Dynamics modeling of variable mass systems – a case study of an underwater inertia based propelled glider performance

• Autorzy: Kostka Zbigniew , Jarzębowska Elżbieta

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15632/jtam-pl/194505

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Underwater gliders are autonomous underwater vehicles that are widely used in oceanography and coastal surveillance due to their low manufacturing costs and long operation time. This paper addresses the development of a dynamical model of such vehicles which are inertia propelled. The dynamical model is based upon the Boltzmann-Hamel equations modified to variable mass and inertia systems. It yields dynamics in a body-fixed frame using non-inertial coordinates. The theoretical development of the vehicle dynamics based upon the modified Boltzmann-Hamel equations is validated by the longitudinal dynamics model of the underwater glider and its performance resulted from the mass change.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

underwater glider; AUV; variable-mass systems; Boltzmann-Hamel equations

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Mechaniki Teoretycznej i Stosowanej
• Czasopismo: Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 62 nr 4
• Strony: 751--761
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kostka Zbigniew

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Warsaw, Poland

autor

Jarzębowska Elżbieta

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Alvarez A., Caffaz A., Caiti A., Casalino G., Gualdesi L., et al., 2009, Fòlaga: a low-cost autonomous underwater vehicle combining glider and AUV capabilities, Ocean Engineering, 36, 1, 24-38 .
• 2. Brodsky P., Luby J., 2013, Flight Software Development for the Liberdade Flying Wing Glider, Office of Naval Research, Arlington.
• 3. Cruz N. (Ed.), 2011, Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/923.
• 4. Eriksen C.C., Osse T.J., Light R.D., Wen T., Lehman T.W., et al., 2001, Seaglider: a long-range autonomous underwater vehicle for oceanographic research, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 26, 4, 424-436.
• 5. Fossen T.I., 1994, Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles, 1st Edition, Wiley.
• 6. Graver J.G., 2005, Underwater gliders: dynamics, control and design, Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, Princeton.
• 7. Hine R., Willcox S., Hine G., Richardson T., 2009, The wave glider: a wave-powered autonomous marine vehicle, Oceans 2009, IEEE Conference, 1-6.
• 8. Jarzębowska E., 2012, Model-Based Tracking Control of Nonlinear Systems, CRC Series: Modern Mechanics and Mathematics, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton.
• 9. Jarzębowska E., Cichowski M., 2018, Dynamics modeling and performance analysis of underwater vehicles based on the Boltzmann-Hamel equations approach, MATEC Web of Conferences, 148, 03005.
• 10. Kawaguchi K., Ura T., Oride M., Sakamaki T., 1995, Development of shuttle type AUV “ALBAC” and sea trials for oceanographic measurement, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 178, 657-665.
• 11. Mahmoudian N., Geisbert J., Woolsey C., 2007, Dynamics and Control of Underwater Gliders I: Steady Motions, Virginia Center for Autonomous Systems, Blacksburg, Virginia.
• 12. Mahmoudian N., Geisbert J., Woolsey C., 2010, Dynamics and Control of Underwater Gliders II: Steady Motions, Virginia Center for Autonomous Systems, Blacksburg, Virginia.
• 13. Müller A., 2021, On the Hamel coefficients and the Boltzmann-Hamel equations for the rigid body, Journal of Nonlinear Science, 31, 2, 40.
• 14. Neimark J.I., Fufaev N.A., 1972, Dynamics of Nonholonomic Systems, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.
• 15. Rudnick D.L., 2016, Ocean research enabled by underwater gliders, Annual Review of Marine Science, 8, 519-541.
• 16. Rudnick D.L., Davis R.E., Sherman J.T., 2016, Spray Underwater Glider Operations, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 33, 6, 1113-1122.
• 17. Schofield O., Kohut J., Aragon D., Creed L., Graver J., et al., 2007, Slocum gliders: robust and ready, Journal of Field Robotics, 24, 6, 473-485.
• 18. Stommel H., 1989, The slocum mission, Oceanography, 2, 1, 22-25.
• 19. Sun C., Tian J., Huang R., Dong H., Li H., Ma Y., 2023, Internal layout optimization of the blended-wing-body underwater glider based on a range target, Ocean Engineering, 280, 114450.
• 20. Sun W., Zang W., Liu C., Guo T., Nie Y., Song D., 2021, Motion pattern optimization and energy analysis for underwater glider based on the multi-objective artificial bee colony method, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9, 3, 327.
• 21. Wagawa T, Kawaguchi Y., Igeta Y., Honda N., Okunishi T., Yabe I., 2020, Observations of oceanic fronts and water-mass properties in the central Japan Sea: Repeated surveys from an underwater glider, Journal of Marine Systems, 201, 103242.
• 22. Wang H., Chen J., Feng Z., Li Y., Deng C., Chang Z., 2023, Dynamics analysis of underwater glider based on fluid-multibody coupling model, Ocean Engineering, 278, 114330.
• 23. Wang S., Sun X., Wang Y., Wu J., Wang X., 2011, Dynamic modeling and motion simulation for a winged hybrid-driven underwater glider, China Ocean Engineering, 25, 1, 97-112.
• 24. Zhang S., Yu J., Zhang A., Zhang F., 2013, Spiraling motion of underwater gliders: Modeling, analysis, and experimental results, Ocean Engineering, 60, 1-13.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).