Effect of touristic activities on seabirds’ habitat selection on sandy beaches

• Autorzy: Costa Leonardo , Rangel Danilo Freitas , Zalmon Ilana

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.26881/oahs-2023.3.03

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Seabirds are biological models for habitat selection studies at different spatial scales. In general, seabirds select areas with a higher availability of prey, but human disturbances can modify their spatial and temporal foraging patterns in urban coastal ecosystems. Here we tested the hypothesis that human activities prevent seabirds foraging on beach sectors that are impacted by urbanization and recreational activities. Seabirds were counted while foraging at the interface between the surf zone and foreshore in three sectors with different levels of urbanization in southeastern Brazil. Physical variables, prey abundance, and human stressors, such as the number of people and dogs, were also measured. The brown booby Sula leucogaster foraged mainlyin the least impacted sector, despite the lower abundance of prey and harsher physical conditions. The number of individuals of this species was negatively related to the number of people, indicating a human-induced avoidance behaviour. In turn, the kelp gull Larus dominicanus, asynatropic species, was more abundant in the high impact sector. Our results have implications for the management and conservation of sandy beaches, especially regarding the zoning and selection of priority areas for environmental protection and nature-based ecotourism activities.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

coastal birds; ecotourism; spatial distribution; anthropogenic impact

• Wydawca: Institute of Oceanography University of Gdańsk
• Czasopismo: Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 52, No. 3
• Strony: 287--298
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 64 poz., fot., map., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Costa Leonardo

• Laboratório de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (UENF), Campos dos Goytacazes, Avenida Alberto Lamego, 2000 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

autor

Rangel Danilo Freitas

• Instituto do Mar, Universidade Federal de SãoPaulo, Santos, Brazil

autor

Zalmon Ilana

• Laboratório de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (UENF), Campos dos Goytacazes, Avenida Alberto Lamego, 2000 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Bibliografia

