PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Pro-ecological and energy-saving technologies for the use of meadow grasslands of different maturity, taking into account their biological characteristics and the environment

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The organisation of green and raw material conveyor systems depends on a variety of factors, such as the biological characteristics of meadow grasses, their early maturity, and environmental conditions. It also includes a set of agrotechnical measures, such as the choice of grass mixtures, selection of land plots and grassland management techniques, mowing, fertilisation and moisture regimes, as well as organisational measures for the creation, maintenance and rational use of sown cenosis. Green and raw material conveyor schemes are created based on cereals, legume-cereals, and mixed seeded and natural meadow grasses. Legume-cereal grass mixtures are the late link in the conveyor, and cereals are the early and mid-season link. When organising different types of conveyors on farms that are well supplied with nitrogen, the ratio between cereals and legume-cereals should be 2:1. And in farms with poor fertiliser supply 1:2. The type of green or raw material conveyor is determined by the purpose of the green mass. It has been proved that in the production of artificially dried grass fodder, nutrient losses are the lowest and amount to only 5–10%. And in the process of harvesting haylage 20–30%, silage 30–35% and in hay from 33–63%. However, the production of artificially dried grass fodder, which is an important concentrated feed for direct feeding of livestock and for use in the production of mixed fodder, requires large amounts of energy. Therefore, it is important to introduce energy-saving and advanced technologies, such as haymaking and haylage production, as well as pasture-based livestock management instead of stall-based. Based on the efficiency of growing fodder crops and the identification of the most competitive experimental options, a model of a raw material conveyor was developed. It is designed for the efficient organization of feed harvesting and providing livestock with high-quality fodder. Our modelling option focuses on the supply of raw materials for feed production using perennial legumes. These perennial legumes were cultivated on sod–podzolic surface-gley soils in the conditions of the Precarpathian region. Subsequently, they were used to make haylage for mono-feeding of 100 heads of cattle.
Twórcy
  • Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Shevchenko Str., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
  • Sumy National Agrarian University, 160, H. Kondratieva Str., Sumy, 40021, Ukraine
  • Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Shevchenko Str., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
  • Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Shevchenko Str., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
  • Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Shevchenko Str., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
  • National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 15, Heroiv Oborony Str., Kyiv, 03041, Ukraine
  • Sumy National Agrarian University, 160, H. Kondratieva Str., Sumy, 40021, Ukraine
  • Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, Koval Str., 3, 36003, Poltava, Ukraine
  • Separate Structural Subdivision “Okhtyrka professional college of Sumy national agrarian University” Principal of College Sumy region, Okhtyrka, 46 Sumska Street, Sumy, 42700, Ukraine
autor
  • Institute of Agriculture of Northern East of National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Parkova Str., 3, Sumy region, village Sad, Ukraine
Bibliografia
  • 1. Adamovičs, А, Beča, М, & Spružs, J. (2005). Racionāla zālaugu bioloģskās daudzveidības izmantošana kvalitatīvas lopbarības ieguvei rational use of herbage biological diversity for hight–quality forage production. Environment. Technology. Resources, 77–84.
  • 2. Ates, S., Keles, G., Yigezu, Y.A., Demirci, U., Dogan, S., Isik, S., & Sahin, M. (2017). Bioeconomic efficiency of creep supplementation of forage legumes or concentrate in pasture based lamb production system. Grass and Forage Science, 72, 81–83.
  • 3. Babych, A.O. (1994). Methods of conducting experiments on fodder production. Vinnytsia, 96 (in Ukrainian).
  • 4. Datsko, O., Butenko, A., Hotvianska, A., Pylypenko, V., Nozdrina, N., Masyk, I., Bondarenko, O., Lemishko, S., Litvinov, D., & Toryanik, V. (2025). Influence of agroecological methods on biometric indicators of corn. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 26(2), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/199324
  • 5. Finneran, E., Crosson, P., O’Kiely, P., Shalloo, L., Forristal, P.D. & Wallace, M. (2012). Economic modelling of an integrated grazed and conserved perennial ryegrass forage production system. Grass and Forage Science, 67(2), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365–2494.2011.00832.x.
  • 6. Getman, N.Y., & Susha, S.K. (2012). History of the development of scientific research on conveyor production of green fodder on arable land. Feeds and feed production, 74, 269–272 (in Ukrainian).
  • 7. Haydenko, O., Chipliak, S., & Podlesky, M. (2017). How to launch a green conveyor. Agribusiness today, 1–4 (in Ukrainian).
