Multi-criteria analysis of Projects' performance in construction

• Autorzy: Zavadskas E. K. , Vilutiene T. , Turskis Z. , Saparauskas J.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1016/j.acme.2013.07.006

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Construction companies usually perform several construction projects at the same time. Projects differ by complexity, duration, budget, variety of works, and number of implementers. Also vary the results of the projects: some of them have been implemented successfully, other terminated with losses or accidents. To determine the causes of one or another result the analysis of project work flow indicators should be performed. The evaluation of project indicators during implementation is not easy task due to the lack of up to date data and indicators measuring problem. The purpose of the research was to analyze common project management problems, the success factors of construction projects and to illustrate how to assess a projects' execution efficiency by mean of the aggregated indicator in particular company. In case study the problem of project performance indicators selection was analyzed, the aggregated project's performance criterion was determined by applying the methods of multi-criteria analysis and logarithmic normalization method was applied. Results show that by using the aggregated indicators it is easy to compare the projects, the received impartial information is useful for strategic planning, quality management, for solving the tasks of resource allocation, motivational project evaluation.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

construction projects; performance indicators; MCDM; evaluation

PL

projekt budowlany; planowanie strategiczne; zarządzanie jakością

• Wydawca: Springer ; Wrocław University of Science and Technology
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 14, no. 1
• Strony: 114--121
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Zavadskas E. K.

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Department of Construction Technology and Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

autor

Vilutiene T.

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Department of Construction Technology and Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

autor

Turskis Z.

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Department of Construction Technology and Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

autor

Saparauskas J.

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Department of Construction Technology and Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

