Bridging the Effect of the Knowledge Spillover and Innovation Performance of Textile Companies: Evidence from Indonesia

• Autorzy: Djulius Horas , Gyu Choi Won , Juanim Juanim , Ratnamiasih Ina , Santy Raeni Dwi

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0014.2380

Warianty tytułu

PL

Pomost pomiędzy wiedzą a i innowacyjnością w firmach włókienniczych na przykładzie Indonezji

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Most studies on knowledge spillover hypothesis testing are limited to its occurrence and impact on improving the productivity or performance of the recipient companies. In this study a model is constructed of how to use knowledge spillovers from the provider to the beneficiary company, in the context of the textile industry in Indonesia. The model suggests that the knowledge obtained from the buyer may increase the innovation of domestic enterprise suppliers. The model also represents the possibility of knowledge spillover from labour turnover and the imitation process. A survey was carried out to measure the variables of the study conducted by distributing questionnaires to the marketing manager, human resource manager and operations manager of textile companies. The structural equation model was used to test the hypothesis. The results state that a company with better knowledge management can take advantage of knowledge spillover to produce innovative products that are more accepted by the market.

PL

Większość badań dotyczących testowania hipotezy rozprzestrzeniania wiedzy ogranicza się do jej wystąpienia i wpływu na poprawę produktywności lub wyników przedsiębiorstw-odbiorców. W artykule przedstawiono model wykorzystania transferu wiedzy od dostawcy do firmy beneficjenta w kontekście przemysłu tekstylnego w Indonezji. Model opisuje wiedzę pozyskaną od kupującego, może zwiększyć innowacyjność dostawców krajowych przedsiębiorstw. Model reprezentuje również możliwość przenoszenia wiedzy z rotacji pracowników i procesu naśladowania. Przeprowadzono ankietę wśród kierowników marketingu, zasobów ludzkich i operacyjnych firm tekstylnych. Do przetestowania hipotezy wykorzystano model równań strukturalnych. Stwierdzono, że firma posiadająca lepsze zarządzanie wiedzą poprzez wykorzystanie transferu wiedzy może wytwarzać innowacyjnych produkty, które są bardziej akceptowane przez rynek.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

knowledge spillover; innovation performance; knowledge management; textile industry

PL

transfer wiedzy; innowacyjność; zarządzanie wiedzą; przemysł tekstylny

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Łódzki Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 28, no. 5 (143)
• Strony: 20--26
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Djulius Horas

