Comparative analysis of humic substances of soil organic matter and liquid products from rice husks pyrolysis

Jamilatun, Siti; Linarti, Utaminingsih; Khairi, Amalya Nurul; Pitoyo, Joko; Rahmawati, Novelia Sinta

doi:10.12911/22998993/195285

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Comparative analysis of humic substances of soil organic matter and liquid products from rice husks pyrolysis

Autorzy

Jamilatun Siti , Linarti Utaminingsih , Khairi Amalya Nurul , Pitoyo Joko , Rahmawati Novelia Sinta

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/195285

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Agriculture has an important role in maintaining food availability. One of the most popular plant nutrition additives in agriculture is inorganic fertilizer, however, it can degrade soil health. This problem can be solved by naturally composting formed soil organic matter (SOM), of which humic substances are one of the main components. However, this process takes a very long time. Humic substances can be obtained faster through the rice husk pyrolysis process. This paper aims to study the characteristics of the humic substance from rice husk pyrolysis and understand its correlation with humic substances from SOM. Rice husk pyrolysis was performed in a fixed bed reactor at a temperature of 400, 500, and 600 ℃, weight of 10 g, and retention time of 45 min. The results show that the minimum pyrolysis temperature to obtain sufficient liquid product is 365 ℃. The liquid product from the pyrolysis process consists of two phases, water phase and tar phase. Based on its chemical properties, namely colour, solubility, organic species (functional group), acidity, hydrophilicity, carbon number, molecular weight, and carbon content, a liquid product from pyrolysis has similarities with humic substances derived from SOM, where the water phase (liquid smoke) has similarities to fulvic acid, while tar has similarities to humin. The results also suggest that pyrolysis can be a faster alternative method for producing humic substances.

Słowa kluczowe

agriculture humic substances rice husk pyrolysis soil organic matter humin liquid smoke

Wydawca

Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej
Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Journal of Ecological Engineering

Rocznik

2025

Tom

Vol. 26, nr 1

Strony

137--152

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 43 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Jamilatun Siti

sitijamilatun@che.uad.ac.id

Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Jl. Jend. Ahmad Yani, Banguntapan, Bantul, Yogyakarta, 55166, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6738-1440

autor

Linarti Utaminingsih

utaminingsih.linarti@ie.uad.ac.id

Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Jl. Jend. Ahmad Yani, Banguntapan, Bantul, Yogyakarta, 55166, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5172-6221

autor

Khairi Amalya Nurul

amalya.khairi@tp.uad.ac.id

Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Jl. Jend. Ahmad Yani, Banguntapan, Bantul, Yogyakarta, 55166, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3308-9753

autor

Pitoyo Joko

joko2107054001@webmail.uad.ac.id

Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Jl. Jend. Ahmad Yani, Banguntapan, Bantul, Yogyakarta, 55166, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2972-6334

autor

Rahmawati Novelia Sinta

noveliasintaa@gmail.com

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Indonesia, Jl. Lingkar Kampus Raya, Beji, Depok, Jawa Barat, 16424, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6133-6698

