A critical review of 3D printing in construction: benefits, challenges, and risks

• Autorzy: El‑Sayegh S. , Romdhane L. , Manjikian S.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s43452-020-00038-w

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper provides a critical review of the related literature on 3D printing in construction. The paper discusses and evaluates the different 3D printing techniques in construction. The paper also discusses and categorizes the benefits, challenges, and risks of 3D printing in construction. The use of 3D printing technology offers several advantages over traditional methods. However, it comes with its own additional challenges and risks. The main benefits of 3D printing in construction include constructability and sustainability benefits. The challenges are categorized into seven groups. The main challenges, found through the literature, are material related. The most cited challenges are material printability, buildability, and open time. Additionally, scalability, structural integrity, and lack of codes and regulations are frequently cited as major challenges. The additional risks are categorized into seven groups: 3D printing material, 3D printing equipment, construction site, and environment, management, stakeholders, regulatory and economic, and cybersecurity risks. The paper fills a gap in the literature as it addresses a new aspect of 3D printing, which is risk. The paper also provides some insights, recommendations, and future research ideas.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

3D printing in construction; smart construction; risk; risk management

PL

konstrukcja inteligentna; zarządzanie ryzykiem; druk 3D

• Wydawca: Springer ; Wrocław University of Science and Technology
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 20, no. 2
• Strony: 48--72
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 123 poz., fot., rys.

Twórcy

autor

El‑Sayegh S.

• Department of Civil Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

autor

Romdhane L.

• Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

autor

Manjikian S.

