Energy-related conditions and envelope properties for sustainable buildings

• Autorzy: Geryło R.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/bpasts-2016-0079

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The assessment methodology for the sustainability of buildings is based on the analysis of environmental, social and economic performance. The main purpose of the paper is the presentation of energy-related conditions and envelope properties as well as methodology aspects. The first part of the paper presents the literature review on sustainability and zero-energy buildings. The second part is devoted to describe different energy indicators for the evaluation of primary energy requirements and energy characteristic. The last section describes the general methodology for characterization of energetic properties of the building envelope and gives examples from literature of the effect of applications in a building’s envelope an aerogel based thermal insulation for higher thermal transmittance and a PCM for higher latent heat capacity with general description of results obtained by other authors. The crucial measure is the use of high thermal performance components for the building’s envelopes combined with the heat storage potential. In the context of sustainability, energy related conditions constitute a new set of indicators for identifying the usefulness and the efficiency of new technologies.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainability of construction works; requirements development; primary energy; embodied energy; thermal performance; thermal stability

PL

trwałość obiektów budowlanych; rozwój wymagań; energia pierwotna; wydajność cieplna; stabilność termiczna

• Wydawca: Polska Akademia Nauk, Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych
• Czasopismo: Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Technical Sciences
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 64, nr 4
• Strony: 697--707
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 69 poz., tab., wykr., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Geryło R.

