Cooperation forms between participants of the inland waterways cargo delivery: a case study of the Dnieper region

• Autorzy: Scherbina Olga , Drozhzhyn Oleksii , Yatsenko Oleksander , Shybaev Oleksander

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.20858/sjsutst.2019.103.12

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The society’s main trend for globalisation requires the restructuring of the global transport system as a whole. The ‘Dnieper region’ is no exception, as it needs changes in its practice of organising and managing its process of cargo delivery in accordance with the current trends. This paper considered the main solution directions of this problem in the aspect of ‘container on barge system’ transportation in accordance with the potential of the region. Based on international experience, the competitiveness of the container on barge system can be ensured by applying the different forms of cooperation between the business-players. In the case of horizontal cooperation, it’s raising the problem of distribution of structural elements of the container on barge system during the container-flows adoption. So, the paper proposed the mathematical decision to maximise the use of the linear ship's characteristics by the barge’s loading capacity and by the tug’s engine power.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cooperation; inland waterways; container; barge; container transportation

PL

współpraca; śródlądowe drogi wodne; kontener; barka; transport kontenerowy

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Transport / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: z. 103
• Strony: 155--166
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Scherbina Olga

• The Odesa National Maritime University, Mechnikova 34 Street, Odesa, Ukraine

autor

Drozhzhyn Oleksii

• The Odesa National Maritime University, Mechnikova 34 Street, Odesa, Ukraine

autor

Yatsenko Oleksander

• Institute of Marine Economy and Entrepreneurship, st. Pl.10 April 1 of.47, Odessa, 65044, Ukraine

autor

Shybaev Oleksander

• Faculty of Maritime Business, The Odesa National Maritime University, Mechnikova 34 Street, Odesa, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• 1. Lind Mikael, Michele Sancricca, Andy Lane, Michael Bergmann, Robert Ward, Richard T. Watson, Niels Bjorn-Andersen, Sandra Haraldson, Trond Andersen, Phil Ballou. 2018. „Making a fragmented and inefficient container industry more profitable through PortCDM”. RISE Research Institutes of Sweden.
• 2. Yap Wei Yim, Seyed Mehdi Zahraei. 2018. „Liner shipping alliances and their impact on shipping connectivity in Southeast Asia”. Maritime Business Review 3(3): 243-255. DOI: 10.1108/MABR-05-2018-0018.
• 3. Guo Yue, Yuanhua Jia, Zhipeng Li. 2018. „Analysis on container fleet competitiveness after COSCO and China shipping reorganization based on multi-attribute decision making”. In 2018 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC): 1020-1024. DOI: 10.1109/CCDC.2018.8407279.
• 4. Porter J. 2006. Maersk faces P&O Nedlloyd invoice crisis. Lloyd’s list.
• 5. Midoro Renato, Alessandro Pitto. 2000. „A critical evaluation of strategic alliances in liner shipping”. Maritime Policy & Management 27(1): 31-40. DOI: 10.1080/030888300286662.
• 6. Fossey J. 1997. „NOL/APL shockwaves”. Containerisation International 6-7.
• 7. Drozhzhyn Alexey. 2007. „Глобальные стратегические альянсы в линейном судоходстве” [In Ukrainian: „The global strategic alliances in liner shipping”]. Collection of Scientific Papers Sworld 1(1): 70-74.
• 8. Irannezhad Elnaz, Carlo G. Prato, Mark Hickman. 2018. „The effect of cooperation among shipping lines on transport costs and pollutant emissions”. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 65: 312-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.09.008.
• 9. Xing Wei, Qing Liu, Guangjun Chen. 2017. „Pricing strategies for port competition and cooperation”. Maritime Policy & Management 45(2): 260-77. DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2017.1405290.
• 10. Tuljak-Suban Danijela. 2017. „Competition or cooperation in a hub and spoke-shipping network: the case of the north adriatic container terminals”. Transport 33(2): 429-36. DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2016.1261368.
• 11. Notteboom Theo E., Francesco Parola, Giovanni Satta, Athanasios A. Pallis. 2017. „The relationship between port choice and terminal involvement of alliance members in container shipping”. Journal of Transport Geography 64: 158-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.09.002.
• 12. Konings Rob. 2019. „Opportunities to improve container barge handling in the port of Rotterdam from a transport network perspective”. Journal of Transport Geography 15(6): 443-454. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.01.009.
• 13. Horst Martijn Van Der, Michiel Kort, Bart Kuipers, Harry Geerlings. 2019. „Coordination problems in container barging in the port of Rotterdam: an institutional analysis”. Transportation Planning and Technology 42(2): 187-99. DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2019.1565164.
• 14. Caris A., C. Macharis, G.K. Janssens. 2011. „Network analysis of container barge transport in the port of Antwerp by means of simulation”. Journal of Transport Geography 19(1): 125-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.12.002.
• 15. Frémont Antoine, Pierre Franc, Brian Slack. 2009. „Inland barge services and container transport: the case of the ports of Le Havre and Marseille in the European context”. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography 437. DOI: 10.4000/cybergeo.21743.
• 16. Notteboom Theo. 2007. „Container river services and gateway ports: similarities between the Yangtze River and the Rhine River”. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 48(3): 330-343. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2007.00351.x.
• 17. Container-On-Barge Port Concept Paper. 2008. Available at: https://towmasters.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/cob_port_concept_paper_seohiopa_2008.pdf.
• 18. Container-On-Barge Port Concept Paper. 2011. Available at: https://towmasters.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/cob_port_concept_paper_seohiopa_2008.pdf.
• 19. Drozhzhyn Alexey. 2012. “ Анализ состояния и проблемы развития контейнерных перевозок на Дунае”. [In Ukrainian: „Analysis of the state and problems of the development of container traffic on the Danube”]. Visnik of the Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University 6(177): 57-61.
• 20. Drozhzhyn Oleksii. 2017. „Container on barge technology: a case study of lower Danube”. Proceedings of Ⅵ International Scientific and Technical Conference of Young Researchers and Students 3: 3-5. Ternopil, Ukraine: TNTU, 16-17 November 2017.
• 21. Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II in Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Ukraine. The LOGMOS Master Plan Project. Appendix 6, Part I. TRACECA Inland Waterways: Analysis of the Situation. Dnipro, October 2013. ENPI 2011/264 459. Master Plan Appendix 6, Part I, p. 1-48.
• 22. Olha Scherbina. 2019. “Organization of operation of the tug barge vessels in transport-technological system”. PhD thesiss. Odessa National Maritime University, Odesa (0419U000767).
• 23. Resolution No. 92/2 on New Classification of Inland Waterways. Report no. CEMT/CM(92)6/FINAL. European Conference of Ministers of Transport. Available at: https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/wat19922e.pdf.
• 24. Jacyna-Gołda Ilona, Mariusz Izdebski, Emilian Szczepanski. 2016. „Assessment of the method effectiveness for choosing the location of warehouses in the supply network”. Challenge of Transport Telematics, TST 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science 640: 84-97.
• 25. Kramarz M., W. Kramarz. 2019. „Managing the flow components in supply chains. Metalurgija 58(1-2): 158-160.
• 26. Mendes Zorro, Dulce Mendes, Olga Delgado. 2018. „Cruises tourism in Lisbon: the impact on the Portuguese economy”. European Transport/Trasporti Europei 70(4). ISSN 1825-3997.
• 27. Maiorov N.N., V.A. Fetisov. 2018. „Improvement of the quality of the sea passenger terminal based on methods of forecasting”. Nase More 65(3): 135-140.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).