• Universitas Pasundan, Faculty of Economics and Business, Indonesia

autor

Gyu Choi Won

• Chonbuk National University, Department of Social Welfare, Republic of Korea

autor

Juanim Juanim

• Universitas Pasundan, Faculty of Economics and Business, Indonesia

autor

Ratnamiasih Ina

• Universitas Pasundan, Faculty of Economics and Business, Indonesia

autor

Santy Raeni Dwi

• Universitas Komputer Indonesia, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• 1. Franco C, Kozovska K. FDIs Produc-o tivity Spillovers in Regional Clusters: A Comparison between Poland and Romania. QA Riv dell’Associazione Ross. 2010; (4): 99-120.
• 2. Branstetter L. Is Foreign Direct Investment a Channel of Knowledge Spillovers? Evidence from Japan’s FDI in the United States. J Int Econ. 2006; 68(2): 325-44.
• 3. Zheng M, Tian G, Yang C. External Networks and Innovation: Evidence from FDI Embedded Clusters in China. Anthropologist. 2015; 22(3): 587-99.
• 4. Liao SH, Fei WC, Chen CC. Knowledge Sharing, Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Capability: An Empirical Study of Taiwan’s Knowledge-Intensive Industries. J Inf Sci. 2007; 33(3): 340-59.
• 5. Lundvall B, Nielsen P. Knowledge Management and Innovation Performance. Int J Manpow. 2007; 28(3/4): 207-23.
• 6. Christina Ling-hsing CT-CL. The Role of Organizational Culture in Knowledge Management. J Knowl Manag. 2016; 7(5): 1-24.
• 7. Donate MJ, Guadamillas F. Organizational Factors to Support Knowledge Management and Innovation. J Knowl Manag. 2011; 15(6): 890-914.
• 8. Indonesia S. Indonesian Foreign Trade Statistics. Jakarta; 2017.
• 9. Basu A. Importance of IT in Textile Industry. Indian Text J. 2007 Dec 1; 118: 39-43.
• 10. Indonesia S. Manufacturing Industry Statistics 2017.
• 11. Karpaty P, Lundberg L. Foreign Direct Investment and Productivity Spillovers in Swedish Manufacturing [Internet]. 2004. Available from: https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:fiefwp:0194.
• 12. Newman C, Rand J, Talbot T, Tarp F. Technology Transfers, Foreign Investment and Productivity Spillovers. Eur Econ Rev. 2015; 76: 168-87.
• 13. Djulius H, Juanim J, Ratnamiasih I. Knowledge Spillover through Foreign Direct Investment in Textile Industry. Int J Econ Policy Emerg Econ. 2018; 11(1-2).
• 14. Elenkov DS, Manev IM. Senior Expatriate Leadership’s Effects on Innovation and the Role of Cultural Intelligence. J World Bus. 2009; 44(4): 357-69.
• 15. Olmos-Peñuela J, García-Granero A, Castro-Martínez E, D’Este P. Strengthening Smes’ Innovation Culture Through Collaborations with Public Research Organizations. Do all firms benefit equally? Eur Plan Stud. 2017; 25(11): 2001-20.
• 16. De Jong J, Den Hartog D. Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour. Creat Innov Manag. 2010; 19(1): 23-36.
• 17. Despres C, Chauvel D. Knowledge horizons: The present and the promise of knowledge management. Knowledge Creation Diffusion Utilization 2000.
• 18. Salina Daud. Knowledge management processes in SMES and large firms: A comparative evaluation. African J Bus Manag. 2012; 6(11): 4223-33.
• 19. Salina Daud WFWY. An Empirical Study of Knowledge Management Processes in Small and Medium Enterprises. Commun IBIMA. 2008; 4: 169-77.
• 20. Darroch J. Knowledge Management, Innovation and Firm Performance. J Knowl Manag. 2005; 9(3): 101-15.
• 21. Sá C, Martins A, Gomes C. Tax Morale Determinants in Portugal. Eur Sci J. 2015; 11(10): 236.
• 22. Hsu R-C, Lawson D, Liang T-P. Factors Affecting Knowledge Management Adoption of Taiwan Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Int J Manag Enterp Dev. 2006; 4(1): 30-51.
• 23. Jiang XZJY. Article information: J Knowl Manag. 2015; 18(2): 1-30.
• 24. Hsu, I-Cheih, 2012. Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management: An Empirical Investigation, Decision Sciences. 2012, 43(3): 489-524.
• 25. Danskin, Paula, Basil G. Englis, Michael R. Solomon, Marla Goldsmith Jennifer Davey (2005). Knowledge Management As Competitive Advantage: Lessons From The Textile And Apparel Value Chain. Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9 Iss 2 pp. 91-102.
• 26. Chong, Chin Wei, Ghazaleh Hasanian, Geok Chew Gan, (2015). Application Of Knowledge Management Factors On Customer Relationship Management Process. Library Review, Vol. 64 Iss 8/9 pp. 583-596
• 27. Joe FHJ. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Tool In Business Research. Marko S, editor. Eur Bus Rev [Internet]. 2014 Jan 1;26(2):106–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
• 28. Li H, Zhang Y (Anthea), Lyles M. Knowledge Spillovers, Search, and Creation in China’s Emerging Market. Manag Organ Rev. 2013; 9(3): 395-412.
• 29. Wu X, Lupton NC, Du Y. Innovation outcomes of knowledge-seeking Chinese foreign direct investment. Chinese Manag Stud. 2015; 9(1): 73-96.