Carrying Capacity Model of Food Manufacturing Sectors for Sustainable Development From Using Environmental and Natural Resources of Thailand

• Autorzy: Sutthichaimethee P. , Tanoamchard W.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/60447

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The objective of this research is to propose an indicator to assess and rank environmental problems caused by production within the food manufacturing sector of Thailand. The factors used to calculate the real benefit included the costs of natural resources, energy and transportation, fertilizer and pesticides, and sanitary and similar service. The highest environmental cost in terms of both natural resources materials and energy and transportation was ice, while the highest environmental cost for fertilizer and pesticides was coconut and palm oil. Confectionery had the highest environmental cost for sanitary and similar services. Overall, real estate gained the highest real benefit, while repair not classified elsewhere had the lowest real benefit for the company. If Thailand uses an indicator of environmental harm, especially within the food manufacturing sector, it could help to formulate efficient policies and strategies for the country in three areas of development, which are social, economic, and environmental development.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

food manufacturing; environment cost; indicator; carrying capacity; revenue; sanitary and similar services; modeling

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 16, nr 5
• Strony: 1--8
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 56 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Sutthichaimethee P.

• Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Management and Tourism, Burapha University, 20131 Chonburi, Thailand

autor

Tanoamchard W.

• Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Burapha University, 210310 Chonburi, Thailand

