Impact of social media addiction on work engagement and job performance

• Autorzy: Ibrahim Mahdani , Yusra Yusra , Shah Najeeb Ullah

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2022.25.1.11

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ uzależnienia od mediów społecznościowych na zaangażowanie i wydajność pracy

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The present study aims to examine the impact of addictive use of social media on work engagement and job performance, the mediation effect of work engagement between social media addiction and job performance, and the moderation effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between work engagement and job performance. The study will give new insight into the knowledge industry domain, especially on these relevant constructs. To achieve this purpose, an online survey questionnaire was distributed. The data was collected from 200 white-collar employees at mid-level positions in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. The data collected were analyzed using Pearson correlations between the variables and partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings revealed a negative relationship between social media addiction and work engagement and job performance. Moreover, work engagement tends to mediate the relationship between social media addiction and job performance. Finally, it was found that self-efficacy would positively moderate the relationship between work engagement and job performance.

PL

Niniejsze badanie ma na celu zbadanie wpływu uzależniającego korzystania z mediów społecznościowych na zaangażowanie w pracę i wydajność pracy, mediacyjnego wpływu zaangażowania w pracę między uzależnieniem od mediów społecznościowych a wydajnością pracy oraz moderacyjnego wpływu poczucia własnej skuteczności na związek między pracą zaangażowanie i wydajność pracy. Badanie da nowy wgląd w dziedzinę przemysłu opartego na wiedzy, zwłaszcza w odniesieniu do tych istotnych konstrukcji. W tym celu rozprowadzono ankietę internetową. Dane zostały zebrane od 200 pracowników umysłowych na stanowiskach średniego szczebla w Klang Valley w Malezji. Zebrane dane zostały przeanalizowane przy użyciu korelacji Pearsona między zmiennymi oraz modelowania metodą najmniejszych kwadratów cząstkowych (PLS-SEM). Wyniki ujawniły negatywny związek między uzależnieniem od mediów społecznościowych a zaangażowaniem w pracę i wydajnością pracy. Co więcej, zaangażowanie w pracę ma tendencję do pośredniczenia w związku między uzależnieniem od mediów społecznościowych a wydajnością pracy. Wreszcie stwierdzono, że poczucie własnej skuteczności pozytywnie wpływałoby na związek między zaangażowaniem w pracę a wydajnością pracy.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

social media addiction; work engagement; job performance; self-efficacy

PL

uzależnienie od mediów społecznościowych; zaangażowanie w pracę; wydajność pracy; poczucie własnej skuteczności

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 25, No. 1
• Strony: 179--192
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 60 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Ibrahim Mahdani

• Dr. Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh

autor

Yusra Yusra

• Sekolah Tinggi IlmuEkonomiSabang, Banda Aceh

autor

Shah Najeeb Ullah

• Dr. Business and Enterprise Development Specialist; Balochistan Livelihood and Entrepreneurship Project (World Bank Funded)