Bibliografia

1. Adi Saputra, N., Komarayati, S., Gusmailina,, Gusmailina. (2021). Organic chemical components of five types of liquid smoke. Journal of Forest Products Research, 39(1), 39–54 (In Indonesian). https://doi.org/10.20886/jphh.2021.39.1.39-54
2. Amiroh, A., Prabowo, C., Istiqomah, I., Anam, C., Qibtiyah, M., Kusumawati, D. (2022). Application of liquid smoke concentration on the growth and production of various rice varieties (Oryza sativa L.). Paspalum: Scientific Journal of Agriculture, 10(1), 86 (In Indonesian). https://doi.org/10.35138/paspalum.v10i1.360
3. Buckau, G., Hooker, P., Moulin, V., Schmeide, K., Maes, A., Warwick, P., Moulin, C., Pieri, J., Bryan, N., Carlsen, L., Klotz, D., Trautmann, N. (2000). Main Conclusions of the Ec-Humics Project: Effects of Humic Substances on the Migration of Radionuclides: Complexation and Transport of Actinides, 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85573-807-2.50024-2
4. Buckau, G., Wolf, M., Geyer, S., Artinger, R., Kim, J. (2002). Humic Substances: Natures Most Versatile Materials.
5. Campitelli, P., Ceppi, S. (2008). Effects of composting technologies on the chemical and physicochemical properties of humic acids. Geoderma, 144(1–2), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. geoderma.2007.12.003
6. Cao, Y., Chang, Z., Wang, J., Ma, Y., Yang, H., Fu, G. (2014). Potential use of anaerobically digested manure slurry to suppress Phytophthora root rot of chilli pepper. Scientia Horticulturae, 168, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.11.004
7. Davies, G., Ghabbour, E. (Eds.). (2003). Humic Substances: Nature’s Most Versatile Materials (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487600
8. Elsadek, M.A., Yousef, E.A.A. (2019). Smoke-water enhances germination and seedling growth of four horticultural crops. Plants, 8(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8040104
9. Fan, H., Wang, K., Zhai, X., Hu, L. (2021). Combustion kinetics and mechanism of pre-oxidized coal with different oxygen concentrations. ACS Omega, 6(29), 19170–19182. https://doi.org/10.1021/ acsomega.1c02520
10. Gamage, J., Voroney, P., Gillespie, A.W., Longstaffe, J. (2024). Chemical composition of soil humin in an organic soil profile. Applied Geochemistry, 165(February), 105954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2024.105954
11. Guo, X. Xia, Liu, H. Tao, Wu, S. Biao. (2019). Humic substances developed during organic waste composting: Formation mechanisms, structural properties, and agronomic functions. Science of the Total Environment, 662, 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.137
12. Hayes, M.H.B., Mylotte, R., Swift, R.S. (2017). Humin: its composition and importance in soil organic matter. Advances in Agronomy 143, October. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2017.01.001
13. Istiqomah, I., Kusumawati, D.E. (2019). Effectiveness Test of Liquid Smoke from Rice Husk Waste to Control Brown Planthopper Pests in Rice Plants. Conference in Research and Community Service, 531–539 (In Indonesian).
14. Istiqomah, I., Kusumawati, D.E. 2020. Potential of liquid smoke from rice husks to increase rice growth and production (Oryza sativa L.). Buana Sains, 19(2), 23 (In Indonesian). https://doi.org/10.33366/bs.v19i2.1745
15. Jamilatun, S., Aziz, M., Pitoyo, J. (2023). Multi-distributed activation energy model for pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse : modelling strategy and thermodynamic characterization. Indonesian Journal of Science & Technology, 8(3), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v8i3.60175
16. Jamilatun, S., Pitoyo, J., Amelia, S., Ma, A., Hakika, D.C., Mufandi, I. (2022). Experimental study on the characterization of pyrolysis products from bagasse (Saccharum Officinarum L): Bio-oil, biochar, and gas products. Indonesian Journal of Science & Technology, 7(3), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v7i3.51566
17. Jindo, K., Sonoki, T., Matsumoto, K., Canellas, L., Roig, A., Sanchez-Monedero, M.A. (2016). Influence of biochar addition on the humic substances of composting manures. Waste Management, 49, 545– 552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.007
18. Kan, T., Strezov, V., Evans, T.J. (2016). Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: A review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 1126–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.185
19. Khatoon, A., Ur Rehman, S., Aslam, M.M., Jamil, M., Komatsu, S. (2020). Plant-derived smoke affects biochemical mechanism on plant growth and seed germination. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(20), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207760
20. Komarayati, S., Wibowo, S. (2015). Characteristics of liquid smoke from three types of bamboo. Journal of Forest Products Research, 33(2), 167–174 (In Indonesian). https://doi.org/10.20886/jphh.v33i2.824.167-174
21. Nastasiienko, N., Kulik, T., Palianytsia, B., Laskin, J., Cherniavska, T., Kartel, M., Larsson, M. (2021). Catalytic pyrolysis of lignin model compounds (pyrocatechol, guaiacol, vanillic and ferulic acids) over nanoceria catalyst for biomass conversion. Applied Sciences. 11, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167205
22. Ndzelu, B.S., Dou, S., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Ma, R., Liu, X. (2021). Tillage effects on humus composition and humic acid structural characteristics in soil aggregate-size fractions. Soil and Tillage Research, 213(May), 105090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105090