Bibliografia

• [1] M.A. Brown, Construction management: the management of the development, conservation and improvement of the built environment, Organization, Technology & Management in Construction: An international Journal 4 (2) (2012) 457–460.
• [2] P.W.G. Morris, Lessons in managing major projects successfully in a European context, Technology in Society 10 (1) (1988) 71–98.
• [3] N. D. Long, S. Ogunlana, T. Quang, K. Ch. Lam, Large construction projects in developing countries: a case study from Vietnam, International Journal of Project Management 22 (7) (2004) 553–561.
• [4] K. C. Iyer, K. N. Jha, Factors affecting cost performance: evidence from Indian construction projects, International Journal of Project Management 23 (4) (2005) 283–295.
• [5] X. Meng, The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction, International Journal of Project Management 30 (2) (2012) 188–198.
• [6] A. Chan, D. Scott, A. Chan, Factors affecting the success of a construction project, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 130 (1) (2004) 153–155.
• [7] A. Enshassi, F. Arain, S. Al-Raee, Causes of variation orders in construction project sin the Gaza Strip, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 16 (4) (2010) 540–551.
• [8] E. Lam, A. Chan, D. Chan, Determinants of successful design-build projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 134 (5) (2008) 333–341.
• [9] H.S. Cha, Ch. K. Kim, Quantitative approach for project performance measurement on building construction in South Korea, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 15 (8) (2011) 1319–1328.
• [10] P.-C. Wu, S. Chaturvedi, The role of procedural justice and power distance in the relationship between high performance work systems and employee attitudes: a multilevel perspective, Journal of Management 35 (5) (2009) 1228–1247.
• [11] J.F. Tomer, Understanding high performance work systems: the joint contribution of economics and human resource management, Journal of Socio-Economics 30 (1) (2001) 63–73.
• [12] J.F. Tomer, The human firm: a socio-economic analysis of its behavior and potential in anew economic age, Routledge, London, 1999.
• [13] L.-Q. Wei, C.-M. Lau, High performance work systems and performance: the role of adaptive capability, Human Relations 63 (10) (2010) 1487–1511.
• [14] W.R. Evans, W. D. Davis, High-performance work systems and organizational performance: the mediating role of internal social structure, Journal of Management 31 (5) (2005) 758–775.
• [15] S. Din, Z. Abd-Hamid, D. J. Bryde, ISO9000 certification and construction project performance: the Malaysian experience, International Journal of Project Management 29 (8) (2011) 1044–1056.
• [16] A.M. Turk, ISO9000 in construction: an examination of its application in Turkey, Building and Environment 41 (4) (2006) 501–511.
• [17] D.S. Sharma, The association between ISO9000 certification and financial performance, The International Journal of Accounting 40 (2) (2005) 151–172.
• [18] E. Naveh, A. Marcus, Achieving competitive advantage through implementing a replicable management standard: installing andusing ISO9000, Journal of Operations Management 24 (1) (2005) 1–26.
• [19] X. Zhang, N. Bakis, T. C. Lukins, Y. M. Ibrahim, S. Wu, M. Kagioglou, G. Aouad, A. P. Kaka, E. Trucco, Automating progress measurement of construction projects, Automation in Construction 18 (3) (2009) 294–301.
• [20] R. Navon, Research in automated measurement of project performance indicators, Automation In Construction 16 (2) (2007) 176–188.
• [21] R. Navon, R. Sacks, Assessing research issue sin Automated Project Performance Control (APPC), Automation in Construction 16 (4) (2007) 474–484.
• [22] D. Rebolj, N.Č. Babič, A. Magdič, P. Podbreznik, M. Pšunder, Automated construction activity monitoring system, Advanced Engineering Informatics 22 (4) (2008) 493–503.
• [23] Y.M. Ibrahim, T. C. Lukins, X. Zhang, E. Trucco, A. P. Kaka, Towards automated progress assessment of work package components in construction projects using computer vision, Advanced Engineering Informatics 23 (1) (2009) 93–103.
• [24] T. Hegazy, M. Abdel-Monem, Email-based system for documenting construction as-built details, Automation in Construction 24 (2012) 130–137.
• [25] J. Gong, C. H. Caldas, An object recognition, tracking, and contextual reasoning-based video interpretation method for rapid productivity analysis of construction operations, Automationin Construction 20 (8) (2011) 1211–1226.
• [26] L.-R. Yang, J.-H. Chen, H.-W. Wang, Assessing impacts of information technology on project success through knowledge management practice, Automation in Construction 22 (2012) 182–191.
• [27] M.J. Skibniewski, E. K. Zavadskas, Technology development in construction: a continuum from distant past into the future, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 19 (1) (2013) 136–147.
• [28] M. Darvish, M. Yasaei, A. Saeedi, Application of the graph theory and matrix methods to contractor ranking, International Journal of Project Management 27 (6) (2009) 610–619.
• [29] Z. Turskis, Multi-attribute contractors ranking method by applying ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14 (2) (2008) 224–239.
• [30] N.-F. Pan, AHP Fuzzy, approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method, Automation in Construction 17 (8) (2008)958–965.
• [31] S Ghosh, L. Amaya, M. J. Skibniewski, Identifying areas of knowledge governance for successful projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18 (4) (2012) 495–504.
• [32] J.-Sh Chou, H.-M. Chen, Ch.-Ch. Hou, Ch.-W. Lin, Visualized EVM system for assessing project performance, Automation in Construction 19 (5) (2010) 596–607.
• [33] G. Marques, D. Gourc, M. Lauras, Multi-criteria performance analysis for decision making In Project management, International Journal of Project Management 29 (8) (2011) 1057–1069.
• [34] E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, T. Vilutiene, Multiple criteria analysis of foundation in stallment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 10 (3) (2010) 123–141.
• [35] L. Shen, Y. Wu, X. Zhang, Key assessment indicators for the sustainability of infrastructure projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 137 (6) (2011) 441–451.
• [36] S.S. Negahban, G. B. Baecher, M. J. Skibniewski, Adecision-making model for adoption of enterprise resource planning tools by small-to-medium size construction organizations, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 8 (2) (2012) 253–264.
• [37] S.H. Zolfani, I-Sh. Chen, N. Rezaeiniya, J.Tamošaitienė, A hybrid MCDM model en compassing AHP and COPRAS-G methods for selecting company supplier in Iran, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(3) (2012) 529–543.
• [38] T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publication, Pittsburgh, 1990.
• [39] E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, A New, Logarithmic normalization method in games theory, Informatica1 9 (2) (2008) 303–314.
• [40] K. Yoon, C. Hwang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An introduction, Sage Publications, London, 1995.