Bibliografia

• 1. Adams W.M. 2009. Green Development: Environment and Sustainability in the Third World (2nd ed.). New York: Rutledge.
• 2. Asian Development Bank (ADB). 1997. Emerging Asia and Challenges. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
• 3. Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2014. Environment, Climate Change, and Disaster Risk Management. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
• 4. Bailey R.; Bras, B.; Allen, JK. 2004. Applying ecological input-output flow analysis to material flows in industrial systems: Part I: Tracing flows. J. Ind. Ecol. 2004a, 8(1): 45–68.
• 5. Benoit 2009. Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. UNEP-SETAC, G. Guillén- Gosálbez.
• 6. Bodini A. 2002. Building a systemic environmental monitoring and indicators for sustainability: What has the ecological network approach to offer? Ecol. Indic. 2012, 15: 140–148.
• 7. Bodini A., Bondavalli C. 2002. Towards a sustainable use of water resources: A whole-ecosystem approach using network analysis. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 18 (5): 463–485.
• 8. Bojarski J., Laínez A., Espuña, L., Puigjaner. 2009. Incorporating environmental impact and regulations in a holistic supply chains modeling. An LCA approach, Comput. Chem. Eng., 33(10), 1747–1759.
• 9. Brent C., Labuschagne C. 2006. Social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry. Int. J. Life Cycle Assessment, 11 (1), 3–15.
• 10. Brunner P.H. 2007. PH. Reshaping urban metabolism. J. Ind Ecol 2007, 11 (2), 11–13.
• 11. Chen D.J. 2003. Analysis, integration and complexity study of industrial ecosystems. Doctoral dissertation, Beijing, Tsinghua University.
• 12. Chen ZM., Chen GQ., Zhou JB., Jiang MM., Chen B. 2010. Ecological input–output modeling for embodied resources and emissions in Chinese economy 2005. Commun Nonlinear SciNumer Simul 2010, 15 (7), 1942–1965
• 13. Duchin F. 2008. Input–output economics and material flows. In: Suh S, editor. Handbook of input– output economics in industrial ecology. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing. Ltd.
• 14. Duque J., Barbosa-Povoa, APFD Novais A.Q. 2010. Design and planning of sustainable industrial networks: Application to a recovery network of residual products. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 49 (9), 4230–4248.
• 15. Espinosa A., Walker J. 2011. A Complexity Approach to Sustainability: Theory and Application. London, Imperial College Press.
• 16. Goedkoop M., Heijungs R., Huijbregts M., Schryver A.D., Struijs J., Van Zelm R. 2009. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonized category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. The Hague, Ministry of VROM. ReCiPe., First edition
• 17. Grossmann I.E. 2009. Optimal design and planning of sustainable chemical supply chains under uncertainty. American Institute of Chemical Engineers J., 55 (1), 99–121.
• 18. Hammond A., Adriaanse A., Rodenburg E., Bryant D., Woodward R. 1995. Environmental indicators: A systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. World resources institute.
• 19. Harwick J.J., Olewiler N.D. 1998. The Economics of Natural Resource Use. Massachusetts, Addison- Wesley.
• 20. Huang SL., Hsu WL. 2003. Materials flow analysis and energy evaluation of Taipei’s urban construction. Landsc Urban Plan, 63 (2), 61–74.
• 21. Hugo A., Pistikopoulos E.N. 2005. Environmentally conscious long-range planning and design of supply chain networks. J. of Cleaner Product., 13(15), 1471–1491.
• 22. Karna A., Engstrom J. 1994. Life-Cycle Analysis of Newsprint: European Scenarios. Paperi ja Puu, 76 (4), 232–237.
• 23. Kennedy C., Cuddihy J., Engel-Yan J. 2007. The changing metabolism of cities. J Ind Ecol, 11 (2), 43–59.
• 24. Lave L.B., Cobas-flores E., Hendrickson C.T., McMichael F.C. 1995. Using Input-Output Analysis to Estimate Economy-wide Discharges. Environmental Science and Technolog, 29 (9), 420A–426A.
• 25. Lee C.L., Huang S.L., Chan S.L. 2009. Synthesis and spatial dynamics of socio-economic metabolism and land use change of Taipei Metropolitan Region. Ecol Model, 220 (21), 2940–2959.
• 26. Lenzen M. 1998. Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: An input-output analysis. Energy Policy, 26(6), 495–506.
• 27. Leontief W.W. 1936. Quantitative input and output relation in the economic system of the United State. Rev. of Economics and Statistics, 18(3), 105–125.
• 28. Leontief, W.W. 1986. Input-Output Economics (2nd ed.). New York, Oxford University Press.
• 29. Li S.S., Zhang Y., Yang Z.F., Liu H, Zhang J.Y. 2012. Ecological relationship analysis of the urban metabolic system of Beijing, China. Environ Pollut, 170, 169–176.
• 30. Li Y., Chen B., Yang Z.F. 2009. Ecological network analysis for water use systems: a case study of the Yellow River Basin. Ecol Model, 220(22), 3163–3173.
• 31. Liang S., Zhang T. 2011. Urban metabolism in China: achieving dematerialization and decarbonization in Suzhou. J Ind Ecol, 15 (3), 420–434.
• 32. Marull J., Pino J., Tello E., Cordobilla M.J. 2010. Social metabolism, landscape change and land-use planning in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy, 27 (2), 497–510.
• 33. McMullan C., 2013. Indicators of urban ecosystem health. Retrieved from http://archive.idrc.ca/ecohealth/indicators_e.html.
• 34. Ness E., Urbel-Piirsalu S., Anderberg, L., Olsson 2007. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 60 (3), 498–508.
• 35. Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. 2015. National Income of Thailand, 2015. Bangkok: NESDB.
• 36. Office of the Prime Minister. 2007. Budget document: expenditure budget for fiscal year Ministry of Public Health. Vol. 3. Bangkok: Bureau of the Budget.
• 37. Pantavisid S. 2012. Natural resource and environmental costs of good and service production via sustainable consumption and production approach towards prioritizing the environmental management in Thailand. Doctoral dissertation, Social Development and Environmental Management, School of Social and Environmental Development, National Institute of Development Administration.
• 38. Pigou, Arthur C. 1960. The Economics of Welfare. 4th ed, Macmillan, London.
• 39. Pinto-Varela A. P., Barbosa-Póvoa A., Novais. 2011. Bi-objective optimization approach to the design and planning of supply chains: Economic versus environmental performances. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 35 (8), 1454–1468.
• 40. Salema M.I.G., Barbosa-Povoa A.P., Novais A.Q. 2010. Simultaneous design and planning of supply chains with reverse flows: A generic modelling framework. European J. of Operational Research, 203 (2), 336–349.
• 41. Sa-nguanwongthong N. 2013. Study of environmental costs for the evaluation of industrial development in Thailand. Doctoral dissertation, Social Development and Environmental Management, School of Social and Environmental Development, National Institute of Development Administration.
• 42. Simpson D.R., Bradford R.L. 1996. Taxing Variable Variable Cost: Environmental Regulation as Industrial policy. J. of Environmental Economics and Management, 30 (30), 282–300.
• 43. Su M.R., Yang Z.F., Chen B., Ulgiati S. 2009. Urban ecosystem health assessment based on energy and set pair analysis – a comparative study of typical Chinese cities. Ecol Model, 220(18), 2341–2348.
• 44. Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI). 2006. Prioritizing Issues in Natural Resources and Environmental Management. Final report prepared the Thailand Health Fund. Bangkok.
• 45. Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI). 2007. Prioritizing environmental problems with environmental costs. Final report prepared the Thailand Health Fund. Bangkok.
• 46. Ukaga O., Maser C., Reichenbach M. 2010. Sustainable development: principle, frameworks and case studies. London, CRC Press Taylor and Frances Group.
• 47. Xu, M. 2010. Development of the physical input monetary output model for understanding material flows within ecological–economic systems. J Res Ecol, 2 (1), 123–134.
• 48. Yigitcanlar T., Dur D., Dizdaroglu D. 2015. Towards prosperous sustainable cities: a multiscalar urban sustainability assessment approach, Habitat Int., 45 (1), 36–46.
• 49. Yigitcanlar T., Dizdaroglu D. 2015. Ecological approaches in planning for sustainable cities: A review of the literature. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 1 (2), 159–188.
• 50. Yu Y.J. 2008. Syndromic city illnesses diagnosis and urban ecosystem health assessment. Acta Ecol Sin, 28 (4), 1736–1747.
• 51. Zhang Y. 2013. Urban metabolism: A review of research methodologies. Environ Pollut 2013, 178, 463–473.
• 52. . Zhang Y., Li S.S., Fath B.D., Yang Z.F., Yang N.J. 2011. Analysis of an urban energy metabolic system: comparison of simple and complex model results. Ecol. Model., 22(1), 14–19.
• 53. Zhang Y., Liu H., Li Y., Yang Z.F., Li S.S., Yang N.J. 2012. Ecological network analysis of China›s societal metabolism. J. Environ. Manage., 93(1), 254–263.
• 54. Zhang Y., Yang Z.F., Fath B.D. 2010. Ecological network analysis of an urban water metabolic system: model development and a case study for Beijing. Sci. Total Environ., 408(20), 4702–4711.
• 55. Zhang Y., Yang Z.F., Fath B.D., Li S.S. 2010. Ecological network analysis of an urban energy metabolic system: model development, and a case study of four Chinese cities. Ecol. Model., 221(16), 1865–1879.
• 56. Zhang Y., Zhao Y.W., Yang Z.F., Chen B., Chen G.Q. 2009. Measurement and evaluation of the metabolic capacity of an urban ecosystem. Common Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 14(4), 1758–1765.