Ecological assessment of soil contamination with heavy metals due to the application of mineral fertilisers

• Autorzy: Suleimenova Naziya , Togisbayeva Ainura , Orynbasarova Gulnar , Kuandykova Elnara , Yerekeyeva Svetlana

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/jwld.2023.143747

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article presents the results of monitoring the aftereffect of the use of excessive zonal doses of mineral fertilisers on soil contamination with heavy metals (HM). With traditional soybean cultivation technology, the level of soil contamination when applying excessive doses (N₆₀ P₁₈₀ K₉₀) of fertilisers is quite high and indicates violations of the ecological balance of the agroecosystem. By the nature of the accumulation of heavy metals in meadow-chestnut soil, depending on the application of the studied doses (P₆₀ K₃₀, N₃₀ P₆₀ K₃₀, N₆₀ P₁₈₀K₉₀) of fertiliser, the content of HM (Pb, Zn, Cd) increases. The greatest contamination of the soil with Cu was revealed, the content of which increases to 3.2 mg∙kg^-1 of soil, which is higher than the threshold of the maximum permissible concentration (MPC) - 3.0 mg∙kg^-1. According to the level of contamination of the soil with copper, it belongs to the highly dangerous classes. In a comparative assessment of the level of soil contamination with HM, optimal norms of mineral fertilisers have been established, namely, against the background of effective resource-saving technology for growing soybeans. The application of fertilisers at a dose of P₆₀ K₃₀ and N₃₀ P₆₀ K₃₀ does not significantly affect the level of soil contamination with HM, optimises the ecological state and nutrient regime of the soil, preserves and restores soil fertility indicators, and increases soybean productivity. This resource-saving technology provides a safe environment for soybean cultivation and a significant increase of 34.5-38.6% in crop productivity (0.53-0.76 Mg∙ha^-1) and yield (2.57 Mg∙ha^-1).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

application; assessment; cultivation technology; heavy metals; mineral fertilisers; soil ecology; soil pollution; soybean; fertilisers use; yield

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo ITP
• Czasopismo: Journal of Water and Land Development
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: no. 56
• Strony: 74--80
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Suleimenova Naziya

• Kazakh National Agrarian Research University, 8 Abay Ave, 050010, Almaty, Kazakhstan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3458-3799

autor

Togisbayeva Ainura

• Kazakh National Agrarian Research University, 8 Abay Ave, 050010, Almaty, Kazakhstan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6645-7017

autor

Orynbasarova Gulnar

• Kazakh National Agrarian Research University, 8 Abay Ave, 050010, Almaty, Kazakhstan
• Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4965-9108

autor

Kuandykova Elnara

• Kazakh National Agrarian Research University, 8 Abay Ave, 050010, Almaty, Kazakhstan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8768-086X

autor

Yerekeyeva Svetlana

• Kazakh National Agrarian Research University, 8 Abay Ave, 050010, Almaty, Kazakhstan
• М. Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Shymkent, Kazakhstan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2972-3101