• [1]. Alves, E. dos S., & Pezzuto, P. R. (2009). Effect of cold fronts on the benthic macrofauna of exposed sandy beaches with contrasting morphodynamics. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, 57, 73-96. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-87592009000200001
• [2]. Becker, B. H., & Beissinger, S. R. (2003). Scale-dependent habitat selection by a nearshore seabird, the marbled murrelet, in a highly dynamic upwelling system. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 256, 243-255. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps256243
• [3]. Bosch, M., Oro, D., & Ruiz, X. (1994). Dependence of yellow-legged gulls (Larus cachinnans) on food from human activity in two western Mediterranean colonies. Avocetta, 18, 135-139.
• [4]. Branco, J. O., Fracasso, H. A. A., Machado, I. F., Bovendorp, M. S., Verani, J. R., & Paulo, S. (2005). Dieta de Sula leucogaster Boddaert (Sulidae, Aves), nas Ilhas Moleques do Sul, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 22, 1044-1049. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752005000400033
• [5]. Chastel, O., Weimerskirch, H., & Jouventin, P. (1995). Influence of body condition on reproductive decision and reproductive success in the blue petrel. The Auk, 112, 964-972. https://doi.org/10.2307/4089027
• [6]. Costa, L. L., Fanini, L., Zalmon, I. R., Defeo, O., & McLachlan, A. (2022a). Cumulative stressors impact macrofauna differentially according to sandy beach type: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 307, 114594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114594 PMID:35121366
• [7]. Costa, L. L., Landmann, J. G., Gaelzer, R., & Zalmon, I. R. (2017a). Does human pressure affect the community structure of surf zone fish in sandy beaches? Continental Shelf Research, 132, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2016.11.007
• [8]. Costa, L. L., Machado, P. M., & Zalmon, I. R. (2019). Do natural disturbances have significant effects on sandy beach macrofauna of Southeastern Brazil? Zoologia, 4689, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.36.e29814
• [9]. Costa, L. L., & Soares-gomes, A. Zalmon, Ilana, R., 2022b. Sandy beach heterogeneity: Intertidal and supralittoral communities, in: Gonçalves, S.C.F., Ferreira, S.M. de F. (Eds.), Sandy Beaches as Endangered Ecosystems. CRC Press, Florida, pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429053252-8
• [10]. Costa, L. L., Tavares, D. C., Suciu, M. C., Rangel, D. F., & Zalmon, I. R. (2017b). Human-induced changes in the trophic functioning of sandy beaches. Ecological Indicators, 82, 304-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.016
• [11]. Defeo, O., Aeberhard, W. H., Cardoso, R. S., & Defeo, O. (2017). Aggregate patterns of macrofaunal diversity: An interocean comparison. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26, 823-834. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12588
• [12]. Defeo, O., Lercari, D., & Gomez, J. (2003). The role of morphodynamics in structuring sandy beach populations and communities: What should be expected? Journal of Coastal Research, 35, 352-362.
• [13]. Dugan, J. E., Hubbard, D. M., Mccrary, M., Hubbard, D. M., Mccrary, M. D., & Pierson, M. O. (2003). The response of macrofauna communities and shorebirds to macrophyte wrack subsidies on exposed sandy beaches of southern California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 58, 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(03)00045-3
• [14]. Duhem, C., Vidal, E., Legrand, J., & Tatoni, T. (2003). Opportunistic feeding responses of the yellow-legged gull Larus michahellis to accessibility of refuse dumps. Bird Study, 50, 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650309461291
• [15]. Esmaeili, Y. S., Corte, G. N., Checon, H. H., Bilatto, C. G., Lefcheck, J. S., Cecilia, A., Amaral, Z., & Turra, A. (2022). Revealing the drivers of taxonomic and functional diversity of nearshore fish assemblages: Implications for conservation priorities. Diversity & Distributions, 28, 1597-1609. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13453
• [16]. Fanini, L., Costa, L. L., Zalmon, I. R., & Riechers, M. (2021). Social and ecological elements for a perspective approach to citizen science on the beach. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 694487. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.694487
• [17]. Fauchald, P. (2009). Spatial interaction between seabirds and prey: Review and synthesis. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 391, 139-151. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07818
• [18]. Figueiredo, J., Menezes, N.A., 1978. Manual de peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil.
• [19]. Fretwell, S. D. (1969). On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheoretica, 19, 54-52.
• [20]. Frid, A., & Dill, L. (2002). Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conservation Ecology, 6, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00404-060111
• [21]. Goutner, V. A. (1992). Habitat use in Yellow-Iegged Gull (Larus cachinnans michahellis) coastal wetland colonies of North-East Greece. Avocetta, 85, 81-85.
• [22]. Graña, M., Marcela, G., & Andrés, P. (2018). Poor body conditions during the breeding period in a seabird population with low breeding success. Marine Biology, 165, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-018-3401-4