• Instytut Techniki Budowlanej (ITB), 1 Filtrowa St., 00-611 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] T. Ramesh, R. Prakash, K.K. Shukla, “Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview”, Energy and Buildings 42 (10), 1592‒1600 (2010).
• [2] W. K. Biswas, “Carbon footprint and embodied energy consumption assessment of building construction works in Western Australia”, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 3 (2), 179–186 (2014).
• [3] C. Thormark, “A low energy building in a life cycle—its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential”, Building and Environment 37 (4), 429‒435 (2002).
• [4] P. Chastas, T. Theodosiou, D. Bikas, “Embodied energy in residential buildings-towards the nearly zero energy building: A literature review”, Building and Environment 105, 267‒282 (2016).
• [5] R. H. Crawford, E. L. Bartak, A. Stephan, C. A. Jensen, “Evaluating the life cycle energy benefits of energy efficiency regulations for buildings”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63, 435–451 (2016).
• [6] A.J. Marszal, P. Heiselberg, J.S. Bourrell, E. Musall, K. Voss, I. Sartori, A. Napolitano, “Zero energy building – A review of definitions and calculation methodologies”, Energy and Buildings 43 (4), 971–979 (2011).
• [7] P. Hernandez, P. Kenny, “From net energy to zero energy buildings: Defining life cycle zero energy buildings (LC-ZEB)”, Energy and Buildings, 42 (6), 815–821 (2010).
• [8] I. Sartori, A. Napolitano, K. Voss, “Net zero energy buildings: A consistent definition framework”, Energy and Buildings 48, 220–232 (2012). [Crossref]
• [9] P. Torcellini, S. Pless, M. Deru, D. Crawley, “Zero energy buildings: A critical look at the definition”, ACEEE Summer Study, California, August 14−18, 2006.
• [10] A. J. Marszal, P. Heiselberg, R. L. Jensen, J. Nørgaard, “Onsite or off-site renewable energy supply options? Life cycle cost analysis of a Net Zero Energy Building in Denmark”, Renewable Energy 44, 154–165 (2012).
• [11] S. B. Sadineni, S. Madala, R. F. Boehm, “Passive building energy savings: A review of building envelope components”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (8), 3617–3631 (2011).
• [12] E. Cuce, P. M. Cuce, C. J. Wood, S. B. Riffat, “Toward aerogel based thermal superinsulation in buildings: A comprehensive review”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 34, 273–299 (2014).
• [13] R. Baetens, B. P. Jelle, A. Gustavsen, “Aerogel insulation for building applications: A state-of-the-art review”, Energy and Buildings 43 (4), 761‒769 (2011).
• [14] R. Baetens, B. P. Jelle, J. V. Thue, M. J. Tenpierik, S. Grynning, S. Uvsløkk, A. Gustavsen, “Vacuum insulation panels for building applications: A review and beyond”, Energy and Buildings 42 (2), 147‒172 (2010).
• [15] M. Alam, H. Singh, M. C. Limbachiya, “Vacuum Insulation Panels (VIPs) for building construction industry – A review of the contemporary developments and future directions”, Applied Energy 88 (11), 3592‒3602 (2011).
• [16] A. Kylili, P. A. Fokaides, “Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Phase Change Materials (PCMs) for building applications: A review”, Journal of Building Engineering 6, 133‒143 (2016).
• [17] Y. Konuklu, M. Ostry, H. O. Paksoy, P. Charvat, “Review on using microencapsulated phase change materials (PCM) in building applications”, Energy and Buildings 106, 134–155 (2015).
• [18] M. Iten, S. Liu, A. Shukla, “A review on the air-PCM-TES application for free cooling and heating in the buildings”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 61, 175–186 (2016).
• [19] L. Czarnecki, J. J. Sokołowska “Material model and revealing the truth”. Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech. 63 (1), 7‒14 (2015).
• [20] D. Gawin, M. Koniorczyk, F. Pesavento “Modelling of hydrothermo-chemo-mechanical phenomena in buildings materials”, Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech. 61 (1), 51‒64 (2013).
• [21] S. Woliński “Defining of the structural robustness”, Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech. 61 (1), 137‒144 (2013).
• [22] L. Czarnecki, M. Kapron, “Sustainable Construction as a Research Area”, International Journal of the Society of Materials Engineering for Resources 17 (2), (2010).
• [23] P. M. Boulanger, “Sustainable development indicators: a scientific challenge, a democratic issue”, S.A.P.I.EN.S 1 (1), (2008).
• [24] Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment, UN Documents, 1987.
• [25] United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992, AGENDA 21, UN Documents, 1992.
• [26] Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2012, 66/288. The future we want, UN Documents, 2012.
• [27] Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, 70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, UN Documents, 2015.
• [28] Agenda 21 on sustainable construction, CIB Report Publication 237, 1999.
• [29] M. Piasecki, R. Geryło, “Economic analysis of buildings in their life cycle – calculation methods and examples”, XIV-th Polish Scientific-Technical Conference on Building Physics in Theory and Practice (2013) [in Polish].
• [30] EN 15643‒1:2010 Sustainability of construction works – Sustainability assessment of buildings – General framework.
• [31] EN 15643‒2:2011 Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of buildings -Framework for the assessment of environmental performance.
• [32] EN 15643‒3:2012 Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of buildings – Framework for the assessment of social performance.
• [33] EN 15643‒4:2012 Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of buildings – Framework for the assessment of economic performance.
• [34] EN 15978:2011 Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of environmental performance of buildings – Calculation method.
• [35] EN 16309:2014 Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of social performance of buildings – Methods.
• [36] EN 16627:2015 Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of economic performance of buildings – Calculation methods.
