Effect of Tillage and Humidification Conditions on Desalination Properties of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

• Autorzy: Lavrenko N. , Lavrenko S. , Revto O. , Lykhovyd P.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/91265

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Chickpea is supposed to be a prospective crop for soil reclamation. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of tillage and humidification conditions on the chickpea desalination properties. The study was conducted by using the randomized split plot method in four replications during 2012–14 at the Agricultural Cooperative Farm «Radianska Zemlia» of Kherson region in Ukraine. The results of the study showed that the maximum salts uptake of 2.516 t ha^-1 from the 0–50 cm soil layer and the maximum chickpea grain yield of 3.33 t ha^-1 were provided under irrigated conditions with moldboard plowing on the depth of 28–30 cm. It was established that the higher chickpea grain yield is, the greater the salts uptake rate from the soil. It was also proven that the plowing depth has no significant effect on the chickpea grain yield and desalination properties. It should be mentioned that chickpea showed limited desalination properties. The crop was not able to adsorb all the sodium from the soil when irrigated with saline water.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

chickpea; irrigation; plowing depth; salinity; desalination

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 19, nr 5
• Strony: 70--75
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Lavrenko N.

• Kherson State Agricultural University, 23 Stritenska Street, 73006, Kherson, Ukraine

autor

Lavrenko S.

• Kherson State Agricultural University, 23 Stritenska Street, 73006, Kherson, Ukraine

autor

Revto O.

• Kherson State Agricultural University, 23 Stritenska Street, 73006, Kherson, Ukraine

autor

Lykhovyd P.

• Institute of Irrigated Agriculture, Naddniprianske, 73483, Kherson, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• 1. APHA. 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 19th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington DC.
• 2. Ayers R.S., Westcott D.W. 1985. Water quality for agriculture. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 29. Rev. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
• 3. Chaunan Y.S. 1987. Screening for tolerance to salinity and waterlogging: Case studies with pigeonpea and chickpea. Adaptation of Chickpea and Pigeonpea to Abiotic Stress. Proc. of the Consultants’ Workshop, 93–103.
• 4. Doneen L.D. 1964. Notes on water quality in agriculture. Water Science and Engineering paper 4001, Department of water science and engineering, University of California, California.
• 5. Dua R.P. 1998. Salimity tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 3(2), 102–106.
• 6. Elsheikh E.A.E, Wood M. 1990. Effect of salinity on growth, nodulation and nitrogen yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Experimental Botany, 41(231), 1263–1269.
• 7. Emenky F.A.O, Khalaf A.S., Salim N.M. 2010. Influence of tillage and weed management methods on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). I. Yield and yield components. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 16(2), 189–198.
• 8. Fusum E., Mehmet T.O. 2007. Effect of salinity on antioxidant responses of chickpea seedlings Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 29, 485–493.
• 9. Hardie M., Doyle R. 2012. Measuring soil salinity. Methods in Molecular Biology, 913, 415–425.
• 10. Hulse J.H. 1991. Nature, composition and utilization of grain legumes. Uses of Tropical Legumes. Proc. of a Consultants Meeting, 502–524.
• 11. Jackson M.L. 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
• 12. Jalota S.K, Sood A., Harman W.L. 2006. Assessing the response of chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) yield to irrigation water on two soils in Punjab (India): a simulation analysis using the CROPMAN model. Agricultural Water Management, 79, 312–320.
• 13. Kambhampati M.S., Vu V.T. 2013. EDTA enhanced phytoremediation of copper contaminated soils using chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 91(3), 310–313.
• 14. Katerji N., Van Hoorn J.W., Hamdy A., Mastrorilli M., Oweis T., Malhorta R.S. 2001. Response to soil salinity of two chickpea varieties differing in drought tolerance. Agricultural Water Management, 50, 83–96.
• 15. Kelly W.P. 1963. Use of saline irrigation water. Soil Science 95(4), 355–391.
• 16. Lauter D.J., Munns D.N. 1986. Salt resistance of chickpea genotypes in solutions salinized with NaCl or Na2SO4. Plant and Soil, 95, 271–279.
• 17. Patel D., Jha C.K., Tank N., Saraf M. 2012. Growth enhancement of chickpea in saline soils using plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 31(1), 53–62.
• 18. Qadir M., Oster J.D., Schubert S., Noble A.D., Sahrawat K.L. 2007. Phytoremediation of sodic and saline-sodic soils. Advances in Agronomy, 96, 197–247.
• 19. Qadir M., Steffens D., Yan F., Schubert S. 2003. Proton release by N2-fixing plant roots: A possible contribution to phytoremediation of calcareous sodic soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 166, 14–22.
• 20. Rajin Anwar M., McKenzie B.A., Hill G.D. 2003. The effect of irrigation and sowing date on crop yield and yield components of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a cool-temperate subhumid climate. Journal of Agricultural Science, 141, 259–271.
• 21. Rao D.L.N., Giller K.E., Yeo A.R., Flowers T.J. 2002. The effect of salinity and sodicity upon nodulation and nitrogen fixation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Annals of Botany, 89, 563–570.
• 22. Saxena A.K., Rewari R.B. 1992. Differential responses of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)–Rhizobiurn combinations to saline soil conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 13(1), 31–34.
• 23. Serraj R., Krishnamurthy L., Upadhyaya H.D. 2004. Screening chickpea mini-core germplasm for tolerance to salinity. International Chickpea Pigeonpea Newsletter, 11, 29–32.
• 24. Singh A.K. 2004. The physiology of salt tolerance in four genotypes of chickpea during germination. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 6, 87–93.
• 25. Singla R., Garg N. 2005. Influence of salinity on growth and yield attributes in chickpea cultivars. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 29, 231–235.
• 26. Sohrabi Y., Heidari G., Esmailpoor B. 2008. Effect of salinity on growth and yield of desi and kabuli chickpea cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 11(4), 664–667.
• 27. Tejera N.A., Soussi M., Lluch C. 2006. Physiological and nutritional indicators of tolerance to salinity in chickpea plants growing under symbiotic conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 58, 17–24.
• 28. Todd D.K. 1980. Groundwater hydrology. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons Publications, New York.
• 29. Vadez V., Krishnamurthi L., Serraj R., Gaur P.M., Uhadhyaya H.D., Hoisington D.A., Varshney R.K., Turner N.C., Siddique K.H.M. 2007. Large variation in salinity tolerance in chickpea is explained by differences in sensitivity at the reproductive stage. Field Crops Research, 104, 123–129.
• 30. Van Hoorn J.W., Katerji N., Hamdy A., Mastrorilli M. 2001. Effect of salinity on yield and nitrogen uptake of four grain legumes and on biological nitrogen contribution from the soil. Agricultural Water Management, 51, 87–98.
• 31. Wilcox L.V. 1955. Classification and use of irrigation water. Circular No. 969. US Department of Agriculture. USDA, Washington.
• 32. Zhang H., Pala M., Oweis T., Harris H. 2000. Water use and water-use efficiency of chickpea and lentil in a Mediterranean environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 51, 295–304.