23. Ni Nyoman, R., Pandit B.V. (2008). Humic Substances: structure, function, effects and applications. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 5, (January 2007), 39–47. http://iospress.metapress. com/content/k104722x155k348t
24. Nugraha, A., Nandiyanto, A.B.D. (2021). How to read and Interpret GC/MS Spectra. Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research, 1(2), 171– 206. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijomr.v1i2.35191
25. Olivelli, M.S., Fugariu, I., Torres Sánchez, R.M., Curutchet, G., Simpson, A.J., Simpson, M.J. (2020). Unraveling mechanisms behind biomass–clay interactions using comprehensive multiphase nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 4(11), 2061–2072. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00215
26. Patel, K., Chikkali, S.H., Sivaram, S. (2020). Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene: Catalysis, structure, properties, processing and applications. Progress in Polymer Science, 109, 101290. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2020.101290
27. Piccolo, A., Pietramellara, G., Mbagwu, J.S.C. (1996). Effects of coal derived humic substances on water retention and structural stability of Mediterranean soils. Soil Use and Management, 12(4), 209–213. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.1996.tb00545
28. Pitoyo, J., Jamilatun, S., Suharto, T.E. (2024). Characteristic of oil palm shell pyrolysis temperature selectivity on phenolic compound. AIP Conference Proceeding, 040002. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0206639
29. PubChem, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
30. Qin, K., Leskovar, D.I. (2020). Humic substances improve vegetable seedling quality and post‐transplant yield performance under stress conditions. Agriculture (Switzerland), 10 (7), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10070254
31. Rupiasih, N.N., Pandit V. (2005). A review: Compositions, structures, properties and applications of humic substances. J. Adv. Sci. and Tech. 8. 16–25.
32. Stefanidis, S.D., Kalogiannis, K.G., Iliopoulou, E.F., Michailof, C.M., Pilavachi, P.A., Lappas, A.A. (2014). A study of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis via the pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 105, 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jaap.2013.10.013
33. Stevenson, F.J. (1995). Humus chemistry: Genesis, composition, reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 72(4), A93. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed072pA93.6
34. Tahir, M.M., Khurshid, M., Khan, M.Z., Abbasi, M.K., Kazmi, M.H. (2011). Lignite-derived humic acid effect on growth of wheat plants in different soils. Pedosphere, 21(1), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60087-2
35. Terry, L.M., Li, C., Chew, J.J., Aqsha, A., How, B.S., Loy, A.C.M., Chin, B.L.F., Khaerudini, D.S., Hameed, N., Guan, G., Sunarso, J. (2021). Bio-oil production from pyrolysis of oil palm biomass and the upgrading technologies: A review. Carbon Resources Conversion, 4(October), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2021.10.002
36. Tiwari, J., Ramanathan, A.L., Bauddh, K., Korstad, J. (2023). Humic substances: Structure, function and benefits for agroecosystems—a review. Pedosphere, 33(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pedsph.2022.07.008
37. Vieira, F.R., Romero Luna, C.M., Arce, G.L.A.F., Ávila, I. (2020). Optimization of slow pyrolysis process parameters using a fixed bed reactor for biochar yield from rice husk. Biomass and Bioenergy, 132(November 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105412
38. Wei, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhao, X., Gao, X., Zheng, Y., Zuo, H., Wei, Z. (2020). Roles of different humin and heavy-metal resistant bacteria from composting on heavy metal removal. Bioresource Technology, 296(November 2019), 122375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122375
39. Yang, H., Li, S., Liu, B., Chen, Y. (2020). Hemicellulose pyrolysis mechanism based on functional group evolutions by two-dimensional perturbation correlation infrared spectroscopy. Fuel, 267(February), 117302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117302
40. Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D.H., Zheng, C. (2007). Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel, 86, 1781–1788. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:52101732
41. Yogalakshmi, P.D., Sivashanmugam, Kavitha. (2022). Lignocellulosic biomass-based pyrolysis: A comprehensive review. Chemosphere, 286(P2), 131824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131824
42. Zhang, J., Chi, F., Wei, D., Zhou, B., Cai, S., Li, Y., Kuang, E., Sun, L., Li, L.-J. (2019). Impacts of Long-term Fertilization on the Molecular Structure of Humic Acid and Organic Carbon Content in Soil Aggregates in Black Soil. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 11908. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48406-8
43. Zherebker, A.Y., Kostyukevich, Y.I., Kononikhin, A.S., Nikolaev, E.N., Perminova, I.V. (2016). Molecular compositions of humic acids extracted from leonardite and lignite as determined by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Mendeleev Communications, 26(5), 446–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2016.09.028

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-8ef726cd-2db7-4ed1-a430-9e5fa2304120