• [37] EN 15804:2012 Sustainability of construction works – Environmental product declarations – Core rules for the product category of construction products.
• [38] Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast), Official Journal of the European Union L 153/13, 18.6.2010.
• [39] Commission delegated regulation (EU) No 244/2012 of 16 January 2012 supplementing Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance of buildings by establishing a comparative methodology framework for calculating cost-optimal levels of minimum energy performance requirements for buildings and building elements, Official Journal of the European Union, L 81/18, 2012.
• [40] R. Gerylo, “The economic optimum of energy requirements for buildings in Poland”, 61-th Scientific Conference of the Civil and Water Engineering of the Polish Academy of Science (PAN) and of the Science Committee PZITB, Bydgoszcz – Krynica, Problem part: Energy-saving construction in Poland – current state and perspectives, 2015 [in Polish].
• [41] M. Basinska, H. Koczyk, E. Szczechowiak, “Sensitivity analysis in determining the optimum energy for residential buildings in Polish conditions”, Energy and Buildings 107, 307–318 (2015).
• [42] H. P. Schettler-Köhler, “Implementation of the EPBD in Germany, 2016 – Implementing the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) Featuring Country Reports”, ADENE, 2015.
• [43] EN 15603:2008 Energy performance of buildings – Overall energy use and definition of energy ratings.
• [44] LEED v4 for Building design and construction, U.S. Green Building Council, 2016.
• [45] The Energy Conservation & Production Act – ECPA, 2014.
• [46] ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1‒2013 – Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, ASHRAE, 2013.
• [47] 2012 International Energy Conservation Code, International Code Council, INC., 2011.
• [48] T. Taylor, Assessing carbon emissions in BREEAM, Briefing paper, BRE Global Ltd, 2015.
• [49] The Building Regulations 2010, Conservation of fuel and power, Approved document L1A Conservation of fule and power in new dwellings, HM Government, 2013 edition incorporating 2016 amendments.
• [50] EN ISO 12631:2012 Thermal performance of curtain walling – Calculation of thermal transmittance.
• [51] B. Pietruszka, R. Gerylo, “Implementation of nanoporous thermal insulations to improve the energy efficiency of curtain walling structures”, 10th International Conference: Modern building materials, structures and techniques, Vilnus, Lithuania, 255‒258 (2010).
• [52] R. Baetens, B. P. Jellea, A. Gustavsen, “Aerogel insulation for building applications: A state-of-the-art review”, Energy and Buildings 43 (4), 761‒769 (2011).
• [53] R. Baetens, B. P. Jelle, J. V. Thue, M. J. Tenpierik, S. Grynning, S. Uvsløkka, A. Gustavsen, Vacuum insulation panels for building applications: A review and beyond, Energy and Buildings 42 (2), 147‒172 (2010).
• [54] D. M. Burch, J. E. Seem, G. N. Walton, B.A. Licitra, “Dynamic evaluation of thermal bridges in a typical office building”, ASHRAE Transactions 98, 291–304 (1992).
• [55] E. Kossecka, J. Kośny, “Three-dimensional conduction z-transfer function coefficients determined from the response factors”, Energy and Buildings 37 (4), 301–310 (2005).
• [56] J. Quinten, V. Feldheim, “Dynamic modelling of multidimensional thermal bridges in building envelopes: Review of existing methods, application and new mixed method”, Energy and Buildings 110, 284–293 (2016).
• [57] K. Martin, C. Escudero, A. Erkoreka, I. Flores, J. M. Sala, “Equivalent wall method for dynamic characterisation of thermal bridges”, Energy and Buildings 55, 704–714 (2012).
• [58] N. Zhu, Z. Ma, S. Wang, “Dynamic characteristics and energy performance of buildings using phase change materials: A review”; Energy Conversion and Management 50 (12), 3169‒3181 (2009).
• [59] H. Akeiber, P. Nejat, M. Z. A. Majid, M. A. Wahid, F. Jomehzadeh, I. Z. Famileh, J. K. Calautit, B. R. Hughes, S. A. Zaki, “A review on phase change material (PCM) for sustainable passive cooling in building envelopes”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 60, 1470‒1497 (2016).
• [60] F. Kuznik, D. Davida, K. Johannes, J. J. Roux, “A review on phase change materials integrated in building walls”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (1), 379‒391 (2011).
• [61] R. Baetensa, B. P. Jellea, A. Gustavsend, “Phase change materials for building applications: A state-of-the-art review”, Energy and Buildings 42 (9), 1361‒1368 (2010).
• [62] V. V. Tyagia, S. C. Kaushika, S. K. Tyagib, T. Akiyamac, “Development of phase change materials based microencapsulated technology for buildings: A review”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2), 1373‒1391 (2011).
• [63] D. I. Kolaitis, M. A. Founti, “Solar wall enhanced with phase-change materials: a detailed numerical simulation study”, Journal Advances in Building Energy Research 10, 1‒17 (2016).
• [64] D. Heim, “Phase-Change Material modeling within whole building dynamic simulation”, ASHRAE Transactions 112 (1), 518‒525 (2006).
• [65] D. Heim, “Isothermal storage of solar energy in building construction”, Renewable Energy 35 (4), 788‒796 (2010).
• [66] D. Heim, A. Wieprzkowicz, “Positioning of an isothermal heat storage layer in a building wall exposed to the external environment”, Journal of Building Performance Simulation 9 (5), 542‒554 (2016).
• [67] A.L.S. Chan, “Energy and environmental performance of building façades integrated with phase change material in subtropical Hong Kong”, Energy and Buildings 43 (10), 2947–2955 (2011).
• [68] M. Saffaria, A. Graciab, S. Ushakb, L. F. Cabezaa, “Economic impact of integrating PCM as passive system in buildings using Fanger comfort model”, Energy and Buildings 112, 159‒172 (2016).
• [69] D. A. Chwieduk, “Some aspects of energy efficient building envelope in high latitude countries”, Energy Procedia 57, 1898‒1907 (2014).

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.