• Department of Civil Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

Bibliografia

• [1] Gerbert P, Castagnino S, Rothballer C, Renz A, Filitz R. The transformative power of building information modeling, March 08, 2016 Boston Consulting Group. 2016. https ://www.bcgpe rspec tives .com/conte nt/artic les/engin eered -produ cts-proje ctbusin ess-digit al-engin eerin g-const ructi on/. Accessed 28 Jan 2019.
• [2] Horvath J. Mastering 3D printing (technology in action). Berkeley: Apress; 2014. https ://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-0025-4.
• [3] Maskuriy R, Selamat A, Maresova P, Krejcar A, Olalekan David O. Industry 4.0 for the construction industry: review of management perspective. Economies. 2019;68(7):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/econo mies7 03006 8.
• [4] Bock T. The future of construction automation: technological disruption and the upcoming ubiquity of robotics. Autom Constr. 2015;59:113–21. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.022.
• [5] García de Soto B, Agustí-Juan I, Hunhevicz J, Joss S, Graser K, Habert G, Adey B. Productivity of digital fabrication in construction: cost and time analysis of a robotically built wall. Autom Constr. 2018;92:297–311. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autco n.2018.04.004.
• [6] Brettel M, Friederichsen N, Keller M, Rosenberg M. How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mechatron Manuf Eng. 2014;8(1):37–44.
• [7] Oesterreich TD, Teuteberg F. Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of industry 4.0: a triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Comput Ind. 2016;83:121–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compi nd.2016.09.006.
• [8] Dallasegaa P, Raucha E, Linderb C. Industry 4.0 as an enabler of proximity for construction supply chains: a systematic literature review. Comput Ind. 2018;99:205–25. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.compi nd.2018.03.039.
• [9] Alaloul WS, Liew MS, Zawawi NW, Mohammed BS. Industry revolution IR 4.0: future opportunities and challenges in construction industry. In: MATEC web of conferences 203, 2010. 2018. https ://doi.org/10.1051/matec conf/20182 03020 10.
• [10] Hager I, Golonka A, Putanowicz R. 3D printing of buildings and building components as the future of sustainable construction? Procedia Eng. 2016;151:292–9. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.proen g.2016.07.357.
• [11] Noorani R. 3D printing: technology, applications, and selection. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018.
• [12] Kietzmann J, Pitt L, Berthon P. Disruptions, decisions, and destinations: enter the age of 3D printing and additive manufacturing. Bus Horiz. 2015;58(2):209–15. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.busho r.2014.11.005.
• [13] Davtalab O, Kazemian A, Khoshnevis B. Perspectives on a BIM-integrated software platform for robotic construction through contour crafting. Autom Constr. 2018;89:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autco n.2018.01.006.
• [14] Camacho D, Clayton P, O’Brien W, Seepersad C, Juenger M, Ferron R, Salamone S. Applications of additive manufacturing in the construction industry: a forward-looking review. Autom Constr. 2018;89:110–9. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autco n.2017.12.031.
• [15] Yossef M, Chen A. Applicability and limitations of 3D printing for civil structures. Civ Constr Environ Eng Conf Present Proc. 2015;35:87–99.
• [16] Lim S, Buswell RA, Le TT, Austin SA, Gibb AG, Thorpe T. Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes. Autom Constr. 2011;21:262–8. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autco n.2011.06.010.
• [17] Wu P, Wang J, Wang X. A critical review of the use of 3D printing in the construction industry. Autom Constr. 2016;68:21–31. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autco n.2016.04.005.
• [18] PMBOK. A guide to the project management body of knowledge. 6th ed. Newtown Square: Project Management Institute Standards Committee, PMI; 2017.
• [19] Barber R. Understanding internally generated risks in projects. Int J Project Manag. 2005;23(8):584–90. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpro man.2005.05.006.
• [20] ANDI. The importance and allocation of risks in Indonesian construction projects. Constr Manag Econ. 2006;24(1):69–80. https ://doi.org/10.1080/01446 19050 03103 38.
• [21] El-Sayegh S. Risk assessment and allocation in the UAE construction industry. Int J Project Manag. 2008;26(4):431–8. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpro man.2007.07.004.
• [22] Jung K-Y, Roh M-S. A study for an appropriate risk management of new technology deployment in nuclear power plants. Ann Nucl Energy. 2016;99:157–64. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.anuce ne.2016.08.013.
• [23] Conner BP, Manogharan GP, Meyers KL. An assessment of implementation of entry-level 3D printers from the perspective of small businesses. Rapid Prototyp J. 2015;21(5):582–97. https ://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0132.
• [24] Malone D. 2017. https ://www.bdcne twork .com/europe%E2%80%99s-first -3d-print ed-build ing-has-been-compl eted. Accessed 22 Feb 2019.
• [25] Paul S, Van Zijl G, Tan M, Gibson I. A review of 3D concrete printing systems and materials properties: current status and future research prospects. Rapid Prototyp J. 2018;24(4):784–98. https ://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2016-0154.
