New Built Land Threat of Martapura River – Implementation of Environmental Sustainability in Banjarmasin City, South Kalimantan, Indonesia

Rusdiyanto, Edi; Munawir, Abdillah

doi:10.12911/22998993/161759

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

New Built Land Threat of Martapura River – Implementation of Environmental Sustainability in Banjarmasin City, South Kalimantan, Indonesia

Autorzy

Rusdiyanto Edi , Munawir Abdillah

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/161759

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The threat of environmental degradation of the Martapura River as a result of an increase in built-up land has become a serious problem, so it is important to implement a new method using the integration of calculations of changes in built-up land and the sustainability of river area environmental management. This study aimed to calculate the change in built-up land directly integrated through Rap-RiverBuiltUp quantitative analysis on the environmental sustainability of the Martapura river area, Banjarmasin City. The research method used is the technique of spatial analysis of ETM/Landsat 8 OLI satellite landsat images and analysis of ecological, social and economic sustainability with Rap-RiverBuiltUP analysis. The results of the analysis of built-up land around the Martapura river, Banjarmasin City, have increased by 2.31% over the last 12 years, followed by a growth in population density of ±1.5% annually. The implementation of sustainable environmental management needs to be prioritized with the efforts to periodically revise regional spatial planning regulations, especially the boundaries of built-up land to reduce the development of built-up land around the Martapura River. The sustainability status of the built-up area around the Martapura river is currently not sustainable. The ecological dimension indicates a less sustainable status, while the economic and social dimensions indicate a fairly sustainable status. Increasing the sustainability index value of the Martapura river from each dimension in the future is by making the lever factor an input for the management policy of the Martapura river, Banjarmasin City.

Słowa kluczowe

threat environmental degradation land use sustainability Martapura river built-up land

Wydawca

Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej
Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Journal of Ecological Engineering

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 24, nr 5

Strony

276--287

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 56 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Rusdiyanto Edi

edi@ecampus.ut.ac.id

Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia, Jl. Cabe Raya, Pondok Cabe, Tangerang Selatan, Banten Province, 15418, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7490-3945

autor

Munawir Abdillah

Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia, Jl. Cabe Raya, Pondok Cabe, Tangerang Selatan, Banten Province, 15418, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9702-3839