• [23]. Harley, C. D. G., Randall Hughes, A., Hultgren, K. M., Miner, B. G., Sorte, C. J. B., Thornber, C. S., Rodriguez, L. F., Tomanek, L., & Williams, S. L. (2006). The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems. Ecology Letters, 9, 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00871.x PMID:16958887
• [24]. Harris, L., Campbell, E. E., Nel, R., & Schoeman, D. (2014). Rich diversity, strong endemism, but poor protection: Addressing the neglect of sandy beach ecosystems in coastal conservation planning. Diversity & Distributions, 20, 1120-1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12226
• [25]. Jones, J. (2001). Habitat Selection Studies in Avian Ecology: A Critical Review. The Auk, 118, 557-562. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/118.2.557
• [26]. Lasiak, T. A. (1986). Juveniles, food and the surf zone habitat: Implications for teleost nursery areas. South African Journal of Zoology, 21, 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02541858.1986.11447956
• [27]. Lewis, S., Hamer, K. C., Money, L., Griffiths, R., Wanless, S., & Sherratt, T. N. (2004). Brood neglect and contingent foraging behavior in a pelagic seabird. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56, 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0762-0
• [28]. Lunardi, V. O., Macedo, R. H. F., Granadeiro, J. P., & Palmeirim, J. M. (2012). Migratory flows and foraging habitat selection by shorebirds along the northeastern coast of Brazil: The case of Baia de Todos os Santos. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 96, 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2011.11.001
• [29]. Maciusik, B., Lenda, M., & Skórka, P. (2010). Corridors, local food resources, and climatic conditions affect the utilization of the urban environment by the Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus in winter. Ecological Research, 25, 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-009-0649-7
• [30]. Maguire, G. S., Miller, K. K., Weston, M. A., & Young, K. (2011). Being beside the seaside: Beach use and preferences among coastal residents of south-eastern Australia. Ocean and Coastal Management, 54, 781-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.07.012
• [31]. Mallord, J. W., Dolman, P. M., Brown, A. F., & Sutherland, W. J. (2007). Linking recreational disturbance to population size in a ground-nesting passerine. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01242.x
• [32]. Matsumura, S., Arlinghaus, R., & Dieckmann, U. (2011). Foraging on spatially distributed resources with sub-optimal movement, imperfect information, and travelling costs: Departures from the ideal free distribution. Oikos, 119, 1469-1483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18196.x
• [33]. McArdle, S. B., & McLachlan, A. (1992). Sand beach ecology: Swash features relevant to the macrofauna. Journal of Coastal Research, 8, 398-407.
• [34]. McLachlan, A., & Defeo, O. (2018). The Ecology of Sandy Shores (3rd ed.). Academic Press.
• [35]. Mclachlan, A., Jaramillo, E., Donn, T. E., & Wessels, F. (1993). Sandy beach macrofauna communities and their control by the physical environment: A geographical comparison. Journal of Coastal Research, 15, 27-38.
• [36]. Meager, J. J., Schlacher, T. A., & Nielsen, T. (2012). Humans alter habitat selection of birds on ocean-exposed sandy beaches. Diversity & Distributions, 18, 294-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00873.x
• [37]. Menezes, N.A., Figueiredo, J., 1985. Manual de peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil.
• [38]. Menezes, N.A., Figueiredo, J., 1980. Manual de peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil.
• [39]. Miller, A. (1942). Habitat selection among higher vertebrates and its relation to intraspecific variation. American Naturalist, 76, 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1086/281011
• [40]. Miralles, A., Raymond, M., & Lecointre, G. (2019). Empathy and compassion toward other species decrease with evolutionary divergence time. Scientific Reports, 9, 19555. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56006-9 PMID:31862944
• [41]. Newsome, D., & Rodger, K. (2008). To feed or not to feed: A contentious issue in wildlife tourism. Australian Zoologist, 34, 255-270. https://doi.org/10.7882/FS.2008.029
• [42]. Olds, A. D., Vargas-Fonseca, E., Connolly, R. M., Gilby, B. L., Huijbers, C. M., Hyndes, G. A., Layman, C. A., Whitfield, A. K., & Schlacher, T. A. (2018). The ecology of fish in the surf zones of ocean beaches: A global review. Fish and Fisheries, 19, 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12237
• [43]. Orams, M. B. (2002). Feeding wildlife as a tourism attraction: A review of issues and impacts. Tourism Management, 23, 281-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00080-2
• [44]. Paleczny, M., Hammill, E., Karpouzi, V., & Pauly, D. (2015). Population trend of the world’s monitored seabirds, 1950-2010. PLoS One, 10(6), e0129342. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129342 PMID:26058068
• [45]. Pyke, G. H. (1984). Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical Review. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15, 523-575. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002515
