The Reasons for the Implementation of the Concept of Green Port in Sea Ports of China

• Autorzy: Marzantowicz Ł. , Dembińska I.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Increasingly, China is showing endeavours to understand the idea of sustainable development. This is evident in the policy of Chinese ports development, which assumes efforts to assign it, or at least to adapt it to conditions of the sustainable development. However, from the three optic of the sustainable development i.e. economic, social and environmental, the latter is the most visible in provisions of the policy assumptions of Chinese seaports. The purpose of this article is to point out the reasons of implementing environmental principles of the Chinese ports sustainable development. The relationship between the concept of sustainable development of the port and the green port has been characterized. The areas of a negative impact of the port on the environment are identified and described. Based on cases of Chinese ports, the key reasons why the concept green port is being implemented have been highlighted.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainable development; sustainable transport; green port; sustainable port development

• Wydawca: Międzynarodowa Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki i Transportu we Wrocławiu
• Czasopismo: Logistics and Transport
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 37, No. 1
• Strony: 121--128
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Marzantowicz Ł.

• SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Poland

autor

Dembińska I.

• The University of Szczecin, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Anastasopoulos D., Kolios S., Stylios C., How will Greek ports become Green ports, Geo-EkoMarina, 17/2011.
• [2] Chao-Feng S., Mei-Ting J., Jing-Lei Y., Cui-Juan H., Chun-Li C., 2009. The strategies and proposals for ecological port construction in China, Journal US-China Public Administration, Vol.6, No7 (Serial No 50).
• [3] Dembińska I., 2014. Corporate Social Responsibility of TSL sector: attitude analysis in the light of research, „Logistyka” 2014, No. 5, pp. 1773—1785.
• [4] European Sea Ports Organization, 1995. Environmental Code of Practice, Brussels: European Sea Ports Organization Secretariat.
• [5] Feldman M.S., Howard T., McDonald-Buller E., Mullins G., Allen D.T., Hasnel A., Wisthaler A., 2010. Applications of satellite remote sensingdata for estimating biogenic emissions in southeastern Texas.Atmospheric Environment, 44, 917-929.
• [6] KPMG. 2011. China’s 12th Five Year Plan: Sustainability.
• [7] Loh, C., Stevenson A., Weldon M., Hedley A. J., McGhee S. M., Lai H. K., Lau A., 2008. A Price Too High: The Health Impacts of Air Pollution in Southern China.
• [8] Mujabar S., Chadrasekar 2011. A shoreline change analysis along the coast between Kanyakumari and Tuticorin, India using Digital shoreline analysis system. Geo-spatial information science, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.282-293.
• [9] Song J., Lee H., 2010. Comparison analysis of the marine air emissions using Tier 1 and Tier 3 methods in a portal area. Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association›s Annual Conference and Exhibition, AWMA No.7, pp.5290-5306
• [10] Raport BSR: Extending Supply Chain Sustainability Metrics to Terminal Operations, may 2011. www.bsr.org - 26.11.2015r.
• [11] Rok B., 2013. The basis of social responsibility in management, Poltext, Warszawa.
• [12] Unctad, 1993. Sustainable Development for Ports, Report UNCTAD (SDD/Port) Vol.1, No. 27/8, Geneva
• [13] Van Breemen T., 2008. Good Practice Guide on Port Area Noise Mapping and management, Noise Management in European Ports (NoMEPorts) project, LIFE05 ENV/NL/000018, pp. 44-50.
• [14] Xu Y., Luo D., Peng J., 2011. Land use change and soil erosion in the Maotiao River watershed of Guizhou Province. Journal of Geographicalsciences, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 11381152.
• [15] UNCTAD, 2009. Review of Maritime Transport, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (http://www.unctad.org).
• [16] Dicken, P., 2003. Global Shift. 4th Ed. London: Sage.
• [17] Panayides, P., 2006. Maritime Logistics and Global Supply Chains: Towards a Research Agenda. Maritime Economics & Logistics, No. 8 (2), pp. 3-18.
• [18] Denktas-Sakar, G., Karatas-Cetin, C., 2012. Port sustainability and stakeholder management in supply chains: A framework on resource dependence theory, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, No. 28 (3): 301-319.
• [19] Lam, J.S.L., van de Voorde, E., 2012. Green port strategy for sustainable growth and development, Proceedings Transport Logistics for Sustainable Growthat a New Level, International Forum on Shipping, Ports and Airports (IFSPA), Hong Kong, pp. 27-30.
• [20] Lirn, T.C., Wu, Y.C.J., Chen, Y.J., 2013. Green performance criteria for sustainable ports in Asia, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, No. 43(5): p. 5.
• [21] Peris-Mora, E., Orejas, J.M.D., Subirats, A., Iba´nez, S. and Alvarez, P., 2005. Development of a system of indicators for sustainable port management, Marine Pollution Bulletin, No. 50 (12): pp. 1649-1660.
• [22] Chang, C.C., Wang, C.M., 2012. Evaluating the Effects of Green Port Policy: Case study of Kaohsiung Harbor in Taiwan, Transportation Research Part D, Transport and Environment, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 185-189.
• [23] Pavlic, B., cepak, F., Sucic, B., Peckaj, M., Kandus, B., 2014. Sustainable Port Infrastructure, Practical Implementation of The Green Port Concept, THERMAL SCIENCE, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 935-948.
• [24] Bailey, D., Solomon, G., 2004. Pollution prevention at ports: clearing the air, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, No. 24: pp. 749-774.
• [25] Corbett, J.J., Winebrake, J.J., Green, E.H., Kasibhatla, P., Eyring, V., Lauer, A., 2007. Mortality from ship emissions: a global assessment. Environmental Science & Technology No. 41, pp. 8512–8518.
• [26] Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. United Nations, 11 December 1987. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/42/ares42187.htm

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).