Bibliografia

• 1.Ali-Hassan, H., Nevo, D. and Wade, M., (2015). Linking dimensions of social media use to job performance: The role of social capital. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(2), 65-89.
• 2.Andreassen, C. S., Torsheim, T., Brunborg, G. S. and Pallesen, S., (2012). Development of a Facebook addiction scale. Psychological Reports, 110(2), 501-517.
• 3.Ariani, D. W., (2013). The relationship between employee engagement, organizational citizenship behavior, and counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Business Administration, 4(2), 46.
• 4.Arikan, G., Acar, I. H. and Ustundag-Budak, A. M., (2022). A two-generation study: The transmission of attachment and young adults’ depression, anxiety, and social media addiction. Addictive Behaviors, 124, 107109.
• 5.Azis, E., Prasetio, A. P., Gustyana, T. T., Putri, S. F. and Rakhmawati, D., (2019). The mediation of intrinsic motivation and affective commitment in the relationship of transformational leadership and employee engagement in technology-based companies. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20.
• 6.Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P. and Taris, T. W., (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187-200.
• 7.Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied psychology, 51(2), 269-290.
• 8.Bandura, A., (1997). The anatomy of stages of change. American journal of health promotion: AJHP, 12(1), 8-10.
• 9.Bannister, F., Remenyi, D., (2009). Multitasking: The uncertain impact of technology on knowledge workers and managers. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 12(1), 1-12.
• 10.Baskaran, S., Howe, N. C., Mahadi, N. and Ayob, S. A., (2017). Youth and social media comportment: A conceptual perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(11), 1260-1277.
• 11.Basoglu, K. A., Fuller, M. A. and Sweeney, J. T., (2009). Investigating the effects of computer mediated interruptions: An analysis of task characteristics and interruption frequency on financial performance. International journal of accounting information systems, 10(4), 177-189.
• 12.Bhandarkar, A.M., Pandey A.K., Nayak R., Pujary K. and Kumar A., (2021). Impact of social media on the academic performance of undergraduate medical students. Medical journal armed forces India 77, 37-S41.
• 13.Carbonell, X., Panova, T., (2017). A critical consideration of social networking sites’ addiction potential. Addiction Research & Theory, 25(1), 48-57.
• 14.Carlson, J. R., Zivnuska, S., Harris, R. B., Harris, K. J. and Carlson, D. S., (2016). Social media use in the workplace: A study of dual effects. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 28(1), 15-31.
• 15.Computing, W., (2009). Social Networking Or Social Not-working?. Wavecrest Computing, Melbourne, FL.
• 16.Gavrea, C., Ilies, L. and Stegerean, R., (2011). Determinants of organizational performance: The case of Romania. Management & Marketing, 6(2).
• 17.David, P., Kim, J. H., Brickman, J. S., Ran, W. and Curtis, C. M., (2015). Mobile phone distraction while studying. New media & society, 17(10), 1661-1679.
• 18.Djoemadi, F. R., Setiawan, M., Noermijati, N. and Irawanto, D. W., (2019). The effect of work satisfaction on employee engagement. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19.
• 19.Falk, R. F., Miller, N. B., (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
• 20.Ghani, A., Kaliappen, N. and Jermsittiparsert, K., (2019). Enhancing Malaysian SME employee work engagement: the mediating role of job crafting in the presence of task complexity, self-efficacy and autonomy. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 6(11), 1-18.
• 21.Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. and Thiele, K. O., (2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 45(5), 616-632.
• 22.Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. and Ringle, C. M., (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review.
• 23.Kahn, W. A., (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724.
• 24.Luo, G., Budnik, K., Bogdziun, D. and Tworek, K., (2021, March). Dynamic IT capabilities and their influence on job performance through teamwork. In Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 9(1) 59-73.
• 25.Markos, S., Sridevi, M. S., (2010). Employee engagement: The key to improving performance. International journal of business and management, 5(12), 89.
• 26.Moqbel, M., Nevo, S. and Kock, N., (2013). Organizational members’ use of social networking sites and job performance: An exploratory study. Information Technology & People.
• 27.Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, M. and Willman, P., (2005). Personality and domain‐specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 157-176.
• 28.Nucleus, S., (2009). Facebook: Measuring the cost to business of social networking. Nucleus Research Inc, Boston, MA.
• 29.Obar, J. A., Zube, P. and Lampe, C., (2012). Advocacy 2.0: An analysis of how advocacy groups in the United States perceive and use social media as tools for facilitating civic engagement and collective action. Journal of information policy, 2(1), 1-25.
• 30.Ophir, E., Nass, C. and Wagner, A. D., (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583-15587.
• 31.Patel, N., Jasani, H., (2010). Social media security policies: Guidelines for organizations. Issues in Information Systems, 11(1), 628-634.
