PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The impact of the organizational innovativeness on the performance of Indonesian SMEs

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Wpływ innowacyjności organizacyjnej na działalność indonezyjskich MŚP
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The main objective of the current study is to examine the impact of the innovation types such as product, process and market innovation on the performance of the Indonesian SMEs. Additionally, the study has also examined the mediating role of organizational innovativeness. The study has adopted the quantitative method of data collection and gathered the primary data from the respondents by using questionnaires. The employees of research and development department of SMEs in Indonesia are the respondents that have been selected by using simple random sampling. The researcher has employed the statistical tools and procedures to analyze the data which was obtained from the self-administered questionnaires. For data analysation in the current study we have used the mixture of inferential and statistical tools. For getting the complete questionnaires all efforts had provided positive result. The results show that the performance of the firm is positively influenced by these four dimensions. The structural linkage among innovative skills (Organizational innovation, Product innovation, Marketing innovation, Process innovation) significantly and positively influenced the performance of SMEs which is determined in a single model. Practically, the innovative procedures for the production of high-quality goods and services, with new or advanced technology obviously enhances the performance of SMEs firm. For a long period of a time company aims for innovation and innovative technology that plays a vital role in high and competitive profit.
PL
Głównym celem obecnego badania jest zbadanie wpływu rodzajów innowacji, takich jak innowacje produktowe, procesowe i rynkowe, na wyniki indonezyjskich MŚP. W badaniu zbadano także pośredniczącą rolę innowacyjności organizacyjnej. W badaniu przyjęto ilościową metodę zbierania danych i zebrano podstawowe dane od respondentów za pomocą ankiet. Pracownicy działu badań i rozwoju MŚP w Indonezji to respondenci, którzy zostali wybrani metodą prostego losowania. Badacz posłużył się narzędziami i procedurami statystycznymi do analizy danych uzyskanych z samodzielnie wypełnianych kwestionariuszy. Do analizy danych w obecnym badaniu wykorzystaliśmy połączenie narzędzi wnioskowania i statystyki. Wszystkie starania, aby otrzymać kompletne kwestionariusze, przyniosły pozytywne rezultaty. Wyniki pokazują, że te cztery wymiary pozytywnie wpływają na wyniki firmy. Strukturalne powiązanie między innowacyjnymi umiejętnościami (innowacje organizacyjne, innowacje produktowe, innowacje marketingowe, innowacje procesowe) znacząco i pozytywnie wpłynęło na wyniki MŚP, które są określone w jednym modelu. Praktycznie, innowacyjne procedury produkcji wysokiej jakości towarów i usług, z wykorzystaniem nowej lub zaawansowanej technologii, w oczywisty sposób poprawiają wyniki MŚP. Od dawna firma dąży do innowacji i innowacyjnych technologii, które odgrywają kluczową rolę w osiągnięciu wysokiego i konkurencyjnego zysku.
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Strony
513--530
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 38 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia
  • Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia
autor
  • Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia
autor
  • Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi, Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia
  • Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Medan Area, Medan, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Bibliografia
  • 1. Anning-Dorson, T., Odoom, R. K. and Acheampong, G., (2017). Innovation and organizational development: the role of organizational leadership. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 8(3), 338-351.
  • 2. Arfi, W. B., Hikkerova, L. and Sahut, J.-M., (2018). External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 210-220.
  • 3. Balakrishnan, J., Foroudi, P., (2019). Does corporate reputation matter? Role of social media in consumer intention to purchase innovative food product. Corporate Reputation Review, 12, 1-20.
  • 4. Basheer, Khan, S., Hassan, S. G. and Shah, M. H., (2018). The Corporate Governance and Interdependence of Investment and Financing Decisions of Non-Financial Firms in Pakistan. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5, 316-323.
  • 5. Chuwiruch, N., Indra, P. and Boonlua, S., (2016). An empirical investigation of marketing innovation strategy of travel agency businesses in Thailand. BU Academic Review, 15(2), 129-143.
  • 6. Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I. and Ferreira, F. A., (2019). To be or not to be digital, that is the question: Firm innovation and performance. Journal of Business research, 101, 583-590.
  • 7. Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S. and Ayala, N. F., (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 15-26.
  • 8. Fuller, R. L., Russ, D. F., (2010). Organizational responsiveness of Russian and American growth-oriented small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Human Resource Development International, 13(3), 317-339.
  • 9. Ganzer, P. P., Chais, C. and Olea, P. M., (2017). Product, process, marketing and organizational innovation in industries of the flat knitting sector. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 14(4), 321-332.
  • 10. Godin, B., (2019). Innovation and the marginalization of research Handbook on Science and Public Policy: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • 11. Gross, J. J., (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological inquiry, 26(1), 1-26.
  • 12. Hair, Hult, G. T. M., & Ringle, C., (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): Sage publications.