• [26] Ghaffar S, Corker J, Fan M. Additive manufacturing technology and its implementation in construction as an eco-innovative solution. Autom Constr. 2018;93:1–11. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autco n.2018.05.005.
• [27] Uppalla S, Tadikamalla M. A review on 3D printing of concrete-the future of sustainable construction. I-Manager’s J Civ Eng. 2017;7(3):49–62. https ://doi.org/10.26634 /jce.7.3.13610.
• [28] Labonnote N, Rřnnquist A, Manum B, Rüther P. Additive construction: state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Autom Constr. 2016;72:347–66. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.026.
• [29] Bos F, Wolfs R, Ahmed Z, Salet T. Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2016;11(3):209–25. https ://doi.org/10.1080/17452 759.2016.12098 67.
• [30] Tay YWD, Panda B, Paul SC, Noor Mohamed NA, Tan MJ, Leong KF. 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2017;12(3):261–76.
• [31] Shakor P, Nejadi S, Paul G, Malek S. Review of emerging additive manufacturing technologies in 3D printing of cementitious materials in the construction industry. Front Built Environ. 2019;4:85.
• [32] Hamidi F, Aslani F. Additive manufacturing of cementitious composites: materials, methods, potentials, and challenges. Constr Build Mater. 2019;218:582–609. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbu ildma t.2019.05.140.
• [33] ISO/ASTM52900-15. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing-general principles-terminology. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2015.
• [34] Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B. Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2015. https ://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3.
• [35] D-shape.com. D-shape building process. 2019. https ://d-shape .com/the-techn ology /d-shape -build ing-proce ss/. Accessed 7 Apr 2019.
• [36] Xu J, Ding L, Love P. Digital reproduction of historical building ornamental components: from 3D scanning to 3D printing. Autom Constr. 2017;76:85–96. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autco n.2017.01.010.
• [37] Yeon J, Kang J, Yan W. Spall damage repair using 3D printing technology. Autom Constr. 2018;89:266–74. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autco n.2018.02.003.
• [38] Mueller RP, Howe S, Kochmann D, Ali H, Andersen C, Burgoyne H, Chambers W, Clinton R, De Kestellier X, Ebelt K, Gerner S, Hofmann D, Hogstrom K, Ilves E, Jerves A, Keenan R, Keravala J, Khoshnevis B, Lim S, Metzger P, Meza L, Nakamura T, Nelson A, Partridge H, Pettit D, Pyle R, Reiners E, Shapiro A, Singer R, Tan W-L, Vazquez N, Wilcox B, Zelhofer A. Automated additive construction (AAC) for earth and space using in-situ resources. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth biennial ASCE aerospace division international conference on engineering, science, construction, and operations in challenging environments (Earth & Space 2016). Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2016. http://oro.open.ac.uk/45865/1/3Dadd itive paper final .pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.
• [39] Ingaglio J, Fox J, Naito CJ, Bocchini P. Material characteristics of binder jet 3D printed hydrated CSA cement with the addition of fine aggregates. Constr Build Mater. 2019;206:494–503.
• [40] Shakor P, Sanjayan J, Nazari A, Nejadi S. Modified 3D printed powder to cement-based material and mechanical properties of cement scaffold used in 3D printing. Constr Build Mater. 2017;138:398–409.
• [41] Lowke D, Dini E, Perrot A, Weger D, Gehlen C, Dillenburger B. Particle-bed 3D printing in concrete construction: possibilities and challenges. Cem Concr Res. 2018;112:50–65. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemco nres.2018.05.018.
• [42] Khoshnevis B, Hwang D, Yao KT, Yeh Z. Mega-scale fabrication by contour crafting. Int J Ind Syst Eng. 2006;1(3):301–20. https ://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE .2006.00979 1.
• [43] Craveiro F, Bartolo H, Gale A, Duarte J, Bartolo P. A design tool for resource-efficient fabrication of 3D-graded structural building components using additive manufacturing. Autom Constr. 2017;82:75–83. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.05.006.
• [44] Duballet R, Baverel O, Dirrenberger J. Classification of building systems for concrete 3D printing. Autom Constr. 2017;83:247–58. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autco n.2017.08.018.
• [45] Gosselin C, Duballet R, Roux P, Gaudilličre N, Dirrenberger J, Morel P. Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high performance concrete: a new processing route for architects and builders. Mater Des. 2016;100:102–9. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.matde s.2016.03.097.
• [46] Zareiyan B, Khoshnevis B. Effects of interlocking on interlayer adhesion and strength of structures in 3D printing of concrete. Autom Constr. 2017;83:212–21. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.019.
• [47] Apis Cor. We print buildings. http://www.apis-cor.com/en/.Accessed 15 Dec 2019.
• [48] Zhang X, Li M, Lim J, Weng Y, Tay Y, Pham H, Pham Q. Large-scale 3D printing by a team of mobile robots. Autom Constr. 2018;95:98–106. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.08.004.
