Effects of Foliar Sulfur Applications on the Quality of Cotton Plant Fibre Under Water Stress Conditions

• Autorzy: Kazgöz Candemir Derya , Odemis Berkant

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0015.2720

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The research was conducted to determine the effects of Sulfurfoliar applications on the fibre quality of cotton plants exposed to water stress at different growth stages in the Amik Plain (Hatay province, Turkey) in 2015 and 2016. Cotton plants were studied in three different developmental stages (vegetative growth period (VG); flowering and boll development period (FB) and boll opening period (BO)) and full irrigation was applied in some periods, while deficit irrigation was applied in the others. Sulfur fertiliser from foliar was applied in different doses (S₀: 0 ml da^-1, S₁: 150 ml da^-1, S₂: 250 ml da^-1, S₃: 350 ml da^-1). The study was carried out with three replications according to the split plot design. In the research, the effects of the water deficit and sulfur dose applications on gin turnout and fibre quality characteristics at different growth stages were investigated. Results showed that the average spinning consistency index (SCI) decreased by 11.75% due to the water deficit (compared to the treatment of TTT, irrigation in all three crop developmental stages). Similar effects were observed in the fibre length, micronaire, fibre strength and uniformity index values, which were decreased by 7.31%, 4.07%, 5.89% and 2.17%, respectively. The average gin turnout of the irrigated treatment (TTT), in which there is no deficit irrigation, decreased by 2.5% compared to the control treatment (OOO). Similar effects were observed in fibre elongation and short fibre content values which were decreased by 8.43% and 14.60%, respectively. The average S₁ and S₃ sulfur doses increased the gin turnout by 0.44% and 0.35%, respectively, and the S₂ dose decreased it by 0.79%.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cotton; deficit irrigation; growth stage; fibre quality; foliar sulfur application; gin turnout

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Łódzki Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 29, no. 6 (150)
• Strony: 37--43
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kazgöz Candemir Derya

• Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, 31040 Antakya, Hatay, Türkiye

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5741-5464

autor

Odemis Berkant

• Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, 31040 Antakya, Hatay, Türkiye

