New biostratigraphic evidence (calcareous nannofossils, ostracods, foraminifers, ammonites, inoceramids) on the Middle Coniacian in the eastern Bohemian Cretaceous Basin

Svobodova, Andrea; Kočí, Tomáš; Kočová-Veselská, Martina; Ferré, Bruno; Košťák, Martin; Čech, Stanislav; Chroustová, Markéta

doi:10.7306/gq.1489

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

New biostratigraphic evidence (calcareous nannofossils, ostracods, foraminifers, ammonites, inoceramids) on the Middle Coniacian in the eastern Bohemian Cretaceous Basin

Autorzy

Svobodova Andrea , Kočí Tomáš , Kočová-Veselská Martina , Ferré Bruno , Košťák Martin , Čech Stanislav , Chroustová Markéta

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7306/gq.1489

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The classical locality of Svinary in the eastern Bohemian Cretaceous Basin is the site of new biostratigraphic investigations. Besides some scarce macrofossil evidence, bulk sediment samples were processed to retrieve micropalaeontological assemblages, and calcareous nannofossil smear slides were analysed. The studied material provided calcareous nannofossil assemblages including Micula staurophora, Lithastrinus septenarius and Broinsonia parca expansa, thus documenting the Middle Coniacian (upper part of UC10 Zone and lower part of UC11 Zone). The foraminifera assemblage is relatively rich, planktonic species show a wide stratigraphical range, while the benthic association represented by Neoflabellina suturalis suturalis and Gaudryina carinata is very similar to the Coniacian biozone of Stensioeina granulata-Eponides whitei, valid for the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin. Ostracods are represented by two common cytherellid species, and two rare ornamented species: Imhotepia marssoni? and Pterygocythereis spinosa. Inoceramid bivalves, namely Platyceramus mantelli, and a newly recorded ammonite, Tridenticeras tridens, support the late Middle Coniacian age of the Svinary outcrop. New biostratigraphic results are given along with palaeoecological interpretations of newly collected fossil material.

Słowa kluczowe

biostratigraphy Coniacian Late Cretaceous Březno Formation Bohemian Cretaceous Basin Czech Republic

Wydawca

Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy

Czasopismo

Geological Quarterly

Rocznik

2019

Tom

Vol. 63, No. 3

Strony

586--602

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 83 poz., fot., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Svobodova Andrea

asvobodova@gli.cas.cz

Institute of Geology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Rozvojová 269, 165 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic
Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Albertov 6, 128 43, Prague 2, Czech Republic

autor

Kočí Tomáš

National Museum, Natural History Museum, Palaeontological Department, Cirkusová 1740, Prague 9- Horní Počernice, Czech Republic

autor

Kočová-Veselská Martina

Institute of Geology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Rozvojová 269, 165 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic
Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Albertov 6, 128 43, Prague 2, Czech Republic

autor

Ferré Bruno

Dame du Lac 213, 3 rue Henri Barbusse, F-76300 Sotteville-lès-Rouen, France

autor

Košťák Martin

Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Albertov 6, 128 43, Prague 2, Czech Republic

autor

Čech Stanislav

Czech Geological Survey, Klárov 3/131, 118 21, Prague 1, Czech Republic

autor

Chroustová Markéta

Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Albertov 6, 128 43, Prague 2, Czech Republic
Czech Geological Survey, Klárov 3/131, 118 21, Prague 1, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