Bibliografia

1. Abera M., Ahmedin N., Muluneh B. 2022. Urban Sprawl or Urban Development? Peri-Urbanism in Metropolitan Areas of Amhara Region, Ethiopia. African Studies Quarterly, 21(1). https://asq.africa.ufl.edu/files/V21i1a1.pdf
2. Anaba L.A., Banadda N., Kiggundu N., Wanyama J., Engel B., Moriasi D. 2017. Aplication of SWAT to Assess the Effect of Land Use Change in the Murchison Bay Catchment in Uganda. Computational Water, Energy, and Environmental Engineering, 6, 24–40.
3. Anshari G.Z., Afifudin M., Nuriman M., Gusmayanti E., Arianie L., Susana R., Nusantara R.W., Sugardjito J., Rafiastanto A. 2010. Drainage and land use impacts on changes in selected peat properties and peat degradation in West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. Biogeosciences, 7, 3403–3419. www.biogeosciences.net/7/3403/2010/ doi:10.5194/bg-7-3403-2010
4. Adrianto L., Kurniawan F., Romadhon A., Bengen D.G., Sjafrie N.D.M., Damar A., Kleinertz S. 2021. Assessing social-ecological system carrying capacity for urban small island tourism: The case of Tidung Islands, Jakarta Capital Province, Indonesia. Ocean and Coastal Management, 212. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105844
5. Balteanu D., Ana P.E. 2010. Land Use Changes And Land Degradation In Post-Socialist Romania. Rev. Roum. Géogr./Rom. Journ. Geogr., 54(2), 95–105. Bucureşti. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328929327
6. Bojocco S., De Angelis A., Perini L., Ferrara A., Salvati L. 2012. The Impact of Land Use/Land Cover Changes on Land Degradation Dynamics: A Mediterranean Case Study. Environmental Management, 49, 980–989. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9831-8
7. Chair M., Yusran F.H., Husaini, Nasruddin. 2020. Policy Priorities For Improving The Quality Of Slum Settlements In Banjarmasin City, South Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. International Journal Of Biology And Biomedical Engineering. DOI: 10.46300/91011.2021.15.9
8. Curley A. 2019. Unsettling Indian Water Settlements: The Little Colorado River, the San Juan River, and Colonial Enclosures. A Radical Journal of Geography, ANTIPODE. April 2019 Antipode, 53(4). DOI: 10.1111/anti.12535
9. Congalton R.G., Green K. 2009. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices. Boca Raton (US): CRC Press.
10. Dahliani Y. 2018. Pengaruh Program Penanganan Permukiman Kumuh Terhadap Ketahanan Permukiman Tepian Sungai Kota Banjarmasin. Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
11. Edwin, Saidi A., Aprisal, Yulnafatmawita, Carolita I. 2015. Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Land Use Change for 11 years (2004–2014) in Sub-Watershed Sumpur Singkarak. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 5(5).
12. Ernoul L., Wardell-Johnson A. 2013. Governance in integrated coastal zone management: A social networks analysis of cross-scale collaboration. Environmental Conservation, 40(3), 231–240. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892913000106
13. Fauzi H. 2014. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan (Studi pada Kawasan Daerah Aliran Sungai (DAS) Riam Kanan, Kalimantan Selatan). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengelolaan DAS Terpadu untuk Kesejahteraan Masyarakat.
14. Fearnside P.M. 2016. Environmental and social impacts of hydroelectric dams in Brazilian Amazonia: Implications for the aluminum industry. World Development, 77, 48–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.015
15. Gebremicaelabc T.G., Mohamedabd Y.A., van der Zaagab P., Hagose E.Y. 2018. Quantifying longitudinal land use change from land degradation to rehabilitation in the headwaters of Tekeze-Atbara Basin, Ethiopia. Science of The Total Environment 2018, 622–623, 1581–1589.
16. Gurney G.G., Cinner J.E., Sartin J., Pressey R.L., Ban N.C., Marshall N.A., Prabuning D. 2016. Participation in devolved commons management: Multiscale socioeconomic factors related to individuals’ participation in communitybased management of marine protected areas in Indonesia. Environmental Science & Policy, 61(2016), 212–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.015
17. Gu W., Guo J., Fan K., Edwin H.W., Chan. 2016. Dynamic Land Use Change and Sustainable Urban Development in a Third-Tier City Within Yangtze Delta. International Conference on Geographies of Health and Living in Cities: Making Cities Healthy for All, Healthy Cities. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 36(3), 98–105.