  • 8. Hryhoriv, Y., Butenko, A., Nechyporenko, V., Lyshenko, M., Ustik, T., Zubko, V., Makarenko, N., & Mushtai, V. ( 2021). Economic efficiency of Camelina sativa growing with nutrition optimization under conditions of Precarpathians of Ukraine. Agraarteadus, 32(2), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.15159/jas.21.33
  • 9. Hryhoriv, Y., Butenko, A., Solovei, H., Filon, V., Skydan, M., Kravchenko, N., Masyk, I., Zakharchenko, E., Tykhonova, O., & Polyvanyi, A. 2024. Study of the Impact of Changes in the Acid-Base Buffering Capacity of Surface Sod-Podzolic Soils. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 25(6), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/186928
  • 10. Huyghe, C., De Vliegher, A. & Golinkski, P. (2014). European grasslands overview: temperate region. EGF at 50: the future of European Grasslands. Proceedings of the 25 general meeting of the European grasslands federation, 19 (September, 7–11, 2014). Aberystwyth, Wales, 29–40.
  • 11. Isselstein, J. & Kayser, M. (2014). Functions of grasslands and their potential in delivering ecosystem services. EGF at 50: the future of European Grasslands. Proceedings of the 25 general meeting of the European grasslands federation, 19 (September, 7–11, 2014). Aberystwyth, Wales, 199–214.
  • 12. Karbivska, U., Butenko, Ye., Nechyporenko, V., Shumkova, O., Shumkova, V., Tymchuk, D., Tymchuk, N., Litvinov, D., Hotvianska, A., & Toryanik, V. (2022a). Ecologicalc and economic efficiency of growing on dark gray soils of bean–ceneral grasses. Agraarteadus, 33(2), 404–409. DOI: 10.15159/jas.22.25.
  • 13. Karbivska, U., Kurgak, V., Gamayunova, V., Butenko, A., Malynka, L., Kovalenko, I., Onychko, V., Masyk, I., Chyrva, A., Zakharchenko, E., Tkachenko, O., & Pshychenko, O. (2020a). Productivity and quality of diverse ripe pasture grass fodder depends on the method of soil cultivation. Acta Agrobotanica, 73(3), 1–11. https://doi: 10.5586/aa.7334
  • 14. Karbivska, U., Masyk, I., Butenko, A., Onychko, V., Onychko, T., Krіuchko, L., Rozhko, V., Karpenko, O., & Kozak, M. (2022b). Nutrient Balance of Sod–Podzolic Soil Depending on the Productivity of Meadow Agrophytocenosis and Fertilization. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 23(2), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/144957
  • 15. Karbivska, U.M., Kurgak, V.G., Kaminskyi, V.F., Butenko, A.O., Davydenko, G.A., Viunenko, O.B., Vyhaniailo, S.M., & Khomenko, S.V. (2020b). Economic and Energy Efficiency of Forming and Using Legume–Cereal Grass Stands Depending on Fertilizers. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10(2), 284–288. doi: 10.15421/2020_98.
  • 16. Karbivska, U.М., Kovalenko, I.M., Onychko, T.O., Radchenko, M.V., Pshychenko, O.I., Tykhonova, O.M., Vereshchahin, I.V., Bordun, R.M., & Tymchuk, D.S. (2022c). Economic and energy efficiency of growing legume grasses. Modern Phytomorphology, 16, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.5281/zen
  • 17. Karpenko, O.Yu., Rozhko, V.M., Butenko, A.O., Masyk, I.M., Malynka, L.V., Didur, I.M., Vereshchahin, I.V., Chyrva, A.S., & Berdin, S.I. (2019). Post–harvest siderates impact on the weed littering of maize, Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 9(3), 300–303. DOI: 10.15421 / 2019_745
  • 18. Katsumata, M., Kobayashi, H., Ashihara, A., & Ishida, A. (2018). Effects of dietary lysine levels and lighting conditions on intramuscular fat accumulation in growing pigs. Animal Science Journal, 89, 988–993 (in Ukrainian).
  • 19. Kirilesko, O.L. (2012). Agroecological bases of production and use of grassy fodder: Monograph. Kharkiv: National Technical University “KhPI”, 309 (in Ukrainian).
  • 20. Klymenko, A.A. (2009). Cost management at agricultural enterprises. Economics and management, 4(8), 51–57 (in Ukrainian).
  • 21. Kolisnyk, O., Yakovets, L., Amons, S., Butenko, A., Onychko, V., Tykhonova, O., Hotvianska, A., Kravchenko, N., Vereshchahin, I., & Yatsenko, V. (2024). Simulation of High–Product Soy Crops Based on the Application of Foliar Fertilization in the Conditions of the Right Bank of the Forest Steppe of Ukraine. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 25(7), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/188638
  • 22. Kovalenko, V., Kovalenko, N., Gamayunova, V., Butenko, A., Kabanets, V., Salatenko, I., Kandyba, N., & Vandyk, M. (2024a). Ecological and Technological Evaluation of the Nutrition of Perennial Legumes and their Effectiveness for Animals. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 25(4), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/185219
  • 23. Kovalenko, V., Tonkha, O., Fedorchuk, M., Butenko, A., Toryanik, V., Davydenko, G., Bordun, R., Kharchenko, S., & Polyvanyi, A. (2024b). The Influence of Elements of Technology and Soil–Dimatic Factors on the Agrobiological Properties of Onobrychis viciifolia. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 25(5), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/185709
  • 24. Kovtun, K.P., Veklenko, Yu.A., & Kopaihorodska, H.O. (2016). Chemical composition and quality of forage degenerate grassland meadow grasses in different ways of their improvement in the conditions of the Forest–Steppe Right–bank. Kormy i kormovyrobnytstvo, 82, 204–209 (in Ukrainian).