• [46]. Ramos, R., Ramírez, F., Sanpera, C., Jover, L., & Ruiz, X. (2009). Diet of Yellow-legged Gull (Larus michahellis) chicks along the Spanish Western Mediterranean coast: The relevance of refuse dumps. Journal of Ornithology, 150, 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-008-0346-2
• [47]. Rangel, D. F., da Silva, E. F. N., & Costa, L. L. (2022). Occurrence and behaviour of shorebirds depend on food availability and distance of beaches from urban settlements. Acta Ornithologica, 56, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3161/00016454AO2021.56.2.008
• [48]. Rangel, D. F., Tavares, D. C., & Zalmon, I. R. (2020). Composição e abundância de aves marinhas costeiras em Arraial do Cabo, Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Ornithologia, 11, 1-6.
• [49]. Schlacher, T. A., Schoeman, D. S., Dugan, J., Lastra, M., Jones, A., Scapini, F., & Mclachlan, A. (2008). Sandy beach ecosystems: Key features, sampling issues, management challenges and climate change impacts. Marine Ecology (Berlin), 29, 70-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.2007.00204.x
• [50]. Sherley, R. B., Ludynia, K., Dyer, B. M., Lamont, T., Makhado, A. B., Roux, J. P., Scales, K. L., Underhill, L. G., & Votier, S. C. (2017). Metapopulation tracking juvenile penguins reveals an ecosystem-wide ecological trap. Current Biology, 27, 563-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.054 PMID:28190725
• [51]. Skórka, P., Lenda, M., Martyka, R., & Tworek, S. (2009). The use of metapopulation and optimal foraging theories to predict movement and foraging decisions of mobile animals in heterogeneous landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 24, 599-609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9333-0
• [52]. Skórka, P., Lenda, M., & Sutherland, W. J. (2016). Response of young and adult birds to the same environmental variables and different spatial scales during post breeding period. Landscape Ecology, 31, 2063-2078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0382-x
• [53]. Steele, W. (2010). Diet of hartlaub’s gull Larus hartlaubu and the kelp gull L. dominicanus in the Southwestern Cape Province, South Africa. The Ostrich, 63, 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00306525.1992.9633952
• [54]. Suciu, M. C., Tavares, D. C., Costa, L. L., Silva, M. C. L., & Zalmon, I. R. (2017). Evaluation of environmental quality of sandy beaches in southeastern Brazil. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 119, 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.04.045 PMID:28473210
• [55]. Suciu, M. C., Tavares, D. C., & Zalmon, I. R. (2018). Comparative evaluation of crustaceans as bioindicators of human impact on Brazilian sandy beaches. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 38, 420-428. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcbiol/ruy027
• [56]. Tavares, D. C., Costa, L. L., Freitas, D., Fulgencio, J., Moura, D., Rosental, I., & Siciliano, S. (2016a). Nests of the brown booby (Sula leucogaster) as a potential indicator of tropical ocean pollution by marine debris. Ecological Indicators, 70, 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.005
• [57]. Tavares, D. C., Fulgencio de Moura, J., & Siciliano, S. (2016b). Environmental predictors of seabird wrecks in a tropical coastal area. PLoS One, 11(12), e0168717. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168717 PMID:27992578
• [58]. Velando, A., & Munilla, I. (2011). Disturbance to a foraging seabird by sea-based tourism: Implications for reserve management in marine protected areas. Biological Conservation, 144, 1167-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.01.004
• [59]. Veríssimo, D., Fraser, I., Groombridge, J., Bristol, R., & MacMillan, D. C. (2009). Birds as tourism flagship species: A case study of tropical islands. Animal Conservation, 12, 549-558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00282.x
• [60]. Vilchis, L. I., Ballance, L. T., & Fiedler, P. C. (2006). Pelagic habitat of seabirds in the eastern tropical Pacific: Effects of foraging ecology on habitat selection. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 315, 279-292. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps315279
• [61]. Waggitt, J. J., Cazenave, P. W., Howarth, L. M., Evans, P. G. H., van der Kooij, J., & Hiddink, J. G. (2018). Combined measurements of prey availability explain habitat selection in foraging seabirds. Biology Letters, 14, 20180348. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348 PMID:30068542
• [62]. Weimerskirch, H. (1998). How can a pelagic seabird provision its chick when relying on a distant food resource? Cyclic attendance at the colony, foraging decision and body condition in sooty shearwaters. Journal of Animal Ecology, 67, 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1998.00180.x
• [63]. Weimerskirch, H., Pinaud, D., Pawlowski, F., Bost, C. A., Weimerskirch, H., & Pinaud, D. (2007). Does prey capture induce area-restricted search? A fine-scale study using GPS in a marine predator, the wandering albatross. American Naturalist, 170, 734-743. https://doi.org/10.1086/522059 PMID:17926295
• [64]. Yamamoto, T., Kohno, H., Mizutani, A., Sato, H., Yamagishi, H., Fujii, Y., Murakoshi, M., & Yoda, K. (2017). Effect of wind on the flight of brown booby fledglings. Ornithological Science, 16, 17-22. https://doi.org/10.2326/osj.16.17

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).