• [49] Barnett E, Gosselin C. Large-scale 3D printing with a cablesuspended robot. Addit Manuf. 2015;7:27–44. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma .2015.05.001.
• [50] https ://www.const ructi onwee konli ne.com/produ cts-services/25754 8-video -cobod -set-to-ship-world s-large st-3d-print erto-saudi -arabi a.
• [51] Kothman I, Faber N. How 3D printing technology changes the rules of the game. J Manuf Technol Manag. 2016;27(7):932–43. https ://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2016-0010.
• [52] Feng L, Yuhong L. Study on the status quo and problems of 3D printed buildings in China. Glob J Hum Soc Sci H Interdiscip. 2014;14(5):7–10.
• [53] 3D Printers, WASP, Leading Company in the 3D painting industry. 2019. https ://www.3dwas p.com/en/. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.
• [54] Le T, Austin S, Lim S, Buswell R, Gibb A, Thorpe T. Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete. Mater Struct. 2012;45(8):1221–32. https ://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z.
• [55] Buswell RA, Leal de Silva WR, Jones SZ, Dirrenberger J. 3D printing using concrete extrusion: a roadmap for research. Cem Concr Res. 2018;112:37–49.
• [56] Cemex Ventures. Benefits of 3D printing in construction. 2019. https ://www.cemex ventu res.com/benefits-of-3d-print ing-in-const ructi on/. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.
• [57] Le T, Austin S, Lim S, Buswell R, Law R, Gibb A, Thorpe T. Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2012;42(3):558–66. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.12.003.
• [58] Papachristoforou M, Mitsopoulos V, Stefanidou M. Evaluation of workability parameters in 3D printing concrete. Procedia Struct Integr. 2018;10:155–62. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.prost r.2018.09.023.
• [59] Wangler T, Lloret E, Reiter L, Hack N, Gramazio F, Kohler M, Flatt R. Digital concrete: opportunities and challenges. Rilem Tech Lett. 2016;1:67–75. https ://doi.org/10.21809 /rilem techl ett.2016.16.
• [60] Hambach M, Volkmer D. Properties of 3D-printed fiber-reinforced portland cement paste. Cem Concr Compos. 2017;79:62–70. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemco ncomp .2017.02.001.
• [61] Doo-Yeol Y, Young-Soo Y. A review on structural behavior, design, and application of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Int J Concr Struct Mater. 2016;10(2):125–42. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s4006 9-016-0143-x.
• [62] Ducoulombier N, Chateau C, Bornert M, Caron J-F, Weitkamp T, Perrin J. Characterisation and modelling of interfacial damage in fibre reinforced concrete for 3D printing in construction. In: 10th international conference on fracture mechanics of concrete and concrete structures, June 2019, Bayonne, France. https ://doi.org/10.21012 /FC10.23556 2.
• [63] Bos F, Bosco E, Salet T. Ductility of 3D printed concrete reinforced with short straight steel fibers. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2019;14(2):160–74.
• [64] Feng P, Meng X, Zhang H. Mechanical behavior of FRP sheets reinforced 3D elements printed with cementitious materials. Compos Struct. 2015;134:331–42.
• [65] Arayici Y, Egbu CO, Coates SP. Building information modelling (BIM) implementation and remote construction projects: issues, challenges, and critiques. J Inf Technol Constr. 2012;17:75–92.
• [66] Robichaud L, Anantatmula VS. Greening project management practices for sustainable construction. J Manag Eng. 2011;27(1):48–57. https ://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.00000 30.
• [67] Feng P, Meng X, Chen J, Ye L. Mechanical properties of structures 3D printed with cementitious powders. Constr Build Mater. 2015;93:486–97. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbu ildmat.2015.05.132.
• [68] Zhang J, Hu Z. BIM- and 4D-based integrated solution of analysis and management for conflicts and structural safety problems during construction: 1. Principles and methodologies. Autom Constr. 2011;20(2):155–66. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.013.
• [69] World Economic Forum. Winsun: demonstrating the viability of 3D printing at the construction scale. 2016. https ://futur eofco nstru ction .org/case/winsu n/. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.
• [70] Dubai Future Foundation. Dubai 3D printing strategy. www.dubai futur e.gov.ae/our-initi ative s/dubai -3d-print ing-strat egy/#14582 29619 399-0dfda dfa-8f328 fc7-fbc6. Accessed 1 Nov 2018.
• [71] D Printhuset. The construction of Europe’s first 3D Printed building has begun and is almost complete. 3D Printhuset. http://www.3dpri nthus et.dk/europ es-first -3d-print ed-build ing/.Accessed 1 Nov 2018.
• [72] CyBe. Redefining construction by enabling 3D concrete painting by providing hardware, software, material, education, certification and business development. CyBe Construction. http://www.cybe.eu/. Accessed 1 Nov 2018.
• [73] CNN Style. The world’s longest 3D-printed concrete bridge is finished. 2019. https ://editi on.cnn.com/style /artic le/shang hai-3dprint ed-bridg e-scli-intl/index .html. Accessed 2 Feb 2019.
• [74] Buswell RA, Soar RC, Gibb AGF, Thorpe A. Freeform construction: mega-scale rapid manufacturing for construction. Autom Constr. 2007;16(2):224–31. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autco n.2006.05.002.