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7636-2858

Bibliografia

• 1. Turktob. [cited 2020 Feb 17]. Available from: https://www.turktob.org.tr/dergi/makaleler/dergi21/8-13.pdf.
• 2. Cukobirlik. [cited 2017 Mar 17]. Available from: http://www.cukobirlik.com.tr/?tekd=777&ikid=1&syf=* PAMUK*.
• 3. Ministry of Customs and Trade General Directorate of Cooperatives. Cotton Report of 2015. [cited 2017 Jan 30]. Available from: http://koop.gtb.gov.tr/data/56e95b3a1a79f5b210d9176f/2015%20Pamuk%20Raporu.pdf.
• 4. Doorenbos J, Kassam AH. Yield Response to Water. FAO 1979; 33: p. 193, Rome.
• 5. Yasar M, Basbag S, Ekinci R. Effects of Topping at Different Times on Fibre Yield and Quality Traits on Cotton. Iğdır Univ. J. Inst. Sci. & Tech. 2017; 7(2): 327-333. (in Turkish).
• 6. Oosterhuis D. Physiology and Nutrition of High Yielding Cotton in the USA 2001; http://www.malavolta.com.br/Pdf/Physiologi. Pdf. 24.
• 7. İzci B. Different Levels of İrrigation Effects of Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) Fibre Quality Conditions Grown İn Çanakkale. Journal of Alınteri 2014; 26 (B): 25-31. (in Turkish).
• 8. Yildirim O. Design of İrrigation Systems. Ankara University Agricultural Faculty 2008; Publication no: 1565, p. 354. (in Turkish).
• 9. Kacar MM, Katkat V. İnvestigation of Cotton Water Stress İndex Variations Under Different Water and Fertilizer Systems. Cukurova University Institute of Science and Technology Agricultural Structures and Irrigation Department. 2007; (M.Sc. Thesis). (in Turkish).
• 10. Burt CM, O'connor K, Ruehr T. Fertigation. irr. Training and Research Center. Cal. Polytec. St. Univ. 1995; San Luis Obispo, Ca 93407, Isbn 0-9643634-1-0. 295 P.
• 11. Uster HVI Test result 2014
• 12. Cotton Incorporated U.S Cotton fibre Chart 1988; New York: Maclean Hunter Publishing Co.
• 13. Bek Y, Efe E. Research and Experiment Medoths I. Cukurova University, Faculty of Agriculture Adana, Turkey. Textbook 1988; p. 395 (in Turkish).
• 14. Yildiz Z, Haliloglu H. Profitable Approach İn Cotton Cultivar Preferences. Journal of Nevsehir Science and Technology (ICAFOF 2017 Special issue) 2017; 261-270. (in Turkish).
• 15. Odemis B, Akıscan Y, Akgol B, Can D. The Effect of Sulfur Doses Applied from the Leaf Under the Deficit İrrigation Conditions on the Drought Tolerance of the Cotton Plant. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project No: 214O254) 2017; (in Turkish).
• 16. Ozdemir Y, Dagdelen N. Effects of Different Drip İrrigation Applications on Cotton Fibre Quality, Yield Characteristics and Net İncome. Journal of Adnan Menderes University Agricultural Faculty 2016; 13(1): 79-88. (in Turkish).
• 17. Coskun Z. The Effect of Drip İrrigation on Cotton Yield İn The Harran Plain. Harran University Institute of Science and Technology Agricultural Structures and Irrigation Department 2015; (M.Sc. Thesis). (in Turkish).
• 18. Haliloglu H, YilmazA, Beyyavas V. Effect of Foliar Fertilizers Applied at Different Stages on Agronomic and Lint Characters of Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.). J Agr Sci 2006; 12 (1) 1-7. (in Turkish).
• 19. Karademir C, Karademir E, Gençer O. Yield and Fibre Quality of F1 and F2 Generations of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Under Drought Stress Conditions, Bulg J Agric Sci 2011; 17 (6): 795-805.
• 20. Sahito A, Baloch ZA, Mahar A, et al. Effect of Water Stress on the Growth and Yield of Cotton Crop (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Am J Plant SC 2015; 6: 1027-1039.
• 21. Ozgen B. Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Yarns Spinned from Aegean Cotton Fibres and their Mixtures with Southeast Anatolian Cotton Fibre. Dokuz Eylül University Institute of Science and Technology 2002; (M.Sc. Thesis). (in Turkish).
• 22. Alhalabi K. A Comparable İnvestigation on the Properties of Cotton Fibres Pro duced in Syria and Turkey and Their Spinning Capabilities. Deparment of Textile Engineering Institute of Naturel and Applied Science University of Çukurova 2017; (M.Sc Thesis) (in Turkish).
• 23. McWilliams D. Drought Strategies for Cotton. Cooperative Extension Service Circular College of Agriculture and Home Economics 2004; http://www.cahe.nmsu.edu/pubs/circulars
• 24. İsotcu C, Basal H. The Comparison of Yield and Fibre Quality of Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) Progeny Rows Under Full and Deficit İrrigation. Journal of Adnan Menderes University Agricultural Faculty 2016; 13(2): 71-77. (in Turkish).
• 25. Kanber R. A Lysimeter Research on the Effects of İrrigation on Cotton Yield and Evapotranspiration of Some Soil Series at Different Usable Humidity Levels in Çukurova Conditions. TOPRAKSU Directorate of Research Institute, Tarsus 1977; (Ph.D. Thesis) (in Turkish).
• 26. Bastug R. A Study on Determining the Water Production Function of Cotton Under Cukuorova Conditions. Cukurova University, Faculty of Agriculture Adana, Turkey 1987; (Ph.D. Thesis) (in Turkish).
• 27. Price K. Investigation of Methods to Evaluate Drought Tolerance in Cotton. Texas Tech University. USA. 2009; (Ph.D. Thesis).
• 28. Baskuru İ. Determination of Responses of Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) Hybrid Populations to Water Stres. Adnan Menderes University Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Field Crops 2015; (M.Sc. Thesis). (in Turkish).
• 29. Peynircioglu C. The Determination of Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) Genotypes for İmprovement of Drought Tolerant Cotton Varieties. Adnan Menderes University Department of Field Crop Sciences 2014; (M.Sc. Thesis). (in Turkish).
• 30. Rai E. Mechanism of Drought Tolerance İn Cotton- Response of Cotton Cultivars to İrrigation in the Texas High Plains 2011; Master of Science, Texas Tech University. USA. P:97.
• 31. Hussein F, Janat M, Yakoub A. Assessment of Yield and Water use Efficiency of Drip İrrigated Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) As Affected By Deficit İrrigation. Turk J Agric For 2011; 35: 611-621
• 32. Karademir E, Karademir C, Ekinci R, Sevilmis U. Determination of Yield and Fibre Quality Properties in Advanced Generation Lines in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Turk J Agric Res 2015; 2: 100-107. (in Turkish).
• 33. Basal H, Dagdelen N, Unay A, Yilmaz E. Effects of Deficit Drip İrrigation Ratios on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Fibre Quality. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2009; 195: 19-29.