PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Methodology for oil pipeline critical infrastructures safety and resilience to climate change analysis

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In the paper there are described the oil pipeline network as the critical infrastructure. The basic definitions concerned with oil pipeline critical infrastructure are given. Moreover the climate and weather impacts on oil pipeline critical infrastructure safety and resilience are described.
Rocznik
Strony
173--178
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 36 poz.
Twórcy
autor
  • Baltic Oil Terminal (BOT), Dębogórze, Poland
  • Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland
  • Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland
Bibliografia
  • [1] Blokus-Roszkowska, A., Bogalecka M., Dziula, P. et al. (2016). Gas Pipelines Critical Infrastructure Network. Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association, Summer Safety and Reliability Seminars 7, 2, 1-6.
  • [2] Caldwell, H., Quinn, K.H., Meunier, J. et al. (2002). Potential impacts of climate change on freight transport. In: U.S. DOT, 2002. The Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Transportation, Summary and Discussion Papers. U.S. Department of Transportation.
  • [3] Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. (2014). Working report of expert group C: space weather. United Nations. A/AC.105/C.1/2014/ CRP.15.
  • [4] Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/s y/en/annexessglossary-e-i.html].
  • [5] Diaz, H.F. & Murnane, R.J. (2008). Climate Extremes And Society, Cambridge.
  • [6] Drzazga, M., Kołowrocki, K. & Soszyńska-Budny, J. (2016). Oil Pipeline Critical Infrastructure Network. Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association, Summer Safety and Reliability Seminars 7, 2, 53-60.
  • [7] EU-CIRCLE Report D1.1-GMU1. (2015). EUCIRCLE Taxonomy.
  • [8] EU-CIRCLE Report D1.2-GMU1. (2016). Identification of existing critical infrastructures at the Baltic Sea area and its seaside, their scopes, parameters and accidents in terms of climate change impacts.
  • [9] EU-CIRCLE Report D1.4-GMU3. (2016). Holistic approach to analysis and identification of critical infrastructures within the Baltic Sea area and its surroundings – Formulating the concept of a global network of critical infrastructures in this region (“network of networks” approach).
  • [10] EU-CIRCLE Report D2.1-GMU2. (2016). Modelling outside dependences influence on Critical Infrastructure Safety (CIS) – Modelling Critical Infrastructure Operation Process (CIOP) including Operating Environment Threats (OET).
  • [11] EU-CIRCLE Report D2.1-GMU3. (2016). Modelling outside dependences influence on Critical Infrastructure Safety (CIS) – Modelling Climate-Weather Change Process (C-WCP) including Extreme Weather Hazards (EWH).
  • [12] EU-CIRCLE Report D2.1-GMU4. (2016). Modelling outside dependences influence on Critical Infrastructure Safety (CIS) - Designing Critical Infrastructure Operation Process General Model (CIOPGM) related to Operating Environment Threats (OET) and Extreme Weather Hazards (EWH) by linking CIOP and CWCP models.
  • [13] EUR-Lex, Access to European Law : http://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/ ?uri=URISERV:l33259].
  • [14] HELCOM. (2013). Climate change in the Baltic Sea Area - HELCOM thematic assessment in 2013. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings 137.
  • [15] HELCOM. (2009). Ensuring safe shipping in the Baltic. Helsinki Commission (HELCOM) - Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission.
  • [16] Houwing, M., Heijnen, P. & Bouwmans, I. (2007). Socio-technical complexity in energy infrastructures - conceptual framework to study the impact of domestic level energy generation storage and exchange. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Taipei, Taiwan, 906-911.
  • [17] IAPA. (2007). Glossary of Occupational Health and Safety Terms. Industrial Accident Prevention Association.
  • [18] IPCC. (2013). Annex III: Glossary. Planton, S. (Ed.). In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K. et al. (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1447-1466, DOI:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.031.
  • [19] IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D.J. et al. (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1132.
  • [20] ISDR. (2009). Terminology of disaster risk reduction, Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction, United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR).
  • [21] Kołowrocki, K., Kuligowska, E. & Reszko, M. (2016). Methodology for oil rig critical infrastructure network safety and resilience to climate change analysis. Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association, Summer Safety and Reliability Seminars 7, 2, 187-195.
  • [22] Kołowrocki, K., Kuligowska, E. & Reszko, M. (2016). Methodology for wind farms critical infrastructure network safety and resilience to climate change analysis. Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association, Summer Safety and Reliability Seminars 7, 2, 179-186.
  • [23] Lauge, A., Hernantes, J. & Sarriegi, J. M. (2015). Critical infrastructure dependencies: A holistic, dynamic and quantitative approach. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 8, 16-23.
  • [24] Martin, D. F. et al. (2005). Ecological impact of coastal defence structures on sediment and mobile fauna: Evaluating and forecasting consequences of unavoidable modifications of native habitats. Coastal Engineering 52, 1027-1051.
  • [25] NIPP. (2013). Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience. U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
  • [26] Pederson, P., Dudenhoeffer, D., Hartley, S. et al. (2006). Critical Infrastructure Interdependency Modeling: A Survey of U.S. and International Research. Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID) Report INL/EXT-06-11464.
  • [27] Slandail terminology. The Slandail project's disaster lexicon [available at: http:// slandailterminology.pbworks.com/w/page/826299 73/Slandail%20Terminology].
  • [28] SREX FD [available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/specialreports/srex/SREX_FD_SPM_final.pdf].
  • [29] United Nations. (1997). Glossary of Environment Statistics. Studies in Methods, New York, Series F, 67.
  • [30] UNISDR. (2009). Terminology, United Nations International [available at: http://www.unisdr. org/we/inform/terminology].
  • [31] US Homeland Security. (2013). National Infrastructure Protection Program. Partnering Strategy for Disaster Reduction for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience.
  • [32] US Department of Homeland Security [available at: http://www.dhs.gov/what-criticalinfrastructure].
  • [33] US Department of Energy. (1999). Office of Emergency Management and Oak Ridge Associated Universities. Glossary and Acronyms of Emergency Management Terms.
  • [34] US President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection. (1997). Critical Foundations: Protecting America’s Infrastructures.
  • [35] WWF. (2010). A Sea Exposed to Oil Accidents [available at: http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/ where_we_work/baltic/threats/shipping/; last accessed: 29.03.2010]. -
  • [36] WWF. (2010). Future Trends in the Baltic Sea. WWF Baltic Ecoregion Programme.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-8cbc6110-ff53-4907-b947-7984f324abe1
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.