• [75] Campbell T, Williams C, Ivanova O, Garrett B. Could 3D printing change the world? Technologies, potential, and implications of additive manufacturing. Atlantic Council. 2011. http://www.atlan ticco uncil .org/image s/files /publi cation_pdfs/403/101711_ACUS_3DPri nting .PDF. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.
• [76] Khoshnevis B. Automated construction by contour crafting-related robotics and information technologies. Autom Constr. 2004;13(1):5–19. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autco n.2003.08.012.
• [77] Chen Q, García de Soto B, Adey B. Construction automation: research areas, industry concerns and suggestions for advancement. Autom Constr. 2018;94:22–38. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autco n.2018.05.028.
• [78] WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). Our common future (Oxford paperbacks). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.
• [79] Karakhan AM, Gambatese JM. Identification, quantification, and classification of potential safety risk for sustainable construction in the United States. J Constr Eng Manag. 2017. https ://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.00013 02.
• [80] Perrot A, Rangeard D, Courteille E. 3D printing of earthbased materials: processing aspects. Constr Build Mater. 2018;172:670–6. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbu ildmat.2018.04.017.
• [81] Zhang Z, Provis J, Reid A, Wang H. Geopolymer foam concrete: an emerging material for sustainable construction. Constr Build Mater. 2014;56:113–27. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbu ildmat.2014.01.081.
• [82] Xia M, Nematollahi B, Sanjayan J. Printability, accuracy and strength of geopolymer made using powder-based 3D painting for construction applications. Autom Constr. 2019;101:179–89. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autco n.2019.01.013.
• [83] OECD. Material resources, productivity and the environment. OECD green growth studies. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015. https ://doi.org/10.1787/97892 64190 504-en.
• [84] Zou P, Zhang G. Comparative study on the perception of construction safety risks in China and Australia. J Constr Eng Manag. 2009;135(7):620–7. https ://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) CO.1943-7862.00000 19.
• [85] Whirlwind Team. Impacts of 3D printing on the construction industry. https ://www.whirl winds teel.com/blog/impac ts-of-3d-print ing-on-the-const ructi on-indus try. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.
• [86] Costanzi C, Ahmed Z, Schipper H, Bos F, Knaack U, Wolfs R. 3D printing concrete on temporary surfaces: the design and fabrication of a concrete shell structure. Autom Constr. 2018;94:395–404. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.autco n.2018.06.013.
• [87] Perkins I, Skitmore M. Three-dimensional printing in the construction industry: a review. Int J Constr Manag. 2015;15(1):1–9. https ://doi.org/10.1080/15623 599.2015.10121 36.
• [88] Panda B, Tay Y, Paul S, Tan M. Current challenges and future potential of 3D concrete printing. Mater Sci Eng Technol. 2018;49(5):666–73. https ://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.20170 0279.
• [89] Paul S, Tay Y, Panda B, Tan M. Fresh and hardened properties of 3D printable cementitious materials for building and construction. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2018;18(1):311–9. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2017.02.008.
• [90] Bridges SM, Keiser K, Sissom N, Graves SJ. Cyber security for additive manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual cyber and information security research conference article no. 14, New York, 2015. New York: ACM International Conference Proceedings Series; 2015. https ://doi.org/10.1145/2746266.27462 80.
• [91] Berman B. 3D printing: the new industrial revolution. IEEE Eng Manag Rev. 2013. https ://doi.org/10.1109/emr.2013.66938 69.
• [92] Shakor P, Nejadi S, Paul G. A study into the effect of different nozzles shapes and fibre-reinforcement in 3D printed mortar. Materials. 2019;12:1708. https ://doi.org/10.3390/ma121 01708 .
• [93] Kreiger MA, MacAllister BA, Wilhoit JM, Case MP. The current state of 3D printing for use in construction. In: Proceedings of the 2015 conference on autonomous and robotic construction of infrastructure, Ames, Iowa; 2015. pp. 149–158.
• [94] Hwang B, Shan M, Supa’at N. Green commercial building projects in Singapore: critical risk factors and mitigation measures. Sustain Cities Soc. 2017;30(7):237–47. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.020.
• [95] El-Sayegh S, Manjikian S, Ibrahim A, Abouelyousr A, Jabbour R. Risk identification and assessment in sustainable construction projects in the UAE. Int J Constr Manag. 2018. https ://doi.org/10.1080/15623 599.2018.15369 63.
• [96] Robinson P. Project learning with 3D printing: 3D materials and construction possibilities. New York: Cavendish Square Publishing; 2018. https ://ebook centr al.proqu est.com/lib/aus-ebooks/reade r.actio n?docID =54048 12. Accessed 7 Apr 2019. ISBN 9781502631473.
• [97] Zayed T, Amer M, Pan J. Assessing risk and uncertainty inherent in Chinese highway projects using AHP. Int J Project Manag. 2008;26(4):408–19. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.05.012.
• [98] Al-Hajj A, Hamani K. Material waste in the UAE construction industry: main causes and minimization practices. Archit Eng Des Manag. 2011;7(4):221–35. https ://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2011.59457 6.