18. Jaya I. 2015. Analisis Citra Digital: Perspektif Penginderaan Jauh untuk Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Teori dan praktek Menggunakan Erdas Imagine], IPB Press, 2015.
19. Hidajat J.T. 2014. Model Pengelolaan Kawasan Permukiman Berkelanjutan di Pinggiran Kota Metropolitan Jabodetabek. Ph.D Disertasi Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, 2014.
20. Kadir. 2016. The recovery of Tabunio Watershed through enrichment planting using ecologically and economically valuable species in South Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 17(1), 1–12.
21. Kemp J., Olley J.M., Ellison T., McMahon J. 2014. River response to European settlement in the subtropical Brisbane River, Australia. Anthropocene, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2015.11.006
22. Kubangun, Siti Hadjar., Oteng Haridjaja, Komarsa Gandasasmita. 2016. Model Perubahan Penutupan/Penggunaan Lahan Untuk Identifikasi Lahan Kritis Di Kabupaten Bogor, Kabupaten Cianjur, Dan Kabupaten Sukabumi. Majalah Ilmiah Globe, 18(1), 21–32.
23. Maestro M., Pérez-Cayeiro M.L., Chica-Ruiz J.A., Reyes H. 2019. Marine protected areas in the 21st century: Current situation and trends. Ocean & coastal management, 171(2019), 28–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.008
24. Mallupattu P.K., Reddy J.R.S. 2013. Analysis of Land Use/Land Cover Changes Using Remote Sensing Data and GIS at an Urban Area, Tirupati, India. The Scientific World Journal, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/268623
25. McAlpine C.A., Etter A., Fearnside P.M., Seabrook L., Laurance W.F. 2009. Increasing world consumption of beef as a driver of regional and global change: A call for policy action based on evidence from Queensland (Australia), Colombia and Brazil. Global Environmental Change, 19, 21e33. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.008
26. Munawir A., June T., Kusmana C., Setiawan Y. 2019. Dynamics Factors that Affect the land Use Change in the Lore Lindu National Park. Proceeding of SPIE 11372. Event: Sixth Internasional Symposium on LAPAN-IPB Satelite. Bogor (ID). https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/11372/2542812/Dynamics-factors-that-affect-the-land-use-change-in-the/10.1117/12.2542812.short
27. Munawir A., Nurhasanah, Rusdiyanto E., Muna S.U.N. 2022a. Kebijakan Pemanfaatan Hutan Mangrove Berkelanjutan dengan Teknik Interpretative Structural Modeling di Taman Nasional Rawa Aopa, Sulawesi Tenggara. Buletin Ilmiah Marina Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan. DOI: 10.15578/marina.v8i2.11693
28. Munawir A., Rusdiyanto E., Nurhasanah. 2022b. Analisis statistik pengelolaan SDA dan lingkungan metode penelitian aplikasi software MDS-Rapsettlement. Penerbit Universitas Terbuka, Tanggerang Selatan Provinsi Banten Indonesia.
29. Jat M.K., Garg P.K., Khare D. 2008. Monitoring and modelling of urban sprawl using remote sensing and GIS techniques. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 10(1), 26–43.
30. Michiani M.V., Asano K. 2019. Physical upgrading plan for slum riverside settlement in traditional area: A case study in Kuin Utara, Banjarmasin, Indonesia. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8(3), 378–395. DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2019.03.005
31. Mondal M.S., Sharma N., Garg P.K., Kappas M. 2016. Statistical Independence Test and Validation of CA Markov Land Use Land Cover (LULC) Prediction Results. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 19, 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2016.08.001
32. Nakamura S. 2014. Impact of slum formalization on self-help housing construction: A case of slum notification in India. Urban Studies, 51(16), 3420–3444. DOI: 10.1177/0042098013519139
33. Nisa H. 2017. Studi Vitality Kota Sebagai Dasar Revitalisasi Kota Banjarmasin Kalimantan Selatan Berbasis Waterfront City. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, 2017.
34. Neimark B., Toulmin C., Batterbury S. 2018. “Periurban land grabbing? dilemmas of formalising tenure and land acquisitions around the cities of Bamako and Ségou, Mali”. Journal of Land Use Science. DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2018.1499831
35. Kamusoko C., Aniya M., Adi B., Manjoro M. 2009. Rural Sustainability Under Threat in Zimbabwe-Simulation of Future Land Use/Cover Changes in the Bindura District Based on the Markov-Cellular Automata Model. Applied Geography, 29, 435–447. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.10.002
