Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Multiple response optimization of the machining of 17-4 PH stainless steel material, which is difficult to process with traditional methods, with EDM was made by Taguchi-based grey relational analysis method. Surface roughness (Ra), material removal rate (MRR), and electrode wear rate (EWR) were the responses, while current, pulse-on time, pulse-off time, and voltage were chosen as process parameters. According to the multi-response optimization, the experiment level that gave the best result was A1B2C2D2. optimum machining outputs were found as A1B3C1D1 using the Taguchi method. As a result of the Taguchi analysis and ANOVA, it was determined that the significant parameters according to multiple performance characteristics were current (56.22%) and voltage (22.40%). The surfaces of the best GRG and optimal sample were examined with XRD, SEM and EDX analysis and the effects on the surfaces were compared.
Wydawca
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
861--868
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 47 poz., fot., rys., tab., wzory
Twórcy
autor
- Erciyes University, Mechanical Engineering Department, Kayseri, Turkey
autor
- Afyon Kocatepe University, İscehisar Vocational School, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
Bibliografia
- [1] N. Hsiao, C.S. Chiou, J.R. Yang, Mater. Chem. Phys. 74, 134-142 (2002). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(01)00460-6
- [2] Gopalakannan, T. Senthilvelan, J. Miner. Mater. Char. Eng. 11, 685-690 (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2012.117053
- [3] A. Thakur, M. Tak, R.G. Mote, Procedia. Manuf. 34, 355-361 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.177
- [4] S. Chandramouli, K. Eswaraiah, Mater. Today-Proc. 4, 2040-2047 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.049
- [5] S. Chandramouli, K. Eswaraiah, Mater. Today-Proc. 5, 5058-5067 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.084
- [6] S. Pasebani, M. Ghayoora, S. Badweb, H. Irrinki, S.V. Atre, Addit. Manuf. 22, 127-137 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.011
- [7] P.D. Nezhadfar, E. Burford, K. Anderson-Wedge, B. Zhang, S. Shao, S.R. Daniewicz, N. Shamsaei, Int. J. Fatigue. 123, 168-179 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.015
- [8] L. Carneiro, B. Jalalahmadi, A. Ashtekar, Y. Jiang, Int. J. Fatigue 123, 22-30 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.006
- [9] M. Albaskara, Z. Arsoy, E. Gerçekcioğlu, J. Charact. 1 (2), 50-60 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.29228/JCHAR.50779
- [10] Y. Sun, R.J. Hebert, M. Aindow, Mater. Design 156, 429-440 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.015
- [11] K.H. Ho, S.T. Newman, Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu. 43, 1287-1300 (2003). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00162-7
- [12] M. Kiyak, O. Çakır, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 191, 141-144 (2007). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.008
- [13] N.M. Abbas, D.G. Solomon, M.F. Bahari, Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu. 47, 1214-1228, (2007). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.08.026
- [14] J.E. Abu Qudeiri, A. Saleh, A. Ziout., A.H.I. Mourad, M.H. Abidi, A. Elkaseer, Materials 12 (6), 907 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060907
- [15] T. Muthuramalingam, B. Mohan, Mater. Manuf. Process. 28 (4), 375-380 (2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2012.746700
- [16] A. Majumder, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 27 (7), 2143-2151 (2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-013-0524-x
- [17] S. Sharif, W. Safiei, A.F. Mansor, M.H.M. Isa, R.M. Saad, Procedia. Manuf. 2, 147-152 (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.026
- [18] K.M. Rao, D.V. Kumar, K.C. Shekar, B. Singaravel, Mater. TodayProc. 46 (1), 701-706 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.067
- [19] R.K. Roy, Design of Experiments Using the Taguchi Approach, John Wiley & Sons, New York (2001).