• [99] Popov G, Lyon BK, Hollcroft B. Risk assessment: a practical guide to assessing operational risks. 2016. https ://ebook centr al.proqu est.com. Accessed 15 Dec 2019. ISBN-13: 978-1628251845.
• [100] Mathews K. Avoid common robotics hazards by following these 6 rules. 2019. Blog.robotiq.com. https ://blog.robot iq.com/avoid-these -common-robot ics-hazar ds-by-follo wing-these -6-rules .Accessed 2 Feb 2019.
• [101] Chinniah Y. Robot safety: overview of risk assessment and reduction. Adv Robot Autom. 2016. https ://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9695.10001 39.
• [102] Li R. An economic analysis on automated construction safety: internet of things, artificial intelligence and 3D printing. Singapore: Springer; 2017. https ://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5771-7.
• [103] Salet T, Ahmed Z, Bos F, Laagland H. Design of a 3D printed concrete bridge by testing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2018;13(3):222–36. https ://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2018.14760 64.
• [104] Kartam N, Kartam S. Risk and its management in the Kuwaiti construction industry: a contractors’ perspective. Int J Project Manag. 2001;19(6):325–35. https ://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00014 -4.
• [105] Tang W, Qiang M, Duffield C. Risk management in the Chinese construction industry. J Constr Eng Manag. 2007;133(12):944–56. https ://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:12(944).
• [106] Chapman R. The controlling influences on effective risk identification and assessment for construction design management. Int J Project Manag. 2001;19(3):147–60. https ://doi.org/10.1016/S0263 -7863(99)00070 -8.
• [107] Wang S, Dulaimi M, Aguria M. Risk management framework for construction projects in developing countries. Constr Manag Econ. 2004;22(3):237–52. https ://doi.org/10.1080/01446 1903200012 4689.
• [108] Travelers.com. 2019. https ://www.trave lers.com/iw-docum ents/busin ess-insur ance/tech-3D-white paper -BTCWH .0003D .pdf.Accessed 2 Feb 2019.
• [109] Sköld G, Vidarsson H. Analyzing the potentials of 3D-printing in the construction industry. A thesis in supply chain management (master’s thesis). Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2015.
• [110] Bak D. Rapid prototyping or rapid production? 3D printing processes move industry towards the latter. Assem Autom. 2003;23(4):340–5. https ://doi.org/10.1108/01445 15031 05011 90.
• [111] Zeltmann S, Gupta N, Tsoutsos N, Maniatakos M, Rajendran J, Karri R. Manufacturing and security challenges in 3D printing. JOM. 2016;68(7):1872–81. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-1937-7.
• [112] Panda B, Paul SC, Tan MJ. Anisotropic mechanical performance of 3D printed fiber reinforced sustainable construction material. Mater Lett. 2017;209:146–9. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.matle t.2017.07.123.
• [113] Workplace health and safety Queensland. Guide to machinery and equipment safety. 2015. https ://www.works afe.qld.gov.au/_data/asset s/pdf_file/0010/82783 /guide tomac hiner y-equipments afety .pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.
• [114] Sweis G, Sweis R, Abuhammad A, Shboul A. Delays in construction projects: the case of Jordan. Int J Project Manag. 2008;26(6):665–74. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.09.009.
• [115] Ling F, Hoi L. Risks faced by Singapore firms when undertaking construction projects in India. Int J Project Manag. 2006;24(3):261–70. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.003.
• [116] Zou P, Zhang G, Wang J. Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. Int J Project Manag. 2007;25(6):601–14. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpro man.2007.03.001.
• [117] El-Sayegh S, Mansour M. Risk assessment and allocation in highway construction projects in the UAE. J Manag Eng. 2015. https ://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.00003 65.
• [118] Faridi A, El-Sayegh S. Significant factors causing delay in the UAE construction industry. Constr Manag Econ.2006;24(11):1167–76. https ://doi.org/10.1080/01446 1906008270 33.
• [119] Ghosh S, Jintanapakanont J. Identifying and assessing the critical risk factors in an underground rail project in Thailand: a factor analysis approach. Int J Project Manag. 2004;22(8):633–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpro man.2004.05.004.
• [120] Doloi H, Sawhney A, Iyer K, Rentala S. Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects. Int J Project Manag. 2012;30(4):479–89. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.10.004.
• [121] Al-Saleh Y, Taleb H. The integration of sustainability within value management practices: a study of experienced value managers in the GCC countries. Project Manag J. 2010;41(2):50–9. https ://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20147.
• [122] Fang D, Li M, Fong PS, Shen L. Risks in Chinese construction market—contractors’ perspective. J Constr Eng Manag. 2004;130(6):853–61. https ://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:6(853).
• [123] Zhi H. Risk management for overseas construction projects. Int J Project Manag. 1995;13(4):231–7. https ://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00015 -I.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021)