1. Abramovich, S., Keller, G., Stüben, D., Berner, Z., 2003. Characterization of late Campanian and Maastrichtian planktonic foraminiferal depth habitats and vital activities based on stable isotopes. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 202: 1-29.
2. Baird, W., 1850. The Natural History of the British Entomostraca. Royal Society, London.
3. Blair, S.A., Watkins, D.K., 2009. High-resolution calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy for the Coniacian/Santonian Stage boundary, Western Interior Basin. Cretaceous Research, 30: 367-384.
4. Bonaduce, G., Ciampa, G., Masoli, M., 1975. Distribution of Ostracoda in the Adriatic sea. Publicazioni Della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli, 40: 1-154.
5. Bosquet, J., 1852. Description des Entomostracés fossiles des Terrains Tertiaires de la France et de la Belgique. Mémoires Couronnés et Mémoires des Savants Étrangers, 24: 1-142.
6. Breman, E., 1976. The Distribution of Ostracodes in the Bottom Sediments of the Adriatic Sea. Thesis, Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
7. Burnett, J.A., 1998. Upper Cretaceous. In: Calcareous Nannofossil Biostratigraphy (ed. P.R. Bown): 132-199. British Micropalaeontological Society, London.
8. Čech, S., 1989. Upper Cretaceous Didymotis Events from Bohemia. In: Cretaceous of the Western Tethys (ed. J. Wiedmann): 657-676. Proceedings of the 3rd International Cretaceous Symposium, Tübingen 1987, Stuttgart (Schweizerbart'sehe Verlagsbuchhandlung).
9. Čech, S., 2011. Palaeography and stratigraphy of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin (Czech Republic) - an overview. Geologické výzkumy na Moravě a ve Slezsku, 1: 18-21.
10. Čech, S., Švábenická, L., 1992. Macrofossils and nanofossils of the type locality of the Březno Formation (Turonian-Coniacian). Věstník Československého geologického ústavu, 67: 311-326.
11. Čech, S., Švábenická, L., 2017. Inoceramids and Calcareous Nanoplankton at the Lower and Middle Coniacian Substage Boundary in the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin. In: 10th International Symposium on the Cretaceous - Abstracts, 21-26 August 2017, Vienna (ed. B. Sames). Berichte der Geologischen Bundesanstalt.
12. Čech, S., Klein, V., Kříž, J., Valečka, J., 1980. Revision of Upper Cretaceous Stratigraphy of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin. Věstník Ústředního ústavu geologického, 55: 277-296.
13. Cushman, J., 1935. Notes on some American Cretaceous flabellinas. Contributions from the Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research, 11: 83-89.
14. Damotte, R., Babinot, J.F., Colin, J.P., 1981. Les Ostracodes du Crétacé moyen européen. Cretaceous Research, 2: 287-306.
15. de Mercey, M.N., 1872. Geologie du Canton d'Amiens. Bulletin de la Société Linnéenne du Nord de la France, 1: 21.
16. Dölling, B., Dölling, M., Hiss, M., 2014. The Upper Cretaceous sedimentary rocks of the southern Münsterland (Northwest Germany) revisited - new correlations of borehole lithostratigraphical, biostratigraphical and natural gamma radiation (GR) log data. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften, 165: 521-545.
17. d’Orbigny, A.D., 1840. Mémoire sur les foraminifères de la craie blanche du bassin de Paris. Mémoires de la Société géologique de France. 1ère série, tome IV, mémoire n° 1: 1-51.
18. d’Orbigny, A.D., 1854-1860. Paléontologie française. Description des animaux invertébrés. Tertain crétacé 6, Échinoïdes irréguliers. Masson, Paris.
19. Dubicka, Z., Peryt, D., Szuszkiewicz, M., 2014. Foraminiferal evidence for paleogeographic and paleoenvironmental changes across the Coniacian-Santonian boundary in western Ukraine. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 401: 43-56.
20. Ehrenberg, C.G., 1840. Über die Bildung der Kreidefelsen und des Kreidemergels durch unsichtbare Organismen. Physikalische Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1838: 59-147.
21. Fraaije, R., Van Bakel, B., Jagt, J., Viegas, P., 2018. The rise of a novel, plankton-based marine ecosystem during the Mesozoic: a bottom-up model to explain new higher-tier invertebrate morphotypes. Boletin de la Sociedad Geologica Mexicana, 70: 187-200.
22. Flegel, K., 1905. Heuscheuer und Adersbach-Weckelsdorf. Eine Studie über die obere Kreide im böhmisch-schlesischen Gebirge. Jahresbericht der Schlesischen Gesellschaft für Vaterländische Kultur, 82: 114-144.