Bibliografia

• ALISHEVA K. 2006. Prirodnyye resursy Kazakhstana, ikh ispol’zovaniye i okhrana. V: Ekologiya [Natural resources of Kazakhstan, their use and protection. In: Ecology]. Almaty. NAS p. 64–105.
• BARSUKOV S.S., BARSUKOV A.C. 2005. Soya – vazhneyshiy istochnik belka i masla [Soy is the most important source of protein and oil]. Agrarnaya nauka. No. 3 p. 10–11.
• BAZDYREV G.I., LOSHAKOV V.G., PUPONIN A.I., RASSADIN A.YA ., SAFONOV A.F., TULIKOV A.M. 2000. Zemledeliye [Agriculture]. Moskva. Kolos pp. 552.
• BECHEI G. 2001. Fenologicheskiye nablyudeniya provodilsya v pervoy polovine dnya. Soi. Obshchiye polozheniya i rekomendatsii po vyrashchivaniyu [Phenological observations were carried out in the morning. Soy. General guidance and recommendations for growing]. Serbia. Institut polevodstva i ovoshchevodstva Novi Sad, “Soya protein” pp. 20.
• BOYKO A.T., KARYAGIN Y U.G. 2004. Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii. Soya – vysokobelkovaya kul’tura [Methodical recommendations. Soybean high-protein culture]. Almaty, Kazakhstan. OAO “Vita” pp. 22.
• BULGAKOV D.S. 2002. Agroekologicheskaya otsenka pakhotnykh pochv [Agroecological assessment of arable soils]. Moskva. Pochvennyy institut im. V.V. Dokuchayeva pp. 252.
• CHERNIKOV V.A., ALEKSAKHIN R.M., GOLUBEV A.V., GRINGOF I.G., IVONIN V.M., KORMILITSYN V.F., ..., CHEKERES A.I. 2000. Agroekologiya [Agroecology]. Moskva. Kolos pp. 536.
• DEZHKIN V.V. 2008. Prirodopol’zovaniye (kurs lektsiy), 3-ye izdaniye [Nature management (course of lectures), 3 rd ed.]. Moskva. Izdatel’stvo MNEPU pp. 72.
• DOSPEKHOV B.A. 1985. Metodika polevogo opyta [Methodology of field experience]. 5 th ed. Moskva. Agropromizdat pp. 351.
• HADGU F., GEBREKIDAN H., KIBRET K., YITAFERU B. 2014. Study of phosphorus adsorption and its relationship with soil properties, analyzed with Langmuir and Freundlich models. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Vol. 3(1) p. 40–51. DOI 10.11648/j.aff.20140301.18.
• ELESHEV R., SMAGULOV T., BALGABAYEV A., RAMAZANOVA R. 2014. Agro ximiyalıq zerttewler adistemesi [Methods of agrochemical research]. Almaty, Kazakhstan. Qazaqstan Respwblïkasınıñ Oqw-ağartw mïnïstrligi. KazNAU, Aitumar pp. 261.
• KALEDIN A.P., ABDULLA-ZADE E.G., DEZHKIN V.V. 2011. Ekologo-ekonomicheskiye aspekty sovremennogo prirodopol’zovaniya [Ecological and economic aspects of modern nature management]. Moskva. MGOiR pp. 268.
• KORSAKOV N.I., MAKASHEVA R.K H., ADAMOVA O.P. 1968. Strukturnyy analiz. Metodika izucheniya kollektsii zernobobovykh kul’tur [Structural analysis. Methods for studying the collection of legumes]. Leningrad. VIR pp. 175.
• Gossort 1989. Metodika gosudarstvennogo sorto ispytaniya sel’sko-khozyaystvennykh kul’tur. Zernovyye, krupyanyye, zerno-bobovyye, kukuruza i kormovyye kul’tury [Methodology for state variety testing of agricultural crops. Grains, cereals, legumes, corn and fodder crops]. Iss. 2. Moskva. Kolos. Gosudarstvennaya komissiya po sortoispytaniyu sel’skokho zyaystvennykh kul’tur pri Ministerstve sel’skogo khozyaystva SSSR pp. 239.
• MINEEV G.V., BOLYSHEVA T.N. 2005. Sovremennyye tendentsii v izmenenii plodorodiya pochv Rossii [Modern tendencies in the change of soil fertility in Russia]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo khimicheskogo obshchestva im. D. I. Mendeleyeva. Vol. XLIX. No. 3 p. 5–10.
• MYAKUSHKO Y U.P., BARANOVA V.F. 1984. Soya [Soy]. Moskva. Kolos pp. 332.
