Technology and disability. The enrichment of human rights

• Autorzy: Siegel Lukáš

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2019.140.26

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Our primary aim is to analyze the impacts of technology on people with disability. Persons with a disability can be encouraged to fully engage in society by using specific types of technology (medical devices that target particular limitations). Many experts argue that medical exoskeletons or wheelchairs with motorized stand-up function provide people with severe disabilities with new possibilities. Impact of these opportunities is enormous and they directly influence the quality of life. Philosophers Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum in their "capability approach" assume that any form of impact that enables a person to pursue what they deem as essential influences quality of their life. Similarly, Eva Feder Kittay (philosopher) argues that care for the elderly, disabled, or children is crucial for any society. These authors will provide a philosophical basis for our arguments for the enrichment of human rights through technology for persons with disabilities.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

human rights; disable people; technology; care

PL

prawa człowieka; osoby niepełnosprawne; technologia; opieka

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: z. 140
• Strony: 317--325
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 12 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Siegel Lukáš

• Department of Philosophy and Applied Philosophy, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava

Bibliografia

• 1. Adya, M., Samant, D., Scherer, M.J., Killeen, M., Morris, M.W. (2012). Assistive/ rehabilitation technology, disability, and service delivery models. Cognitive Processing, 13, 1, 75-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0466-8.
• 2. Burke, T., De Paor, A., Coyle, E. (2010). Disability and Technology: Engineering a More Equitable Ireland. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 29, 1, 35-41. DOI: 10.1109/MTS.2010.935975.
• 3. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (n. d.). United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRPD/Pages/ConventionRightsPersonsWithDisabilities.aspx#19, 2019.08.07.
• 4. Disabilities (n. d.). World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/topics/disabilities/en/, 2019.08.10.
• 5. Kittay, F.E. (1999). Love´s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. London: Routledge.
• 6. Kollak, I. (ed.) (2017). Safe at Home with Assistive Technology. Springer - Ebook. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42890-1.
• 7. Lazar, J., Stein, M.A. (eds.) (2017). Disability, Human Rights, and Information Technology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• 8. Nussbaum, M.C. (2007). Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
• 9. Nussbaum, M.C. (2011). Capabilities, Entitlements, Rights: Supplementation and Critique. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12, 1, 23-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2011.541731.
• 10. Ravneberg, B., Söderström, S. (2017). Disability, Society and Assistive Technology. London: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group.
• 11. Rockefeller, K. (2008). Using Technology to Promote Safe Patient Handling and Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Nursing, 33, 1, 3-9. DOI: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2008. tb00186.x.
• 12. Sen, A. (2010). The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Books.