Choosing a proper method for strengthening WPC beams with grooving method using SWARA-EDAS

Chini, Mahdi; Arefi Lale, Shahid; Zolfani Hashemkhani, Sarfaraz; Ustinovicius, Leonas

doi:10.2478/ace-2018-0050

Powiadomienia systemowe

Sesja wygasła!

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Choosing a proper method for strengthening WPC beams with grooving method using SWARA-EDAS

Autorzy

Chini Mahdi , Arefi Lale Shahid , Zolfani Hashemkhani Sarfaraz , Ustinovicius Leonas

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ace-2018-0050

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Wood plastic composite (WPC) is a lightweight material, resistant against corrosion and damage, with recyclability of consuming materials. These materials usually used in marine structures frequently due to their unique features. In order to strengthen beams made by this material, usually Fibre-reinforced plastic (FRP) sheets are used, and one of the fracture modes in these beams is debonding of FRP sheet from the surface of the beams. To deal with this problem some grooves are used in the surface of the beam to improve the contact surface. The grooves include longitudinal, transverse and diagonal grooves. The main goal of this study is to assess different grooving methods in WPC-FRP beams. In this regard, primarily criteria (improving resistance, performance speed, performance complexity, performance costs, displacement and absorbing energy) were determined through interviews with experts in this field in order to assess the beams. Then, SWARA method employed to evaluate criteria with a policy based perspective and finally EDAS method applied for evaluating related alternatives. Based on obtained results, the longitudinal groove method is the best way of strengthening WPC beams to prevent debonding.

Słowa kluczowe

wood polymer composites WPC debonding grooving fibre-reinforced plastic FRP step-wise analysis weight assessment ratio SWARA distance from average solution EDAS

kompozyt drewno-polimer WPC odklejenie rowkowanie tworzywo sztuczne wzmocnione włóknem FRP analiza stopniowa współczynnik oceny masy SWARA odległość od średniej rozwiązania EDAS

Wydawca

Komitet Inżynierii Lądowej i Wodnej PAN
Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej

Czasopismo

Archives of Civil Engineering

Rocznik

2018

Tom

Vol. 64, nr 4/I

Strony

161--174

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 51 poz., il., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Chini Mahdi

M.chini@bhrc.ac.ir.

Road Housing and Urban Development Research Center (BHRC), Tehran, Iran

autor

Arefi Lale Shahid

shahin.arefi@gmail.com.

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran (student)

autor

Zolfani Hashemkhani Sarfaraz

sa.hashemkhani@gmail.com.

Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Technology Foresight Group, Department of Management, Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

autor

Ustinovicius Leonas

leonas959@gmail.com.

