Probabilistic Liquefaction Analysis Using Standard Penetration Test

• Autorzy: Kamel Filali , Badreddine Sbartai

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/sgem-2022-0009

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The Youd etal liquefaction resistance curves developed in 2001 to characterize the cyclic resistance of soil based on SPT test are the most used in the context of the Seed and Idriss simplified procedure as a deterministic model. These curves were developed from a modified database of Seed etal. in 1985 with the assumption that the actual peak shear stress (τ_d) induced at depth h is always less than that predicted by the simplified procedure (τ_r) of Seed and Idriss (rd= τ_d/τ_r<1). By using a suite of equivalent linear site response analyses to adjust the dynamic and the simplified shear stress at depth h, Filali and Sbartai showed in 2017 that the dynamic peak shear stress for some earthquakes is greater than the simplified peak shear stress (rd>1). As in this case, the assumption of the simplified procedure is not verified, Filali and Sbartai have proposed a corrector factor (RC) in the range where r_d>1 to adjust the deformable and rigid body. In this paper, we will present a probabilistic study for the evaluation of the liquefaction potential using a database based on SPT measurement compiled after the Chi-Chi Taiwan earthquake, in which the cyclic stress ratio is evaluated using the proposed corrector factor. The objective of this study is to present a probabilistic shape of the cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) curves based on the original simplified method of Seed and Idriss and the corrected version and a new formulation for computing the probability of liquefaction.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

earthquake; probabilistic hazard analysis; site effect; liquefaction; probability; random variable; wave propagation

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 44, nr 2
• Strony: 162--174
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 39 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kamel Filali

• LMGHU laboratory, University August 20, 1955-Skikda Road el-hadeik, 21000 Skikda, Algeria