• 32.Pa, W. A. M. W., Mahmud, M. S. and Zainal, M. S., (2021). Implications of social media addiction on academic performance among generation Z student-athletes during COVID- 19 Lockdown. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(8).
• 33.Prasalska-Nikoniuk, J., Stegienko, K. and Ulewicz, R., (2021). Managing the process of supervision over the certificate during a pandemic–remote inspections. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 24(1).
• 34.Preacher, K. J., Hayes, A. F., (2008). Assessing mediation in communication research (pp. 13-54). London: The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research.
• 35.Ram, P., Prabhakar, G. V., (2011). The role of employee engagement in work-related outcomes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(3), 47-61.
• 36.Reicher, R. Z., (2018). Hungarian millennials’ attitudes on being online. In Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 6(1), 5-18). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB.
• 37.Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A. and Crawford, E. R., (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of management journal, 53(3), 617-635.
• 38.Roberts, J. A., David, M. E., (2020). The social media party: Fear of missing out (FoMO), social media intensity, connection, and well-being. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 36(4), 386-392.
• 39.Robertson, B. W., Kee, K. F., (2017). Social media at work: The roles of job satisfaction, employment status, and Facebook use with co-workers. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 191-196.
• 40.Rodwell, J. J., Kienzle, R. and Shadur, M. A., (1998). The relationship among work‐related perceptions, employee attitudes, and employee performance: The integral role of communications. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 37(3‐4), 277-293.
• 41.Rooksby, J., Baxter, G., Cliff, D., Greenwood, D., Harvey, N., Kahn, A. and Sommerville, I., (2009). Social networking and the workplace. The UK Large Scale Complex IT Systems Initiative, 1-39.
• 42.Saks, A. M., Gruman, J. A., (2018). Socialization resources theory and newcomers’ work engagement: A new pathway to newcomer socialization. Career Development International.
• 43.Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
• 44.Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. and Salanova, M., (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
• 45.Schneider, B., Macey, W. H., Barbera, K. M. and Martin, N., (2009). Driving customer satisfaction and financial success through employee engagement. People & Strategy, 32(2), 22-28.
• 46.Schwarzer, R., Jerusalem, M., (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs, 35, 37.
• 47.Shepherd, C., (2011). Does social media have a place in workplace learning?. Strategic direction.
• 48.Shohrowardhy, H. S., Hassan, H. M., (2014). Students’ perception of social networking for academic purposes in Bangladesh. Shohrowardhy, HS, Hassan, HMK (2014),’ Students' Perception of Social Networking for Academic Purposes in Bangladesh', Management & Marketing, Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 9(4), 459-470.
• 49.Singleton, R. A., Straits, B. C., (2005). Approaches to social research 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
• 50.Sonnentag, S., (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of applied psychology, 88(3), 518.
• 51.Sonnentag, S., Wiegelmann, M. and Czink, M., (2021). Empirical approaches to address the dynamic aspects of work engagement: study design and data analyses. In A Research Agenda for Employee Engagement in a Changing World of Work. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• 52.Syed, S., Singh, H., Thangaraju, S. K. and Bakri, N. E., (2020). The impact of cyberloafing on employees’ job performance: A review of literature. Journal of Advances in Management Sciences & Information Systems, 6, 16-28.
• 53.Tamasevicius, V., Diskiene, D. and Stankeviciene, A., (2020). Human Resource Management Practice in Lithuania: Evidences and Challenges. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 16(1), 207-226.
• 54.Tripopsakul, S., (2018). Social media adoption as a business platform : an integrated TAMTOE framework. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(2), 350-362.
• 55.Truss, C., Shantz, A., Soane, E., Alfes, K. and Delbridge, R., (2013). Employee engagement, organisational performance and individual well-being: exploring the evidence, developing the theory. The international journal of human resource management, 24(14), 2657-2669.
• 56.Turel, O., Bechara, A., (2016). A triadic reflective-impulsive-interoceptive awareness model of general and impulsive information system use: Behavioral tests of neuro-cognitive theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 601.
• 57.Turner, J. W., Reinsch Jr, N. L., (2007). The business communicator as presence allocator: Multicommunicating, equivocality, and status at work. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 44(1), 36-58.
• 58.Voorveld, H. A., (2019). Brand communication in social media: A research agenda. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 14-26.
• 59.Watson, J. C., Prosek, E. A. and Giordano, A. L., (2020). Investigating psychometric properties of social media addiction measures among adolescents. Journal of Counseling & Development, 98(4), 458-466.
• 60.Zubielqui, G. C., Fryges, H. and Jones, J., (2019). Social media, open innovation & HRM: Implications for performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 334-347.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).