Department of Construction Management and Real Estate (VGTU), Vilnius, Lithuania

Bibliografia

1. Jam N. Jafarian, A. H. Behravesh, “Flow Behavior of HDPE-Fine Wood Particles Composites”, Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials 20(5): 439-451, 2007.
2. Jam N. Jafarian, A. H. Behravesh, “Challenge to the Production of Fine Wood-Plastic Injection Molded Composites”, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 28(1): 73-82, 2009.
3. J. Markarian, “Material and processing developments drive wood-plastic composites forward”, Plastics, Additives and Compounding 5(4): 24-26, 2003.
4. A. Wechsler, S. Hiziroglu, “Some of the properties of wood-plastic composites”, Building and Environment 42(7): 2637-2644, 2007.
5. G. Pritchard, “Two technologies merge: wood plastic composites”, Reinforced Plastics 48(6): 26-29, 2004.
6. O. Gunes, O. Buyukozturk, E. Karaca, „A fracture-based model for FRP debonding in strengthened beams”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 76(12): 1897-1909, 2009.
7. F. F. Wangaard, “Elastic deflection of wood–fiberglass composite beams”, Forest Products Journal 14(6): 256-260, 1964.
8. K. J. Haiar, “Performance and design of prototype wood-plastic composite section”, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (Master thesis), Washington State University, Pullman (WA), 2000.
9. J. R. Gilfillan, S. G. Gilbert, G. R. H. Patrick, “The Use of FRP Composites in Enhancing the Structural Behavior of Timber Beams”, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 22(15): 1373-1388, 2003.
10. A. Borri, M. Corradi, A. Grazini, “A method for flexural reinforcement of old wood beams with CFRP materials”, Composites Part B: Engineering 36(2): 143-153, 2005.
11. R. Lopez-Anido, A. P. Michael, T. C. Sandford, “Experimental characterization of FRP composite-wood pile structural response by bending tests”, Marine Structures 16(4) ; 257-274, 2003.
12. C. P. Pantelides, P. Romero, L. D. Reaveley, “Rehabilitation of splice connections of wood trusses with FRP composites”, Construction and Building Materials 24(1): 37-45, 2010.
13. M. Naghipour, M. Nematzadeh, Q. Yahyazadeh, “Analytical and experimental study on flexural performance of WPC-FRP beams”, Construction and Building Materials 25(2): 829-837, 2011.
14. D. Mostofinejad, A. T. Kashani, “Experimental study on effect of EBR and EBROG methods on debonding of FRP sheets used for shear strengthening of RC beams”, Composites: Part B 45: 1704-1713, 2013.
15. M. Naghipour, Arefi S. Lale, M. Nematzadeh, “Performance of longitudinal grooves to prevent debonding of GFRP sheets used for the reinforcement of WPC beams”, European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 17(9): 761-776, 2013.
16. Arefi, S. Lale, M. Naghipour, Z. Turskis, M. Nematzadeh, “Evaluation of grooving method to postpone debonding of FRP laminates in WPC-FRP beams”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 20(2): 237-246, 2014.
17. D. Mostofinejad, A. Moghaddas, “Bond efficiency of EBR and EBROG methods in different flexural failure mechanisms of FRP strengthened RC beams”, Construction and Building Materials 54: 605-614, 2014.
18. D. Mostofinejad, E. Mahmoudabadi, “Grooving as Alternative Method of Surface Preparation to Postpone Debonding of FRP Laminates in Concrete Beams”, Journal of Composites for Construction 14(6) https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000117, (2010).
19. D. Mostofinejad, S. M. Shameli, A. Hosseini, “EBROG and EBRIG methods for strengthening of RC beams by FRP sheets”, European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 18(6): 652-668, 2014.
20. N. Moshirim, A. Hosseini, D. Mostofinejad, “Strengthening of RC columns by longitudinal CFRP sheets: Effect of strengthening technique”. Construction and Building Materials 79 (2015): 318-325, 2015.
21. D. Mostofinejad, A. Torabian, “Experimental Study of Circular RC Columns Strengthened with Longitudinal CFRP Composites under Eccentric Loading: Comparative Evaluation of EBR and EBROG Methods”, Journal of Composites for Construction 20(2): 04015055-1:15, 2016.
22. D. Mostofinejad, A. Akhlaghi, “Efficiency of Grooving Method Used for Deficient RC Beam-Column Joints Seismically Rehabilitated with CFRP Sheets”, High Tech Concrete: Where Technology and Engineering Meet, Springer, 849-857, 2017.
23. B. Juodagalvienė, Z. Turskis, J. Saparauskas, A. “Endriukaitytė, Integrated multi-criteria evaluation of house’s plan shape based on the EDAS and SWARA methods”, Engineering Structures and Technologies 9(3): 117-125, 2017.
24. Zolfani S. Hashemkhani, J. Saparauskas, “New Application of SWARA Method in Prioritizing Sustainability Assessment Indicators of Energy System”, Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics 24(5): 408-414, 2013.
25. D. Stanujkic, D. Karabasevic, E. K. Zavadskas, “A framework for the Selection of a packaging design based on the SWARA method”, Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics 26(2): 181-187, 2015.
26. T. L. Saaty, “The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resources Allocation”, London, McGraw-Hill, 1980.
27. T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process”, Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications, 2001.
28. R. Ginevicius, “A new determining method for the criteria weights in multi-criteria evaluation”, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 10(6): 1067-1095, 2011.
29. J. Rezaei, “Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method”, Omega 53: 49-57, 2015.