36. Lambin E.F., Meyfroidt P. 2010. Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy, 27, 108e118. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.003
37. Luo Y., Yang S., Liu X. 2014. Land Use Change in the Reach from Hekouzhen to Tongguan of the Yellow River During 1998-2010. China (CN): Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(1), 42–53.
38. Paimin, Irfan B.P., Purwanto, Dewi R.I. 2012. Sistem Perencanaan Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai. Bogor (ID): Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Konservasi dan Rehabilitasi (P3KR).
39. Rafiudin, Widiatmaka, Munibah, K. 2016. Land Use Change Pattern and the Balance of Food Production in Karawang District”, J. Il. Tan. Lingk., 18(1), 15.
40. Rusdiyanto E., Sitorus S.R.P., Pramudya B., Sobandi R. 2020a. The Dynamic of Built Land Development in the Cikapundung Riverside Area, Bandung City, Indonesia. Journal of AES Bioflux, 12(2), 146–159.
41. Rusdiyanto E., Sitorus S.R.P., Pramudya B., Sobandi R. 2020b. Sustainability Analysis of Settlement Area on Cikapundung Riverside, Bandung City, Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 10(10).
42. Rustiadi E. 2001. Alih fungsi lahan dalam perspektif lingkungan pedesaan.. Makalah disampaikan pada Lokakarya Penyusunan Kebijakan dan Strategi Pengelolaan Lingkungan Kawasan Pedesaan di Cibogo tanggal 10–11 Mei 2001. Bogor.
43. Roig-Munar F., Martín-Prieto J.A., Rodríguez-Perea A., Pons G.X., Gelabert B., Mir-Gual M. 2012. Risk Assessment of Beach-Dune System Erosion: Beach Management Impacts on The Balearic Islands. Journal of Coastal Research, 28(6), 1488–1499.
44. Rozario P.F., Oduor P., Kotchman L., Kangas M. 2017. Transition Modeling of Land-Use Dynamics in the Pipestem Creek, North Dakota, USA. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 5, 182–201. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2017.53013
45. Roy D., Lees M. 2020. Understanding resilience in slums using an agent-based model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 80, 101458. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101458
46. Sari I.K., Limantara L.M., Priyantoro D. 2012. Analisa Ketersediaan dan Kebutuhan Air pada DAS Sampean. Jurnal Pengairan UB, 2(1), 5–19. http//jurnalpengairan. ub.ac.id
47. Setiawan B. 2010. Kampung Kota dan Kota Kampung, Potret Tujuh Kampung di Kota Jogja [Urban Village and Slum City, Portrait of Seven Urban Villages in Yogyakarta]. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Lingkungan Hidup, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
48. Sevtsuk A., Mekonnen M., Kalvo R. 2013. Urban Network Analysis, 29. Available at: http://cityform.mit.edu/projects/urban-network-analysis.html. Accessed 20 May 2019.
49. Shao Y., Jiang Q., Wang C., Wang M., Xiao L., Qi Y. 2020. Analysis of critical land degradation and development processes and their driving mechanism in the Heihe River Basin. Science of The Total Environment, 716, 137082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137082
50. Sheikh A., Zadeh M., Rajabi M.A. 2013. Analyzing the effect of the street network configuration on the efficiency of an urban transportation system. Cities, 31, 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.08.008
51. Wang X.L., Bao Y.H. 1999. Study on the methods of land use dynamic change research. Progress in Geography, 18(1), 81–87.
52. Whiteside T.G., Bogg G.S., Maier S.W. 2011. Comparing object based and pixel based classification for mapping savannas. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf, 13(6), 884–893.
53. Wulandari F., Aina N., Razak H. 2019. Potensi Budaya Pada Kawasan Permukiman Tepian Sungai Studi Kasus Kelurahan Seberang Mesjid Kota Banjarmasin Kalimantan Selatan. Nalars, Jurnal Arsitektur. DOI: 10.24853/nalars.18.1.57-64
54. Yang X., Zheng X.Q., Chen R. 2014. A Land Use Change Model: Integrating Landscape Pattern Indexes and Markov-CA. Ecological Modelling, 283, 1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.03.011
55. Yusuf M., Kusmana C., Fahrudin A., Kamal M.M. 2016. Analisis Faktor Penentu dalam Pengelolaan Berkelanjutan Estuaria DAS Tallo. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 13(1), 41–51.
56. Zhang W.B. 2010. The Urbanizing Process With Moving Boundary. Geographical Analysis, 20(4), 328–339.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-9079b592-d120-4ced-8283-5f919a5b279b