  • 25. Kurgak, V.G. (1995). Organisation of conveyors on sown meadows. Animal husbandry of Ukraine, 4(6), 26–27 (in Ukrainian).
  • 26. Kurhak, V.G., Tsymbal, Y.S., & Yakymenko, L.P. (2014). Cultivation of fodder crops in the green conveyor system in organic production. Collection of scientific papers of the National Scientific Centre “Institute of Agriculture of NAAS”, 1(2), 116–125 (in Ukrainian).
  • 27. Kurhak, Volodymyr, Šar unait˙e, Lina, Arlauskien˙e, Aušra, Karbivska, Uliana, & Tkachenko, Anton. (2023). The Impact of Management Practices on the Stability of Meadow Communities on a Mountain Slope. Diversity, 15, 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050605
  • 28. Lindström, B.E.M., Frankow–Lindberg, B.E., Dahlin, A.S., Watson, C.A., & Wivstad, M. (2014). Red clover increases micronutrient concentrations in forage mixtures. Field Crops Res, 169, 99–106.
  • 29. Lindström, B.E.M., Frankow−Lindberg, B.E., Dahlin, A.S., Wivstad, M., & Watson, C.A. (2014). Micronutrient concentrations in relation to phenological development of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and timothy (Phleum pratense L.). Grass Forage Sci., 69, 276–284.
  • 30. Oenema, O., de Klein, C. & Alfaroc, M. (2014). Intensification of grassland and forage use: driving forces and constrains. Crop and Pasture Science, 65(6), 524–537. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP14001.
  • 31. Panakhyd, H.Ia., & Konyk, H.S. (2017). The main indicators of quality of forage legumes and cereals sown grass. Kormy i kormovyrobnytstvo, 83, 145–149.
  • 32. Paz–Ferreiro, J., & Fu, S. (2016). Biological Indices for Soil Quality Evaluation: Perspectives and Limitations. Land Degradation & Development, 27, 14–25. DOI: 10.1002/LDR.2262
  • 33. Petrychenko, V.F., Kvitko, G.P., & Tsarenko, M.K. (2008). Scientific basis of intensification of field fodder production in Ukraine. Vinnytsia: FOP Danilyuk V.G., 240 (in Ukrainian).
  • 34. Pirhofer−Walzl, K., Søegaard, K., Høgh−Jensen, H., Eriksen, J., Sanderson, M.A., Rasmussen, J., & Rasmussen J. (2011). Forage herbs improve mineral composition of grassland herbage. Grass Forage Sci., 66, 415–423.
  • 35. Puyu, V.L., Bakhmat, M.I., Rikhlivskyi, I.P., & Shcherbatiuk, N.V. (2019). Optimisation of conveyor production of green fodder. World Science, 7(47), 32–39.
  • 36. Rieznik, S. Havva, D., Butenko, A., & Novosad, K. (2021). Biological activity of chernozems typical of different farming practices. Agraarteadus, 32(2), 307–313. DOI: 10.15159/jas.21.34.
  • 37. Sarnatsky, P.L., Vidrin, Y.V., & Nedozhdiy Y.P. (1988). The green conveyor. Kyiv, Urozhay, 72 (in Ukrainian).
  • 38. Tsymbal, Y.S. (2017). Organisation of a green conveyor based on perennial grasses and mixtures of annual crops. Bulletin of Agrarian Science, 6, 19–23 (in Ukrainian).
  • 39. Tsymbal, Y.S., & Kushuk, M.A. (2023). Green (raw material) conveyor in organic fodder production based on perennial grasses and mixtures of annual crops. Agrarian Week, 1–3.
  • 40. Veklenko, Y.A. (2003). Economic evaluation of low– cost methods of creation and use of sown mowed pasture grasslands. Feed and fodder production, 51, 235–237 (in Ukrainian).
  • 41. Voitovyk, M., Butenko, А., Prymak, I., Mishchenko, Yu., Tkachenko, M., Tsiuk, O., Panchenko, O., Slieptsov, Yu., Kopylova, T., & Havryliuk, O. (2023). Influence of fertilizing and tillage systems on humus content of typical chernozem. Agraarteadus, 34(1), 44–50. DOI: 10.15159/jas.23.03
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-8d317471-e0dd-456a-8efb-8bb724a7dd1f
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.