30. R. Haghnazar Kouchaksaraei, Zolfani S. Hashemkhani, M. Golabchi, “Glasshouse locating based on SWARACOPRAS approach”, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 19(2): 111-122, 2015.
31. M. Vafaeipour, Zolfani S. Hashemkhani, Varzandeh M. H. Morshed, A. Derakhti, Eshkalag M. “Keshavarz, Assessment of regions priority for implementation of solar plants in Iran: New application of a hybrid multicriteria decision making approach”, Energy Conversion and Management 86: 653-663, 2014.
32. Zolfani S. Hashemkhani, M. Pourhossein, M. Yazdani, E. K. Zavadskas, “Evaluating construction projects of hotels based on environmental sustainability with MCDM framework”, Alexandria Engineering Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.11.002, 2017. (In press).
33. M. R. Khodadadi, Zolfani, S. Hashemkhani, M. Yazdani, E. K. Zavadskas, “A hybrid MADM analysis in evaluating process of chemical wastewater purification regarding to advance oxidation processes”, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management 25(3): 277-288, 2017.
34. Asl G. Karimi, E. Karimi, Zolfani, S. Hashemkhani, J. Saparauskas, “Analyzing LARG supply chain management competitive strategies in Iranian cement industries”, E+M Ekonomie a Management 20(3): 70-83, 2017.
35. J. Nakhaei, Arefi S. Lale, M. Bitarafan, S. Kildiene, “Evaluation of light supply in the public underground safe spaces by using of COPRAS-SWARA methods”, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 2-0(2): 198-206, 2016.
36. J. Nakhaei, M. Bitarafan, Arefi S. Lale, O. Kapliński, “Model for rapid assessment of vulnerability of office buildings to blast using SWARA and SMART methods (a case study of swiss re tower)”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 22 (6): 831-843, 2016.
37. D. Karabasevic, E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, D. Stanujkic, “The framework for the selection of personnel based on the SWARA and ARAS methods under uncertainties”, Informatica 27(1): 49-65, 2016.
38. D. Karabasevic, J. Paunkovic, D. Stanujkic, „Ranking of companies according to the indicators of corporate social responsibility based on SWARA and ARAS methods”, Serbian Journal of Management 11(1): 43-53, 2016.
39. M. Yazdani, Zolfani S.Hashemkhani, E. K. Zavadskas, “New integration of MCDM methods and QFD in the selection of green suppliers”, Journal of Business Economics and Management 17(6): 1097-1113, 2016.
40. D. Karabasevic, D. Stanujkic, S. Urosevic, M. Maksimovic, “Selection of candidates in the mining industry based on the application of the SWARA and the MULTIMOORA methods”, Acta Montanistica Slovaca: 20(2), 116-124, 2015.
41. Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Salimi, J., Maknoon, R., Kildiene, S. (2015). Technology Foresight About R&D Projects Selection; Application of SWARA Method at the Policy Making Level, Inzinerine Ekonomika- Engineering Economics, 26(5), 571-580.
42. M. R. Ghorshi Nezhad, Zolfani S. Hashemkhani, F. Moztarzadeh, E. K. Zavadskas, M. Bahrami, “Planning the priority of high tech industries based on SWARA-WASPAS methodology: The case of the nanotechnology industry in Iran”, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 28(1): 1111-1137, 2015.
43. M. Bitarafan, S. Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. Lale Arefi, E. K. Zavadskas, A. Mahmoudzadeh, “Evaluation of realtime intelligent sensors for structural health monitoring of bridges based on SWARA-WASPAS; a case in Iran”, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 9(4): 333-340, 2014.
44. M. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, E. K. Zavadskas, L. Olfat, Z. Turskis, “Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS)”, Informatica 26(3): 435-451, 2015.
45. E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, J. Antucheviciene, A. Zakarevicius, “Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment”, Electronics and Electrical Engineering (6): 3-6, (2012).
46. Ghorabaee M. Keshavarz, E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, J. Antucheviciene, “A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making”, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research 50(3): 25-44, 2016.
47. D. Stanujkic, E. K. Zavadskas, Ghorabaee, M. Keshavarz, Z. Turskis, “An Extension of the EDAS Method Based on the Use of Interval Grey Numbers”, Studies in Informatics and Control 26(1), 5-12, 2017.
48. E. K. Zavadskas, F. Cavallaro, V. Podvezko, U. Ubarte, A. Kaklauskas, “MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius”, Sustainability 9(702), doi:10.3390/su9050702, 2017.
49. Ghorabaee M. Keshavarz, M. Amiri, E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, “Multi-Criteria group decision-making using an extended EDAS method with interval Type-2 fuzzy sets”, E&M Economics and Management 20(1): 48-68, 2017.
50. E. Trinkūnienėa, V. Podvezko, E. K. Zavadskas, I. Jokšienė, I. Vinogradova, V. Trinkūnas, “Evaluation of quality assurance in contractor contracts by multi-attribute decision-making methods”, Economic Research- Ekonomska Istraživanja 30(1): 1152-1180, 2017.
51. C. Kahraman, Ghorabaee M. Keshavarz, E. K. Zavadskas, Onar S. Cevik, M. Yazdani, B. Oztaysi, “Intuitionistic fuzzy EDAS method: an application to solid waste disposal site selection”, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management 25(1): 1-12, 2017.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-90036f19-4e50-4541-8dd8-f60c9e1d575f