23. Frič, A., 1889. Studien im Gebiete der Böhmischen Kreideformation. IV. Die Teplitzer Schichten. Archiv der Naturwissenschaftlichen Landesdurchforschung von Böhmen, 7: 1-120.
24. Hampton, M.J., Bailey, H.W., Gallagher, L.T., Mortimore, R.N., Wood, C.J., 2007. The biostratigraphy of Seaford Head, Sussex, southern England; an international reference section for the basal boundaries for the Santonian and Campanian Stages in chalk facies. Cretaceous Research, 28: 46-60.
25. Hercogová, J., 1982. Vertreter der Gattungen Palmula und Neoflabellina in der Kreide der Böhmischen Masse. Sborník Geologických Věd, Paleontologie, 25: 97-126.
26. Houdková, M., 2016. Paleoekologie turonskych ostrakodů (Ostracoda) lokality Úpohlavy. M.Sc. thesis, Charles University, Praha.
27. Hradecká, L., 2012. Zonace svrchnokřídových sedimentů české křídové pánve na základě bentických foraminifer. Rebilance zásob podzemních vod, závěrečná zpráva České geologické služby. 28. str. Česká geologická služba, Praha.
28. Kaplan, U., Kennedy, W.J., 1994. Ammoniten des westfälischen Coniac. Geologie und Paläontologie in Westfalen, 31: 1-155.
29. Kędzierski, M., 2008. Calcareous nannofossil and inoceramid biostratigraphies of a Middle Turonian to Midle Coniacian section from the Opole Trough of SW Poland. Cretaceous Research, 29: 451-467.
30. Keller, G., Han, Q., Adatte, T., Burns, S.J., 2001. Palaeoenvironment of the Cenomanian-Turonian transition at Eastbourne, England. Cretaceous Research, 22: 391-422.
31. Košťák, M., Čech, S., Ekrt, B., Mazuch, M., Wiese, F., Voigt, S., Wood, C.J., 2004. Belemnites of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin in a global context. Acta Geologica Polonica, 54: 511-533.
32. Košťák, M., Čech, S., Uličný, D., Sklenář, J., Ekrt, B., Mazuch, M., 2018. Ammonites, inoceramids and stable carbon isotopes of the Cenomanian-Turonian OAE2 interval in central Europe: Pecínov quarry, Bohemian Cretaceous Basin (Czech Republic). Cretaceous Research, 87: 150-173.
33. Krutský, N., Váně, M., Holá, A., Hercogová, J., 1975. Turon a coniak v dolním Poohří. Sborník geologických věd, 27: 99-142.
34. Küchler, T., 1998. Upper Cretaceous of the Barranca (Navarra, northern Spain); integrated litho-, bio- and event stratigtaphy. Part I: Cenomanian through Santonian. Acta Geologica Polonica, 48: 157-236.
35. Kunzmann, L., 2007. Neue Untersuchungen zu Araucaria Jussieu aus der europäischen Kreide. Palaeontographica Abteilung B: Palaeophytologie, 276: 97-131.
36. Lees, J.A., 2008. The calcareous nannofossil record across the Late Cretaceous Turonian/Coniacian boundary, including new data from Germany, Poland, the Czech Republic and England. Cretaceous Research, 29: 40-64.
37. Liebau, A., 1984. Grundlagen der Ökobathymetrie. Paläontologische Kursbücher, 2.
38. Melinte, M.C., Lamolda, M.A., 2007. Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Coniacian/Santonian boundary interval in Romania and comparison with other European regions. Cretaceous Research, 28: 119-127.
39. Nádaskay, R., Čech, S., Švábenická, L., Valečka, J., 2017. Stratigraphy of the Lower-Middle Coniacian core section (NW-part of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin): deciphering T-R history and linking offshore to proximal deposits. In: 10th International Symposium on the Cretaceous - Abstracts, 21-26 August 2017, Vienna (ed. B. Sames). Berichte der Geologische Bundesanstalt, 120: 192.
40. Niebuhr, B., Baldschuhn, R., Ernst, G., Walaszczyk, I., Weiss, W., Wood, C.J., 1999. The Upper Cretaceous succession (Cenomanian-Santonian) of the Staffhorst Shaft, Lower Saxony, northern Germany: integrated biostratigraphic, lithostratigraphic and downhole geophysical log data. Acta Geologica Polonica, 49: 175-213.
41. Ohmert, W., 1969. Die Neoflabellinen (Foraminifera) des bayerischen Coniac-Santons. Mitteilungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und historische Geologie, 9: 3-32.
42. Özuluğ, O., Kubanç, S.N., Kubanç, C., Demirci, G.Í., 2018. Checklist of Quaternary and Recent Ostracoda (Crustacea) species from Turkey with information on habitat preferences. Turkish Journal of Bioscience and Collections, 2: 51-100.
43. Pascual, A., Martín Rubio, M., Martinez García, B., Rodriguez Lázaro, J., 2008. Influencia de la batimetría y tipo de sedimento en la distribución de la microfauna (foraminíferos bentónicos y ostrácodos) en la plataforma matina vasca. Geogaceta, 45: 75-78.
