PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Assessment of the impact of personality characteristics on the environmental awareness

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Ocena wpływu cech osobowości na świadomość ekologiczną
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The paper is focused on assessing the impact of personality characteristics on the level of identified environmental awareness factors in Slovakia. On a theoretical basis, the work examines 3 factors of environmental awareness: cognitive, emotional and behavioural factors. Personality characteristics were studied from the point of view of the Big-Five trait taxonomy. Primary data were obtained through questionnaires. The object of the research are the residents of Slovakia aged 18 and above with Slovak nationality. The research sample consisted of 1108 respondents. In the analysis of the research results, the used factor model proved to be significant, and personality characteristics proved to be a statistically significant predictor of the level of identified environmental awareness factors. According to the results of the model, Conscientiousness and Openness influenced all 3 factors of environmental awareness, and other personality traits influenced environmental awareness only within some factors. Thus, this study extends the empirical research focused on factors affecting environmental awareness in the understudied region of Central and Eastern Europe, and the achieved results may be the basis for environmental awareness management measures in practice.
PL
Artykuł koncentruje się na ocenie wpływu cech osobowości na poziom zidentyfikowanych czynników świadomości ekologicznej na Słowacji. Na gruncie teoretycznym w pracy zbadano 3 czynniki świadomości środowiskowej: czynniki poznawcze, emocjonalne i behawioralne. Cechy osobowości badano z punktu widzenia taksonomii cech Wielkiej Piątki. Dane pierwotne uzyskano za pomocą kwestionariuszy. Obiektem badań są mieszkańcy Słowacji w wieku 18 lat i więcej, posiadający narodowość słowacką. Próba badawcza liczyła 1108 respondentów. W analizie wyników badań zastosowany model czynnikowy okazał się istotny, a cechy osobowości okazały się istotnym statystycznie predyktorem poziomu zidentyfikowanych czynników świadomości środowiskowej. Zgodnie z wynikami modelu Sumienność i Otwartość wpływały na wszystkie 3 czynniki świadomości ekologicznej, a pozostałe cechy osobowości wpływały na świadomość ekologiczną tylko w zakresie niektórych czynników. Tym samym niniejsze opracowanie jest rozszerzeniem badań empirycznych skoncentrowanych na czynnikach wpływających na świadomość ekologiczną w niedostatecznie zbadanym regionie Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, a uzyskane wyniki mogą być podstawą do podejmowania działań w zakresie zarządzania świadomością ekologiczną w praktyce.
Rocznik
Strony
217--232
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 46 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • University of Presov in Presov, Faculty of Management and Business
  • University of Presov in Presov, Faculty of Management and Business
  • University of Presov in Presov, Faculty of Management and Business
  • University of Presov in Presov, Faculty of Management and Business
  • University of Presov in Presov, Faculty of Management and Business
  • University of Presov in Presov, Faculty of Management and Business
  • University of Presov in Presov, Faculty of Management and Business
Bibliografia
  • 1.Abdollahi, A., Hosseinian, S., Karbalaei, S., Beh-Pajooh, A., Keshavarz, Y. and Najafi, M. (2017). The big five personality traits and environmental concern: the moderating roles of individualism/collectivism and gender. Romanian Journal of Psychology, 19(1), 1-9.
  • 2.Ashley, M. (2000). Behaviour change and environmental citizenship: A case for spiritual development? International Journal of Children's Spirituality, 5(2), 131-145.
  • 3.Bamberg, S., Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25.
  • 4.Barr, S., Gilg, A. W. (2007). A conceptual framework for understanding and analyzing attitudes towards environmental behaviour. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 89(4), 361-379.
  • 5.Barr, S., Gilg, A. W. and Ford, N. J. (2001). A conceptual framework for understanding and analysing attitudes towards household-waste management. Environment and Planning A, 33(11), 2025-2048.
  • 6.Biel, A., Thøgersen, J. (2007). Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(1), 93-112.
  • 7.Bozoglu, M., Bilgic, A., Topuz, B. K. and Ardali, Y. (2016). Factors affecting the students’ environmental awareness, attitudes and behaviors in Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 25(4), 1243-1257.
  • 8.Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Guilford publications.
  • 9.Calculli, C., D'Uggento, A. M., Labarile, A. and Ribecco, N. (2021). Evaluating people's awareness about climate changes and environmental issues: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, Article 129244.
  • 10.Chan, R. Y., Lau, L. B. (2000). Antecedents of green purchases: a survey in China. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(4), 338-357.
  • 11.DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B. and Higgins, D. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 825-858.
  • 12.Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A. and Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 335-372.
  • 13.Erten, S. (2012). Environmental consciousness among Turkish and Azeri candidate teachers. Education and Science, 37(166), 88-100.