  • 13. Hair, Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L. and Sarstedt, M., (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123.
  • 14. Hajibayova, L., Buente, W., (2017). Representation of Indigenous cultures: Considering the Hawaiian hula. Journal of Documentation, 73(6), 1137-1148.
  • 15. Hameed, Basheer, M. F., Iqbal, Jawad, and Anwar, A., Ahmad, Hafiz Khalil., (2018). Determinants of Firm’s open innovation performance and the role of R & D department: an empirical evidence from Malaysian SME’s. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 8(1), 29-35.
  • 16. Heidenreich, S., Landsperger, J. and Spieth, P., (2016). Are innovation networks in need of a conductor? Examining the contribution of network managers in low and high complexity settings. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 55-71.
  • 17. Henseler, J., Hubona, G. and Ray, P. A., (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20.
  • 18. Kasemsap, K., (2017). Developing a unified framework and a causal model of transformational leadership, empowerment, innovation support, and organizational innovation Organizational Culture and Behavior: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 381-406): IGI Global.
  • 19. Khalid, S., (2018). Assessing the relevance of culture in TPB entrepreneurial intention model: A comparative study in Japan and Pakistan. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 14(1), 140-172.
  • 20. Lohith, C., Srinivasan, R. and Kadadevaramath, R. S., (2018). Innovation and strategic marketing-the key factors: a literature review on Indian micro small medium enterprises. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 12(1), 53-68.
  • 21. Lütjen, H., Schultz, C. and Tietze, F., (2019). Managing ecosystems for service innovation: A dynamic capability view. Journal of Business Research, 104, 506-519.
  • 22. Musa, H., Chinniah, M., (2016). Malaysian SMEs development: future and challenges on going green. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224(2016), 254-262.
  • 23. Naala, M., Nordin, N. and Omar, W., (2017). Innovation capability and firm performance relationship: A study of pls-structural equation modeling (Pls-Sem). International Journal of Organization & Business Excellence, 2(1), 39-50.
  • 24. Narsa, I. M., (2019). The Effect of Market Orientation, Innovation, Organizational Learning and Entrepreneurship on Firm Performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22(3), 1-13.
  • 25. Nguyen, C. N., Adhikari, R. and Miles, M. P., (2018). Exploring market orientation, innovation, and financial performance in agricultural value chains in emerging economies. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 154-163.
  • 26. Ocak, M., Ozturk, A., (2018). The role of transformational leadership behaviours’ effects on corporate entrepreneurship behaviours and financial performance of firms. International Review of Management and Marketing, 8(4), 45-51.
  • 27. Ong, M. H. A., Puteh, F., (2017). Quantitative Data Analysis: Choosing Between SPSS, PLS, and AMOS in Social Science Research. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Scientific Research, 3(1), 14-25.
  • 28. Papetti, A., Menghi, R., (2019). Resources value mapping: A method to assess the resource efficiency of manufacturing systems. Applied Energy, 249, 326-342.
  • 29. Perani, G., (2019). Business innovation statistics and the evolution of the Oslo Manual. NOvation: Critical Studies of Innovation, 1, 36-36.
  • 30. Piercy, N. F., (2016). Market-led strategic change: Transforming the process of going to market: Taylor & Francis.
  • 31. Ralston, P., Grawe, S. and Daugherty, P., (2017). variation in the delivery of healthcare services”, Journal of healthcare management/American College of Healthcare Executives. OECD. (2015), Health at a Glance 2015-OECD Indicators. Improving healthcare logistics processes, 20(1), 267-271.
  • 32. Ramayah, T., Cheah, J. and Memon, M., (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0 An Updated Guide and Practical Guide to Statistical Analysis: Pearson.
  • 33. Singh., (2018). Innovation capability, disruptive technology and SME's performance in Malaysia. Universiti Utara Malaysia.
  • 34. Singh, Hanafi, N. B., (2019). Disruptive Technology and SMEs Performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,13, 9(12).
  • 35. Singh, Prasad, T., (2018). Application of PLS-SEM in Modeling the Significance of Social Valuation in the Determination of Entrepreneurial Intention of Business Management Students. The IUP Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 8(3), 11-23.
  • 36. Tresna, P. W., Raharja, S. u. J., (2019). Effect of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Product Innovation and Competitive Advantage on Business Performance in Creative Industries in Bandung City, Indonesia. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 8, 51-60.
  • 37. Yeniyurt, S., Kim, D. and Cavusgil, S. T., (2019). Information technology resources, innovativeness, and supply chain capabilities as drivers of business performance: A retrospective and future research directions. Industrial Marketing Management, 79, 46-52.
  • 38. Zhang, K., Wang, J. and Feng, L., (2019). The evolution mechanism of latecomer firms value network in disruptive innovation context: a case study of Haier Group. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(12), 1488-1500.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-8c8f4cf7-b809-4795-80d1-31a92fc23441
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.