• Novaya otraslevaya programma po razvitiyu agropromyshlennogo kompleksa na 2013–2020 gody “Agrobiznes–2020” APK RK. [New sectoral program for the development of the agro-industrial complex for 2013–2020 “Agrobusiness–2020” of the agro-industrial complex of the Republic of Kazakhstan] 2013. [online]. [Access 18.02.2015]. Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P1500000860
• NOVIKOVA A.M., NOVIKOVA D.A. 2010. Metodologiya nauchnogo issledovaniya [Methodology of scientific research]. Moskva. Librokom pp. 280.
• OVSYANNIKOV YU.A. 2000. Teoreticheskiye osnovy ekologo-biosfernogo zemledeliya [Theoretical foundations of ecological-biosphere agriculture]. Yekaterinburg, Rossiya. Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta pp. 264.
• KENENBAYEV S.B., SAGITOV A.O., YSKAK S. et al. 2005. Sistema vedeniya sel’skogo khozyaystva Almatinskoy oblasti. Rekomendatsii [Agricultural management system of Almaty region. Recommendations]. Almaty, Kazakhstan. TOO “Nurly Alem” pp. 296.
• SOLDAT I.Y. TYUTYUNOV S.I., LUKIN S.V. 2003. Rezul’taty agroekologicheskogo monitoringa v adaptivno-landshaftnom zemledelii Belgorodskoy oblasti [Results of agroecological monitoring in adaptive landscape agriculture of the Belgorod region]. Modeli i tekhnologii optimizatsii zemledeliya. Sb. dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-praktich. Konf. 9–11 sent. 2003 g. VNIIZiZPEGU “Kurskiy TSNTI”. Kursk, Rossiya p. 94–96.
• SULEIMENOVA N., FILIPOVA M., ZHARASPAYEVA S., KUANDYKOVA E. 2016a. Innovative technology in the field of environmental safety today. 16 th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2016. Vol. 2. 30 June – 6 July. Albena, Bulgaria p. 501–507.
• SULEIMENOVA N.S H., FILIPPOVA M.V., ZHARASPAEVA S.M. 2016b. Ekologicheskiye aspekty khimizatsii zemledeliya pri resursosbere-gayushchey tekhnologii vozdelyvaniya soi [Environmental aspects of chemicalisation of agriculture with resource-saving soybean cultivation technology]. Vestnik KazNU. Seriya ekologicheskaya. No. 2(47) p. 44–55.
• SULEIMENOVA N.S H., ORYNBASAROVA G.O., SULEIMENOVA M.S H., BOZHBANOV A., YEREKEYEVA S. 2021. Environmental monitoring of the sustainability and productivity of the agroecosystem of oilseeds in South-East Kazakhstan. Journal of Ecological Engineering. Vol. 22 (7) p. 89–99. DOI 10.12911/22998993/139114.
• TOLOKONNIKOV V.V., DANILENKO Y U.P., ISUPOVA O.V., SEDANOV G.V. 2002. Novaya ekologicheski bezopasnaya tekhnologiya vozdely-vaniya soi v usloviyakh Nizhnego Povolzh’ya [New ecologically safe technology of soybean cultivation in the Lower Volga region]. Volgograd, Rossiya. Ekologo-ekonomicheskiye problemy ekologicheskoy politiki regiona: Materialy kruglogo stola p. 29–33.
• TUPITSYNA O.V., CHERTES K.L., PIMENOVA A. 2013. Ratsional’noye prirodopol’zovaniye: Kurs lektsiy [Rational use of natural resources: A course of lectures]. 2nd ed. Samara, Rossiya. Samarskiy gosudarstvennyy tekhnicheskiy universitet pp. 136.
• YUSHKEVICH L.V. 2001. Resursosberegayushchaya sistema obrabotki i plodorodiye chernozomnykh pochv pri intensifikatsii vozdely-vaniya zernovykh kul’tur v yuzhnoy lesostepi Zapadnoy Sibiri [Resource-saving system of processing and fertility of chernozem soils during the intensification of cultivation of grain crops in the southern forest-steppe of Western Siberia]. PhD Thesis abstract. Omsk, Rossiya pp. 32.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).