  • 14.Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • 15.Frankovský, M. (2012). Possibilities of detecting the environmental awareness. Journal of Management and Business: Research and Practice, 4(1), 7-14.
  • 16.Gerlitz, J.-Y., Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten persoenlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP, Research Notes, 4. DIW Berlin.
  • 17.Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26-34.
  • 18.Hahn, E., Gottschling, J. and Spinath, F. M. (2012). Short measurements of personality-Validity and reliability of the GSOEP Big Five Inventory (BFI-S). Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3), 355-359.
  • 19.Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin B. J. and Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • 20.Heyl, M., Moyano Díaz, E. and Cifuentes, L. (2013). Environmental attitudes and behaviors of college students: A case study conducted at a Chilean university. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 45(3), 487-500.
  • 21.Hirsh, J. B. (2010). Personality and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 245-248.
  • 22.Hirsh, J. B., Dolderman, D. (2007). Personality predictors of consumerism and environmentalism: A preliminary study. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1583-1593.
  • 23.Holotová, M., Nagyová, Ľ. and Holota, T. (2020). The impact of environmental responsibility on changing consumer behaviour - sustainable market in Slovakia. Economics and Sociology, 13(3), 84-96.
  • 24.Hu, L.-T., Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Sage Publications, Inc.
  • 25.Koutsos, T. M., Menexes, G. C., Balampekou, E. I. and Oikonomou, A. (2021). University students’ perception of the factors affecting preschool and primary students’ recycling behaviour as a tool to improve environmental education in the university curriculum. PsyEcology, 12(2), 125-176.
  • 26.Kozma, G., Szabó, G., Molnár, E. and Pénzes, J. (2015). The Position of Environmental Protection in Municipal Council Committees of Local Governments in Hungary. Administratie si Management Public, 24, 44-55.
  • 27.Krajhanzl, J., Chabada, T. and Svobodová, R. (2018). The relationship of the Czech public toward nature and the environment: Representative public opinion surveys. Masaryk University Press.
  • 28.Lang, F. R., John, D., Lüdtke, O., Schupp, J. and Wagner, G. G. (2011). Short assessment of the Big Five: Robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), 548-567.
  • 29.Lange, F., Dewitte, S. (2019). Cognitive flexibility and pro-environmental behaviour: A multimethod approach. European Journal of Personality, 33(4), 488-505.
  • 30.Lis, M., Szczepanska-Woszczyna, K. (2015). Managing customer relations: The use of CRM system by services company. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Strategic Management and its Support by Information Systems 2015, SMSIS 2015, 66-75.
  • 31.Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503-515.
  • 32.McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, and L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 159-181). The Guilford Press.
  • 33.Milfont, T. L., Sibley, C. G. (2012). The big five personality traits and environmental engagement: Associations at the individual and societal level. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(2), 187-195.
  • 34.Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
  • 35.Sadik, F., Sadik, S. (2014). A study on environmental knowledge and attitudes of teacher candidates. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2379-2385.
  • 36.Saunders, C. D. (2003). The emerging field of conservation psychology. Human Ecology Review, 10(2), 137-149.
  • 37.Schultz, P. W.,(2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327-339.
  • 38.Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P. and Franek, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 457-475.
  • 39.Schultz, W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391-406.
  • 40.Shao, L., Zhang, H. and Irfan, M. (2021). How public expenditure in recreational and cultural industry and socioeconomic status caused environmental sustainability in OECD countries?. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1-18.
  • 41.Soutter, A. R. B., Mõttus, R. (2021). Big five facets' associations with pro‐environmental attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Personality, 89(2), 203-215.
  • 42.Wold, H. (1982) Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. In: K. G. Joreskog, and H. O. A. Wold (Eds.), Systems under Indirect Observations: Part II (pp. 1-54). North Holland Publishing Co.
  • 43.Yan, G. D., Kang, J. C., Wang, G. D., Lin, H., Zhu, J., Liu, C., Sun, W., Li, Y. and Jin, T. (2012). Quantitative study on the influencing factors of improving public environmental awareness in Shanghai based on structural equation model. In R. Iranpour, J. Zhao, A. Wang, F. Yang, and X. Li (Eds.), Advances in environmental science and engineering (pp. 5103-5107). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
  • 44.Yazici, N., Babalik, A. A. (2016). Determination of environmental awareness of university students: the case of Suleyman Demirel University (SDU). Environmental earth sciences, 75(3), 1-8.
  • 45.Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T. and Iyer, R. (2014). Engagement with natural beauty moderates the positive relation between connectedness with nature and psychological well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 55-63.
  • 46.Zhao, L., Gu, J., Abbas, J., Kirikkaleli, D. and Yue, X. G. (2022). Does quality management system help organizations in achieving environmental innovation and sustainability goals? A structural analysis. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1-24.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-8f3ec940-c130-413b-ab34-0a1fee23996b
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.