PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Ethical case for self-defense robots

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Advances in robotics and Artificial Intelligence (AI) make utilizing robots in domestic law enforcement and self-defense increasingly viable. As with any set of technological developments, this opens up a space of possibilities for their licit and illicit use and creates a need for ethically-informed, effective and enforceable regulation. What is unique is the technology’s potential to solve a persistent issue necessarily impacting all self-defense and law enforcement executed by humans – the License to Overkill and the Response Time Trilemma. The paper starts by explaining what these issues are and how they thwart our attempts to conform with an ethical ideal of self-defense. It then outlines the particulars of the technological solution and describe its great promise. Finally, possible objections and the regulatory measures that would limit the negative impact of self-defense robots while preserving the social and ethical benefits of their sensible employment are discussed.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
205--219
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 20 poz.
Twórcy
autor
  • University of Warsaw, Department of Ethics, Institute of Philosophy
Bibliografia
  • 1. Altmann, J., & Sauer, F. (2017). Autonomous Weapon Systems and Strategic Stability. Survival, 59:5, 117-142.
  • 2. Arkin R.C. (2011). Governing Lethal Behavior: Embedding Ethics in a Hybrid Deliberative/Reactive Robot Architecture. Technical Report GIT-GVU-07-11. Available online www.cc.gatech.edu/ai/robot-lab/online-publications/formalizationv35.pdf.
  • 3. Arkin, R.C., Ulam, P., & Duncan, B. (2009). An Ethical Governor for Constraining Lethal Action in an Autonomous System. Georgia Institute of Technology. Available online www.cc.gatech.edu/ai/robot-lab/online-publications/GIT-GVU-09-02.pdf.
  • 4. Card B.A. (2018). Terror From Above; How the Commercial UAV Revolution Threatens the US Threshold. Air and Space Power Journal, 32, 1.
  • 5. Coons Ch., & Weber M. (Eds.) (2016). The Ethics of Self Defense. USA: Oxford University Press.
  • 6. FRA (2014). EU Agency For Fundamental Right. Violence against women: an EU-wide survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • 7. Gettinger, D. (2018). Public Safety Drones. An Update. Center For The Study Of The Drone At Bard College publication. Available online http://dronecenter.bard.edu/public-safety-drones-update/.
  • 8. Hanacek, J. (2018). The perfect can wait; good solutions to the ‘drone swarm’ problem, WarOnTheRocks.com, https://warontherocks.com/2018/08/the-perfect-can-wait-good-solutions-to-the-drone-swarm-problem/, 14.08.2018.
  • 9. LaFollette, H. (2000). Gun Control. Ethics, 110, 263-281.
  • 10. Marks, P. (2013). ‘Self-aiming’ Rifle Turns Novices Into Expert Snipers, https://www.new scientist.com/article/dn23571-self-aiming-rifle-turns-novices-into-expert-snipers/, 20.05.2013.
  • 11. McMahan, J. (2015). A Challenge to Gun Rights. University of Oxford “Practical Ethics” Blog, http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2015/04/a-challenge-to-gun-rights/, 17.04.2015.
  • 12. Pattison, J. (2016). The Case for the Nonideal Morality of War: Beyond Revisionism versus Traditionalism in Just War Theory. Political Theory, 25th October 2016. DOI: journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0090591716669394.
  • 13. Pionion, D. (2018). The Navy and Marine Corps Need to prepare for the Swarm of the Future. WarOnTheRocks.com, https://warontherocks.com/2018/03/the-navy-and-marine-corps-must-plan-for-the-swarm-of-the-future/, 28.03.2018.
  • 14. Pratt, G.A. (2015). Is a Cambrian Explosion Coming for Robotics? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 3, 51-60.
  • 15. Ryan, M. (2018). Human-Machine Teaming For Future Ground Forces. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, https://csbaonline.org/uploads/documents/ Human_Machine_Teaming_FinalFormat.pdf.
  • 16. Terzian, D. (2013). The Right to Bear (Robotic) Arms. Penn State Law Review, 117:3, 755-796.
  • 17. Velez-Green, A. (2015). The South Korean Sentry – A 'Killer Robot' To Prevent War. Lawfare, https://www.lawfareblog.com/foreign-policy-essay-south-korean-sentry%E2% 80%94-killer-robot-prevent-war, 01.03.2015.
  • 18. Von Hofer, H. (2000). Crime Statistics as Constructs: The Case of Swedish Rape statistics. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8, 77-89.
  • 19. Yung, C.R. (2013). How to Lie with Rape Statistics: America’s Hidden Rape Crisis. Iowa Law Review, 99, 1197-1256.
  • 20. Zając, M. (2017). Regulating Civilian-use Drones and Robots as a Serious Homeland Security Hazard. Transformations, 3-4(94-95), 60-71.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-924115c6-9e71-4830-84f2-f4d8e5d167fb
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.