- [20] M. Rahang, P.K. Patowari, Mater. Manuf. Process. 31, 422-431 (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1037921
- [21] K. Aslantaş, E. Ekici, A. Çiçek, Measurement 128, 419-427 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.06.066
- [22] P. Sivaiah, D. Chakradhar, Measurement 134, 142-152 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.067
- [23] M.R. Kumar, A. Krishnaiah, R.S. Kalva, Mater. Today-Proc. 5, 27269-27276 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.09.043
- [24] S.V. Narayanan, D.M. Benjamin, M.V. Hariharan, R. Keshav, D.S. Raj, Mach. Sci. Technol. 25 (2), 209-236 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2020.1815037
- [25] C. Moganapriya, R. Rajasekar, K. Ponapp, R. Venkatesh, R. Karthick, Arch. Metall. Mater. 62 (3), 1827-1832 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amm-2017-0276
- [26] J.L. Lin, C.L. Lin, Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu. 42, 237-244 (2002).
- [27] H.N. Phan, T. Muthuramalingam, Silicon 13, 2771-2783 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00632-w
- [28] H.N. Phan, T. Muthuramalingam, Silicon 13, 1879-1885 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00573-4
- [29] E. Kuram, B. Özcelik, Measurement 46, 6, 1849-1864 (2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.02.002
- [30] Y. Kuo, T. Yang, G.W. Huang, Eng. Optimiz. 40 (6), 517-528 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150701857645
- [31] M. Sivaraj, S. Rajkumar, S. Muthuraman, Mater. Today-Proc. 37, 2, 1254-1263 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.437
- [32] J.B. Saedon, N. Jaafar, M.A. Yahaya, N.H. Saada, M.S. Kasim, Proc. Tech. 15, 832-840 (2014). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.09.057
- [33] M. Sarıkaya, V. Yılmaz, H. Dilipak, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B. 230 (6), 1049-1065 (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405414565136
- [34] M. Sarıkaya, A. Güllü, J. Clean. Prod. 91, 347-357 (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.020
- [35] T.L. Banh, H.P. Nguyen, C. Ngo, D.T. Nguyen, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. E: J. Process Mech. Eng. 232 (3), 281-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408917693661
- [36] O. Zerti, M.A. Yallese, A. Zerti, S. Belhadi, F. Girardin, Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput. 9, 173-194 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2017.7.001
- [37] G. Uzun, Measurement 142, 122-130 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.059
- [38] N. Jeyaprakash, C.H. Yang, D.R. Kumar, Mater. Today-Proc. 21 (3), 1425-1431 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.212
- [39] B. Gugulothu, G.K.M. Rao, M. Bezabih, Mater. Today-Proc. 46 (1), 89-98 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.135
- [40] P.H. Nguyen, T.L. Banh, K.A. Mashood, Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 45, 5555-5562 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04456-z
- [41] S.V. Kajendirakumar, G.S. Kumar, P. Parameswaran, B.S. Kumar, Mater. Today-Proc. 37 (2), 1137-1139 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.347
- [42] S. Kalyanakumar, S.T. Chandy, K.T.A. Muhammed, P.S. Rohith, Mater. Today-Proc. 45 (7), 6193-6197 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.508
- [43] C.H.C. Haron, B.Md. Deros, A. Ginting, M. Fauziah, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 116, 84-87 (2001).
- [44] T. Rajmohan, R. Prabhu, G.S. Rao, K. Palanikumar, Procedia. Eng. 38, 1030-1036 (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.129
- [45] M. Chakmakchi, A. Ntasi, W. D. Mueller, S. Zinelis, Dent. Mater. 37, 4, 588-596 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.01.012
- [46] N. Natarajan, P. Suresh, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 77, 1741-1750, (2014). DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6494-z
- [47] K.K. Saxena, S. Agarwal, S.K. Khare, Procedia. CIRP. 42, 79-184 (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.26
Uwagi
This study was supported by the Erciyes University Scientific Research Projects Coordination unit under grant number FDK-2020-9339. The authors, also, would like to thank Mr. Hüsamettin Ertürk from Iscehisar Vocational School for his valuable support for the softwares.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-917632ed-7f7d-4308-8f8e-f0a0fcaea4a0