autor

Badreddine Sbartai

• Universityof BadjiMokhtar-Annaba, BP12 Annaba 23000, Algeria

Bibliografia

• [1] Al-Zoubi, M. S. (2015). Reliability-based determination of the coefficients of lateral earth pressure on retaining walls subjected to seismic loading. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 9(4), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.14525/jjce.9.4.3115
• [2] Bagheripour, M. H., I. Shooshpasha, and M. Afzalirad. (2012). “A Genetic Algorithm Approach for Assessing Soil Liquefaction Potential Based on Reliability Method.” Journal of Earth System Science 121 (1): 45–62. doi:10.1007/s12040-012-0137-2.
• [3] Boulanger, R., & Idriss, I. (2004). Evaluating the potential for liquefaction or cyclic failure of silts and clays. Neuroscience Letters, 339(December), 123–126. https://doi.org/UCD/CGM-04/01
• [4] Cetin, K. O., & Seed, R. B. (2004). Nonlinear shear mass participation factor (rd) for cyclic shear stress ratio evaluation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24(2), 103–113. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2003.10.008
• [5] Cetin, K. Onder, Raymond B Seed, Robert E Kayen, Robb E. S Moss, H. Tolga Bilge, Makbule Ilgac, and Khaled Chowdhury. 2016). Summary of SPT Based Field Case History Data of CETIN (2016) Database. Ankara: METU / GTENG 08/16-01 Middle East Technical University. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70184187.
• [6] Dismuke, J. N. (2014). Nonlinear shear stress reduction factor (rd) for assessment of liquefaction potential in christchurch central business district. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 47(1), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.47.1.1-14
• [7] F, Rauch A. 1997. “Soil Liquefaction in Earthquakes.” university of Texas. http:/%0AScholarlib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-219182249741411/%0Aunrestricted/chp02.pdf.
• [8] Farrokhzad, F. (2016). Depth reduction factor assessment for evaluation of cyclic stress ratio based on site response analysis. Advances in Systems Science and Applications, 16(3), 33–51.
• [9] Filali, K., & Sbartai, B. (2017). A comparative study between simplified and nonlinear dynamic methods for estimating liquefaction potential. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 9(5), 955–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.05.008
• [10] Goharzay, Maral, Ali Noorzad, Ahmadreza Mahboubi Ardakani, and Mostafa Jalal. (2017). “A Worldwide SPT-Based Soil Liquefaction Triggering Analysis Utilizing Gene Expression Programming and Bayesian Probabilistic Method.” Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 9 (4): 683–693. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.03.011.
• [11] Hwang, J. H., C. H. Chen, and C. H Juang. 2012. “Calibrating the Model Uncertainty of the HBF Simplified Method for Assessing Liquefaction Potential of Soils.” Sino-Geotechnics 133: 77–86. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Calibratingthe model uncertainty of the HBF simplified method for assessing liquefaction potential of soils&journal=Sino-geotechnics&volume=133&pages=77-86&publication_year=2 012&author=Hwang%2CJH&author=Che.
• [12] Hwang, Jin Hung, and Chin Wen Yang. (2001). “Verification of Critical Cyclic Strength Curve by Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake Data.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 21 (3): 237–257. doi:10.1016/S0267-7261(01)00002-1.
• [13] Idriss, I M, and R W Boulanger. (2010). “Spt-Based Liquification Triggering Procedures.” Report UCD/CGM-10/02, no. December: 259. https://faculty.engineering.ucdavis.edu/boulanger/wp-content/uploads/sites/71/2014/09/Idriss_Boulanger_SPT_Liquefaction_CGM-10-02.pdf.
• [14] Idriss, I M, and Ross W. Boulanger. (2008). Soil Liquefaction during Earthquakes. Oakland, California: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. http://b-ok.org/dl/1129142/46a2fd.
• [15] Idriss, I M, Joseph. I. S. (1992). User's Manual for SHAKE91. Center for Geotechnical Modeling (p. 75). Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis.
• [16] Idriss, I. M. (1999). An update to the Seed-Idriss simplified procedure for evaluating liquefaction potential. Proc., TRB Worshop on New Approaches to Liquefaction, Pubbl. n. FHWA-RD-99-165.
• [17] Idriss, I. M., & Boulanger, R. W. (2003a). Estimating Kα for use in evaluating cyclic resistance of sloping ground. 8th US–Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures against Liquefaction, Report MCEER-03-0003, MCEER, 449–468.
• [18] Idriss, I. M., & Boulanger, R. W. (2003b). Estimating Kα for use in evaluating cyclic resistance of sloping ground. 8th US–Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures against Liquefaction, Report MCEER-03-0003, MCEER, 449–468.
• [19] Juang, C. H., Chen, C. J., Rosowsky, D. V., & Tang, W. H. (2000b). CPT-based liquefaction analysis, Part 2: Reliability for design. Geotechnique. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.5.593
• [20] Juang, C. H., Chen, C. J., Tang, W. H., & Rosowsky, D. V. (2000a). CPT-based liquefaction analysis, Part 1: Determination of limit state function. Géotechnique, 50(5), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.5.583
• [21] Juang, C. H., Rosowsky, D. V., & Tang, W. H. (1999). Reliability-based method for assessing liquefaction potential of soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:8(684)
• [22] Juang, C. Hsein, Caroline J. Chen, Tao Jiang, and Ronald D. Andrus. (2000). “Risk-Based Liquefaction Potential Evaluation Using Standard Penetration Tests.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal 37 (6): 1195–1208. doi:10.1139/cgj-37-6-1195.
• [23] Juang, C. Hsein, Sunny Ye Fang, Wilson H. Tang, Eng Hui Khor, Gordon Tung Chin Kung, and Jie Zhang. (2009). “Evaluating Model Uncertainty of an Spt-Based Simplified Method for Reliability Analysis for Probability of Liquefaction.” Soils and Foundations 49 (1): 135–152. doi:10.3208/sandf.49.135.
• [24] Juang, C., Andrus, R., Jiang, T., & Chen, C. (2001). Probability-based liquefaction evaluation using shear wave velocity measurements. Proc., 4th Int. Conf. Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 26–31.
• [25] Juang, C., Jiang, T., & Andrus, R. D. (2002). Assessing probability-based methods for liquefaction potential evaluation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 128(7), 580–589. http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:7(580)
• [26] Lasley, S. J., Green, R. A., & Rodriguez-Marek, A. (2016). New stress reduction coefficient relationship for liquefaction triggering analyses. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 142(11). http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001530
• [27] Liao, Samson S C, and Robert V Whitman. (1986). “Overburden Correction Factors for SPT in Sand.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 112 (3): 373–377. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:3(373).
• [28] National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE), National Advanced Project in Hazard Mitigation (NAPHM), and Taiwan Geotechnical Society (GST). (2001). Geotechnical Reconnaissance Report Of the 921 Ji-Ji Earthquake, Taiwan, 1999.
• [29] Singh, P., Kumar, D., & Samui, P. (2020). Reliability analysis of rock slope using soft computing techniques. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 14(1), 2020.
• [30] Sebaaly, Graziella T., and Muhsin E. Rahhal. (2019). “Probabilistic Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Based on CPT and SPT Results.” In COMPDYN Proceedings, 1:141–150. doi:10.7712/120119.6908.19549.
• [31] Seed, H B, K Tokimatsu, L F Harder, and R M Chung. (1985). “Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 111(12): 1425–45. http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425).
• [32] Seed, H. B. (1979). Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 105(GT2), 201–255. http://worldcat.org/oclc/3519342
• [33] Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1971). Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 97(9), 1249–1273.
• [34] Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1982). Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
• [35] Seed, H. B., Idriss, I. M., & Arango, I. (1983). Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Using Field Performance Data. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 109(3), 458–482. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:3(458)
• [36] Seed, H. Bolton. (1984). The Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations. Report No. UCB/EERC-84/15. Berkeley: University of California, Earthquake Engineering Research Center. http://www.worldcat.org/title/influence-of-spt-procedures-in-soil-liquefaction-resistance-evaluations/oclc/11804853.
• [37] Sun, R., Wang, K., & Yuan, X. (2020). Influencing Factors and New Calculation Formulae for the Stress Reduction Coefficient. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. http://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1739172
• [38] Youd, B. T. L., Idriss, I. M., Andrus, R. D., Arango, I., Castro, G., Christian, J. T., Dobry, R., Finn, W. D. L., Jr, L. F. H., Hynes, M. E., Ishihara, K., Koester, J. P., Liao, S. S. C., Iii, W. F. M., Martin, G. R., Mitchell, J. K., Moriwaki, Y., Power, M. S., Robertson, P. K., … Ii, K. H. S. (2001). Liquefaction Resistance of Soils : Summary R Eport From the 1996 Nceer and 1998 Nceer / Nsf Workshops on Evaluation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(10), 817–833. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(817)
• [39] Youd, T. L., & Noble, S. K. (1997). Magnitude scaling factors. NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, 149–166. https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=542970