387, doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00021-5.
• 30. Turner, R. (2014). Handbook of project management. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
• 31. Urbinati, A., Landoni, P., Cococcioni, F., De Giudici, L. (2021). Stakeholder management in open innovation projects: A multiple case study analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 24, Iss. 5, pp. 1595-1624, doi: 10.1108/EJIM-03-2020-0076.
• 32. Wang, J., Wang, C.Y., Wu, C.Y. (2015). A real options framework for R&D planning in technology-based firms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 35, pp. 93-114, doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2014.12.001.
• 33. Wrona, T., Ladwig, T. (2020). Hybridisation of IT project management methodologies: Complementary or contradictory? In: G. Silvius, E. Turkulainen (Eds.), Advances in project management research (pp. 235-248). London: Springer.
• 34. Wynn, D.C., Eckert, C.M. (2017). Perspectives on iteration in design and development. Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 28 Iss. 2, pp. 153-184, doi: 10.1007/s00163-016-0226-3.
• 35. Young, T.L. (2016). Successful project management. London: Kogan Page.
• 36. Zwikael, O., Smyrk, J. (2019). Project management for the creation of organizational value. London: Springer.