Investigation the root causes of seafarers’ turnover and its impact on the safe operation of the ship

• Autorzy: Turker F. , Er I. D.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Thus, the importance of turnover from the point of view of managers’ is that a high rate of turnover not only necessitates a costly personnel replacement, recruitment, selection and training of new personnel but also disrupts normal operations resulting in a loss of productivity and safety. Besides a loss of critical personnel who is carrying out core activities, like master, chief engineer or chief officer that can not be compensated easily with an other competent alternative, it could definitely result in a loss of production and loss of a skilled worker who is competent and reliable with safety precautions and company politics which means loss of thousands of dollars in maritime transportation. This study concentrates on making an investigation on “intention to quit” and its antecedents. Consequently the effects of turnover on both organizational and safety aspects and their countermeasures are discussed in advanced.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

human factor; safe operation of ship; safety at sea; seafarers turnover; crew resource management; job satisfaction; UK P&I Club; seafarers; Turkish

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: Vol. 1, no. 4
• Strony: 435--440
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Turker F.

• Maritime Transportation Management Department, Istanbul, Turkey

autor

Er I. D.

• Maritime Transportation Management Department, Istanbul, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. Aven, A.F., Parker,B. And McEvoy, G.M. 1993, “Gender and attitudinal commitment of organizations: a meta-analysis” Journal of Business Research, 26:63-74.
• 2. Allen, N.J. and Meyer J.P., 1990. “The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment” Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63: 1-18.
• 3. Angle, H.L. and Perry, J.L. 1981, “An empirical assesment of organizational effectiveness”. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 26, 1-13. Cited in J.P. Meyer, S.V. Paunonen, I.R. Gellatly, D.N. Goffin and D.N. Jackson, 1989, Organizational commitment and job performance. Journal of Aplied Psychology, 74:152-156.
• 4. Arnold, J. H. & Feldman, C.D., 1986, Organizatioanla Behavior, McGraw Hill, New York.
• 5. Cook, J.D. and Wall, T.D., 1980, New Work attitude measured of Trust, Organizational Commitment and Personal neednone-fullfilment”. Journal of Occupational Psychology,53:39-52.
• 6. Cook, J.D., Hepworth, S.J., Wall, T.D. and Warr, P.B. 1981, The experience of Work. Academic Press Inc.London.
• 7. Davis, K. And Newstrom, J.W, 1998. Organizational Behaviour Human Behaviour at Work, McGraw Hill, Newyork.
• 8. DeCourtis, T.A. and Summers, T.P., 1987, “A path analysis of a model of the antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment”. Human Relations. 40(7), 445-470.
• 9. Mitchell, T.R.(1982). People in Organization:An Introduction to Organizational Behaviour, 2nd edition, McGraw Hill Books. Co. New York.
• 10. McAfee, R.B. and Champagne, P.J.(1987), Organizational Behaviour. Complimentary Review Copy. Wets Publishing Company, USA.
• 11. Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W. and Steers, R.M. 1979. “ The Measuremnet of Organizational Commitment”. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 14:224-247.
• 12. Hellrieger, D., Slocum, J.W. & Woodman, R.W, 1995, Organizational Behaviour, West publishing, USA..
• 13. Luthans,F.,1992, Organizational Behaviour,6th edition,
• 14. McGraw Hill Inc., New York.
• 15. Lum, L., Kervin, J., Clark, K., Reid, E. & Sirola, W., 1998,Explaining nursing turnover intent: job satisfaction, pay satisfaction or organizatioal commitment, Journal of organizational Behaviour,19,305-320.
• 16. Hallowell, R., Schlesinger, L.A., Zornitsky, J., 1996, Internal Service Quality, Customer and Job Satisfaction:Linkages and Implications Management.Human Resources Planning. V.19:20-30.
• 17. Koch, J.L. and Steers, R.M., 1976, Job attachments, satisfaction and turnover among public employees. Technical Report, No:6, Office of Naval Research.
• 18. Ko, J.W., price,J.L and Muller,C.W. 1997, “Assement of Meyer and Allen’s Three Component Model of Organizational Commitment in South Korea” Journal of Applied Psychology, 82:961-973.
• 19. Ostroff, C., 1992, “Relationship between satisfaction and performance: An organizational level analysis” Journal of Applied Psychology, 77:963-974.
• 20. UK P&I Club, 2004, The Human Factor in Liability Claims: An Underwriter’s View. Human Element with industry.
• 21. Jaush, L.R. and Glueck, W.F., 1978, “Organizational Loyalty, professional commitment and academic research productivity” Academy of Management Journal, 21:84-92.
• 22. Porter,L.W., Steers, R.M., Mowday, R.T. and Boulian, P.V., 1974. “Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians” Journal of Applied Psychology.59:693-699.
• 23. Reichers, A.E., 1985, “A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment” Academy of Management Review, 10:465-476.
• 24. Scandura, T.A. and Lankua, M.J., 1997. “Relationships of Gender,Family Responsibility and Flexible Work Hours to Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction”. 18:377-391.
• 25. School, R.W. 1981, “Differentiation Organizational Commitment from Expectancy as a Motivating Force”, Academy of Management Review, 6:589-599.
• 26. Shermerhorn, J.R., Hunt, J.G. and Osborn, R.N. 1982. Managing Organizational Behaviour. John Wiley ans Sons Inc. USA.
• 27. Wiener, Y. And Vardi, Y., 1980, “Relationships between organization and career commitments and work outcomes”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26:81-96.