44. Perçin-Paçal, F., Altinsaçli, S., Balkis, H., 2015. An updated checklist of recent marine and coastal brackish water ostracods (Crustacea Ostracoda) in Turkey. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 3: 20-33.
45. Pessagno, E.A., 1967. Upper Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera from the western Gulf Coastal Plain. Palaeontographica Americana, 5: 245-445.
46. Petrizzo, M.R., 2002. Palaeoceanographic and palaeoclimatic inferences from Late Cretaceous planktonic foraminiferal assemblages from the Exmouth Plateau (ODP Sites 762 and 763, eastern Indian Ocean). Marine Micropaleontology, 45: 117-150.
47. Peypouquet, J.P., Nachite, D., 1984. Les ostracodes en Méditerranée nord-occidentale. ECOMED, Écologie des microorganismes en Méditerranée occidentale. In: Écologie des microrganismes en Méditerranée occidentale ECOMED (eds. J.J. Bizon and P.F. Burollet): 51-169. Association Française des Techniciens du Petrole, Paris.
48. Pokorný, V., 1966. New species of Pterygocythereis (Ostracoda, Crust.) from the Upper Cretaceous of Bohemia. Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Geologica, 1966: 305-320.
49. Pokorný, V., 1979. Ostracode Biostratigraphy of the Turonian and Coniacian of Bohemia, Czechoslovakia. In: Paleontological Conference (ed. V. Pokorný): 243-251. Charles University, Prague, February 10-11, 1977.
50. Pokorný, V., 1984. The Genus Golcocythere (Ostracoda, Crustacea) in the Late Cretaceous of Bohemia, Czechoslovakia. Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Geologica, 1983: 137-146.
51. Pokorný, V., 1987. Spinose species of Pterygocythereis (Ostracoda, Crustacea) in the Upper Cretaceous of Bohemia, Czechoslowakia. Časopis pro Mineralogii a Geologii, 32: 337-343.
52. Premoli Silva, I., Sliter, W.V., 1999. Cretaceous paleoceanography: evidence from planktonic foraminiferal evolution. Geological Society of America, Special Paper, 332: 301-328.
53. Puri, H.S., Bonaduce, G., Malloy, J., 1965. Ecology of the Gulf of Naples. Pubblicazione della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli, 33: 87-199.
54. Reuss, A.E. 1845-1846. Die Versteinerungen der Böhmischen Kreideformation. Part 1, 2. E. Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlug, Stuttgart.
55. Robaszynski, F., Caron, M., 1995. Foraminifères planctoniques du Crétacé: commentaire de la zonation Europe-Méditerranée. Bulletin Société Géologie France, 166: 681-692.
56. Roemer, F.A., 1840-1841. Die Versteinerungen des Norddeutschen Kreidegebirges. Hahn'sche Hofbuchhandlung, Hannover.
57. Santamaría-Zabala, R., 1992. Los Ammonoideos del Cenomaniense superior al Santoniense de la plataforma nord-castellana y la cuenca navarro-cántabra, Parte I (in Spanish). Bioestratigráfia y sistemática: Phylloceratina, Ammonitina (Desmoceataceae y Hoplitaceae) y Ancyloceratina, Treballs del Museu de Geologia de Barcelona, 2: 171-268.
58. Santamaría-Zabala, R., Ricardo, M., 1993. Preliminary report on Middle Coniacian-Lower Santonian Ammonite distribution from the Basque-Cantabrian Basin (Northern Spain). Geobios, 23: 341-345.
59. Schlüter, C., 1876. Verbreitung der Cephalopoden in der oberen Keide Norddeutschlands. Zeischrift der Deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, 28: 457-518.
60. Schneider, S., Niebuhr, B., Wilmsen, M., Vodrážka, R., 2011. Between the Alb and the Alps - the fauna of the Upper Cretaceous Sandbach Formation (Passau region, southeast Germany). Bulletin of Geosciences, 86: 785-816.
61. Schönfeld, J., 1990. Zur Stratigraphie und Ökologie benthischer Foraminiferen im Schreibkreide-Richtprofil von Lägerdorf/Holtstein. Geologisches Jahrbuch, A 117: 3-151.
62. Seitz, O., 1965. Die Inoceramen des Santon und Unter-Campan von Nordwestdeutschland. II. Teil. (Biométrie, Dimorphismus und Stratigraphie der Untergattung Sphenoceramus J. Böhm). Beihefte, Geologisches Jahrbuch, 69: 1-194.
63. Soukup, J., 1956. Stratigrafické rozdělení křídy českého masivu (in Czech). Několik poznámek k názvosloví a ke stratigrafické tabulce. Věstník Ústředního ústavu geologického, 31: 173-180.
64. Soukup, J., 1962. Druhý den exkurze 9. Svinárky (in Czech). Sjezdový průvodce. 13. sjezd Československé společnosti pro mineralogii a geologii v Hradci Králové. Československá společnost pro mineralogii a geologii při ČSAV pobočka, Praha.
65. Svobodová, A., Košťák, M., Čech, S., Švábenická, L., 2014. New biostratigraphic evidences (texanitid ammonites, inoceramids and calcareous nannofossils) for the Upper and the uppermost Coniacian in the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 165: 577-589.
66. Štemproková-Jírová, D., 1969. Paleoekologický výzkum foraminifer křídového souvrství z Března u Loun (in Czech). Zprávy o geologických výzkumech v roce 1968. Ústřední ústav geologický - Geofond v Academii Nakladatelství ČSAV: 126-128.
67. Štemproková-Jírová, D., 1978. Stratigraphic distribution of Foraminifera in the Turonian and Coniacian of the Bohemian Massif Czechoslovakia. Paleontologická konference 77, Univerzita Karlova Praha: 189-195.
68. Švábenická, L., 2009. Diachronic occurrence of Marthasterites furcatus in the Turonian sediments of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin and Western Carpathians, Czech Republic. Geoscience Research Reports, 42: 126-129.
69. Švábenická, L., 2010. Late Turonian and Turonian-Coniacian boundary according to study of calcareous nannofossils in the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin, Jizera development. Geoscience Research Reports, 43: 58-64.
70. Švábenická, L., 2012. Nannofossil record across the Cenomanian-Coniacian interval in the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin and Tethyan foreland basins (Outer Western Carpathians), Czech Republic. Geologica Carpathica, 63: 201-217.
71. Švábenická, L., Bubík, M., 2014. Biostratigraphical correlations of the calcareous nannofossil Marthasterites furcatus in the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin and Outer Flysch Carpathians, Czech Republic. Cretaceous Research, 51: 386-398.
72. Švábenická, L., Havlíček, P., 2017. Acme Marthasterites furcatus as a good marker for the Turonian-Coniacian boundary and Lower Coniacian, Jizera development of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin. Geoscience Research Reports, 50: 111-116.
73. Švábenická, L., Kycl, P., Rapprich, V., 2016. The stratigraphically youngest calcareous nannofossils of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin. Geoscience Research Reports, 49: 19-25.
74. Tunoglu, C., 1996. General distribution of Pterigocythereis jonesii (Baird, 1850) and Pterigocythereis ceratoptera (Bosquet, 1852) (Ostracoda) in the sea of Marmara. Journal of Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment, 2: 107-114.
75. Tsourou, T., Drinia, H., Antonarakou, A., Lianou, V., 2012. A rich Ostracod fauna from Cape Kalogeras (Zakynthos island, Greece). 10th Panhellenic Symposium on Oceanography and Fisheries, Athens, 7-11 May, 2012: 1-13.
76. Uličný, D., Hladíková, J., Attrep, M.J., Čech, S., Hradecká, L., Svobodová, M., 1997. Sea-level changes and geochemical anomalies across the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary: Pecínov quarry, Bohemia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 132: 265-285.
77. Uličný, D., Laurin, J., Čech, S., 2009. Controls on clastic sequence geometries in a shallow-marine, transtensional basin: the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin, Czech Republic. Sedimentology, 56: 1077-1114.
78. Vašíček, Z., 1992. Coniacian ammonites from Štíty in Moravia (Czechoslovakia). Sborník geologických věd. Paleontologie, 32: 163-195.
79. Walaszczyk, I., Wood, C.J., 2018. Inoceramid bivalves from the Coniacian (Upper Cretaceous) of the Staffhorst shaft (Lower Saxony, Germany) - stratigraphical significance of a unique succession. Cretaceous Research, 87: 226-240.
80. Wessely, G., Schreiber, O.S., Fuchs, R., 1981. Lithofazies und Mikrostratigraphie der Mittel- und Oberkreide des Molasse-untergrundes im östlichen Österreich. Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 124: 175-281.
81. Wilkinson, I.P., 2007. Foraminifera and Ostracoda in the St Andrew's Bay member (Forth Formation: Holocene), offshore Montrose. Geological Survey Internal Report, IR/07/014.
82. Wyton, J., Bown, P.R., 2007. Palaeoecological trends in Turonian-Coniacian (Late Cretaceous) calcareous nannofossils from Chalk Group sections, SE England. Journal of Nannoplankton Research, 29: 31-37.
83. Zahálka, B., 1949. Křídový útvar v profilu Josefov - Skalička (in Czech). Věstník Státního geologického ústavu Československé republiky, 24: 265-290.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-8e10ba4f-4786-443e-ae8b-3865dbc83db1